It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

For feedback on the game code and design. Feedback on server rules and playstyle belong in Policy Discussion.
Post Reply
cacogen
Forum Soft Banned
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
Byond Username: Cacogen

It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by cacogen » #502142

If a department is bombed the most anyone's willing to do is fill in the holes and leave dark, airless plating because of how time-consuming it is to rebuild everything manually
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
Image

Image
SpaceManiac
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2017 4:06 am
Byond Username: SpaceManiac
Github Username: SpaceManiac

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by SpaceManiac » #502143

Any concrete suggestions?
cacogen
Forum Soft Banned
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
Byond Username: Cacogen

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by cacogen » #502144

I want to know if people agree and don't want to make the thread about my ideas rather than the issue itself and discourage people from sharing their own but:

1. Give the drone that's used to build the auxiliary base to engineers with greater capacity (can spawn machines, for example). Also give them something that shows them the layout of the department before it was bombed (similar to what the blueprints do for wiring/piping)
2. Just give them something that returns a tile or an area to how it was roundstart. As far as I know the game can already pull from .dmm files. It would need the right balance, and fluff to justify its existence.
Last edited by cacogen on Fri Jul 05, 2019 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
Image

Image
User avatar
Anonmare
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 8:59 pm
Byond Username: Anonmare

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by Anonmare » #502145

I have an idea.
As an engineering cyborg, the memorized blueprints you've got in your modules are great for rebuilding, because after an explosion you can see where wires, pipes and stuff ought to go which helps avoid situations where you get re-building and realise you've rebuilt the pipenets entirely wrong. I'd like it if engineers had that same holographic overlay, even if it's integrated into the mesons/engineering goggles as an alternate mode.

Another idea might be using air shutters. Other servers also usually have air shutters to prevent/reduce air loss, along with disabling air vents in the affected area to cut down on spacewind and loss of air. Firelocks have a sort of functionality like that with how fire alarms react to sudden bursts of cold but they don't reinitialize if reset, which can be irritating if you're trying to fix somewhere and some jackshit assistant keeps opening the doors and knocking you around with spacewind.

One final two ideas I had is merging fire alarm/air alarm/APC electronics into a singular circuit board subtype (either the frame the electronics go into differentiate it, or screwdrivering it into a particular type). And adding a BULKY construction satchel that can hold W_CLASS NORMAL or smaller construction items (can carry, wires, boards, electronics and ~half stacks of materials), making carrying materials to the site of hull breaches less of a PITA. The satchel ought to only be able to hold around about ~150 sheets of any material at a time, if it was filled with nothing but sheets of course.

Alternatively, repurposing floorbots into construction bots that will rebuild rooms' floors, pipes, cables and walls according to the station blueprints but I imagine that'd both be extremely tricky to implement and probably eat into server resources a fair margin.
Image
Image
Image
Dr_bee
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:31 pm
Byond Username: DrBee

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by Dr_bee » #502216

Simply having an easy way to see how the room used to look before an explosion would be nice. Right now there are enough tools to quickly seal breaches with smart foam and RCDs, its the full repairs that require a bit more time.

Hell if you made air and disposal pipes bomb resistant so only the obliteration radius destroys them it would make repairing the station ten times better while still letting people C4 disposal and air pipes if they dont want to use tools.
User avatar
CPTANT
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
Byond Username: CPTANT

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by CPTANT » #502218

New wires are already an improvement.
Timberpoes wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
Dr_bee
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 6:31 pm
Byond Username: DrBee

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by Dr_bee » #502223

CPTANT wrote:New wires are already an improvement.
Arent smartpipes coming as well? I guess it will do different loops with layering.
User avatar
Atlanta-Ned
In-Game Game Master
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:11 pm
Byond Username: Atlanta-ned

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by Atlanta-Ned » #502248

You're all wrong.

It should be harder to the point where it's easier to seal off the area around the breach than it is to actually fix the breach.
Statbus! | Admin Feedback
OOC: Pizzatiger: God damn Atlanta, how are you so fucking smart and charming. It fucking pisses me off how perfect you are
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #502257

no the point is its easy to fix the hole but making it not look like shit is hard, especially when you cant even make floor overlays and almost every floortile now has an overlay


the CE blueprints show (i think) how the pipes/cables/disposals were at roundstart, would be nice if a read only version of the bp existed where it just shows pipes and cable shit
User avatar
terranaut
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:43 pm
Byond Username: Terranaut

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by terranaut » #502281

This is a player issue and not a code issue. On others servers, where breaches are slightly more annoying to fix because the atmosphere loss is much more severe, a maxcapped breach usually gets fixed within 10 minutes by a team of engineers supported by a borg, fixed meaning lights, wiring, piping, disposals. On /tg/ you'll have half the engineers just refusing to do it because there's no penalty to not doing your job and they'd rather get drunk in the bar or do their private autism project or think engineers are just assistants with roundstart tools and gloves. I'm not saying we should penalize not doing your job here, I'm just underlining that this is not a code problem.
[🅲 1] [🆄 1] [🅼 1]

Image
User avatar
Davidchan
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 4:48 pm
Byond Username: Davidchan

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by Davidchan » #502294

Upgrade the blueprints to store map default configurations? Or rather, make a holoprojector that can have room layouts uploaded to it. When used it scans the room as defined in the blueprints and creates holographic overlays of missing or destroyed items/structures. If a pipe runs through that was destroyed, a holo blueprints hovers in the air saying what kind of pipe it was and it's layout. Examining the overlay of something like a machine will list the required parts needed to build it (for example, a cryotube would list 5 metal for the frame, 6 wire lengths to wire it plus the wire it needs after the board is installed, the cryotube board, a matter bin and 4 sheets of glass.)

If a room was remodeled engineering could do a new scan to mark the layout and upload it to their collection. Attacking the overlay will dismiss it on that tile if engineering decides not to build it and the holoemitter itself would have a clear all projections option as holofans and other holobarriers would. In the long term, some coder could implement a system to allow players to save configurations to some copy/paste format and allow them to post them here on the forums or wiki so future players in other rounds could upload them and build them, so if CE decided he wanted to build an SM chamber or Singulo containment in space off of engineering, he could input the parameters and project it, basically allowing engineering to color in the lines and build according to blueprints.
Law 0: Secborg din do nuffin.
User avatar
Anuv
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2018 11:34 pm
Byond Username: Anuv

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by Anuv » #502326

It absolutely should be harder. A single engiborg can fix a bombing in 15 seconds.
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by oranges » #502338

We are working on it

edit: also blueprints or engineering goggles already show roundstart pipes/wires iirc.
User avatar
CPTANT
Joined: Mon May 04, 2015 1:31 pm
Byond Username: CPTANT

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by CPTANT » #502340

Anuv wrote:It absolutely should be harder. A single engiborg can fix a bombing in 15 seconds.
The hull maybe, but that still leaves an airless barren hunk of plating.
Timberpoes wrote: Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:21 pm The rules exist to create the biggest possible chance of a cool shift of SS13. They don't exist to allow admins to create the most boring interpretation of SS13.
cacogen
Forum Soft Banned
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
Byond Username: Cacogen

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by cacogen » #502355

time to quotemine
Dr_bee wrote:Simply having an easy way to see how the room used to look before an explosion would be nice.
That would be helpful but I can already get the image on the wiki (or open the .dmm file in the code). It's the building itself that takes ages because of the step-by-step nature of it and the need to source materials. This is balanced normally, just not when you're an engineer that is expected to do a lot of it. It's an unrealistic expectation to the point that when engineers actually fix hull breaches they just add plating and leave it at that.
Dr_bee wrote:Hell if you made air and disposal pipes bomb resistant so only the obliteration radius destroys them it would make repairing the station ten times better while still letting people C4 disposal and air pipes if they dont want to use tools.
This is a good idea.

Atlanta-Ned wrote:It should be harder to the point where it's easier to seal off the area around the breach than it is to actually fix the breach.
you sound like a realism kiddo or hard sci-fi nerd

Anuv wrote:It absolutely should be harder. A single engiborg can fix a bombing in 15 seconds.
i doubt that. even if the holes are RCD'd shut it's still a airless, freezing, depressurised, dark area that's untenable to most of the crew and is probably sucking air from other places leaving them dangerous as well. but the point is returning a department to functionality, not whether filling in the breaches themselves is balanced

terranaut wrote: a maxcapped breach usually gets fixed within 10 minutes by a team of engineers supported by a borg, fixed meaning lights, wiring, piping, disposals.
it sounds like you're describing high RP servers where people are penalised for not doing their jobs. and it's dumb to aim the code at an ideal player rather than at how our players actually play the game.

doing large amounts of construction like this is tedious and unfun because of how finicky and painstaking the manual construction is and there is no reward. no one cares. it should just be easier for engineers who have to do a lot of it, and the RCD is a good start but it's received few additions over the years

and you also have to take into account the short rounds that make it easier to call the shuttle than to put in the effort and the fact some rounds end abruptly so your work is lost anyway. and are long rounds even good?

Dr_bee wrote:
CPTANT wrote:New wires are already an improvement.
Arent smartpipes coming as well? I guess it will do different loops with layering.
this is a good start
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
Image

Image
User avatar
wesoda25
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 9:32 pm
Byond Username: Wesoda25

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by wesoda25 » #502363

A remote control drone for engineering (controle console in engineering, or possibly an app on engi tablet) would be pretty cool tbh.
User avatar
Cobby
Code Maintainer
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by Cobby » #502433

readd drones :^)

FIX BOMB CALCS SO THAT THE TOP TIER GASSES ARE REQ'D TO REACH MAXCAP

FIX BOMB CALCS SO THAT THE TOP TIER GASSES ARE REQ'D TO REACH MAXCAP

FIX BOMB CALCS SO THAT THE TOP TIER GASSES ARE REQ'D TO REACH MAXCAP

FIX BOMB CALCS SO THAT THE TOP TIER GASSES ARE REQ'D TO REACH MAXCAP

FIX BOMB CALCS SO THAT THE TOP TIER GASSES ARE REQ'D TO REACH MAXCAP

FIX BOMB CALCS SO THAT THE TOP TIER GASSES ARE REQ'D TO REACH MAXCAP

FIX BOMB CALCS SO THAT THE TOP TIER GASSES ARE REQ'D TO REACH MAXCAP
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
User avatar
MisterPerson
Board Moderator
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
Byond Username: MisterPerson

Re: It should be easier to rebuild after a hull breach

Post by MisterPerson » #502477

The problem with having robust RCD/RPD/RPED/etc is that they still leave manual construction in a shitty place. And then it's like... why even have manual construction at all if it's going to be left awful?

Serious question: do we actually expect people to rebuild all the newscasters and light switches and status screens and fire doors and fire alarms and cameras and snack machines and signs and colored floor tiles and stylized airlocks and windows? Like how much repair do we actually want people to do? Get the room back into working order, yeah? So I think it's really telling that if someone bombs Medbay, the thought is "gotta fix the hull" or "gotta fix the wires/pipes" or MAYBE "gotta reair" instead of "gotta get Medbay working again".

What I think would help get people back in the right mindset is to make bombs and shit less deleterious but still destructive. Instead of deleting a computer, leave behind a broken computer frame that you need to fix. Instead of deleting a camera, leave behind a broken camera shell. All you gotta do is examine the broken stuff around you and follow the directions. Easier repairs, you don't gotta constantly check how things were and try to recreate it, just look, easy! Don't delete the required building material either, just throw it around. So if you need some wires to repair that airlock, spawn enough and throw it. This will help with component requirements; you won't need to run back to gather more, you can just scavenge what's around.
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.

Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users