specify the specific bounds of the new 'anti-cum' policies

Locked
User avatar
bobbahbrown
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2014 1:04 am
Byond Username: Bobbahbrown
Location: canada
Contact:

specify the specific bounds of the new 'anti-cum' policies

Post by bobbahbrown » #633571

good evening,

this post is a formal request for the 'discord janitors' (hereinafter jannies) to clarify what they mean by '...This post is the final time you can react with "CUM" or any similar semen themed reactions..." (hulkamania, discord).

this ruling is both spontaneous, with no merit other than a verbal claim of 'the head admins support this' (paraphrasing), meanwhile the public is left in the dark as to what is or isn't bannable under this new draconian policy. we need a specific wording introduced to the official /tg/station discord rules to give any basis to these claims, and i would request that it be done so in a manner that addresses the issues of both ambiguity (is this policy applying to the entire discord? the newsbus channel?) and severity of punishment (are we punishing members of the discord appropriately for their 'pro-cum' standings?)

i trust that this bureaucratic-minded administration will respond in good time with a response to match the people's concerns with this new policy. i would ask that the public refrain from reacting any semen-derived messages to this post for the time being to prevent formal administrative warnings and action against them.

best wishes,
bobbah 'bee' brown
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

The information contained in this post is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you received this post in error, please notify the sender by reply post and delete and destroy the message.

L’information contenue dans ce message est destinée exclusivement aux personnes ou aux entités auxquelles le message est adressé. Le contenu de ce message (y compris toute pièce jointe) peut renfermer de l’information confidentielle et / ou privilégiée. Si ce message ne vous est pas destiné, vous ne pouvez utiliser, divulguer, diffuser, copier ou imprimer son contenu. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur en lui faisant parvenir une réponse. De plus, veuillez supprimer et détruire le message.
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: specify the specific bounds of the new 'anti-cum' policies

Post by oranges » #633574

that's the "headmins fucking up the communication of a new policy on day one of their regime" bingo square crossed off.
User avatar
MrStonedOne
Host
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:56 pm
Byond Username: MrStonedOne
Github Username: MrStonedOne

Re: specify the specific bounds of the new 'anti-cum' policies

Post by MrStonedOne » #633576

No.

The ambiguity is intentional and allows us to enforce the rule in a matter based on what uses are annoying enough to warrant enforcement.

The only ones who can expect to get bans before very clear warnings are ones who are obviously acting in defiance to the rule.
Forum/Wiki Administrator, Server host, Database King, Master Coder
MrStonedOne on digg(banned), Steam, IRC, Skype Discord. (!vAKvpFcksg)
Image
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users