Search found 269 matches
- Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:48 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Law-Purged Silicons
- Replies: 31
- Views: 10105
Re: Law-Purged Silicons
Please define "treated badly", "go batshit", and "rampage". Does one or two jackasses permit a silicon to plasmaflooddoorshock? Does a significant fraction of the crew being jackasses permit such? Does a majority of the crew being jackasses permit such? And on a paralle...
- Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:39 pm
- Forum: Successful Complaints
- Topic: [Ahammer18]TheWiznard - drone stuff
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2663
Re: [Ahammer18]TheWiznard - drone stuff
Did the captain, at any point, indicate that he didn't want the soap taken? If not, I can't see a drone as being at fault for using something that wasn't being used. If using something in somebody's workplace/quarters that's sitting untouched is considered a breach of KEEPER law one, then they're al...
Re: Events...
What is the most difficult part of setting up events? Predicting and guiding player behavior. Almost all really good events share the common element of "And then the players took it and made it great", and the trick to eventing is to provide a framework that the players can play off of to...
- Tue Dec 16, 2014 5:34 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Filipenis's Ban Appeal - Gordon Jesse
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1741
Re: Filipenis's Ban Appeal - Gordon Jesse
There's no admin with the ckey grayrachnid on /tg/station, and we don't ban for bigotry. You most likely got banned on a server that didn't properly replace the appeals URL for the ban message, and were erroneously directed here. E: A quick google search indicates that grayrachnid appears to be a yo...
- Sun Dec 14, 2014 10:47 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Admin Involvement
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4233
Re: Admin Involvement
There's also the people who hate it, and will bitch your ear off for half an hour over some admin hitting a button that made them lose their greentext. And the people who see it happen once and won't stop asking for it to happen again. And the people who'll complain about how they never get to be pa...
- Sun Dec 14, 2014 8:55 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: no more ERP
- Replies: 265
- Views: 68618
Re: No More ERP {Discussion}
I wish the two headmins involved in making this decision would step forward and answer concerns and questions in the thread. It's really embarrassing for the community as a whole to see HG lock his announcement thread on the issue and then for both of them to drop of the face of the earth and just ...
- Sun Dec 14, 2014 7:15 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: no more ERP
- Replies: 265
- Views: 68618
Re: No More ERP {Discussion}
I asked HG in #adminbus, he said proper response for an admin is to issue a "Cut that shit out", not to just jump to banning.
- Sat Dec 13, 2014 9:43 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Detonating borgs when there's a lockdown button
- Replies: 36
- Views: 10532
Re: Detonating borgs when there's a lockdown button
Traitor cyborgs who haven't yet scrambled their codes, differing interpretations of a vague lawset, lawsets that specify different behavior for the AI and borgs, and cutting lawsync and changing just the borg's laws can all create a situation where the cyborg is acting "rogue" and the AI h...
- Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:40 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Aurx] B&
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1039
Re: [Aurx] B&
Looks legit to me. Lifting now.
- Fri Dec 12, 2014 12:38 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Detonating borgs when there's a lockdown button
- Replies: 36
- Views: 10532
Re: Detonating borgs when there's a lockdown button
There's a lockdown button. There is ALSO an unlock button. The AI can use the unlock button on locked borgs slaved to it.
I question the viability of the lockdown button.
I question the viability of the lockdown button.
- Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:37 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Repeated ghosting for failing antag rolls at roundstart
- Replies: 27
- Views: 6378
Re: Repeated ghosting for failing antag rolls at roundstart
Wait, since when was "You'll get antagbanned if you're clearly just here to fish for antag" NOT policy?
- Wed Dec 03, 2014 1:41 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: The An0n3 Amendment
- Replies: 27
- Views: 6278
Re: The An0n3 Amendment
Why isn't it an option?
- Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:59 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: leibniz-Litlbear "Lying to admins"
- Replies: 19
- Views: 4251
Re: leibniz-Litlbear "Lying to admins"
An0n3, did you or the handling admin check prints on the mop after it vanished from your PDA tracker?
- Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:39 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Arming up without reason. - And other things
- Replies: 45
- Views: 13184
Re: Arming up without reason. - And other things
BlessedHeretic:
How do you propose that arming up should be enforced? Under what circumstances should a 'min PM someone over their equipment?
How do you propose that arming up should be enforced? Under what circumstances should a 'min PM someone over their equipment?
- Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:04 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
- Replies: 181
- Views: 50485
Re: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
The issue is that if people keep citing ASIMOV by Asimov, other people WILL come to think that Asimov's interpretation is fair game, with all the grief it allows. And that'll lead to banning. angry appealing, drama, and an unnecessary headache for everyone.
- Sat Nov 29, 2014 6:28 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
- Replies: 181
- Views: 50485
Re: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
>Logic isn't really tied to anything. It just exists. The issue is that if people keep citing ASIMOV by Asimov, other people WILL come to think that Asimov's interpretation is fair game, with all the grief it allows. And that'll lead to banning. angry appealing, drama, and an unnecessary headache f...
- Sat Nov 29, 2014 8:11 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
- Replies: 181
- Views: 50485
Re: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
>The psychologist said, "If a modified robot were to drop a heavy weight upon a human being, he would not be breaking the First Law, if he did so with the knowledge that his strength and reaction speed would be sufficient to snatch the weight away before it struck the man. However once the wei...
- Sat Nov 29, 2014 12:24 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
- Replies: 181
- Views: 50485
Re: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
>If it was a heuristic intelligence it would've had to learn everything it knows, including its laws, through experience and teaching rather than being programmed like Malkevin suggests or having things instantiated for it logically like I suggest. If someone added a Law 4 to it it would have to go...
- Fri Nov 28, 2014 6:56 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
- Replies: 181
- Views: 50485
Re: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
>So the AI should have to beat a few humans to death or dissect some before it knows what they are? Then it can start protecting them. "Oh whoops humans die when you put them in space without a suit. Good thing I know that now." BREAKING NEWS AI PLAYERS NOT ALLOWED TO KNOW ANYTHING AT ROU...
- Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:57 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
- Replies: 181
- Views: 50485
Re: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
>If it's truly "intelligent", it will evaluate things via a series of logic proofs and truth tables instead of code. If it's truly intelligent, it's going to be nearly exclusively using heuristics. >By the order in which the AI is forced to instantiate all humans as things it must protect...
- Fri Nov 28, 2014 5:41 pm
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: Severity of Rule 8 violations
- Replies: 7
- Views: 16910
Re: Severity of Rule 8 violations
I don't see any reason not to punish people who take sexual actions at other players expense.
I also see no manner in which permitting "me humps XXXX" or "say FUCK THAT PUSSY HARD" would improve the game experience or server culture.
I also see no manner in which permitting "me humps XXXX" or "say FUCK THAT PUSSY HARD" would improve the game experience or server culture.
- Fri Nov 28, 2014 2:57 am
- Forum: Resolved Requests
- Topic: Blackiwhat - Teamkilling over getting robusted earlier
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3849
Re: Blackiwhat - Teamkilling over getting robusted earlier
Why would we separate them? Shouldn't the incident be considered as the sum of the parts? Also, I'm clearly failing to understand your meaning, because "I think the former isn't worth talking about" and "Ruining other people's fun for your own fun is textbook dickery." seem contr...
- Thu Nov 27, 2014 5:35 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
- Replies: 181
- Views: 50485
Re: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
>$meatsack = target >If $meatsack EQUALS $def.human >(i.e. the text book definition of human) AAAAAAA YOU'RE COMPARING WHAT LOOKS LIKE A POINTER TO WHAT DOESN'T AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA THERE'S A COMMENT THAT'S NOT COMMENTED AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA OH GOD MY COMPSCI SENSIBILITIES AAAAAAAAAAA...
- Thu Nov 27, 2014 3:44 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Population Issues
- Replies: 184
- Views: 37282
Re: Population Issues
Then go play with your friend on the other server, obviously.
- Tue Nov 25, 2014 4:33 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
- Replies: 181
- Views: 50485
Re: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
>Actually, if we look in Asimov stories
Again, those are NOT policy.
E: Green'd the text at Malk's request
Again, those are NOT policy.
E: Green'd the text at Malk's request
- Tue Nov 25, 2014 2:30 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [stickymayhem] goymaster123 - ban 2880 mins
- Replies: 23
- Views: 6948
Re: [stickymayhem] goymaster123 - ban 2880 mins
StickyMayhem, I have to ask.
Why would you spawn a singulo in a crowded area?
What sort of event was it you were running?
And if you spawned it based on some sold item, why would it be acceptable for the presumably non-antag player to request/trigger the spawn somewhere populated?
Why would you spawn a singulo in a crowded area?
What sort of event was it you were running?
And if you spawned it based on some sold item, why would it be acceptable for the presumably non-antag player to request/trigger the spawn somewhere populated?
- Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:45 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Population Issues
- Replies: 184
- Views: 37282
Re: Population Issues
>Here's a simple fact that shows that people prefer highpop anyway.
That would only be true if the servers were completely identical aside from mean population. They are not, so player preference cannot solely be attributed to mean population.
That would only be true if the servers were completely identical aside from mean population. They are not, so player preference cannot solely be attributed to mean population.
- Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:54 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
- Replies: 181
- Views: 50485
Re: Security Cyborgs, Silicons, and ASIMOV
He's also assuming that ASIMOV by Issac Asimov is server policy.
It's not. Hell, in Asimov's books the robots do things that would be considered breach of laws in SS13. SS13 ASIMOV and Asimov ASIMOV are two different things, really.
It's not. Hell, in Asimov's books the robots do things that would be considered breach of laws in SS13. SS13 ASIMOV and Asimov ASIMOV are two different things, really.
- Thu Nov 20, 2014 5:08 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [saegrimir] Urist McBronzemurder - Defending self intent
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1371
Re: [saegrimir] Urist McBronzemurder - Defending self intent
Saegrimr wrote:As the chaplain, you're the only one with access to use the button to turn it on.
Their statement implies the lawyer had chapel access. And thus crematorium ignition access.jakeinmn wrote:a seemily suspicious lawyer comes into my office and goes into my cremitorium.
- Sat Nov 15, 2014 7:03 pm
- Forum: Archived/Deleted
- Topic: [subtlegraces] LNGLY
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1317
Re: [subtlegraces] LNGLY
Please reference the Pasikonik Doctrine for why your complaint is going to be disregarded.
- Fri Nov 14, 2014 11:53 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [HBL] MatildaHatchKey/Mai Emershon pls unban pls
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3430
Re: Permaban
Please use the template.
- Fri Nov 14, 2014 7:14 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: [POLL]Headminstration 3: Term Lengths?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3666
Re: Headminstration 3: Term Lengths?
>at what point do people decide that finally there are enough people unhappy and who exactly will decide that It's called "voting in an election". If people don't like them, they'll vote for someone else and attempt to convince others to do likewise. Assuming electing headmins by player vo...
- Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:41 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: [POLL]Headminstration 3: Term Lengths?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 3666
Re: Headminstration 3: Term Lengths?
I see no reason to have any sort of term limit. If someone's doing a good job, we want to KEEP them doing a good job. If someone's not, they should be pointed to by the other 'mins and announced as such, and then not re-elected. I'd rather not have to deal with fresh heads with fresh "OHH LEMME...
- Fri Nov 14, 2014 5:37 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Roundstart suiciding in "non-important" roles
- Replies: 35
- Views: 8027
Re: Roundstart suiciding in "non-important" roles
An automated 1 week job ban for rolling an important job, checking for antag and suiciding when you didn't get it? I know some people would just choose to take the ban just have a roll at that sweet engi/atmos/scientist/etc. antag. Great idea! By what algorithm do we decide if somebody was checking...
- Fri Nov 14, 2014 2:46 am
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: New headmins and existing deputy heads
- Replies: 9
- Views: 16182
Re: New headmins and existing deputy heads
It's got the current headmins, so I assumed it to be accurate. Apparently it was just partially updated.
- Fri Nov 14, 2014 1:26 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Stickymayhem] NikNakFlak- Out-Goated
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1261
Re: [Stickymayhem] NikNakFlak- Out-Goated
And? Why do you think he's asking for that?
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 9:00 pm
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: Method of replacing a inept/inactive headmin
- Replies: 2
- Views: 12496
Method of replacing a inept/inactive headmin
We should decide on some procedure for removing and replacing a headmin if need arises, as well as a way to confirm that need has arisen.
Not saying it's going to happen, but an ounce of prevention ect ect.
Not saying it's going to happen, but an ounce of prevention ect ect.
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 5:31 pm
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: New headmins and existing deputy heads
- Replies: 9
- Views: 16182
Re: New headmins and existing deputy heads
Then the wiki's list-o-mins needs updating, it still lists you as such.
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 8:31 am
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: New headmins and existing deputy heads
- Replies: 9
- Views: 16182
New headmins and existing deputy heads
Given the new crop of headmins, what's to become of the deputy heads, namely Pandar's being Head of Robutts, Ely's being Head of Bans, and TBM's being Head of Trialmin Stuff?
- Thu Nov 13, 2014 3:54 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Aurx] Perma Banned?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3979
Re: [Aurx] Perma Banned?
I'm inclined to agree with CreationPro and say I dont' see any reason to lift this at the moment, but if you play on some other server for a couple months and can get them to vouch that you're a reasonable player, I'd be fine lifting it.
- Tue Nov 11, 2014 4:16 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Aurx] Perma Banned?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3979
Re: [Aurx] Perma Banned?
>I decide to do what any clowns wet dream is and go fuck with the brig, because shitcurity. Did you have any evidence of shitcurity in-round at the time? >I scream over radio "HELP, THE HOS IS SEXUALLY HARASSING ME!" when he says to me in game, "That's it, I was just going to brig you...
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 6:47 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Swagile] bolien - Ban for something I never did (AGAIN)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 745
Re: [Swagile] bolien - Ban for something I never did (AGAIN)
Ban database is acting up.
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 5:49 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Ban Appeal[More info please]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 686
Re: Ban Appeal[More info please]
Ban database is currently acting up.
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 2:20 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Aurx] Madison Cooper - IC in OOC
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1818
Re: [Aurx] Madison Cooper - IC in OOC
Unbanned.
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 12:43 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Aurx] Madison Cooper - IC in OOC
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1818
Re: [Aurx] Madison Cooper - IC in OOC
What I want is some proof that you have indeed gotten the message, such as putting what IC in OOC means in your own words so I know you understand what you did wrong.
- Mon Nov 10, 2014 12:03 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Aurx] Madison Cooper - IC in OOC
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1818
Re: [Aurx] Madison Cooper - IC in OOC
Your exact words during the second offense were [18:23:32]OOC: Madison Cooper/Bragdolior9000 : this is great. they just got thrashed [18:24:06]OOC: Madison Cooper/Bragdolior9000 : No. I died and someone got trapped in the same department as me and called for help [18:24:11]OOC: Madison Cooper/Bragdo...
- Fri Nov 07, 2014 7:12 pm
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: Transparent policy discussion: Telescience calculators.
- Replies: 12
- Views: 21380
Re: Transparent policy discussion: Telescience calculators.
The combination of the two is only a problem insofar as the first is required to make any usage of the second, and the second's where the issue comes from. You also need power to use telesci, but we don't label the APC as part of the problem. Being able to telesci into/out of places like the AI core...
- Fri Nov 07, 2014 5:08 pm
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: Transparent policy discussion: Telescience calculators.
- Replies: 12
- Views: 21380
Re: Transparent policy discussion: Telescience calculators.
We're actually looking at TWO issues: 1: Is the use of an external utility for telesci calculations metagaming? 2: Is knowing the coordinate locations of everything on the maps metagaming? The first is mostly a moot point because telesci math is too complex to perform in your head and there's no in-...
- Wed Nov 05, 2014 3:56 am
- Forum: Successful Complaints
- Topic: [Tedward1337] Pow Ergam - security harassment
- Replies: 34
- Views: 11112
Re: [Tedward1337] Pow Ergam - security harassment
Looking over the provided logs, Tedward1337 came off as very hostile and accusatory for no apparent reason in the exchange of messages. Additionally, demanding answers from a player DURING a tense situation is just horribly shitty to do. I'd sure as hell not be able to effectively do anything while ...
- Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:28 pm
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: ITT Admin confessions and fuck ups.
- Replies: 152
- Views: 112907
Re: ITT Admin confessions and fuck ups.
I must object to this existing, I don't want players admins to try to get listed here and clog up or obfuscate ahelp/pray rounds in the process.
Having it private and 'mins only is would be bad enough, having it be given a spotlight is just begging for trouble.
Having it private and 'mins only is would be bad enough, having it be given a spotlight is just begging for trouble.