The_Silver_Nuke wrote:oranges wrote:none of them really twist my nips I have to say
I'm not sure what you mean by this. In particular isn't this something you supported?*8. Delay removal until medical is better equipped...
Have you changed your stance officially on the subject then? That cloning needs an immediate and brutal amputation from the rest of the codebase? Personally despite the constant grief you get as a headcoder I do support many of the decisions you make, but in order to properly do things we have to maintain consistency. I do think that medical is headed in the right direction even if many players don't think so, but logical and transparent decisions with proper laid out reasoning is severely needed.
If you think it's typical of Orange to lay out a clear and specific response to a point you put out, just check his post history. He's one of the few coders we can talk with on this issue, but he also doesn't care for any form of discussion that doesn't agree with him.
Even test-merging this shit is completely forced. He sees a train get completely derailed and then says 'well let's just see if it can still commute passengers, you never know'. Even though Skog is the one who did the pull request, Orange's support of the complete removal is completely counter to his opinions expressed 3 months ago. In what way is Medical better prepared for the removal of the cloner over the past 3 months?
Skog's defense of cloning isn't much better.
skoglol wrote:If we discard the non-feedback, the ones who have missed the point completely, the ones who think we are removing revival (defib, surgery, podcloning, strange reagent) and the suggestions to do something else instead, we are left with fairly few actual issues to overcome.
Which basically translates to: "If we ignore any and all criticism indicating anything short of removing cloning, the outlook is positive!" which in itself translates to "As long as we ignore negative feedback, we don't have to worry about feedback." This is widely known as a 'dick move'. It is also known in certain circles as 'coderbus', unironically.