Headmin Elections General
:):):):)autumn sinnow:):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):)
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
dezzmont wrote:I am one of sawrge's alt accounts
dezzmont wrote:sawrge has it right.
Connor wrote:miggles is correct though
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
The part that drives me insane here is that it's true.paprika wrote:the chances one of them are friends with said admin is so fucking high I doubt any admins will be removed as per usual because nobody likes to step on toes
It all depends on severity, really. If an admin's behavior can be corrected in a civil manner (simply speaking with them) then we should do just that. Serious or repeat issues after they've already been spoken to should be met with a significantly harsher response (temp/perma deadminning, admin-bans, restricting-permissions). After all, one bad admin makes the rest of us look bad, and violates the trust we should have with the players.miggles wrote:question to all candidates: what do you plan to do about taking action against admins who have made mistakes or abused power
current forms of punishment are limited to stern talkings to and warnings which are often ignored
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
this really does not seem at all different than the current processIkarrus wrote:It all depends on severity, really. If an admin's behavior can be corrected in a civil manner (simply speaking with them) then we should do just that. Serious or repeat issues after they've already been spoken to should be met with a significantly harsher response (temp/perma deadminning, admin-bans, restricting-permissions). After all, one bad admin makes the rest of us look bad, and violates the trust we should have with the players.miggles wrote:question to all candidates: what do you plan to do about taking action against admins who have made mistakes or abused power
current forms of punishment are limited to stern talkings to and warnings which are often ignored
Historically, though, deadminning or even temp-deadminning anyone is guaranteed to cause a massive amount of drama (Terranaut & Elyina are some examples off the top of my head), so I can understand why it's been avoided. It also doesn't help that the last year or so headmins didn't have remote access, limiting their influence to admin-bans.
Really though, I think it's a process that should involve all the headmins, adminbus in general, and possibly even SOS, rather than one angry headmin. Reasonable and thorough discourse should be attempted first and foremost, but in a prompt manner.
dezzmont wrote:I am one of sawrge's alt accounts
dezzmont wrote:sawrge has it right.
Connor wrote:miggles is correct though
dezzmont wrote:I am one of sawrge's alt accounts
dezzmont wrote:sawrge has it right.
Connor wrote:miggles is correct though
dezzmont wrote:I am one of sawrge's alt accounts
dezzmont wrote:sawrge has it right.
Connor wrote:miggles is correct though
dezzmont wrote:I am one of sawrge's alt accounts
dezzmont wrote:sawrge has it right.
Connor wrote:miggles is correct though
Bluespace wrote:Yeah brotemis is right
Bad players are terrible admins
Absolutely
Terrible
No.geilebeer wrote:Is spacemanspark even an admin.
:):):):)autumn sinnow:):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):) Can you literally fuck off?An0n3 wrote:At any rate the biggest problem plaguing /tg/station these days is our godawful playerbase.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
They have a lot more choice than you're aware of. CDB is an example of what happens when the playerbase tries its hardest against a high-profile admin while the adminbus tries its hardest to keep them around.paprika wrote:Players don't elect admins lmfao
:):):):)autumn sinnow:):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):) 
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
dezzmont wrote:I am one of sawrge's alt accounts
dezzmont wrote:sawrge has it right.
Connor wrote:miggles is correct though
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
