/tg/Station 13

this is just more proof oranges is a maintainer simply to make people angry
he damn well knew what he was doing when letting that guy make the pr

DrWoofington wrote:this is just more proof oranges is a maintainer simply to make people angry
he damn well knew what he was doing when letting that guy make the pr

If you're getting angry, that's your doing. oranges doesn't control you lmao, stop getting mad because your fetish is getting removed

The fact that rather than debate people on the thread the pro-catgril group spammed catgirl child porn leads me to belive that the vocal catgirl supporters are either very uset that people disagree with them or they are closet fucking peadophiles.

I mean, that shit was not kosher and they were abloe to get a shittone of it to hand in a really really short space of time, they had to have that saved somewhere and anyone who has so much of that saved is probably the kind of creep you don't want associated with any serious community.

I probably hate catgirls more than anyone else and even I wouldn't delve into arguing about them nowadays lmao it's like the axtinguisher nerf its gonna be around whether you like it, or not just give up and maybe stechek's bequest will come around.

I mean it's not like I play on /tg/ anymore but genetrash is the worst cancer
actually, second-worst, all this is the result of opening to the hub and becoming redditstation

Most of the people in this thread at any given moment:

That includes you sorry buddy boy

That's why I used most :^)

>unironically using xkcd
>unironically using a "comic" created by an entitled former NASA janitor
how much more digg can you be
how much more digg can "/tg/" be if this is one third of our headmin team

DemonFiren wrote:>unironically using xkcd
>unironically using a "comic" created by an entitled former NASA janitor
how much more digg can you be
how much more digg can "/tg/" be if this is one third of our headmin team

>unironically thinking calling anything you don't like digg is convincing anyone

Please tell me more about how cultured you are, anon.

i personally dislike catpeople and if you disagree then

Deitus wrote:i personally dislike catpeople and if you disagree then

Spoiler:

thats your right

Rather than try to explain their viewpoint on the subject and provide logical deconstructions of your arguments they'll just spam dump their underage catgirl porn folder till the tread gets locked and nobody can discuss anything seriously.

iamgoofball wrote:

DrWoofington wrote:this is just more proof oranges is a maintainer simply to make people angry
he damn well knew what he was doing when letting that guy make the pr

If you're getting angry, that's your doing. oranges doesn't control you lmao, stop getting mad because your fetish is getting removed

Me? Mad?
That's a funny joke there goof
oranges knew that letting someone make a serious pr to remove catgirls would cause all this shit, drama and whatever happened there
Cyberboss closing the pr also shows that oranges probably doesn't care about what maintainers think, because if he really did then he would talk it over with them firsthand. It's really obvious for everyone that removing catpeople would cause a massive outrage from all the catpeople players.
There is already a config option for headmins to make catpeople not-roundstart. Stop trying to circumvent config options.
EDIT: If you really want catpeople gone then go ahead and run for headmin. Nothing's stopping you.

Arianya wrote:

DemonFiren wrote:>unironically using xkcd
>unironically using a "comic" created by an entitled former NASA janitor
how much more digg can you be
how much more digg can "/tg/" be if this is one third of our headmin team

>unironically thinking calling anything you don't like digg is convincing anyone

Please tell me more about how cultured you are, anon.

>thinking this is about convincing people
what's it like being vision impaired and unable to check what forum this thread is in

CosmicScientist wrote:I'm disappointed in all of you who didn't immediately post loli images like everyone at the end of the PR.

GuyonBroadway wrote:The fact that rather than debate people on the thread the pro-catgril group spammed catgirl child porn leads me to belive that the vocal catgirl supporters are either very uset that people disagree with them or they are closet fucking peadophiles.

GuyonBroadway wrote:they'll just spam dump their underage catgirl porn folder till the tread gets locked and nobody can discuss anything seriously.

excuse me can we please talk about what you mean by this exactly like what

I remember some shit involving lolicon in the past in this community where people really didn't like that person. I didn't know posting lolicon or saying that you're posting lolicon is a meme here now.

edit: a wise man said 'no they actually werent' which is good. though, im still wondering if cosmic was laying down bait, i can't tell if someone is being sarcastic anymore, or i actually missed some important information on how to do a good meme.

Someone's always gonna be mad about the state of catgirls, so obviously the best solution is the one that makes the most people angry

when the fuck are they gonna add tattoos aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAA

https://github.com/tgstation/tgstation/ ... -116137048 GIVE ME THE FUCKING TATTOOS WJOHN YOU FUCKING FURRY

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

CosmicScientist wrote:But you did a good job at putting 244 comments on a PR that had been open for only 4 hours.

we're going for the high score

I'm a supporter of keeping catgirls in the code and I was pissed off about the image spam Wilchen and GaynessGolem (likely someones alt) performed. Please don't generalize a whole group based off of two people, that's like me saying all cops are killers based on the woman who shot a man in his own home, or that black people are all druggies based off that black man's stash of weed.

Ayy Lemoh wrote:

CosmicScientist wrote:I'm disappointed in all of you who didn't immediately post loli images like everyone at the end of the PR.

GuyonBroadway wrote:The fact that rather than debate people on the thread the pro-catgril group spammed catgirl child porn leads me to belive that the vocal catgirl supporters are either very uset that people disagree with them or they are closet fucking peadophiles.

GuyonBroadway wrote:they'll just spam dump their underage catgirl porn folder till the tread gets locked and nobody can discuss anything seriously.

excuse me can we please talk about what you mean by this exactly like what

I remember some shit involving lolicon in the past in this community where people really didn't like that person. I didn't know posting lolicon or saying that you're posting lolicon is a meme here now.

edit: a wise man said 'no they actually werent' which is good. though, im still wondering if cosmic was laying down bait, i can't tell if someone is being sarcastic anymore, or i actually missed some important information on how to do a good meme.

It's not a meme this time, Wilch and gaynessgolem literally dumped (albiet softcore) underage catgirl porn in the PR.

Every deleted comment by Wilch and Golem was catgirl spamming. Not all of it was softporn but there was a fair amount of it.

i don't play on this awful server but this is funny. none of you actually care that there are catgirls in the game, you're just using this as an opportunity to signal how "un-degenerate" you are, while you secretly jerk off to anime catgirls like everyone else

this tho

Wilchen's images were mainly clothed but yes gayness literally dumped a ton of softcore porn catgirl art. I still have it in my email. Don't lump in everyone who disagrees with you with them Guyonbroadway

BeeSting12 wrote:I'm a supporter of keeping catgirls in the code and I was pissed off about the image spam Wilchen and GaynessGolem (likely someones alt) performed. Please don't generalize a whole group based off of two people, that's like me saying all cops are killers based on the woman who shot a man in his own home, or that black people are all druggies based off that black man's stash of weed.

Sorry but its pretty hard not to generalize when any time someone takes a prod at catgirls SOMEONE flies off the handle in an unacceptable manner.

Case in point, that time MSO turned them off for an hour and that one (now ex) admin, rather than talk about it or even ask so much as "Hey guys why did this happen? Whats going on?" they decided to adminbomb the server over a couple rounds as "protest against the host attacking the playerbase". Not once did they seek to reconcile the issue in any other manner, they jsut went from 0 to I BOM U REEEEE!! in 2 seconds flat.

The only copped a 2 day slap on the wrist ban and it took five pages of forum discussion to actually have them held to the same standard as a non antag player maxcapping the station. Initially they weren't even going to have any kind of admin reprimand either.

While people who complain about catgirls might get occasionally "salty" they have never been mallacious to the extent the pro catgirl have gotten.

how dare people react angrily when you poke them with a pen

Ayy Lemoh wrote:

CosmicScientist wrote:I'm disappointed in all of you who didn't immediately post loli images like everyone at the end of the PR.

GuyonBroadway wrote:The fact that rather than debate people on the thread the pro-catgril group spammed catgirl child porn leads me to belive that the vocal catgirl supporters are either very uset that people disagree with them or they are closet fucking peadophiles.

GuyonBroadway wrote:they'll just spam dump their underage catgirl porn folder till the tread gets locked and nobody can discuss anything seriously.

excuse me can we please talk about what you mean by this exactly like what

I remember some shit involving lolicon in the past in this community where people really didn't like that person. I didn't know posting lolicon or saying that you're posting lolicon is a meme here now.

edit: a wise man said 'no they actually werent' which is good. though, im still wondering if cosmic was laying down bait, i can't tell if someone is being sarcastic anymore, or i actually missed some important information on how to do a good meme.

Someone posted a bunch of creepy porn and also not-porn on an alt account. It's been reported to github and banned from the repository.

PKPenguin321 wrote:

GIVE ME THE FUCKING TATTOOS NOW NOW NOW NOW NOWWWWWW

Hey PK PK hey PKPenguin psst

Shut the fuck up

Add me to the screenshot

The fruit want to have another catgirl server poll. Neat.

The most stupid thing about all the "remove catpeople" PRs is that the authors assume the problem they see can be fixed by removing an effect of it. It can't. Even if by some remote chance it did go through and catgirls were removed, it won't remove the people that play them. They'll still post cat lewds on discord and probably find a substitute ingame, and nothing will change that.

TehSteveo wrote:The fruit want to have another catgirl server poll. Neat.

Both of those polls are just for the server, and not the remove yes/no from the codebase poll oranges is looking for.

iamgoofball wrote:

TehSteveo wrote:The fruit want to have another catgirl server poll. Neat.

Both of those polls are just for the server, and not the remove yes/no from the codebase poll oranges is looking for.

Except for the edge cases of admin fuckery, it accomplishes the same thing if it was disabled via the configuration. I doubt these numbers will change much for a "code solution." A good majority of players will just see it as removal in either scenario and not care that it was a configuration edit or PR that removed the thing.

iamgoofball wrote:

TehSteveo wrote:The fruit want to have another catgirl server poll. Neat.

Both of those polls are just for the server, and not the remove yes/no from the codebase poll oranges is looking for.

You got the people that actually play in both of those polls, why do you want the people that don't to be considered?

confused rock wrote:it's like the axtinguisher nerf its gonna be around whether you like it

I dislike catpeople since I personally feel it does not fit in well with the universe. More than anything else (species related) it strikes me as some god inserting a Human variant with cat ears, its low effort, boring and while anecdotal I find some catpeople players to be annoying.

I also find catpeople to be very inconsistant. Lizardpeople actually look like humanoid Lizards instead of a Human, with pink skin, having a green tail. Mothpeople actually look like a giant moth, again not just a Human with moth wings.

Catpeople are just Humans with cat ears and tails. It'd be far more thematic if Catpeople actually looked like a large Humanoid cat.

I created a poll

I have to say, the catpeople removal PR is really emblematic of IRL politics. The whole "we'll lose our funding if we don't submit to the powerful interests" thing, the identity politics aspect of it all, and especially the concept of an overton window, with lizards, for example, once being something people wanted to remove, now being an unapproachably radical concept.

ladies and gentlemen, fact of the matter is catgirls are here to stay, even someone as dumb as me learned that after a couple of shitstorms

>create drama around one thing just so you can say that we must remove that thing to prevent drama

the same old shit that happened with ERP, removed for "disrupting the round" when the only people doing the disrupting were admins and ERP haters doing everything in their power to create chaos and destruction around ERPers.

Then again, I don't know what happened behind the scenes, but forcing a server poll to bypass headmins on a config option (which is a server-only decision to make), seems rather gross. Did headmins even had any say in this poll? Because I don't remember any one of them running on a platform against catgirls or even making the promise to poll the community to decide about the issue.

Nervere said he wouldn't make a poll to help oranges stir shit and oranges said it doesn't matter since he has that power anyway.

So what's the oversight on this? Does the poll filter accounts to prevent manipulation? What do the headmins have to say about this, besides Arianya's "I don't care"?

I mean, do we even need headmins if coders can just poll the community directly whenever they want to remove configs (only to ignore it if the poll doesn't go their way because "the poll wasn't binding, code and server are separate etc. etc.")

I want kor back already

Bawhoppennn wrote:with lizards, for example, once being something people wanted to remove, now being an unapproachably radical concept.

To be precise, people (myself included) didn't want to have lizards as a standard playable race, not removed altogether. I was mocked for using slippery slope argument, but here we are, after I was proven right at least five times.
And lizards always were a part of tgstation in some capacity, or at least as far back in time I can recall.

As for the Catpeople, I really don't care anymore. Any aesthetic/lore integrity these servers had, has been thrown into trash long time ago. And I can handle dozens of nyaafags, if Mei Ling can still be Mei Ling.

Grazyn wrote:So what's the oversight on this? Does the poll filter accounts to prevent manipulation? What do the headmins have to say about this, besides Arianya's "I don't care"?

I mean, do we even need headmins if coders can just poll the community directly whenever they want to remove configs (only to ignore it if the poll doesn't go their way because "the poll wasn't binding, code and server are separate etc. etc.")

>oversight on oranges
lol

Any admin can access unfiltered poll results, I believe, and even if we can't I'm sure MSO would call oranges out on it if he faked poll results. I haven't seen any headmins comments on this yet (they might've but I'm not going through discord looking for it).

edit- If you're talking about voter fraud or whatever which is probably something that will happen with something like this, then poll filters should be able to prevent this.

can we have a poll about lizards and moths too?

Any admin can access unfiltered poll results, I believe, and even if we can't I'm sure MSO would call oranges out on it if he faked poll results. I haven't seen any headmins comments on this yet (they might've but I'm not going through discord looking for it).

My opinion on it is that we've had 2 polls in the past 2 years and both have come out in favour of keeping them, and nothing substantive has changed in the meantime that justifies another poll.

That said I'm refusing to engage in the topic any more then I have to because it's pretty clearly oranges fishing for reactions.

Arianya wrote:

Any admin can access unfiltered poll results, I believe, and even if we can't I'm sure MSO would call oranges out on it if he faked poll results. I haven't seen any headmins comments on this yet (they might've but I'm not going through discord looking for it).

My opinion on it is that we've had 2 polls in the past 2 years and both have come out in favour of keeping them, and nothing substantive has changed in the meantime that justifies another poll.

That said I'm refusing to engage in the topic any more then I have to because it's pretty clearly oranges fishing for reactions.

update your source for avatar you big liar

Done

Free kor




Also oranges is the hero tg needs