Page 1 of 2
>post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 1:44 am
by iamgoofball
Weird fucking coincidence after I trash your shitty newmin for being a shitstain who rules with an iron fist. So weird.
What are you gonna do? Try to rule zero me again, you cowards? You can't handle actually debating me in public because you know I'm right, so you try to silence me instead. Go back to jerking off in your circle and learn from the last five times you've tried to silence a player.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 1:53 am
by Ayy Lemoh
God, everything is turning into a trashfire.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:04 am
by Deitus
As much as I don’t like goof nabski’s actions and the mental gymnastics they and other admins are pulling to try and cover for it do little to prove his tinfoilposting wrong tbh
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:05 am
by iamgoofball
Deitus wrote:As much as I don’t like goof nabski’s actions and the mental gymnastics they and other admins are pulling to try and cover for it do little to prove his tinfoilposting wrong tbh
i really don't like that my tinfoil garbage gets proved right so often
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:27 am
by DemonFiren
inb4 goof ends up on general post approval
like holy fuck I don't know who I want to win this, the shit coder or the shit admins
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:29 am
by iamgoofball
DemonFiren wrote:inb4 goof ends up on general post approval
like holy fuck I don't know who I want to win this, the shit coder or the shit admins
I cant take this to admin complaints because not ingame lol, so there's nowhere else to take this complaint.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:33 am
by Lazengann
robustin didn't violate a rule but you did with your peanuttery
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:38 am
by Super Aggro Crag
Maybe just stop being a little bitch all the time
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:57 am
by oranges
man stands on soapbox to decry being unable to soapbox
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:10 am
by PKPenguin321
oranges wrote:man stands on soapbox to decry being unable to soapbox
I'VE BEEN SILENCED, declares man atop platform with megaphone to all who will hear him
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:13 am
by PKPenguin321
Double posting but post approval is not an outright ban, and on-topic posts that are within the rules will still be let through
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:14 am
by Super Aggro Crag
Goofball is like alex jones except less coherent
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:29 am
by confused rock
Goofball is not a good boy but he does not deserve this he is not a paprika why do we do this to him
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:57 am
by bandit
Super Aggro Crag wrote:Maybe just stop being a little bitch all the time
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 4:05 am
by Ispiria
Hi! I'm the one who initially complained about the obvious soapboxing going on in FNR, and then raised enough of a stink about it that the thread being used as a platform for complaining about the admin conspiracy was eventually cleaned up.
I want to make it clear that there was no personal motive here for the removal of the posts in the complaint thread, and that goof being put on post approval had nothing to do with any kind of personal vendetta.
goof was using a complaint thread, one of the already most restrictive areas of fnr, to vent his opinions about the admin being complained about. In general discussion this would have been fine, but if we allow people to chime in with their opinions regarding admins in an official complaint, the initial issue being complained about quickly becomes muddied and makes an objective judgement about the specific incident much harder to reach for those responsible for doing so. goof has a history of doing this, which is likely why he was put on approval for it.
Incidentally, I didn't even necessarily disagree with the things goof was saying, and fully believed there was some merit to his points - but a complaint thread isn't the place to share them. We have feedback threads and GD for that.
tl;dr: what oranges said but more verbosely
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 4:26 am
by Nabski
Ispiria wrote:Hi! I'm the one who initially complained about the obvious soapboxing going on in FNR, and then raised enough of a stink about it that the thread being used as a platform for complaining about the admin conspiracy was eventually cleaned up.
I want to make it clear that there was no personal motive here for the removal of the posts in the complaint thread, and that goof being put on post approval had nothing to do with any kind of personal vendetta.
goof was using a complaint thread, one of the already most restrictive areas of fnr, to vent his opinions about the admin being complained about. In general discussion this would have been fine, but if we allow people to chime in with their opinions regarding admins in an official complaint, the initial issue being complained about quickly becomes muddied and makes an objective judgement about the specific incident much harder to reach for those responsible for doing so. goof has a history of doing this, which is likely why he was put on approval for it.
Incidentally, I didn't even necessarily disagree with the things goof was saying, and fully believed there was some merit to his points - but a complaint thread isn't the place to share them. We have feedback threads and GD for that.
tl;dr: what oranges said but more verbosely
What are you doing!
It's one liners and vague insults only in this thread.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 4:35 am
by Ispiria
Nabski wrote:
What are you doing!
It's one liners and vague insults only in this thread.
I included a one liner at the end! ;C
But the OP seemed serious and deserves a serious reply, if all you do is troll someone you don't get to complain when they get angry and retaliate.
also more like badski gottem
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 5:14 am
by Ayy Lemoh
Ispiria wrote:But the OP seemed serious and deserves a serious reply, if all you do is troll someone you don't get to complain when they get angry and retaliate.
Smart lad.
De-escalation works better than trying to thrust the knife in further.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:12 am
by ishortjr33
If you're going to put iamgoofball on whatever kind of screening this is answer this for everyone,
Is what he is saying wrong? Is he factually, demonstrably wrong about what he's said? I noticed he got a pee-pee smack when posting in the KangTut BA thread as well.
Is what he's saying incorrect?
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:25 am
by Arianya
Funny how many other critics of """the dictatorship""" walk free in FNR while ye goof is unable to play even within the pretty simple rules of FNR :thonk:
I look forward to goof not even trying to make posts and instead just posting in the hut about whatevers going on in FNR.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:46 am
by oranges
name one other critic of the dictatorships
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:51 am
by Stickymayhem
oranges wrote:name one other critic of the dictatorships
sup
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:57 am
by oranges
hahah no
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:10 am
by iamgoofball
oranges wrote:name one other critic of the dictatorships
gotta agree with oranges here
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:20 am
by Lazengann
tonto
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:27 am
by Ayy Lemoh
Lazengann wrote:tonto
Tonto seems more like he's defending himself, even if ALL of us agreed that he's in the wrong, imo.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:35 am
by Karp
Ayy Lemoh wrote:Lazengann wrote:tonto
Tonto seems more like he's defending himself, even if ALL of us agreed that he's in the wrong, imo.
tonto was in the right though
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 9:38 am
by Stickymayhem
oranges wrote:hahah no
I am a man of the people
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 10:28 am
by Ayy Lemoh
Karp wrote:Ayy Lemoh wrote:Lazengann wrote:tonto
Tonto seems more like he's defending himself, even if ALL of us agreed that he's in the wrong, imo.
tonto was in the right though
Name policy is dumb however I just said 'even if he was wrong' so that it's still seen as him defending himself if someone reads that and goes 'but tonto is bad guy'
I'm not saying I think he's wrong.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 10:36 am
by iamgoofball
Lazengann wrote:tonto
tonto only has to critique when he's banned or being banned/harassed by administrators, by that logic everyone who posts a ban appeal is a critic of the administration
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 11:36 am
by Lazengann
he's the best at it though
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 2:03 pm
by iksyp
my post got removed for calling nabski babski so obviously we need a full rework on FNR rules here
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:09 pm
by Stickymayhem
iksyp wrote:my post got removed for calling nabski babski so obviously we need a full rework on FNR rules here
that was a hate crime and you know it
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:43 pm
by Atlanta-Ned
iksyp wrote:my post got removed for calling nabski babski so obviously we need a full rework on FNR rules here
adminbus is OUT OF CONTROL
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 3:46 pm
by DemonFiren
*dabski
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 4:45 pm
by MrStonedOne
Super Aggro Crag wrote:Maybe just stop being a little bitch all the time
Crag is right, as always
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 5:31 pm
by Super Aggro Crag
MrStonedOne wrote:Super Aggro Crag wrote:Maybe just stop being a little bitch all the time
Crag is right, as always
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:24 pm
by PKPenguin321
ishortjr33 wrote:If you're going to put iamgoofball on whatever kind of screening this is answer this for everyone,
Is what he is saying wrong? Is he factually, demonstrably wrong about what he's said? I noticed he got a pee-pee smack when posting in the KangTut BA thread as well.
Is what he's saying incorrect?
you dont get put on post approval for "being wrong" you get put on post approval in FNR for ignoring the fairly simple rules of the FNR boards lol
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:06 pm
by ishortjr33
PKPenguin321 wrote:ishortjr33 wrote:If you're going to put iamgoofball on whatever kind of screening this is answer this for everyone,
Is what he is saying wrong? Is he factually, demonstrably wrong about what he's said? I noticed he got a pee-pee smack when posting in the KangTut BA thread as well.
Is what he's saying incorrect?
you dont get put on post approval for "being wrong" you get put on post approval in FNR for ignoring the fairly simple rules of the FNR boards lol
That makes sense but I thought the thread in questions rules got changed to allow posting? You know what I obviously don't understand any of this fully so I'll just chill.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 7:17 pm
by somerandomguy
ishortjr33 wrote:PKPenguin321 wrote:ishortjr33 wrote:If you're going to put iamgoofball on whatever kind of screening this is answer this for everyone,
Is what he is saying wrong? Is he factually, demonstrably wrong about what he's said? I noticed he got a pee-pee smack when posting in the KangTut BA thread as well.
Is what he's saying incorrect?
you dont get put on post approval for "being wrong" you get put on post approval in FNR for ignoring the fairly simple rules of the FNR boards lol
That makes sense but I thought the thread in questions rules got changed to allow posting? You know what I obviously don't understand any of this fully so I'll just chill.
t. guy who hasn't read the board rules
you need to bring up a rule or precedent or logs
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2018 8:05 pm
by Karp
[youtube]bFtcLJVN8yg[/youtube]
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 10:02 am
by iamgoofball
MrStonedOne wrote:Super Aggro Crag wrote:Maybe just stop being a little bitch all the time
Crag is right, as always
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 2:13 pm
by Cobby
Which admin/person thinks Nabski did not take it overboard? Are we reading the same thread?
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 6:07 pm
by CitrusGender
ITT: People argue who is more against the ```oppressive /tg/ dictatorship``` in online retro game community headed by bald stoner.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 11:52 pm
by DemonFiren
shut up redditmin
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 12:11 am
by IkeTG
i know how to get you off of post approval
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 1:26 am
by kevinz000
this isn't the ntr hut
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 1:47 am
by Xeroxemnas
Everywhere is the ntr hut for goof, why do you think he's on post approval.
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 5:32 am
by Cobby
I just press yes to all post approvals so sure
Re: >post approval for calling an admin on banning someone who didnt break a rule
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 5:58 pm
by Qbopper
iamgoofball wrote:a player.
funniest part of this post well done op