i wasn't sure if this should go here or the wiki subforum so move it if it's wrong. i am referring to this https://tgstation13.org/wiki/Rules
First thing: Rule 2-4 and 4-2 are the same, they both say the same thing about atmos techs not stopping the AI etc.
edit: this was fixed thanks
Second thing: I was trialminning today and a player asked me if saying things like "lol" or "omg" IC would actually result in a ban or not. This is in fact a rule we have, and probably should be added to the rules page to clarify. Maybe also mention not doing things like copy pasting game logs into IC. (RuleBreaker McAssistant says, "Engieborg292 prods Captain with the stun arm!")
small rules change suggestion
- PKPenguin321
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:02 pm
- Byond Username: PKPenguin321
- Github Username: PKPenguin321
- Location: U S A, U S A, U S A
small rules change suggestion
Last edited by PKPenguin321 on Wed Oct 12, 2016 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
i play Lauser McMauligan. clown name is Cold-Ass Honkey
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
Spoiler:
-
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 5:13 am
- Byond Username: Lzimann
- Github Username: lzimann
Re: small rules change suggestion
I don't agree with rule 2 and 4 being the same, one is about metacomming(or using info you got as a ghost, for example) and the other about what an antag can do. The part about atmos tech is repeating, not sure why, it might have been moved around and someone forgot to delete from the other part.
The "lol", "omg" falls under rule 3, don't "ooc in ic", maybe we could put something in precedents to be a bit more clear in netspeak, emoticons, etc.
The "lol", "omg" falls under rule 3, don't "ooc in ic", maybe we could put something in precedents to be a bit more clear in netspeak, emoticons, etc.
- DemonFiren
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 9:15 pm
- Byond Username: DemonFiren
Re: small rules change suggestion
It's not about rules 2 and 4, I believe.
It's possibly about predecents 2.4 and 4.2, but I don't see that much relation, either.
It's possibly about predecents 2.4 and 4.2, but I don't see that much relation, either.
-
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2014 5:13 am
- Byond Username: Lzimann
- Github Username: lzimann
Re: small rules change suggestion
They were just repeating, now it is only showing up in rule 2 precedents(which makes more sense than being in rule 4 precedents).
- Okand37
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:37 pm
- Byond Username: Okand37
Re: small rules change suggestion
Generally we categorise netspeak, emoticons, links, logs, etc as OOC in IC-but it could use clearer phrasing.
Are you being the neighbour Mr. Rogers would've wanted you to be?
- PKPenguin321
- Site Admin
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:02 pm
- Byond Username: PKPenguin321
- Github Username: PKPenguin321
- Location: U S A, U S A, U S A
Re: small rules change suggestion
Yeah, it really just needs to be specifically stated.
i play Lauser McMauligan. clown name is Cold-Ass Honkey
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
Spoiler:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users