Im done If being removed from being able to shitpost here hurt you i apologize. If you thought you were being accused of eoxxing, blame miscommunication. At all times i said the deets were already in the open, it was the threat of them being found and used for a false criminal accusation to get some...
Everything to do with why i banned you. My motivation was and still is to get rid of anyone who thinks they can make those threats. If you want the most truthful personal reason, and its one you probably wouldnt have guessed and one i only figured out after thinking, its a desire to get rid of peopl...
A lot of baseless accusations from someone immature enough to make threats involving cp. None of which are true but imagine being so out of control you'd cross that line to hurt someone and then try to push the spotlight off such a violation by trying to put it on someone else. I offered you an oliv...
i have a long memory so does goof I'm sure if so he can silently reflect upon the many actions of his that lead to his current predicament and of course not ever admit or own up to them, as goof isn't the sort of guy to own up to the consequences of his shit-stirring otherwise he might not have done...
>keep on track >isn't going anywhere productive >>>>>help out tgstation in any possible way We have a bunch of female players and admins, abuse or harassment towards them is not tolerated, nor is it for the other half with dicks. It has never been. How shit of you to insinuate that we need those sor...
Because curtailing player freedom in that manner has zero objective benefits unless you were planning on running a ss13 server which enforces strict roleplaying of characters that conform to specific settings. On a server where an assistant can smash windows to steal medkits and doctors can morphine...
This is the worst possible slippery slope to get on /tg/ being eminently retarded and trying to legislate absolutely irrelevant minutiae of rules that dont even really affect gameplay while trying to cater to the most soft skinned idiots who must be protected from historical names lest they have a b...
Why is policy discussion so fucking filled with retarded name policy threads these days jesus christ
If its le hitler man just let the crew lynch him if they feel like it, and if its anything else just dont pay them any special attention. Theres no fucking line that needs to be drawn.
If i had to take a guess its admins fumbling around for a reason to perma the guy who thinks spamming meme laws is a good idea, because this is typical behaviour of people we dont want. So they involve rule 8, which is a great excuse to remove someone, on something that is obnoxious but only the mos...
Happy New Year Sent: Tue Jan 02, 2018 2:09 am by Anajamois SS13 is like, the only game I would boot up with genuine enthusiasm even if the only roles left were something like Botanist or Chemist. What's the appeal of them? Anyway Happy New Year, my resolution is not to fuck up as hard as last y...
I meant that there was less of a thing for pod people or golems to fuck about and get revenge. Remember, fighting your own faction over an IC thing then respawning is a good way to get dunked ghost banned. Fighting someone on station, taking a ghost role and going after that person is also a good w...
Lol no one would ever enforce that, it'd have to be a code thing. There would be no point at all to ashlizards if it were, no point in golems making different mineral bodies etc
xe.nt.au lists 1AP to 1TC as 0.5TC. WP isnt really traded frequently but for reference, many traitors will spend all 20TC for a single spell, so rates may be as high as 1WP for 10TC.
The practical answer is admins dont care nor do players most of the time. No one will ever enforce ashliggers going to the place of their dead body to return it to the tendril or golems doing the same to retrieve lost gear. Admins would also have a hard time caring about protecting a miner player wh...
>trying to turn it as something personal on the end of people who banned you
Hmm
Look you might have changed but what i said still holds true. Maybe someone more naive will give you your 2xth chance but they're gonna risk being the 2xth idiot to unban you.
Wizards can choose to buy a scrying orb or plan ahead with many different other tactics. AIs being cucked if atmos tinkers with pipes is a bit unfair as its only because AIs have borgs, atmos, and occasional reliable traitor allies and nearly no other strategies.
>go mad >then be abusive and threaten someone for pics >also be a deranged furry >try to beg for attention in ntr hut >try to suck up to admins in fnr with incorrect rule interpretations >be so seething you make a complaint AND a ntr thread
Dont take this as criticism however its still a bad use iof admin powers which dont set good precedents nor encourage healthy mindsets for tg. I've done bad bans before, had egg on my face, lifted the ban and apologized. Thats all this thread needs. Lmao fuck off with the calm moral high ground anon...
As i said in discord, players and characters get shit talked. Admins arent here to baby people unless a clear pattern of metagrudging can be established. The only rulings weve had for similar names were for dumb gimmicks when many players took on the same name in order to grief. Do not quote precede...
>Admins are fully accountable for any consequences should they invoke this rule. Admins are also allowed to intervene in rounds when it is in the best interest of the playerbase. Your post doesnt meet the anon3 guideline as it is fallacious. Their actions did not benefit the server and therefore the...
Maybe youve been an admin for too long, but if I can see how a player had complete reason to think they were wronged by server administration, why cant I similarily empathize with them lashing out at it? We ignore, understand and deal with so much emotional shit from players ingame who have all sort...
Admin discretion to change names does not mean you enforce whatever fits your own particular admin fancy, especially if a player has done nothing to try and give the original user of the name a bad reputation. Its there so admins, in compliance with rule 0, can take easily justifiable action against...
>always disallowed But thats blatantly not true. Admins have perhaps stepped in when players grief or play with the intention of causing severe disrepute to the original player. Admins can change your name at their discretion but rule 0 applies, in the context of all admin actions especially enforce...
assuming there are two or three at most?? summer ball rounds for the summer ball, it's entirely likely admins will be able to host a normal summer ball and then one that ends crazily, admins just have to be aware to not run the event into the ground
>like to use sparks as fluff for answering prayers to make it look cool >pretend I never saw this thread so I can burn players to death while still using sparks when answering prayers
>little much You haven't learned a thing. >dressing up trying to steal the spare and ahelping when you get dunked is players creating interesting situations I dont care at all for your excuses, I dont care for your probation terms when your original ban shouldnt have been lifted, I dont want to see ...
Your original rule 0 was triggered by personal observations and reports of you constantly stealing the spare ID during low pop and proceeding to get into all sorts of unnecessary conflict and validhunting. Lo and behold this incident continues to involve you trying to get the spare ID during lowpop ...
>loot rpg as US >realize RPG's can not only penetrate walls but also retain enough destructive power to gib people and destroy tunnels on the other side, far beyond from where the enemy team can even attempt to shoot at you >mfw salt from VC on cuchi's last two objectives
Rule 0: Enforcement of these rules and intervention ingame is at the discretion of admins. SS13 and our server experiences and encourages a wide variety of possible player interactions. Admins also apply their own experiences and a common approach when answering ahelps or intervening ingame. Enforc...
How am I supposed to figure out, as a player, what the intent of the other player is, and what the admin online thinks the intent of the other player is, and what the other player and what the admin (of which we have ~40, and new ones weekly) consider "reasonable equivalent" all within ha...
"You are allowed to respond with reasonable equivalent retaliation or intent?" Then we'd be going full circle back to the rules before the most recent change by Kor, that were aimed at dealing with a different set of problems. There's going to be very little chance every situation and con...
better be careful then m80, we're going to be lenient for everyone except you
tldr is an issue that can be mitigated- there's some truth to the rules not really being read by players who'd rather just jump in and play on good faith but any time the rules are being read we may as well make them good