Search found 539 matches
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 8:08 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Does Rule 1 actually cover grief?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 7635
Re: Does Rule 1 actually cover grief?
There are two pieces from silicon policy that specifically cover this: You are not obligated to follow commands in a particular order (FIFO, FILO, etc.), only to complete all of them in a manner that indicates intent to actually obey the law. When given an order likely to cause you grief if complete...
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:55 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: aight for real about them escalation rules
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5141
Re: aight for real about them escalation rules
your assumption is incorrectGrazyn wrote:I understand that there was no ahelp from the other guy.
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:42 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: aight for real about them escalation rules
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5141
Re: aight for real about them escalation rules
If either of you had done something explicitly wrong, you would have gotten a note or a ban. I had intended to _advise you_ that it's typically not a good idea to re-initiate a fight after someone has disengaged fully. Please understand that no ban, and no note, was placed. Making the argument that ...
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:32 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: aight for real about them escalation rules
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5141
Re: aight for real about them escalation rules
Nope.BeeSting12 wrote:you just said
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:31 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: aight for real about them escalation rules
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5141
Re: aight for real about them escalation rules
If you have any issues with the way the situation was handled please file an admin complaint.
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:29 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: aight for real about them escalation rules
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5141
Re: aight for real about them escalation rules
They both thought the other had blown them up with a hot potato, but it was actually a third person that got them both.
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 12:21 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: aight for real about them escalation rules
- Replies: 21
- Views: 5141
Re: aight for real about them escalation rules
You didn't get a note or a ban. I said that when someone disengages from you that hard (leaving entirely) and they don't re-engage with you (they were coming back to their workplace and you dunked them) that you've acted in bad faith and you should stop doing that. If this hadn't been a situation in...
- Mon Jun 04, 2018 8:45 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [DaxYeen] Smarrazzo - banned for 1 day for no reason
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1638
Re: [DaxYeen] Smarrazzo - banned for 1 day for no reason
You have three bans of increasing length after prior warnings and four additional notes, all within the past few weeks, for either ic in ooc or ooc in ic, and have consistently been rude in ahelps and frequently implied that you didn't care about the rules.
Shape up or get banned.
Shape up or get banned.
- Mon Jun 04, 2018 8:39 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [DaxYeen] Smarrazzo - banned for 1 day for no reason
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1638
Re: [DaxYeen] Smarrazzo - banned for 1 day for no reason
A history of being warned for ooc in ic and you continuing to do it regardless is definitely relevant, as is you trying to argue that your history is irrelevant. There are rules and when you're reminded to follow them you should probably make more of an effort to do so than you did before you were w...
- Sun Jun 03, 2018 4:35 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Does Rule 1 actually cover grief?
- Replies: 31
- Views: 7635
Re: Does Rule 1 actually cover grief?
Rule 1 covers grief. Rule 0 lets you get away with it to a point. Admins understand that the /tg/ game operates on a certain layer of what would be considered, in other games, or even other servers, 'grief.' This has become one of the major reasons that rule 0 exists. It's not just a 'catch all' to ...
- Wed May 30, 2018 9:49 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feemjmeem] youtubepornstar - ban evasion misunderstanding
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1078
- Wed May 30, 2018 9:47 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feemjmeem] youtubepornstar - ban evasion misunderstanding
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1078
Re: [feemjmeem] youtubepornstar - ban evasion misunderstanding
Thank you for following up. I'll remove this ban and reduce it to a warning.
- Wed May 30, 2018 6:44 pm
- Forum: Town Hall
- Topic: Trialmin Review: Daxyeen
- Replies: 29
- Views: 6779
Re: Trialmin Review: Daxyeen
When Dax first came on I was super apprehensive but they've proven themselves to be a fantastic admin. I'm really happy I was wrong. A++
- Sat May 26, 2018 11:14 pm
- Forum: Town Hall
- Topic: Trialmin Review: Jerry Derpington
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4479
Re: Trialmin Review: Jerry Derpington
rated a for admin
- Sat May 26, 2018 1:51 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: How IC is VR?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1091
Re: How IC is VR?
agreeoranges wrote:yes
no
- Sat May 26, 2018 1:50 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: How IC is VR?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1091
How IC is VR?
Should we be bwoinking people for OOC in IC in VR?
Should admins be banned for modifying the game world in VR?
Should admins be banned for modifying the game world in VR?
- Fri May 25, 2018 2:42 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Antagonist reputation system
- Replies: 160
- Views: 41951
Re: Antagonist reputation system
because mso just activated it, or at least stated that it would be activated, in the server config threadCobby wrote: why do we have a policy for a feature that’s not even implemented this is the utmost bikeshed bait.
- Wed May 23, 2018 10:30 pm
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [Arianya] BigPenorBoi - Very poor administrative skills
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3888
Re: [Arianya] BigPenorBoi - Very poor administrative skills
making a complaint/appeal would be completley valid While space law is NOT a rule on the server, rule 1 is, and there are precedents specifically about security's use of force. During discussions about the rules and precedents (which say, super-summarized, 'security should not use excessive force u...
- Tue May 22, 2018 11:33 pm
- Forum: Former Admins
- Topic: [No Longer Admin] Krusvik
- Replies: 27
- Views: 11001
Re: Krusvik
i accidentally thought they were skorvold once and they forgave me
goodmin
goodmin
- Mon May 21, 2018 1:57 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Free golems retailation on the crew.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4306
Re: Free golems retailation on the crew.
As a follow up, there's really never going to be a situation where golems/ash walkers/beach bums/veterinarians BoH bombing or maxcapping the station ends up being entirely okay. There are many situations which could, given sufficient escalation and RP opportunity/round development, lead to destructi...
- Mon May 21, 2018 1:51 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Free golems retailation on the crew.
- Replies: 18
- Views: 4306
Re: Free golems retailation on the crew.
1. A golem being killed by a nonantag 2. A golem being a shitter gets killed by a nonantag 3. A golem being killed by security instead of non-lehtaly detained. 4. Free golems ordered to be kill on sight by captain/security. with the understanding that i have very little belief that this post is in ...
- Sun May 20, 2018 1:02 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feemjmeem] Floral Shoppe - Ban Appeal
- Replies: 1
- Views: 757
Re: [feemjmeem] Floral Shoppe - Ban Appeal
This seems reasonable. Understand that you'll be under more scrutiny moving forward, but if you're able to provide reasonable explanations for your behavior it's likely you'll be fine. Unbanned. Ban message has been modified to read: After engaging in some really hardcore greytiding from roundstart ...
- Fri May 18, 2018 10:31 pm
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Moff naming policy
- Replies: 20
- Views: 5962
Re: Moff naming policy
Tarkin or get out.
- Fri May 18, 2018 9:30 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [spyroshark] danksinatra - "disconnect" ban while still connected
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1669
Re: [spyroshark] danksinatra - "disconnect" ban while still connected
You were previously banned on other servers for nigh-identical behavior, and this fact indicates that you explicitly DID understand that welderbombing people FNR was unacceptable, which means that, yes, you lied in your ahelps. I'm going to place a separate rule 0 ban as there's not really any reaso...
- Fri May 18, 2018 8:55 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [spyroshark] danksinatra - "disconnect" ban while still connected
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1669
- Thu May 17, 2018 9:08 pm
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [Nope.Wav] - An addendum
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1279
Re: [Nope.Wav] - An addendum
S̮̻̽ͥͣ͒ͪͤ̄ǒ̻̻̟̩̣͉͓͂̍̓m̤͚͌̔͐̒̒e̩̤̖͚̖̜ͧ̂̂̀b̠̬̘̭̱̤ͅò̍̌̀͒̌d̢̳̗͖̺̗͐̈ͬ̾ͤ̈́y̫͕̫̜̻̿̽͛̍͗̍̾͡ ́͑̑̋ǒ̷̠̃̿̚ͅn̸͓̠ͭ͗ͥͅc҉͎e͐̓̒̋͐̿ͥ ̳͍̦͎̘̜̬ͮ̍̒͐̆ẗ͎ͨ̓̊o̸̭ͤ̓ͩ̇̾̀ḽ̺̺͎̖ͯ̈́ͪ͊ͅͅd̡̙̀ͤ̆͋͊ ̈́͊ͬm͉̟̜̽ͯ̈e͓̩̦͕̖̻ͭ̄̃̽̓̀ͬͅ ̥͗͂̃̆ͮͪ͂t͖̱͍͉͍̽̌̍̑h̩̠̟͔̪̄̍̾ě̉̚҉̞̞̤̜̖̦̘ ẘ̥̞̜̱̻̭̐͋͞ọ̯ͥ͋̎̾̔ͦř͛ͧ̈́͋l͇͍̯ͩ̓d̷̤͛̂̍̓̓̄͋ ̟̥̲̓̎́iͮ͋̆̊̾s̷͓̻͔ͤ̈̓ͧ̔͑̔ ̴̥̻̙͂͋̊...
- Thu May 17, 2018 8:05 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feemjmeem] Baby10001 - A serious apology to all TG players who i have hurt in the past
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1234
Re: [feemjmeem] Baby10001 - A serious apology to all TG players who i have hurt in the past
Unfortunately I honestly have no idea what other servers are out there these days.
- Thu May 17, 2018 7:25 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feemjmeem] Baby10001 - A serious apology to all TG players who i have hurt in the past
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1234
Re: [feemjmeem] Baby10001 - A serious apology to all TG players who i have hurt in the past
I'm pretty forgiving but I have some concerns. 1) You stated that the other account in question, baby1991, was your brother's, however you both have an identical behavior pattern (down to naming yourself Adolf, and engaging in exactly the same abuses and activities), and you began playing under the ...
- Thu May 17, 2018 6:05 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [Feemjmeem] Alterist - An Apology
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1016
Re: [Feemjmeem] Alterist - An Apology
Thank you for your apology and your understanding. Salt happens and we're all susceptible to it. The important thing to do is to ensure we understand what's happened and resolve to prevent it next time. Thank you again for your candor. Regarding the count of dead, I included people who died as a res...
- Mon May 14, 2018 3:36 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feemjmeem] 0nibba2spooky3me - Ban Appeal
- Replies: 3
- Views: 980
Re: Ban Appeal
After reviewing the logs, I do see that this is the only person you did this to. Nonetheless, you've been given many, many warnings for similar behavior. This really would have been a note except that you've been doing very similar line-toeing schtick for the whole three months you've been here, and...
- Mon May 14, 2018 3:04 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feemjmeem] 0nibba2spooky3me - Ban Appeal
- Replies: 3
- Views: 980
Re: Ban Appeal
You have been warned in the past for gibbing people without checking whether or not they're alive, and today you were meatspiking people when they were NOT catatonic. That means they could very well return to their body (which is what happened). While you're welcome to strip them and steal their shi...
- Wed May 02, 2018 10:47 pm
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [feemjmeem] Vaina - Partial and heavy-handed
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3613
Re: [feemjmeem] Vaina - Partial and heavy-handed
After considering things from your point of view, I both added context to the ban note and reduced the time of the ban. I "immediately sided with the CMO" because, in summary, you killed your boss for demoting you after you syringe gunned him. And you syringe gunned him because you "i...
- Wed May 02, 2018 4:09 pm
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [feemjmeem] Vaina - Partial and heavy-handed
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3613
Re: [feemjmeem] Vaina - Partial and heavy-handed
[2018-04-30 18:35:15.220] PDA: xxx/(Vud Doo) (PDA: chief medical officer PDA) sent "A staff memeber of mine is rogue, keep an eye out for Goose" to Matthew Green (Security Officer) (92,105,2) [2018-04-30 18:36:35.068] PDA: xxx/(Vud Doo) (PDA: chief medical officer PDA) sent "he is ba...
- Tue May 01, 2018 4:22 pm
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [feemjmeem] Vaina - Partial and heavy-handed
- Replies: 15
- Views: 3613
Re: [feemjmeem] Vaina - Partial and heavy-handed
I don't really have anything to say, but after discussing this with the headmins, I have independently decided to reduce the time to time served and modify the note to be more clear and thorough in describing the incident. Banned for 720 minutes - As a non-antag medical doctor, killed the CMO becaus...
- Sun Apr 29, 2018 3:38 am
- Forum: Admin Feedback
- Topic: Daxyeen
- Replies: 66
- Views: 29052
Re: Daxyeen
Have been consistently impressed with how they handle themselves as an administrator. Great job.
- Tue Apr 24, 2018 10:52 pm
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: ITT Admin confessions and fuck ups.
- Replies: 152
- Views: 110208
Re: ITT Admin confessions and fuck ups.
i tried to send canisters of urine to the station but ended up turning all oxygen into urine and breaking lavaland and also breathing
- Mon Apr 23, 2018 7:06 pm
- Forum: Admin Feedback
- Topic: Togopal
- Replies: 40
- Views: 12716
Re: Togopal
are you sure this wasn't me because this sounds like something I would do
- Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:46 pm
- Forum: Town Hall
- Topic: Trialmin Review: Jcll
- Replies: 42
- Views: 8833
Re: Trialmin Review: Jcll
Admin immediately.
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:45 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [jerry derpington] top ten epic gamer pranks gone wrong
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4678
Re: [jerry derpington] top ten epic gamer pranks gone wrong
^ one of the admins in question
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 8:31 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [jerry derpington] top ten epic gamer pranks gone wrong
- Replies: 22
- Views: 4678
Re: [jerry derpington] top ten epic gamer pranks gone wrong
I resigned because of several admins' refusal to take your actions and their consequences seriously, sawrge, so I'm at least somewhat pleased to see someone's holding someone accountable.
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 5:35 am
- Forum: Auditorium
- Topic: Admin Staffing Log
- Replies: 1198
- Views: 818474
Re: Admin Staffing Log
Feem has quit adminning.
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 3:09 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Enable credits
- Replies: 47
- Views: 10717
Re: Enable credits
yeah, when we did have credits running, it was really annoying to see people who had like two PRs in there but not people with like a hundred
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:55 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feem] Caroline Dupont - Head Roleban
- Replies: 5
- Views: 847
Re: [feem] Caroline Dupont - Head Roleban
Oh god damn it, rustled stopped saying that they were transferred after like the fifth note so I misunderstood when reading the notes.
Alright. I'll pull this ban, but consider it a SERIOUS warning to shape up, because you ARE treading lines.
Alright. I'll pull this ban, but consider it a SERIOUS warning to shape up, because you ARE treading lines.
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:50 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feem] Caroline Dupont - Head Roleban
- Replies: 5
- Views: 847
Re: [feem] Caroline Dupont - Head Roleban
Actual ban reason:
You abuse command roles like crazy and need to take some time off to see what it's like not to have absolute authority. Two weeks command ban.
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 12:49 am
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: [feem] Caroline Dupont - Head Roleban
- Replies: 5
- Views: 847
Re: [feem] Caroline Dupont - Head Roleban
I did NOT ban them for the wizard corpse. I explicitly told them during the round that I wasn't giving them a ban or a note for that. I also asked them to seriously reconsider how they played head based upon their history. Through the rest of the round they gulagged and executed people left and righ...
- Sat Mar 10, 2018 10:51 pm
- Forum: Town Hall
- Topic: Trialmin Review: STP
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3423
Re: Trialmin Review: STP
promote him why aren't you promoting him
- Sat Mar 10, 2018 10:08 pm
- Forum: Resolved Appeals
- Topic: Stickymayhem DoM - Perma Ban
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1912
Re: Stickymayhem DoM - Perma Ban
I'm with Sticky on this one.
I'd much rather have someone playing the game and potentially not actually causing any trouble (here's hoping) than play a never-ending game of hunting down a bunch of alts and prosecuting evasion.
I'd much rather have someone playing the game and potentially not actually causing any trouble (here's hoping) than play a never-ending game of hunting down a bunch of alts and prosecuting evasion.
- Sat Mar 03, 2018 3:06 am
- Forum: Former Admins
- Topic: [No Longer Admin] Optimumtact
- Replies: 113
- Views: 31319
Re: Optimumtact
I've seen no issues with his administrative decisions, but he seems to make an active effort to antagonize other admins and players, ignores or abuses forum rules, and is unapologetic about any of it. We're volunteers and I'm not asking for you to jump in line and be serious all the time, but a modi...
- Sat Mar 03, 2018 2:59 am
- Forum: Closed Policy Discussion
- Topic: Requesting a ghost role in OOC
- Replies: 28
- Views: 6544
Re: Requesting a ghost role in OOC
I'm kind of a stickler for not talking about the round in OOC. Anything that happens there can and WILL impact the way players behave. I mean, if you ask for a pAI for example, let's say that makes two dudes rush for the pAI at the same time, except one of them is a traitor and kills the first one. ...
- Sat Mar 03, 2018 2:57 am
- Forum: Closed Complaints
- Topic: [Sybil] Citrusgender - Optimumtact
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4028
Re: [Sybil] Citrusgender - Optimumtact
When admins make meme admin complaints repeatedly in the actual admin complaints forum and not in the shed, you're doing a disservice to the other admins who are actually NOT trying to be complete raging idiots wandering around dropping their dicks in the faces of everyone that walks by. This is not...