[POLL] Security Sprite Changes

[Grazyn]

Bottom post of the previous page:

What if you replace the armors in sec lockers with pap's armor, spawning/latejoining officers get ausops armor. This way we can still keep the formal suits, officers can swap their tacticool armor with the less threatening one to go along with the formal suit, and at the same time civilians who get job-replaced to security get the civilian armor from the lockers so it's instantly obvious they're "rookies".

[RogerWilco]

That's what happens when many people are altering the same files, shame there's no easy way to avoid merge conflicts.

Currently the Bartender and the Head of Personal will both get paprika's armour sprite alternative, I'm also considering replacing the armour cargo get's with pap's sprites as well. This would show a better difference between Security's armour and Civilian armour.

Cargo armor crates are surplus security equipment though

to be honest, just remove papsprites and bring back glorious tactical security helmets

[Steelpoint]

That seems overly complicated sorry. I think there should only be one consecutive armour sprite style for sec at all times.

to be honest, just remove papsprites and bring back glorious tactical security helmets

I did, all armour sprites have been reverted.

[Grazyn]

I don't know much about coding, but how is replacing 6 items in 6 lockers "overly complicated"? Is it harder than replacing the cargo crate? Considering that it will allow the use of the formal sprites, and that berets/caps/masks/adjusting suit/satchel/backpack can already alter the look of security, I don't think it's a big deal

[Steelpoint]

What I mean by complicated is that it makes a jumble of what armour security officers will wear as some will be wearing one armour and some the other.

[Grazyn]

And so what, you can as well remove caps and berets and satchels because god forbid officers have different outlooks

[Steelpoint]

Headwear is fine, but armour has always been a consistent factor in the security uniform.

[RogerWilco]

And so what, you can as well remove caps and berets and satchels because god forbid officers have different outlooks

the thing is
papsprites were shit
security caps, berets and glorious satchel aren't sprited shittily though

[Steelpoint]

Paprika has indicated he wants to another sprite PR to replace all sec sprites with the newly created dues ex sprites made from singulo.

Should make a new poll, thread for that if/when it arrives.

[Grazyn]

Great, a coder war. Unless you try to carve some neck space from the ausops sprites, the armor is gonna hide the tie of the deus ex sprites, turning them into a shitty khaki uniform. And really now, he wants to make them the new standard sec suit? Please no

[Scones]

Paprika has indicated he wants to another sprite PR to replace all sec sprites with the newly created dues ex sprites made from singulo.

Should make a new poll, thread for that if/when it arrives.

Oh shit, really? Because those sprites look absolutely fantastic. Not sure about the HoS coat, but the rest of it looks pretty good.
Really gives that 'Private Security Force' feel over the current 'Corporate Paramilitary' shit

[paprika]

https://github.com/tgstation/-tg-station/pull/6441

[Steelpoint]

We're having a good discussion of this on coderbus, I think we may reach a good compromise.

[Lumbermancer]

I like the new-old uniforms. They're utilitarian and sleek. There's clear distinction between uniform and jackboots, no unnecessary grey shit kneepads cluttering the sprite. Plain armor vest also looks nice.

I do not like the security belt though, it needs some more distinguishing.

[JStheguy]

Paprika has indicated he wants to another sprite PR to replace all sec sprites with the newly created dues ex sprites made from singulo.

Should make a new poll, thread for that if/when it arrives.

Done, new poll for Dual Sex Vs Ausops Vs Paprika: https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2286

[Steelpoint]

He's made his own thread (pending approval).

However there are new sprites that may be the one's we are using.