IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
http://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=445
So is this policy now? Seems very hugbox to me.
So is this policy now? Seems very hugbox to me.
AliasTakuto wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:24 pm
- Byond Username: Aurx
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
IEDing security five minutes in is supposed to be anything other than dickish? Breaking the brig such that fixing it requires help from engineers who may or may not be willing to help is just all fine and dandy? Greytiding is supposed to be the norm now?Vekter wrote:http://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=445
So is this policy now? Seems very hugbox to me.
You're an IDIOT. This has been policy basically since IEDs became a thing.
Nice buzzword, by the way.
Head admin, /vg/station
Game admin, /tg/station
POMF FOR HEADMIN
Game admin, /tg/station
POMF FOR HEADMIN
- ShizCalev
- Code Maintainer
- Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:12 am
- Byond Username: ShizCalev
- Github Username: ShizCalev
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
IED'ing security and attacking them for the sole reason of LOLICAN is both very dicky and an epitome of greytiding.
-
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:40 pm
- Byond Username: Lo6a4evskiy
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Yes, absolutely, this is true.Aurx wrote:You're an IDIOT.
This also happens to be true.Aurx wrote:This has been policy basically since IEDs became a thing.
However
Aurx wrote:Nice buzzword, by the way.
Seriously?Aurx wrote:Greytiding
- Psyentific
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:44 am
- Byond Username: Psyentific
- Location: Vancouver, Canada
- Contact:
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Tossing IEDs at the brig at roundstart is bannable, yes - It's greytide as fuck.
I haven't logged into SS13 in at least a year.
- Pandarsenic
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
- Byond Username: Pandarsenic
- Location: AI Upload
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Destroying parts of the brig unprompted is, in fact, Not Okay.
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
- imblyings
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
- Byond Username: Ausops
- Location: >using suit sensors
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
can we on the spot execute ied throwers throwing ieds at the brig then
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
-
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:24 pm
- Byond Username: Aurx
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Greytiding is a formally defined term used in administrative matters. Hugbox is just there to serve as an ad hominem in a single word.Lo6a4evskiy wrote:Aurx wrote:Nice buzzword, by the way.Seriously?Aurx wrote:Greytiding
Head admin, /vg/station
Game admin, /tg/station
POMF FOR HEADMIN
Game admin, /tg/station
POMF FOR HEADMIN
- danno
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:07 pm
- Byond Username: Dannno
- Location: e-mail me if you want a pizza roll
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
>greytiding
>buzzword
what?? that's not a buzzword
"hugbox" is an infamous buzzword, greytiding is an accurate term for something that happens frequently and observably in the gaame
>buzzword
what?? that's not a buzzword
"hugbox" is an infamous buzzword, greytiding is an accurate term for something that happens frequently and observably in the gaame
-
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:40 pm
- Byond Username: Lo6a4evskiy
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Well, from what definition of "buzzword" I could google:
1. A word or phrase connected with a specialized field or group that usually sounds important or technical and is used primarily to impress laypersons.
2. A stylish or trendy word or phrase.
greytiding fits if you ask me.
But who cares anyway
1. A word or phrase connected with a specialized field or group that usually sounds important or technical and is used primarily to impress laypersons.
2. A stylish or trendy word or phrase.
greytiding fits if you ask me.
But who cares anyway
- Pandarsenic
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
- Byond Username: Pandarsenic
- Location: AI Upload
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
I wouldn't hate seeing them thrown in perma on the spot if they fuck up a cell. Double points if you tell them "Sorry, you ruined our normal cells" while emoting how saccharine your tone is.imblyings wrote:can we on the spot execute ied throwers throwing ieds at the brig then
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
- paprika
- Rarely plays
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
- Byond Username: Paprka
- Location: in down bad
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Fun fact you can permabrig someone for intentionally exposing an area to space AKA those idiots who grey tide IED windows.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
- Psyentific
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:44 am
- Byond Username: Psyentific
- Location: Vancouver, Canada
- Contact:
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Grey Tide - The tendency of the station's Assistants to vastly outnumber Security and to antagonize or harass security, commit petty crimes, interfere with security, or otherwise make their job harder, often for its own sake. A mundane example would be stungloving an officer who has his baton/taser out, or who is transporting a prisoner. An extreme example would be a swarm of assistants outside the brig beating down the windows.Lo6a4evskiy wrote:Well, from what definition of "buzzword" I could google:
1. A word or phrase connected with a specialized field or group that usually sounds important or technical and is used primarily to impress laypersons.
2. A stylish or trendy word or phrase.
greytiding fits if you ask me.
But who cares anyway
I haven't logged into SS13 in at least a year.
- danno
- Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:07 pm
- Byond Username: Dannno
- Location: e-mail me if you want a pizza roll
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
just perma/gulag them
no need for execution you psycho
no need for execution you psycho
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
This was my point. Can't this be handled in character?paprika wrote:Fun fact you can permabrig someone for intentionally exposing an area to space AKA those idiots who grey tide IED windows.
AliasTakuto wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
- MisterPerson
- Board Moderator
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
- Byond Username: MisterPerson
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Handling a situation ICly doesn't make the OOC player stop being a shit, which is what the admins are here to do.
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
I more intended that it'd be the kind of thing someone would get a note for, maybe a verbal slap and a permabrigging. If they make a constant habit of it, THEN do something about it.MisterPerson wrote:Handling a situation ICly doesn't make the OOC player stop being a shit, which is what the admins are here to do.
AliasTakuto wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
- Antonkr
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:28 pm
- Byond Username: Antonkr
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Basic issue with IEDing the brig is that it entirely hampers security's ability to deal with criminals, as cells get damaged/destroyed and it's just a generally dick thing to do. That's basically why the policy is set in place to prevent that.
No longer an admin by own free will. Feel free to add me on steam.
- bandit
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:35 pm
- Byond Username: Bgobandit
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
IEDs used as graytiding tools have been bannable basically from the minute they were implemented. I'm 75% sure this actually came from SoS, too.
- Hornygranny
- Horny Police
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:54 pm
- Byond Username: Hornygranny
- Vekter
- In-Game Admin
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
- Byond Username: Vekter
- Location: Fucking around with the engine.
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
I'm still surprised we don't have an admin decision/ruling forum. Case closed then, lock it up.Hornygranny wrote:Yes, it did.
AliasTakuto wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
- paprika
- Rarely plays
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
- Byond Username: Paprka
- Location: in down bad
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Metastation has blast doors the warden can close where the cell windows are if IEDs fuck them up. The only thing that's broken by IEDing cells on metastation is the ability to visit prisoners in the cells.
Why the FUCK don't people take more hints from metastation?
Why the FUCK don't people take more hints from metastation?
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
- Steelpoint
- Github User
- Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:37 pm
- Byond Username: Steelpoint
- Github Username: Steelpoint
- Location: The Armoury
- Pandarsenic
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
- Byond Username: Pandarsenic
- Location: AI Upload
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
The problem is the blast doors lock down more than just that and they're not selective. They're extremely inconvenient to have active.
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
- paprika
- Rarely plays
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
- Byond Username: Paprka
- Location: in down bad
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
When has it ever been a problem anywhere but security.
OH SHIT YOU GUYS, ATMOS TECHS HAVE TO REPAIR DAMAGE TO ATMOS PIPING, FUCKING BAN THOSE GREYSHITS RULE 1
OH SHIT YOU GUYS, ATMOS TECHS HAVE TO REPAIR DAMAGE TO ATMOS PIPING, FUCKING BAN THOSE GREYSHITS RULE 1
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
- leibniz
- Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 6:21 pm
- Byond Username: Leibniz
- Location: Seeking help
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
It is annoying when they break an APC.paprika wrote:When has it ever been a problem anywhere but security.
OH SHIT YOU GUYS, ATMOS TECHS HAVE TO REPAIR DAMAGE TO ATMOS PIPING, FUCKING BAN THOSE GREYSHITS RULE 1
Founder and only member of the "Whitelist Nukeops" movement
-
- Rarely plays
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:26 pm
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Yah, APCs are a fucking pain to fix.
I am located here, lurking in your posts, leaving piles of transparent wordings and being confused. Oh, I also try to map...
This, this is an example of what I leave for you.
Also, these days I mostly play Ursit McStation, mostly because I like roleplay.
This, this is an example of what I leave for you.
Also, these days I mostly play Ursit McStation, mostly because I like roleplay.
- Antonkr
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:28 pm
- Byond Username: Antonkr
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
The only reason IEDs are not used extensively against security is because it is easy as shit to see someone doing it in the adminlogs, and people got banned for it a LOT before it stopped being so common. Also, it's one thing if it poses a small problem for the engineering team, but an assistant can make IEDs faster then pipes wires and APCs get fixed.paprika wrote:When has it ever been a problem anywhere but security.
OH SHIT YOU GUYS, ATMOS TECHS HAVE TO REPAIR DAMAGE TO ATMOS PIPING, FUCKING BAN THOSE GREYSHITS RULE 1
No longer an admin by own free will. Feel free to add me on steam.
-
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:40 pm
- Byond Username: Lo6a4evskiy
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Well shit's supposed to be easier to destroy than to fix.
- Antonkr
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:28 pm
- Byond Username: Antonkr
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
That's still not an excuse to allow people to be dicks to security, and engineering without a good reason.Lo6a4evskiy wrote:Well shit's supposed to be easier to destroy than to fix.
No longer an admin by own free will. Feel free to add me on steam.
-
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:40 pm
- Byond Username: Lo6a4evskiy
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
err, who's allowing them?
ban people who do it
what's the fucking problem, do we have to remove all weapons now because somebody might start murdering others as non-antag?
ban people who do it
what's the fucking problem, do we have to remove all weapons now because somebody might start murdering others as non-antag?
- Antonkr
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:28 pm
- Byond Username: Antonkr
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
That was in response to the thread proposing looser punishment for it. People are banned for it and I ban for it.Lo6a4evskiy wrote:err, who's allowing them?
ban people who do it
what's the fucking problem, do we have to remove all weapons now because somebody might start murdering others as non-antag?
No longer an admin by own free will. Feel free to add me on steam.
- peoplearestrange
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:02 pm
- Byond Username: Peoplearestrange
- Location: UK
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
I think this thread has been answered now. Can we please lock it.
Whatever
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:47 pm
- Byond Username: Callanrockslol
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
There is always a need for execution.danno wrote:no need for execution you psycho
Always.
The most excessive signature on /tg/station13.
Still not even at the limit after 8 fucking years.
The evil holoparasite user I can't believe its not DIO and his holoparasite I can't believe its not Skub have been defeated by the Spacedust Crusaders, but what has been taken from the station can never be returned.
OOC: TheGel: Literally a guy in a suit with a shuttle full of xenos. That's a doozy
Still not even at the limit after 8 fucking years.
Spoiler:
OOC: TheGel: Literally a guy in a suit with a shuttle full of xenos. That's a doozy
- paprika
- Rarely plays
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
- Byond Username: Paprka
- Location: in down bad
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
You're not making box fans look any better. I made a legitimate reason for the difference in the maps being a huge deal gameplay-wise and you do this shit.
Anyway like I said, metastation's brig shutters can be selectively closed on the cell windows so grey tide IEDing the brig is way less of a big deal as it doesn't destroy cell functionality on metastation, which is something people have been saying it does. This subforum is for -both- servers, ikarrus.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
-
- Rarely plays
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:26 pm
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Talking about brig shutters is a map war now?
Why shutters arent off topic is in the spoiler.
Spoiler:
I am located here, lurking in your posts, leaving piles of transparent wordings and being confused. Oh, I also try to map...
This, this is an example of what I leave for you.
Also, these days I mostly play Ursit McStation, mostly because I like roleplay.
This, this is an example of what I leave for you.
Also, these days I mostly play Ursit McStation, mostly because I like roleplay.
- Ikarrus
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:17 am
- Byond Username: Ikarrus
- Github Username: Ikarrus
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
If you want to talk about it then you can talk about it without the insults.
I did close more than what was warranted, and I'd like to restore a couple of them, but mods lack the ability to 'un-delete' things.
If you have any other concerns, please take it to PMs with me or a site admin, because I don't want to further sidetrack on-topic discussion.
I did close more than what was warranted, and I'd like to restore a couple of them, but mods lack the ability to 'un-delete' things.
If you have any other concerns, please take it to PMs with me or a site admin, because I don't want to further sidetrack on-topic discussion.
Former Dev/Headmin
Who is this guy?
Who is this guy?
- paprika
- Rarely plays
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
- Byond Username: Paprka
- Location: in down bad
Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?
Sorry I agree I was turning into a jerk and since you're like the only one who actively works on fixing boxstation's outdated things, I probably shouldn't have. I posted my suggestion in the boxstation feedback thread and hopefully it'll cull the tide a bit.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users