Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform
- Itseasytosee2me
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:14 am
- Byond Username: Rectification
- Location: Space Station 13
Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform
Why even bother instead of just locking them up?
- Sincerely itseasytosee
See you later
See you later
- dragomagol
- In-Game Head Admin
- Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 11:04 pm
- Byond Username: Dragomagol
Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform
Because it's easier to see all of the open policy threads instead of wading through a combination of open and closed threads
- Cheshify
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2020 6:42 pm
- Byond Username: Cheshify
Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform
When I want to see active policy threads, I don't want to see resolved ones
When I want to see resolved policy threads with rulings, I don't want to see active ones.
When I want to see resolved policy threads with rulings, I don't want to see active ones.
- NamelessFairy
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2020 8:40 pm
- Byond Username: NamelessFairy
Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform
Alternative proposal, Closed Policy should be archived policy and separate "Active Policy" (but with a better name) subforum is created alongside it, which only shows rulings that are still active. Overruled, reclarified or fully denied policy threads can remain in the archive for record keeping sake while the active policy subforum can hold any information that might be useful. This would also be a great opportunity to discover policy rulings from years ago that might be in need of a review as times have changed.
- Itseasytosee2me
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:14 am
- Byond Username: Rectification
- Location: Space Station 13
Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform
Yeah that’s a better nameNamelessFairy wrote: ↑Wed Nov 30, 2022 5:46 pm Alternative proposal, Closed Policy should be archived policy and separate "Active Policy" (but with a better name) subforum is created alongside it, which only shows rulings that are still active. Overruled, reclarified or fully denied policy threads can remain in the archive for record keeping sake while the active policy subforum can hold any information that might be useful. This would also be a great opportunity to discover policy rulings from years ago that might be in need of a review as times have changed.
- Sincerely itseasytosee
See you later
See you later
- san7890
- In-Game Game Master
- Joined: Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:12 pm
- Byond Username: San7890
- Github Username: san7890
- Location: here
- Contact:
Re: Get rid of the “Closed policy discussion” subform
This change was implemented this term (approved unanimously), so we think it should remain for at least the remainder of this term.
Simultaneously making both the best and worst jokes on the internet. I like looking at maps and code. Learn how to map today!. You may rate me here.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users