/tg/Station 13

Screemonster

Stunning an officer repeatedly, using lethal or restricted weapons on them , disrupting the arrests or sentences of dangerous criminals, or damaging the brig, are examples of behaviour that may make you valid for security under Rule 4. the bolded part is something I've seen come up in the peanut th...

Screemonster

Cobby wrote:There’s absolutely no reason for this not to be in the main rules.

I always figured it was part of the "may not pre-emptively search for etc." part

Screemonster

Doesn't modifying the det revolver to fire 356 give you a 1 in 2 chance of blowing off your hand every time you shoot or did they remove that Either it does not work or it just wastes the bullet(I think it wastes the bullet) but most Manuel dets have more .357 speed loaders then engis have tools. M...

Screemonster

people gave a shit, it's just that the people that gave a shit didn't really say anything because they didn't want to be the first to stick their head over the parapet and get shouted down by a bunch of screaming idiots who consider their right to be an asshole to everyone around them without conseq...

Screemonster

Remember kids, "roleplay" means "tedious realism" and the more tedious and """"""realistic""""" it is the higher the roleplay! The gun's fine. It's thematic. Who gives a fuck about whether it's "realistic" that NT w...

Screemonster

also why is "you can examine them to determine that they're not sec" even an issue if you're minding your own business in your own department and some redshirt comes in and starts fucking whaling on you out of nowhere then it doesn't matter if they're a "real" sec officer or not,...

Screemonster

If there's one thing that is guaranteed to piss off an admin, it's metagrudging or harassing people ooc for ahelping in good faith.

Screemonster

* does something SEC can kick your ass for * * gets ass kicked by SEC * ahelp: help help evil shitsec murdered me, there I was minding my own business.... what were they doing that sec could kick their ass for besides "being in their department" are you suggesting that sec should be allow...

Screemonster

I had a go on it when it went free to play and it was in the newspapers and shit in like 2005 or whatever and nissan had an island with a car vending machine and I vended out a nissan sentra which I took back to the spawn point to drive around on the roads then immediately lagged out and crashed and...

Screemonster

tl;dr the spirit of the gamemode is that picking a team is supposed to be voluntary and explicitly not a forced conversion gamemode as we have a bunch of those already, and people are using game mechanics that exist outside of the mode to force people to convert thus turning it into yet another shi...

Screemonster

I still don’t even get why there’s a debate here. Can someone explain it to me? I feel like I’m missing some context. tl;dr the spirit of the gamemode is that picking a team is supposed to be voluntary and explicitly not a forced conversion gamemode as we have a bunch of those already, and people a...

Screemonster

How about treating forced conversion as the same as killing in terms of what you're allowed to do, so if someone's not valid for you to kill then they're not valid for you to forcibly induct into your team either? Obviously revs and cult are allowed to kill people outside their team as long as it do...

Screemonster

local 4chan user shocked and appalled to find rest of world has higher standards than 4chan

Screemonster

the real big brain policy is to ban it purely because it lets you get rid of all the people who are incapable of or outright refuse to comply with a simple request that costs them nothing for half an hour of their life

Screemonster

It perplexes me how much someone has to be full of themselves to not be able to do something as simple as apologizing and recognizing that they made a fucking mistake, instead deflecting everything back and being completely unable to look at things from outside their tunnelvision. Just amazing. no ...

Screemonster

Omega_DarkPotato wrote:I like to compare timber's responses before and after alphonzo keeps digging himself deeper in his hole-to-china project

Postby Timberpoes » Sun Aug 29, 2021 2:41 pm #612973

Postby Timberpoes » Mon Aug 30, 2021 2:41 am #613015

I like how they're exactly 12 hours apart to the minute

Screemonster

Super Aggro Crag wrote:Give detective his thermals back. Let him get drill bullets that drill through a wall do he can shoot maint criminals

add that one gun from that one episode of deep space nine with the seeing-through-walls sniper scope and a transporter on the front that transports the bullet through the walls

Screemonster

I believe it being lethal only actually deters the detective from making arrests which is a good thing. Also it is cool. god I can just see it "hmmm I want to talk to this person about a crime" PEW PEW PEW CUFF "whoa man it's only a stun why are you being an asshole about answering m...

Screemonster

It's not acting like an antag to defend yourself by any means against someone attacking you with antag gear
defending yourself against someone coming at you with antag gear is in fact perfectly normal behaviour for any crewmember

Screemonster

Cobby wrote:If there isnt any other piece in the story

this is what I wondered from the first post 'cause without context or logs I was like "okay, they banned for THAT? there's gotta be something else going on here surely"

Screemonster

on the one hand slacking off isn't really "acting like an antag" to go validhunt and declaring that someone's probably a traitor for it is on a par with checking the dorms for locked doors at roundstart on the other cmon dude you're supposed to be some sort of infiltration agent performing...

Screemonster

Super Aggro Crag wrote:
MortoSasye wrote:
Super Aggro Crag wrote:Morto gave me a warning for peanut posting sigh my post was really funny though
It was, yes
I'm really happy that you thought it was funny too! Its alao good that even tho it was funny you applied the rules very integrity

post it here

Screemonster

IkeTG wrote:their ic name is a homestuck reference

another reason to keep them banned forever

Screemonster

I don't have a cat but the neighbours at the back of my house had a couple of longhaired cats that were very skittish around people and would run off if I opened my door and they were outside for the longest time I thought it was just the one until I saw one of them sleeping on my lawn and then went...

Screemonster

they should stay banned for inflicting the phrase "nyan of your pawsness" upon this innocent earth

Screemonster

Flatulent wrote:I’ve read about 10 messages from cacogen and I know exactly what he’s like, so much so that i know in advance what he’s going to say

that's like saying you know what noise a whoopee cushion is going to make

Screemonster

Domitius wrote:
MrStonedOne wrote:
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
Last time I decelerated into an underage I lost my license for a while.

fucking lol

Screemonster

also it's another "security kills a guy then tries to use something they discovered after the killing to try and justify their decision to kill in the appeal" episode

Screemonster

Let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that whatever meta protections security has don't apply to HoP promoted security officers. This is also under the assumption that roundstart security officers, of course, have them as well. How does this affect how you play? With the limited information you ...

Screemonster

BONERMASTER wrote:
Milthy wrote: Fearing for my life, after several warnings I fired upon them.

ahahahahahaha

With warm regards
-The prosecution

*man with back to detective*
detective: HE'S COMING RIGHT FOR US

Screemonster

If they're bad faith this just plays into their hands, if they're good faith this makes our community look like absolute shit for no reason other than it makes naloac feel like they're super badass who cares what some ruskies think lol It's not about their opinion of us, it's just not being needles...

Screemonster

lmao vekter comes in with more context and it makes it even funnier some fuckin wannabe roger cook busts in like he's someone that literally anyone should give a shit about, reads the admins their miranda rights like that's a thing journalists do, then asks to speak to the manager when they tell him...

Screemonster

lmao what a karen

Screemonster

chef_breaks_into_engineering.jpg

Screemonster

yeah if you have "kill someone and die a glorious death" it's not murderbone to maxcap yourself and your target when three other people happen to be in the room arguably it might be murderbone if you contrived to have the entire crew assemble in that room by like conducting a wedding or so...

Screemonster

this thread is like that gif of the black guy coming in with a stack of pizzas and the room is on fire

Screemonster

CRPL1000 wrote: [*]Can someone get security meta-protection by being promoted?

giving security meta-protection to someone that wasn't a roundstart sec officer and could very well be an antagonist seems incredibly silly to me

Screemonster

Anuv wrote:If you *deathgasp you should not be able to ahelp for the rest of the round period. Make it an exclusive function.

or add a big obvious notification to all their PMs from that point on

Request for help from some_tiding_dipshit (Succumbed): hey security just killed me for no reason

Screemonster

even if he didn't succumb he was still valid as fuck for trying to fight his way out of brig and stunning the warden with a stolen weapon even if they didn't know about the antag shit in his bag at the time of putting his ass on the floor, finding the antag shit in his bag is a solid reason to not h...

Screemonster

(ie. the officer instigated and tried to justify it retroactively) If a player wrongs you(theft, attacks, etc), you may retaliate. If you choose to retaliate with violence, you in turn have opened yourself up to violence. If you choose this route, do not expect admins to help you out if you die, ev...

Screemonster

even if he didn't deathgasp it's a prisoner running around with a stun baton in brig didnt we just have an appeal about a guy lasering an assistant with a baton during blob or whatever the assistant in that one was wanted, didn't know he was wanted, and had the baton in his bag that the officer did...

Screemonster

I find it hilarious that there are people who are against rule 11 because "words are just words, they don't mean anything" yet also riot if they aren't allowed to say those meaningless words its almost like their entire personality is built around being edgy and they dont know how to func...

Screemonster

I find it hilarious that there are people who are against rule 11 because "words are just words, they don't mean anything" yet also riot if they aren't allowed to say those meaningless words its almost like their entire personality is built around being edgy and they dont know how to func...

Screemonster

did the deathtrap end the round, like, did the last headrev walk into it or something? 'cause if so that's a: hilarious and b: arguably the "bomb the wiz" clause since the thing that caused one (1) collateral death did in fact end the round as a result of its deployment honestly though whe...

Screemonster

XDTM wrote:
Soyoboyo wrote:What I don't think rule 11 is for is people calling each other slurs because it's the nature of an online space.
"People do this if there's no rule to forbid it, so there shouldn't be a rule to forbid it"

"it's the nature of an online space"

[youtube]j2zlPNGuPbw[/youtube]

Screemonster

cSeal wrote:why did you double dip on peanuts you fucking NARD i DEMAND a forum jannie delete this thread and ban this man for at least half a year for this disgusting violation

dippin dese double-nuts onto your forehead

Screemonster

WineAllWine wrote:Successfully appealed!

Sad that the guy had to sit out a day of spessmen For No Reisin.

the day off isn't as bad as if someone had read that note and banned him longer for "a history of overescalation" based on it

Screemonster

even if the ban has expired it's still a misleading note because "doing stuff in the cargo bay" implies the chef was merely in his department and not, you know, stealing shit from the department and stabbing him in the eyes when he attempted to remove him

Screemonster

how the fuck is refusing an order from a fucking dog bannable

like yes a talking dog is something that only tends to appear in the game through admin intervention but that does not mean that a dog talking to you has the same weight as a fucking bwoink

Screemonster

bumping this thread to say that I saw these raspberry multi-layered magnums in the supermarket earlier and that's some fucking good shit thanks for the heads up

Search found 3158 matches