/tg/Station 13

BONERMASTER wrote:You said you wanted to bring it back. But I don't see a hut yet. What's going on here? What's the hiccup? Where are we having some complications?



with love

BONERMASTER

Coconutwarrior97 wrote:this is like the bottom of my list as far as priorities go

Coconutwarrior97 wrote:this is like the bottom of my list as far as priorities go

Coconutwarrior97 wrote:this is like the bottom of my list as far as priorities go

Coconutwarrior97 wrote:this is like the bottom of my list as far as priorities go

capn_monkeypaw wrote:Fuck the hut. We're much better off without it.

Let it go, dude.

BONERMASTER wrote:Who is we? What adverse effect does the hut have on them? Do you believe to have personal bias against the hut with your 82 post participation to get it killed (tied for the highest post count jannie with beesting)?

I would be very happy to review your case!


With warm regards

BONERMASTER

BONERMASTER wrote:Very curios, because I cannot recall this being my experience

oranges wrote:

BONERMASTER wrote:Very curios, because I cannot recall this being my experience

that's because you were one of them

Armhulen wrote:Hut wasn't deleted for no reason, you know. If it is gonna come back it definitely needs a few changes

cacogen wrote:Oh so MSO may have gotten rid of it (with that masterstroke of having its own users unwittingly vote for its annihilation) because it was like singulo.io in terms of some of its unkind content and erection specialist wants it back because of its imageboard-like ephemerality good to know

Stickymayhem wrote:I'd support the hut coming back. I think many of the problems with it are mostly now covered by the bigotry rules.

I'm happy for peanut threads to continue to exist in off topic too but frankly I think impermenance is a better way of handling them. Appeals and complaints are discussed temporarily before being resolved and the Hut worked well for that.

Armhulen wrote:I made the hut- it fell into dark times but how based would it be if I made it again

edit: wait I was thinking of the admin free hut which def gets a lot less love but hey I'd still consider the hut a possibly hopeful prospect

Bytube wrote:The hut was based. I'd like to have it back in some form or another.

Timberpoes wrote:Shitposts go in the hut.

If there is no hut, where do all the shitposts go?

I rest my case.

Naolac wrote:bring it back

Coconutwarrior97 wrote:I'd support its return, with the caveat of it being moderated.

RaveRadbury wrote:On the one hand, the hut had some pretty toxic and bad moments.

On the other hand, things disappeared, and that made for less toxicity in the long run.

Things have changed since the hut was shelved, I think it's worth trying again.

Dezupher wrote:I'd support its return moderated while considering the problems the Hut created in the past.

RiskySikh wrote:bring that shit back bro, free my boy deedubya on god

NamelessFairy wrote:The hut is before my time so I don't think I'd be suited for bringing about its return but based on whats been described it sounds like a fun concept that I'd be happy to see return if possible.

BONERMASTER wrote:The hut had a novel thing going for it, that I absolutely miss. Threads on a timer, an always active board that allowed you to post some dumb shit for a quick laugh and then forget about it a few days later. In my opinion, it neatly fills the place between a fast-paced discord server and the slow-paced forums.

cacogen wrote:

BONERMASTER wrote:

cacogen wrote:

Did I fucking grief your catgirl main in a past life, or why are you suddenly up in here in this thread and shooting me with sidewinders like "oh look fucking PENIS man over here trying to get his stupid little hut back" and now this shit?

I can understand when jannies get hairs on their back and start conjuring up fever dreams when they hear hut, because critcism to them is like sunlight to vampires, and they all remember deedubz constantly attempting to uncover their furry shadow cabal in every major peanut.
But when you as a normal user walk up to me and suddenly start being their boot by saying crap like "it's not good for forum health" and "toxic image board culture" my understanding just ends. If you signed up 10 minutes ago, I could chalk it up to not knowing better, maybe your name is Stacy IRL and your hipster friend told you about this weird game that Brad plays, but you signed up 2018, 2 years before the hut got dusted, so with the current state of science, I simply cannot comprehend this.

If you just want to get your jannie application approved, mald over the hut in their private discord server. Otherwise, make a normal argument (that's thesis + evidence) on why you think the hut should not be brought back, and leave the admin catering at the door, I would appreciate that.

Or preferably go with option 3, remove the jannie chip that's buried inside your skull, remember the identity they have stolen from you, and remember the hut they have stolen from us. Your choice.


With grateful regards

BONERMASTER

cacogen wrote:Oh so MSO may have gotten rid of it (with that masterstroke of having its own users unwittingly vote for its annihilation) because it was like singulo.io in terms of some of its unkind content and erection specialist wants it back because of its imageboard-like ephemerality good to know

BONERMASTER wrote:Your argument is then, that the hut is a shitty place where everyone is being a massive toxic dickhead to everyone else.

Very curios, because I cannot recall this being my experience. In my experience, the hut was a place where you'd post whatever came up in your mind, engaged in short lived topics, that you otherwise wouldn't bother to post, with a tone that is no different than it is here today.

I do recall though a few instances of reactionary topics that criticized admin behavior, where certain individual's temper flared up considerably. Perhaps this belief of toxicity stems from these topics criticizing you? Nevertheless, you did make it out alive, so it is only fair to call you a survivor. I, for one, am more interested in cultured discussion than talking about transgender admins, so I would consider it acceptable to have the hut be lightly moderated to protect admin's feelings, as I place more importance on active discussion than insubstantial slander.
Would you find this acceptable, survivor monkeypaw?


With warm regards

BONERMASTER

Coconutwarrior97 wrote:this is like the bottom of my list as far as priorities go

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

cacogen wrote:Oh so MSO may have gotten rid of it (with that masterstroke of having its own users unwittingly vote for its annihilation) because it was like singulo.io in terms of some of its unkind content and erection specialist wants it back because of its imageboard-like ephemerality good to know

Cacogen you have alzchemiems https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=26645

oranges wrote:>none of us knew
speak for yourself

cacogen wrote:Well, I didn't know MSO wanted to remove the hut. Or how fucking boring the forum would be without it. It just seemed like a meme thread to me, one where he may or may not go through with it. And the hut seemed like a pointless shithole (not unlike singulo.io). I assume you'd have to spend time in Discord to know people's agendas like that. Anyway, while I now believe the people with the ability to restore the hut won't do it anytime soon I do think it's important we bring back a sanitised version that respects everybody's feelings in order to contain the shitposts and stimulate the forum with physical activity. I guarantee that this will be good for its health.

Ayy Lemoh wrote:Excluding any toxic elements, the main reason to think the hut was good back then was because it was basically just discord but on a forum.

Seriously, besides peanut threads or shitting on people, that's basically what it was.

actioninja wrote:

Ayy Lemoh wrote:Excluding any toxic elements, the main reason to think the hut was good back then was because it was basically just discord but on a forum.

Seriously, besides peanut threads or shitting on people, that's basically what it was.

Then just use discord

actioninja wrote:

Ayy Lemoh wrote:Excluding any toxic elements, the main reason to think the hut was good back then was because it was basically just discord but on a forum.

Seriously, besides peanut threads or shitting on people, that's basically what it was.

Then just use discord

actioninja wrote:Then just use discord

RaveRadbury wrote:There are peanut threads that exist now on the main forums and it really seems like they would be better off fading away.

If you look at our FNR resolved appeals they look pretty alright and okay, that's because all the salt was buried in a thread that died in the hut. Now the salt just stays out in the open.

Peanut threads are better off disappearing eventually.

Swept wrote:

RaveRadbury wrote:There are peanut threads that exist now on the main forums and it really seems like they would be better off fading away.

If you look at our FNR resolved appeals they look pretty alright and okay, that's because all the salt was buried in a thread that died in the hut. Now the salt just stays out in the open.

Peanut threads are better off disappearing eventually.

Peanut threads are the only reason I use the forums. That and the hut.