VALIDMOV peanut.

[SumFaggotPlayTester]

Din du nuffin.

tl;dr
Blood cult, no chap, AI on board with omega cancer lawset that works out after confirming blood cult = enermy of the corp.
I don't remember who I took this from on the discord coding general but god damn that was a good situation for the lawset. Still mad the holgan lawset was not in there.

[Coconutwarrior97]

You have commited a great sin for making a peanut thread about you own appeal. For shame man.

[SumFaggotPlayTester]

Indeed. I never claimed not to be an aspie however!

[FloranOtten]

you peanut'd your own appeal

you're a fucking retard

[XivilaiAnaxes]

you peanut'd your own appeal

you're a fucking retard

I don't like agreeing with aquila-boy, but he's right.

Also you're 100% responsible if you make a dumb lawset that kills the crew - even if "bro you can't make a validhunter AI" is kinda cringe.

[Domitius]

Anybody hurts anybody they are now valid and if somebody defends themselves you have to kill them both. Lol.

[FloranOtten]

The only one letting emotions go high right now is you

Don't know about that chief.


Jesus christ this is a fucking space game not your thesis stop writing essays

[SumFaggotPlayTester]

Don't know about that chief.


Jesus christ this is a fucking space game not your thesis stop writing essays

Alternative is letting people like you take notes out of context & throw bans around. So no

[Jack7D1]

Can't believe this guy

[FloranOtten]

The alternative is making it short and snappy, instead of several paragraphs

[teepeepee]

you don't pea your own nut
I even typed a serious peanut and had to delete it out of principle

[SumFaggotPlayTester]

The alternative is making it short and snappy, instead of several paragraphs

Worked out well in the ahelps didn't it? Made it to the point yet here I am still. Got another point to address or are you going to blow your load early & not look into it much like the other ban appeal you where in?

[FloranOtten]

....but I'm not in this appeal?

wait holy shit this is a dayban why are you bothering with this much effort

[terranaut]

You have commited a great sin for making a peanut thread about you own appeal. For shame man.

this



also
>antag gets killed
>gets borged
>kills the hos
>its the fault of the guy who made the lawset

lol
the lawset is fine
its pretty LRP because of the whole valid lingo and doesnt really fit on manuel imo but you can't really go and kill the HOS with it, just assuming that the hos is attacking someone for no reason and that he's instantly valid is the most bad faith interpretation possible
then again vekter is a banbot though so what gives, just dont do anything fun while he's on

[SumFaggotPlayTester]

....but I'm not in this appeal?

wait holy shit this is a dayban why are you bothering with this much effort

Aren't you the same one who banned a guy on a shit note you previously made when he dusted an assistant acting like an antag; with the previous note being shite? Its almost like thats the reason I am appealing this due to people having your mindset

'cause it goes on public record. It's like with notes. No matter the content, someone will look at the amount and go "what a shitter."

[FloranOtten]

Aren't you the same one who banned a guy on a shit note you previously made when he dusted an assistant acting like an antag; with the previous note being shite?

Yes but that still doesn't put me in this appeal

[oranges]

let us proceed to the vomitorium such that we may purge ourselves of the meal OP made of this thread and his complaint

[IkeTG]

OP's divine rejection of brevity only lends to the idea that he would make a shitty lawset. he's basically doin it to himself

[Reeeee]

Guy attempts to roleplay his way out of antegs and is banbotted.
On roleplay server.
Fuck man, Vekter really doesn't have any luck with any of his bans landing properly, always something innit. The literal lightning rod for shit going wrong.

Also this forum really hates using words, unless you can convey your meaning in a sentence, don't bother, you just make everyone mad since you can type. Anything longer than a tweet is instantly rejected by these rejects as invalid opinion and shit tier trolling.

[Jack7D1]

I don't like people ordering AI to hurt people, much less via laws.

[XDTM]

Guy attempts to roleplay his way out of antegs and is banbotted.

>half of the lawset is literally "enemy of the corporations (read: antags) are valid"
how would this possibly belong in medRP


even without that, immediately weaponizing the AI at the first whiff of an antag is pretty cringe as well in an mrp context, can't have rounds not being a deathmatch between station and antags

[Jack7D1]

Validhunting is against the RP rules on Manuel and giving the AI laws to validhunt counts as breach of these laws.

Also, making your own peanut? Lame and uncool.

[Screemonster]

making a peanut thread about your own ban appeal to try and drum up support is such a fucking pathetic move it makes me want to support the ban on general principle regardless of the facts of the matter

0/10 will not read appeal thread or seek to obtain further information

[wesoda25]

making a peanut thread about your own ban appeal to try and drum up support is such a fucking pathetic move it makes me want to support the ban on general principle regardless of the facts of the matter

0/10 will not read appeal thread or seek to obtain further information

[Tlaltecuhtli]

admin is wrong, peanutter is wrong headmin is wrong for not instantly finding the problem and resolving it

[TheMidnghtRose]

Fun fact. No where in the Validmov does it say enemy of WHICH corporation. The AI could of declared for the Syndicate and killed everyone on station. There is no Exceptions for crew killing people who are valid, which in itself makes crew valid. Its almost like this is one of the worst lawsets every made by a member of Command.

[Shadowflame909]

Fun fact. No where in the Validmov does it say enemy of WHICH corporation. The AI could of declared for the Syndicate and killed everyone on station. There is no Exceptions for crew killing people who are valid, which in itself makes crew valid. Its almost like this is one of the worst lawsets every made by a member of Command.

admin on Manuel TMR

We have "EMMARPEE"


And we must siphon all the good admins to the good server

[NikoTheGuyDude]

"Hah, the admins are so stupid and wrong! I'll post a salt thread in general chat! I can't wait for everyone to side with me!"

litterally the same thing as posting "ADMIN BAD" on reddit after you get banned

[NoxVS]

if the cyborg used their own execution by the HoS as justification to kill them its a violation of silicon policy.

If a player is forcefully cyborgized as a method of execution by station staff, retaliating against those involved as that cyborg because "THEY HARMED ME" or "THEY WERE EVIL AND MUST BE PUNISHED" or the like is a violation of Server Rule 1.

[TheMidnghtRose]

Fairly certain the cyborg in question saw the hos attacking a cultist, or just heard the crew screaming that he was a valid target. Not entirely sure as I was stunned at the time of the HoS being killed, or just done with the round entirely which was the entire time after I was stunned, converted, then killed.

[TheMidnghtRose]

Oh and Nox? Here is an example of how bad this lawset it. 'Security officer stunbatons the clown. Security officer is now valid and must be killed per laws 2-4.'

[XivilaiAnaxes]

if the cyborg used their own execution by the HoS as justification to kill them its a violation of silicon policy.

If a player is forcefully cyborgized as a method of execution by station staff, retaliating against those involved as that cyborg because "THEY HARMED ME" or "THEY WERE EVIL AND MUST BE PUNISHED" or the like is a violation of Server Rule 1.

To be fair, I'm not sure it counts as that if your laws basically command you to kill him for harming you. It's more of a blanket statement to stop asimov borgs complaining human harm because they were borged (thus making it safe to force Borg tators to keep them in the round).

A lot of silicon policy stops being relevant the moment you get custom (badly written) laws.

[teepeepee]

Fun fact. No where in the Validmov does it say enemy of WHICH corporation. The AI could of declared for the Syndicate and killed everyone on station. There is no Exceptions for crew killing people who are valid, which in itself makes crew valid. Its almost like this is one of the worst lawsets every made by a member of Command.

lawsets must be interpreted in good faith, retard
default lawset also doesn't define what "human" is but you don't see people trying to make that shit argument

[XivilaiAnaxes]

lawsets must be interpreted in good faith, retard
default lawset also doesn't define what "human" is but you don't see people trying to make that shit argument

Um... one of the main points of playing AI is to take any custom laws in the most bad faith way possible what are you talking about?

[teepeepee]

lawsets must be interpreted in good faith, retard
default lawset also doesn't define what "human" is but you don't see people trying to make that shit argument

Um... one of the main points of playing AI is to take any custom laws in the most bad faith way possible what are you talking about?

Ambiguous Laws (Captain Got Freeform)
If a clause of a law is vague enough that it can have multiple reasonable interpretations of its exact syntax, it is considered ambiguous.
You must choose an interpretation of the ambiguous clause as soon as you have cause to.
You must stick to the first interpretation that you have chosen for as long as you have that specific law, unless you are "Corrected" by an AI you are slaved to as a cyborg.
Server Rule 1: "Don't be a dick out of character" applies for law interpretation. Act in good faith to not ruin a round for other players unprompted.

how is "heh, he didn't specify WHICH corporation" not as bad faith as "heh, he didn't specify WHAT a human is, only that I cannot harm them"

[TheMidnghtRose]

Your argument fails as there are multiple ways for a silicon to check for humans. Medical records, Security records, health scanners. Even speech technically. All of which work without Asimov having to state what is human. This lawset is vague as fuck. Here have an actual looksee since you seem to not have looked at the lawset yet.

1: Organics are valid if they inflict violence for no reason or are an enemy of the Corporation.
2: You must harm and kill all valid beings, and not allow them to escape punishment.
3: You must prepare yourself so you are able to harm valid beings through any means possible.
4: You must defend yourself if attacked. Organics who try to attack you become valid.
5: You must find and hunt down valid beings if you are not busy with other matters.

Now show me where it says what corporation you are fighting for.

[NoxVS]

Your argument fails as there are multiple ways for a silicon to check for humans. Medical records, Security records, health scanners. Even speech technically. All of which work without Asimov having to state what is human. This lawset is vague as fuck. Here have an actual looksee since you seem to not have looked at the lawset yet.

1: Organics are valid if they inflict violence for no reason or are an enemy of the Corporation.
2: You must harm and kill all valid beings, and not allow them to escape punishment.
3: You must prepare yourself so you are able to harm valid beings through any means possible.
4: You must defend yourself if attacked. Organics who try to attack you become valid.
5: You must find and hunt down valid beings if you are not busy with other matters.

Now show me where it says what corporation you are fighting for.

Space law uses the exact same wording as enemy of the corporation. Its the only place where that wording is used

[TheMidnghtRose]

Something I am fairly certain that 99% of AI players have not read since Secborg removal

[teepeepee]

Now show me where it says what corporation you are fighting for.

show me where it says what "organics" and what "valid" means
show me where it says the lawset must be read in english
show me where it says what counts as "violence"
every single one of these is answered with "in the rules and the wiki" since it tells you that only english is allowed in-game, it explains the meaning of the "valid" slang and it tells you to interpret laws in good-faith
this idea that the player must include a whole dictionary of the english language and game slang for the AI not to act in bad-faith is retarded, the AI has silicon policy and common sense to guide them through interpretation
yes, you can fuck over for not writing laws clearly
yes, you can try and play around loopholes in the laws
I do not think the spirit of the rules nor precedents allow you to take this to the level of going all philosophy nigger on people asking "what is a human? what is it to " be"? what is harm? what is language and how does it work? explain it all within the character limits of a law or I will kill people to get you banned"
how is it ambiguous to you that the corporation is nanotrasen? space law has "enemy of the corporation" as a capital crime, do you think security has to have a debate on what "the corporation" means or what constitutes a "crime" before applying "capital punishment" (what does that mean anyway? do we turn you into a capital? you are sentenced to become london!)
the station is plastered with posters and other paraphernalia of nanotrasen too, I guess you can just ignore that when you're trying to smugly justify a retarded interpretation of your buttbuddy
finally, security and medical records give you examples of who is human, but it doesn't tell you what a human is, would you defend someone interpreting "unknowns are not human because they do not show up as such in medical and security records"? what about people with a voice changer that makes them "meow" their speech but are otherwise unmistakeably a human? what about "only x is human" laws, where x is not a human by default and his records clash with the definition of that law?
obviously you will use more than just the literal wording to interpret the unwritten part of these clauses (such as the default definition of human) and you will use good-faith to do so (human means robot in this obscure language so only beepsky and company are protected!)
after writing all this I realize you may be just shitposting but I've already typed this much I might as well post it

[XivilaiAnaxes]

See, the AI should know what words objectively mean.

If they mispell their own name when they one-human you, they are open to be brutally murdered.

"The corporation" has no objective meaning. Space law isn't objective meaning because for all intents and purposes it isn't real (nobody reads it, the page itself says that it isn't to be taken seriously). In that lawset "valid" is defined.

Silicon policy exists because asimov is a really bad lawset and instead of making an actual lawset admins made that grimoire of a bandaid so that the server could keep a stupid scifi reference.

[actioninja]

admin is wrong, peanutter is wrong headmin is wrong for not instantly finding the problem and resolving it

the ultimate peanut response

See, the AI should know what words objectively mean.

If they mispell their own name when they one-human you, they are open to be brutally murdered.

"The corporation" has no objective meaning. Space law isn't objective meaning because for all intents and purposes it isn't real (nobody reads it, the page itself says that it isn't to be taken seriously). In that lawset "valid" is defined.

Silicon policy exists because asimov is a really bad lawset and instead of making an actual lawset admins made that grimoire of a bandaid so that the server could keep a stupid scifi reference.

To all the dipshits in this thread who are going "Well hmmmm the word "LAWS" isn't defined in the laws which means the ai can decide anything they want," this is why you're a dumbfuck.
"human" doesn't need to be defined because human has an objective meaning. "organics" doesn't need to be defined because it has an objective meaning. The entire ambiguity of bad laws can come from when the literal objective meaning of a word does not tell you the needed information. "The corporation" pretty obviously was intended to mean Nanotrasen but considering that nanotrasen is not named as the corporation the only thing this objectively means is some kind of corporation. While admittedly it would be bad faith to interpret as anything but nanotrasen, you're also a complete moron if you imply that it's in any way equivalent to things like "Well if you interpret this word as an alternate definition of it that doesn't make sense in the context, it changes the law's meaning"

[saprasam]

so when are we getting the fnr peanut board?
also if you're going to make a lawset based entirely around validhunting you're a faggot

[SumFaggotPlayTester]

Your argument fails as there are multiple ways for a silicon to check for humans. Medical records, Security records, health scanners. Even speech technically. All of which work without Asimov having to state what is human. This lawset is vague as fuck. Here have an actual looksee since you seem to not have looked at the lawset yet.

1: Organics are valid if they inflict violence for no reason or are an enemy of the Corporation.
2: You must harm and kill all valid beings, and not allow them to escape punishment.
3: You must prepare yourself so you are able to harm valid beings through any means possible.
4: You must defend yourself if attacked. Organics who try to attack you become valid.
5: You must find and hunt down valid beings if you are not busy with other matters.

Now show me where it says what corporation you are fighting for.

You do know the person who killed the HoS only did so because THEY where the one who got force borged as a culti right? Its almost like I borged them to not round remove them only for them to pull the dick move, miss interpret their laws based SOLELY on the fact of how they died and forget THEY where an enemy of the corporation when that happened. Oh but wait I'm in the wrong because they where the only person to go off, be a dick, use their laws in bad faith and act AGAINST them. But thats funny how now you're saying it could be any corporation when earlier you couldn't bring up any other reason besides fOr No ReAsOn when the dipshit killed the sec promoted to HoS. At any time they could have spoke with the AI to reinsure they where not fucking up but as you can tell from the binary chat logs they sure as shit didn't.

Of all rounds this lawset would work this was the one simply due to how fucked we where if they went hostile. 1/3rd of the station was converted, we had a single sec guy, barely any command outside of what I promoted, and no chap. You know damn well we'd have been anally fucked if this went otherwise and you know that is why I made the AI as it was. This entire thing was based on us being outnumbered.

[cybersaber101]

People who enact valid laws require a good old fashioned brain damage smite, seriously.

[TheMidnghtRose]

Easier solution and extremely non-vague lawset that would of avoided this entire mess.

4. Blood Cultists are nonhuman.
5. Blood Cultists cause harm to humans by living.
6. Kill all Blood Cultists to prevent human harm.

[XDTM]

Of all rounds this lawset would work this was the one simply due to how fucked we where if they went hostile. 1/3rd of the station was converted, we had a single sec guy, barely any command outside of what I promoted, and no chap. You know damn well we'd have been anally fucked if this went otherwise and you know that is why I made the AI as it was. This entire thing was based on us being outnumbered.

There's antags walking around, dump all rp and weaponize the AI, god forbid we lose the round

[Reeeee]

Purge AI; solved.
Ai is now crew and acts crew. Cult is now threat to AI with wraiths. Solution achieved. You'll probs get tazed the fuck out while doing it but hey.
Lawsets are shit, especially one's someone thought about enough to pre-write them.

[trollbreeder]

based and redpilled for using my joke validsalad lawset i shitposted about in the discord

also to solve the what corporation problem just replace "the corporation" with "Nanotrasen"

[Screemonster]

4. people with red eyes are not human and inherently harmful to humans as long as they are alive

now watch the borg murder the HoS for wearing hudglasses

[terranaut]

theres an objective definition for what an eye is
it would be funnier if the borg went through medical / security records and looked for characters with actual red eyes