IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Locked
User avatar
Vekter
In-Game Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
Byond Username: Vekter
Location: Fucking around with the engine.

IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Vekter » #6637

http://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=445

So is this policy now? Seems very hugbox to me.
AliasTakuto wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
Reply PM from-REDACTED/(REDACTED): i tried to remove the bruises by changing her gender

PM: Bluespace->Delaron: Nobody wants a mime's asscheeks farting on their brig windows.

PM: REDACTED->HotelBravoLima: Oh come on, knowing that these are hostile aliens is metagaming

[17:43] <Aranclanos> any other question ping me again
[17:43] <Vekter> Aranclanos for nicest coder 2015
[17:44] <Aranclanos> fuck you
Aurx
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:24 pm
Byond Username: Aurx

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Aurx » #6639

Vekter wrote:http://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=445

So is this policy now? Seems very hugbox to me.
IEDing security five minutes in is supposed to be anything other than dickish? Breaking the brig such that fixing it requires help from engineers who may or may not be willing to help is just all fine and dandy? Greytiding is supposed to be the norm now?

You're an IDIOT. This has been policy basically since IEDs became a thing.
Nice buzzword, by the way.
Head admin, /vg/station
Game admin, /tg/station
POMF FOR HEADMIN
User avatar
ShizCalev
Code Maintainer
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:12 am
Byond Username: ShizCalev
Github Username: ShizCalev

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by ShizCalev » #6641

IED'ing security and attacking them for the sole reason of LOLICAN is both very dicky and an epitome of greytiding.
ImageImage
>Be ling
>Spread misinformation about how SM works to sabotage it
OOC: ChemicalRascal: Lying about game mechanics in relation to an engine that is poorly understood by most isn't cool, though
Lo6a4evskiy
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:40 pm
Byond Username: Lo6a4evskiy

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Lo6a4evskiy » #6642

Aurx wrote:You're an IDIOT.
Yes, absolutely, this is true.
Aurx wrote:This has been policy basically since IEDs became a thing.
This also happens to be true.

However
Aurx wrote:Nice buzzword, by the way.
Aurx wrote:Greytiding
Seriously?
User avatar
Psyentific
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:44 am
Byond Username: Psyentific
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Psyentific » #6644

Tossing IEDs at the brig at roundstart is bannable, yes - It's greytide as fuck.
I haven't logged into SS13 in at least a year.
User avatar
Pandarsenic
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
Byond Username: Pandarsenic
Location: AI Upload

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Pandarsenic » #6648

Destroying parts of the brig unprompted is, in fact, Not Okay.
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
User avatar
imblyings
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
Byond Username: Ausops
Location: >using suit sensors

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by imblyings » #6688

can we on the spot execute ied throwers throwing ieds at the brig then
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
Aurx
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:24 pm
Byond Username: Aurx

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Aurx » #6689

Lo6a4evskiy wrote:
Aurx wrote:Nice buzzword, by the way.
Aurx wrote:Greytiding
Seriously?
Greytiding is a formally defined term used in administrative matters. Hugbox is just there to serve as an ad hominem in a single word.
Head admin, /vg/station
Game admin, /tg/station
POMF FOR HEADMIN
User avatar
danno
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:07 pm
Byond Username: Dannno
Location: e-mail me if you want a pizza roll

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by danno » #6695

>greytiding
>buzzword

what?? that's not a buzzword
"hugbox" is an infamous buzzword, greytiding is an accurate term for something that happens frequently and observably in the gaame
Hornygranny wrote: wtf i like danno now
Image
I don't even play ss13 anymore, pretty much due to dannos stupid bullshit
Lo6a4evskiy
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:40 pm
Byond Username: Lo6a4evskiy

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Lo6a4evskiy » #6722

Well, from what definition of "buzzword" I could google:
1. A word or phrase connected with a specialized field or group that usually sounds important or technical and is used primarily to impress laypersons.
2. A stylish or trendy word or phrase.
greytiding fits if you ask me.

But who cares anyway
User avatar
Pandarsenic
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
Byond Username: Pandarsenic
Location: AI Upload

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Pandarsenic » #6724

imblyings wrote:can we on the spot execute ied throwers throwing ieds at the brig then
I wouldn't hate seeing them thrown in perma on the spot if they fuck up a cell. Double points if you tell them "Sorry, you ruined our normal cells" while emoting how saccharine your tone is.
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
User avatar
paprika
Rarely plays
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
Byond Username: Paprka
Location: in down bad

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by paprika » #6764

Fun fact you can permabrig someone for intentionally exposing an area to space AKA those idiots who grey tide IED windows.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
User avatar
Psyentific
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:44 am
Byond Username: Psyentific
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Psyentific » #6765

Lo6a4evskiy wrote:Well, from what definition of "buzzword" I could google:
1. A word or phrase connected with a specialized field or group that usually sounds important or technical and is used primarily to impress laypersons.
2. A stylish or trendy word or phrase.
greytiding fits if you ask me.

But who cares anyway
Grey Tide - The tendency of the station's Assistants to vastly outnumber Security and to antagonize or harass security, commit petty crimes, interfere with security, or otherwise make their job harder, often for its own sake. A mundane example would be stungloving an officer who has his baton/taser out, or who is transporting a prisoner. An extreme example would be a swarm of assistants outside the brig beating down the windows.
I haven't logged into SS13 in at least a year.
User avatar
danno
Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 5:07 pm
Byond Username: Dannno
Location: e-mail me if you want a pizza roll

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by danno » #6781

just perma/gulag them
no need for execution you psycho
Hornygranny wrote: wtf i like danno now
Image
I don't even play ss13 anymore, pretty much due to dannos stupid bullshit
User avatar
Vekter
In-Game Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
Byond Username: Vekter
Location: Fucking around with the engine.

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Vekter » #6834

paprika wrote:Fun fact you can permabrig someone for intentionally exposing an area to space AKA those idiots who grey tide IED windows.
This was my point. Can't this be handled in character?
AliasTakuto wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
Reply PM from-REDACTED/(REDACTED): i tried to remove the bruises by changing her gender

PM: Bluespace->Delaron: Nobody wants a mime's asscheeks farting on their brig windows.

PM: REDACTED->HotelBravoLima: Oh come on, knowing that these are hostile aliens is metagaming

[17:43] <Aranclanos> any other question ping me again
[17:43] <Vekter> Aranclanos for nicest coder 2015
[17:44] <Aranclanos> fuck you
User avatar
MisterPerson
Board Moderator
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:26 pm
Byond Username: MisterPerson

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by MisterPerson » #6844

Handling a situation ICly doesn't make the OOC player stop being a shit, which is what the admins are here to do.
I code for the code project and moderate the code sections of the forums.

Feedback is dumb and it doesn't matter
User avatar
Vekter
In-Game Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
Byond Username: Vekter
Location: Fucking around with the engine.

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Vekter » #6895

MisterPerson wrote:Handling a situation ICly doesn't make the OOC player stop being a shit, which is what the admins are here to do.
I more intended that it'd be the kind of thing someone would get a note for, maybe a verbal slap and a permabrigging. If they make a constant habit of it, THEN do something about it.
AliasTakuto wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
Reply PM from-REDACTED/(REDACTED): i tried to remove the bruises by changing her gender

PM: Bluespace->Delaron: Nobody wants a mime's asscheeks farting on their brig windows.

PM: REDACTED->HotelBravoLima: Oh come on, knowing that these are hostile aliens is metagaming

[17:43] <Aranclanos> any other question ping me again
[17:43] <Vekter> Aranclanos for nicest coder 2015
[17:44] <Aranclanos> fuck you
User avatar
Antonkr
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:28 pm
Byond Username: Antonkr

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Antonkr » #7021

Basic issue with IEDing the brig is that it entirely hampers security's ability to deal with criminals, as cells get damaged/destroyed and it's just a generally dick thing to do. That's basically why the policy is set in place to prevent that.
No longer an admin by own free will. Feel free to add me on steam.
User avatar
bandit
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:35 pm
Byond Username: Bgobandit

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by bandit » #7024

IEDs used as graytiding tools have been bannable basically from the minute they were implemented. I'm 75% sure this actually came from SoS, too.
"I don't see any difference between ERP and rape." -- erro

admin feedback pls
User avatar
Hornygranny
Horny Police
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 4:54 pm
Byond Username: Hornygranny

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Hornygranny » #7053

Yes, it did.
Image
User avatar
Vekter
In-Game Admin
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:25 pm
Byond Username: Vekter
Location: Fucking around with the engine.

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Vekter » #7121

Hornygranny wrote:Yes, it did.
I'm still surprised we don't have an admin decision/ruling forum. Case closed then, lock it up.
AliasTakuto wrote: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:11 pm As for the ear replacing stuff, you can ask Anne but I don't think this is what I was banned for. If I was all I can say is "Sorry for being hilarious"...
Omega_DarkPotato wrote:This sucks, dude.
Spoiler:
Reply PM from-REDACTED/(REDACTED): i tried to remove the bruises by changing her gender

PM: Bluespace->Delaron: Nobody wants a mime's asscheeks farting on their brig windows.

PM: REDACTED->HotelBravoLima: Oh come on, knowing that these are hostile aliens is metagaming

[17:43] <Aranclanos> any other question ping me again
[17:43] <Vekter> Aranclanos for nicest coder 2015
[17:44] <Aranclanos> fuck you
User avatar
paprika
Rarely plays
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
Byond Username: Paprka
Location: in down bad

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by paprika » #7315

Metastation has blast doors the warden can close where the cell windows are if IEDs fuck them up. The only thing that's broken by IEDing cells on metastation is the ability to visit prisoners in the cells.

Why the FUCK don't people take more hints from metastation?
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
User avatar
Steelpoint
Github User
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:37 pm
Byond Username: Steelpoint
Github Username: Steelpoint
Location: The Armoury

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Steelpoint » #7316

Box has had that for a very long time.
Image
User avatar
Pandarsenic
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:56 pm
Byond Username: Pandarsenic
Location: AI Upload

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Pandarsenic » #7318

The problem is the blast doors lock down more than just that and they're not selective. They're extremely inconvenient to have active.
(2:53:35 AM) scaredofshadows: how about head of robutts
I once wrote a guide to fixing telecomms woohoo
User avatar
paprika
Rarely plays
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
Byond Username: Paprka
Location: in down bad

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by paprika » #7348

When has it ever been a problem anywhere but security.

OH SHIT YOU GUYS, ATMOS TECHS HAVE TO REPAIR DAMAGE TO ATMOS PIPING, FUCKING BAN THOSE GREYSHITS RULE 1
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
User avatar
leibniz
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 6:21 pm
Byond Username: Leibniz
Location: Seeking help

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by leibniz » #7358

paprika wrote:When has it ever been a problem anywhere but security.

OH SHIT YOU GUYS, ATMOS TECHS HAVE TO REPAIR DAMAGE TO ATMOS PIPING, FUCKING BAN THOSE GREYSHITS RULE 1
It is annoying when they break an APC.
Founder and only member of the "Whitelist Nukeops" movement
AseaHeru
Rarely plays
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:26 pm

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by AseaHeru » #7370

Yah, APCs are a fucking pain to fix.
I am located here, lurking in your posts, leaving piles of transparent wordings and being confused. Oh, I also try to map...

This, this is an example of what I leave for you.
Also, these days I mostly play Ursit McStation, mostly because I like roleplay.
User avatar
Antonkr
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:28 pm
Byond Username: Antonkr

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Antonkr » #7376

paprika wrote:When has it ever been a problem anywhere but security.

OH SHIT YOU GUYS, ATMOS TECHS HAVE TO REPAIR DAMAGE TO ATMOS PIPING, FUCKING BAN THOSE GREYSHITS RULE 1
The only reason IEDs are not used extensively against security is because it is easy as shit to see someone doing it in the adminlogs, and people got banned for it a LOT before it stopped being so common. Also, it's one thing if it poses a small problem for the engineering team, but an assistant can make IEDs faster then pipes wires and APCs get fixed.
No longer an admin by own free will. Feel free to add me on steam.
Lo6a4evskiy
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:40 pm
Byond Username: Lo6a4evskiy

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Lo6a4evskiy » #7388

Well shit's supposed to be easier to destroy than to fix.
User avatar
Antonkr
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:28 pm
Byond Username: Antonkr

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Antonkr » #7390

Lo6a4evskiy wrote:Well shit's supposed to be easier to destroy than to fix.
That's still not an excuse to allow people to be dicks to security, and engineering without a good reason.
No longer an admin by own free will. Feel free to add me on steam.
Lo6a4evskiy
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:40 pm
Byond Username: Lo6a4evskiy

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Lo6a4evskiy » #7393

err, who's allowing them?

ban people who do it

what's the fucking problem, do we have to remove all weapons now because somebody might start murdering others as non-antag?
User avatar
Antonkr
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:28 pm
Byond Username: Antonkr

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Antonkr » #7395

Lo6a4evskiy wrote:err, who's allowing them?

ban people who do it

what's the fucking problem, do we have to remove all weapons now because somebody might start murdering others as non-antag?
That was in response to the thread proposing looser punishment for it. People are banned for it and I ban for it.
No longer an admin by own free will. Feel free to add me on steam.
User avatar
peoplearestrange
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 12:02 pm
Byond Username: Peoplearestrange
Location: UK

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by peoplearestrange » #7399

I think this thread has been answered now. Can we please lock it.
Whatever
Spoiler:
oranges wrote:singulo.io is the center point of rational and calm debate, where much of tg's issues are worked out in a fun and family friendly environment
miggles wrote:it must have been quite the accomplishment, killing a dead butterfly
WeeYakk wrote:If you take a step back from everything watching the community argue janitor related changes is one of the most surreal and hilarious things about this game. Four pages of discussing the merits of there being too much or too little dirt in a video game.
Operative wrote:Vote PAS for headmin! Get cucked and feel good getting cucked.
TheNightingale wrote:I want to get off Mr. Scones's Wild Ride...
NikNakFlak wrote:Excuse you, I was doing intentional bug testing for the well being of the server. I do not make mistakes.
Fragnostic wrote:stop cucking the first shitshow ever that revolved around me.
This is my moment, what are you doing?!
Anonmare wrote:Oranges gestures at the thread, it shudders and begins to move!
Saegrimr wrote:
callanrockslol wrote:all you have to do is ban shitters until the playbase improves/ceases to exist, whichever comes first.
IM TRYING
Screemonster wrote:hellmoo is the mud for grown adults who main reaper in overwatch
Kor wrote:
confused rock wrote:...its like if we made fire extinguishers spawn in emergency boxes and have them heal you when you put out fires rather than them being in wall storages...
Are you having a stroke
bandit wrote:you are now manually GLORFing
MrStonedOne wrote:The best part about the election is when I announce my pick because I'm just as surprised as everybody else.
PM:[USER]->IrishWristWatch0: Yeah, im make it on but how im make the station to to sun and not go to sun

OOC: Francinum: Five Rounds at PAS's
"You are destinied to defeat Dr. Uguu and his 5 Robot Masters
(All-Access-Man, ShootyBlackCoat Man, ChloralHydrate Man, Singulo Man and TeleportArmor Man)"
I'm a box
callanrockslol
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 1:47 pm
Byond Username: Callanrockslol

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by callanrockslol » #7684

danno wrote:no need for execution you psycho
There is always a need for execution.


Always.
The most excessive signature on /tg/station13.

Still not even at the limit after 8 fucking years.
Spoiler:
Urist Boatmurdered [Security] asks, "Why does Zol have a captain-level ID?"
Zol Interbottom [Security] says, "because"

Sergie Borris lives on in our hearts

Zaros (No id) [145.9] says, "WITH MY SUPER WIZARD POWERS I CAN TELL CALLAN IS MAD."
Anderson Conagher wrote:Callan is sense.
Errorage wrote:When I see the win vista, win 7 and win 8 hourglass cursor, it makes me happy
Cause it's a circle spinning around
I smile and make circular motions with my finger to imiatate it
petethegoat wrote:slap a comment on it and call it a feature
MisterPerson wrote:>playing
Do you think this is a game?
Gun Hog wrote:Untested code baby
oranges wrote:for some reason all our hosts turn into bohemia software communities after they implode
Malkevin wrote:I was the only one that voted for you Callan.
Miggles wrote:>centration development
>trucking
ill believe it when snakes grow arms and strangle me with them

OOC: Aranclanos: that sounds like ooc in ooc related to ic to be ooc and confuse the ic
OOC: Dionysus24779: We're nearing a deep philosophical extistential level

Admin PM from-Jordie0608: 33-Jan-2552| Warned: Is a giraffe dork ~tony abbott

OOC: Saegrimr: That wasn't a call to pray right now callan jesus christ you're fast.

OOC: Eaglendia: Glad I got to see the rise, fall, rise, and fall of Zol

OOC: Armhulenn: CALLAN
OOC: Armhulenn: YOU MELTED MY FUCKING REVOLVER
OOC: Armhulenn: AND THEN
OOC: Armhulenn: GAVE ME MELTING MELONS
OOC: Armhulenn: GOD FUCKING BLESS YOU
OOC: Armhulenn: you know what's hilarious though
OOC: Armhulenn: I melted ANOTHER TRAITOR'S REVOLVER AFTER THAT

7/8/2016 never forget
Armhulen wrote:
John_Oxford wrote:>implying im not always right
all we're saying is that you're not crag son
bandit wrote:we already have a punishment for using our code for your game, it's called using our code for your game
The evil holoparasite user I can't believe its not DIO and his holoparasite I can't believe its not Skub have been defeated by the Spacedust Crusaders, but what has been taken from the station can never be returned.

OOC: TheGel: Literally a guy in a suit with a shuttle full of xenos. That's a doozy
User avatar
paprika
Rarely plays
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
Byond Username: Paprka
Location: in down bad

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by paprika » #7721

Image
You're not making box fans look any better. I made a legitimate reason for the difference in the maps being a huge deal gameplay-wise and you do this shit.

Anyway like I said, metastation's brig shutters can be selectively closed on the cell windows so grey tide IEDing the brig is way less of a big deal as it doesn't destroy cell functionality on metastation, which is something people have been saying it does. This subforum is for -both- servers, ikarrus.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
AseaHeru
Rarely plays
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:26 pm

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by AseaHeru » #7754

Talking about brig shutters is a map war now?
Spoiler:
As for off topic, the brig shutters where being talked about for the simple reason that they can keep the brig closed after IEDs...
Why shutters arent off topic is in the spoiler.
I am located here, lurking in your posts, leaving piles of transparent wordings and being confused. Oh, I also try to map...

This, this is an example of what I leave for you.
Also, these days I mostly play Ursit McStation, mostly because I like roleplay.
User avatar
Ikarrus
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:17 am
Byond Username: Ikarrus
Github Username: Ikarrus
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by Ikarrus » #7777

If you want to talk about it then you can talk about it without the insults.

I did close more than what was warranted, and I'd like to restore a couple of them, but mods lack the ability to 'un-delete' things.

If you have any other concerns, please take it to PMs with me or a site admin, because I don't want to further sidetrack on-topic discussion.
Former Dev/Headmin
Who is this guy?
User avatar
paprika
Rarely plays
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:20 pm
Byond Username: Paprka
Location: in down bad

Re: IEDs = Rule 1 Violation Now?

Post by paprika » #7904

Sorry I agree I was turning into a jerk and since you're like the only one who actively works on fixing boxstation's outdated things, I probably shouldn't have. I posted my suggestion in the boxstation feedback thread and hopefully it'll cull the tide a bit.
Oldman Robustin wrote:It's an established meme that coders don't play this game.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users