Moderators: In-Game Game Master, In-Game Head Admins
trollbreeder wrote:Why not just put every server on the hub at this point?
trollbreeder wrote:Why not just put every server on the hub at this point?
jackrip wrote:Majority of players are appearing on sybil because sybil is where the players are at. That is because it is on the hub and bagil is not. When sybil was not on the hub it was basically equal / slightly less pop than bagil. As soon as it was put on the hub the pop shot up.
Either remove sybil from the hub (my preferred) or add bagil (and remove the bunker).
Armhulen wrote:Wrong. Sybil was consistently hitting <10 players, we could have bobbahbrown look at avg player counts for when sybil wasn't hubbed to prove/disprove this
Armhulen wrote:jackrip wrote:Majority of players are appearing on sybil because sybil is where the players are at. That is because it is on the hub and bagil is not. When sybil was not on the hub it was basically equal / slightly less pop than bagil. As soon as it was put on the hub the pop shot up.
Either remove sybil from the hub (my preferred) or add bagil (and remove the bunker).
Wrong. Sybil was consistently hitting <10 players, we could have bobbahbrown look at avg player counts for when sybil wasn't hubbed to prove/disprove this
jackrip wrote:Armhulen wrote:jackrip wrote:Majority of players are appearing on sybil because sybil is where the players are at. That is because it is on the hub and bagil is not. When sybil was not on the hub it was basically equal / slightly less pop than bagil. As soon as it was put on the hub the pop shot up.
Either remove sybil from the hub (my preferred) or add bagil (and remove the bunker).
Wrong. Sybil was consistently hitting <10 players, we could have bobbahbrown look at avg player counts for when sybil wasn't hubbed to prove/disprove this
What was wrong with my statement? When exactly was sybil put on the hub?
Armhulen wrote:jackrip wrote:Armhulen wrote:jackrip wrote:Majority of players are appearing on sybil because sybil is where the players are at. That is because it is on the hub and bagil is not. When sybil was not on the hub it was basically equal / slightly less pop than bagil. As soon as it was put on the hub the pop shot up.
Either remove sybil from the hub (my preferred) or add bagil (and remove the bunker).
Wrong. Sybil was consistently hitting <10 players, we could have bobbahbrown look at avg player counts for when sybil wasn't hubbed to prove/disprove this
What was wrong with my statement? When exactly was sybil put on the hub?
i wanna say not soon after new headmins were picked, they changed a lotta stuff with configs.
Cobby wrote:being on the hub helps existing pop, it doesn't revive pop as seen with sybil (although tbf it was named lowpop so it prob dissuaded people from joining). The issue is the people who played bagil play nigh-exclusively for the pop and not because it's bagil so just go to sybil since it will be the equivalent to the experience you'd have if bagil was hubbed and with players.
Sybil has been on the hub for a while fyi, it just wasnt populated because of above.
Reeeee wrote:imagine having enough pop to populate two servers, much less four and a containment server.
I doubt we would get players to have three running much less the five and spares community is attempting to.
SSethtiders were never permanent pop so i imagine about three is where we will land up in at the end of this.
And doubt not, the end is near.
IT IS COMING ON WHEELS OF FIRE AND THINGS MAKING SLIGHTLY DEFLATED SOUND.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users