Page 1 of 1

[Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:34 pm
by Jarek
I'm not going to stop until I have a squeaky clean slate

Byond account and character name: JarekTheRaptor - Loves-the-lizards

Ban type (What are you banned from?): Note

2017-07-21 02:57:04 | Sybil | durkel
Banned for 2 minutes - Linking pornographic websites in game. This is a christian server and such actions will not be tolerated.


Server you were playing when banned (Sybil or Bagil): Sybil
Your side of the story: It was a meme round by a very loose defintion in that all the rules of that round had been thrown out of the window, to the point OOC IC and IC OOC was allowed, too. I had a link as a name for the clown and it actually turned out to act as a real working link that people could click on and use, to which I ahelped and told durkel and then got a meme ban for my trouble, or maybe he noticed, I dunno

Why you should be unbanned: The entire round was a big meme with no rules and I'm a good boy ok???

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:55 pm
by Durkel
>links pornhub in dead chat.
>complain when you get a note.

What did he mean by this?

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 8:58 pm
by Jarek
>Meme round with no rules
>Handing out notes
>lol

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 9:02 pm
by Durkel
I removed it you big baby, but you can't escape the meme notes forever.

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 9:08 pm
by onleavedontatme
This was a good note though

He broke a rule which he had not previously broken, and was apparently unaware of so he was not banned, but a record was made that he broke the rule so there cant be any "I didnt know rule 8 didnt apply!" in future rounds

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 9:11 pm
by Jarek
Aww shiet

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 9:11 pm
by Durkel
Feel free to add it back if you think it's necessary, I doubt he will be posting a link like that again in the future though.

You do have the final say after all.

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 12:34 am
by Tsaricide
I re-added the note.

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 1:06 am
by Armhulen
>"no rules round"

>"oh sorry you broke a rule that is exempt from the no rules rule!"

It was a meme round by a very loose defintion in that all the rules of that round had been thrown out of the window, to the point OOC IC and IC OOC was allowed, too.

If it's that round I'm thinking of it allowed erp in that one

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 1:19 am
by Jarek
I think the entire point of the note was to be a meme because the round WAS a meme, it wasn't the round you're thinking of, that's the more recent MEME round, there was another at the time the note shows that was just a massive shitfest, to the point respawning was allowed and I'm fairly sure highlander got spammed

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 1:42 am
by Armhulen
If it wasn't the relaxed rules round then I take it back don't break rules please

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 2:05 am
by Jarek
It was the relaxed rules round, Just not the one you're thinking about

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:10 am
by onleavedontatme
Evil candy corn make up your mind

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:50 am
by Armhulen
I don't have access to the db or logs for this round for awhile so someone else should confirm if it was the low rules round

If so drop the note

If not keep the note

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:29 pm
by Durkel
https://tgstation13.org/parsed-logs/syb ... /game.html


Beyond me making a staff of honk that shoots blanks,throwing a porn reader into a wall and near the end making a honk conveyor belt no one said it's meme/low rule round.

[02:55:35]SAY: Ghost/JarekTheRaptor : Tfw want to link pornhub (110,105,2)
[02:56:07]SAY: Ghost/JarekTheRaptor : www.pornhub.com (84,78,2)
[02:57:30]SAY: Ghost/Durkel : ADMIN LOG: Durkel/(Tim Ebow) has banned JarekTheRaptor/(Loves-The-Lizards). (97,102,2)

I honestly believe he won't be posting anymore porn links so I don't care what happens to the note.

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 4:51 pm
by Pascal125
This is sort of peanut posting, but you wouldn't find logs of a low-rules / meme round in chat. It was in the MOTD/Admin Announcement thing for a few shifts.

Also, i mean. Just look at the shit people are saying. It's obviously a Meme/Low-Rules round.
Unless people on Sybil Commonly scream about, Rape, ERP, Vore, Ghosts, Use Acronyms, Spam in All-Caps, etc
But, i sincerely doubt that they do.

Also. it's just a website. And chances are, it scrolled past the chat without anyone even noticing until he apologized to an admin about it.

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 5:31 pm
by bandit
Add me to the "this note is stupid" side. The only difference between "linking pornhub" and saying the word pornhub, like I have now done twice, is about seven characters. Everyone knows what it is.

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:24 pm
by onleavedontatme
Of course bandit would finally be on the IC issue side of the argument once porn was involved

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:36 pm
by bandit
if it's OK to say "pornhub" then adding a "www" and a ".com" doesn't make it magically not OK. It isn't a trick NSFW link. Everyone knows what it is. The note is a meme note that is even written as a meme ("This is a christian server and such actions will not be tolerated") and the fact people are having an actual argument about it is fucking stupid

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 7:51 pm
by feem
yeah this whole thread is ridiculous and you know how much I love to argue

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 4:22 am
by Cobby
The note should just be deleted. He knows not to do it again and the only instance in which he has ever done it was revolving (to what he believed to be) a meme round.

And honestly, how would you ever forget Jarek appealing a note about him linking porn?

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 7:12 pm
by Durkel
I already removed it once, someone make a decision and close this trash already.

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 5:56 pm
by Jarek
Can we get a definite answer on this so I can continue my crusade against other notes?

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:59 pm
by bandit
you realize this "crusade against your notes" is not helping your case and is contributing to simple cases like this turning into multi-post clusterfucks

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:13 pm
by Lazengann
Players just got the ability to appeal notes so it is natural there'd be a backlog of notes they would've appealed but couldn't

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:16 pm
by NikNakFlak
They have had the ability for awhile now actually...

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 10:20 pm
by Jarek
bandit wrote:you realize this "crusade against your notes" is not helping your case and is contributing to simple cases like this turning into multi-post clusterfucks
I'm not a fan of having admins brand me a certain way because I have X amount of notes, I'd rather lower that number if I can so at the very least people don't get the wrong impression right off the bat, that being said I think I've done enough to put a dent in that number and with fading notes I'm not sure how useful this will really be so

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:58 am
by Cobby
Only admins and people who read the ban appeals section can see your notes, and the former has a fairly solid opinion of you already even if none of these notes existed.

Next time I get on the computer I'll delete the note and we can have a note War or whatever.

Re: [Durkel] M e m e n o t e

Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 3:02 am
by Armhulen
god these threads make me want hidden notes again

I think cobster handled this??