Page 1 of 1

[armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:11 am
by technokek
BYOND account: Techno#7612
Ban type: Discord
Ban length: Permanent
Ban reason: Image
Time ban was placed: 07.01.2021
Server you were playing on when banned: Discord
Round ID in which ban was placed: This is retarded how am i a "creep"
Why you think you should be unbanned: I said i dont watch anime so i dont care about lolies, i cant belive we are are actually having this discussion

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:39 am
by Armhulen
I wanna say that I used that as an example and you are more generally a creep:

armhulenToday at 4:57 PM
i should say that this isn't from that one discussion but just how techno has always been and i think no person should be a vocal supporter of that content
for any reason.

If headmins wanna let him back into the discord, i guess. but there is no more unenjoyable environment for new people than to come into the discord and see the pedophile devil's advocate

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:56 am
by technokek
Armhulen wrote:I wanna say that I used that as an example and you are more generally a creep:

armhulenToday at 4:57 PM
i should say that this isn't from that one discussion but just how techno has always been and i think no person should be a vocal supporter of that content
for any reason.

If headmins wanna let him back into the discord, i guess. but there is no more unenjoyable environment for new people than to come into the discord and see the pedophile devil's advocate



First of all thank you for your quick response.

I have never endorsed loli or pedophilic contend, I simply stated in the daily discuss in politics that where going on for quite some time one the topic of loli that :

1. I don't not watch anime or the porn form
2. I don't think actual pedophilia should be connected to drawings since it is is dishonest to actually victims of pedophilia.
3. I gave examples of how Amazon is selling practically nude depictions of anime girls, because someone wouldn't belive me that they where selling it.
4. That loli is from my understanding just the definition of a underage character and not directly related to pornographic contend.

I have never endorsed the usage of "lolis" in pornographic material.

I simply don't care as I have been to a very cool catholic school in germany "AKO" with multiple priest that ACTUALLY made sexual advances on children.

Again I have never advocated for the use of underage anime characters in pornographic material.

I simply couldn't care less if some guy in Indonesia draws some dumb cartoons. <-- Cartoon not porn.

Thanks for making me google all this garbage

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 8:12 am
by technokek
Addendum: I would fully understand if you banned me for saying stuff like "I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls" or something similar, but I do not recall ever doing that and since I am banned I can neither verify I didn't say it or delete any evidence of me saying it. Again I do not endorse pornographic use of underage characters, but banning the general use of a underage character in a PG13 cartoon is kinda dumb in my epic opinion.

Like would you ban child actors too?

Again I don't not endorse the pornographic use of children in any form nor have I ever done that.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 8:19 am
by technokek
I genuinely believe this is a misunderstanding. I think you came to the conclusion that I actually support sexualization of under children. This is simply not the case. From what I understand the term loli does not describe a sexual depiction of a character it only refers to its age and gender. I didn't want to make another comment on my own thread. Did you see me advocating for the sexual use or these characters on discord? Because that does not reflect my opinion

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 9:16 am
by technokek
hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:03 am
by Stickymayhem
technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.


I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.

Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.

I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.

That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.

Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:08 am
by technokek
Stickymayhem wrote:
technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.


I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.

Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.

I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.

That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.

Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.


i never posted loli on the discord, i linked to a amazon (i made sure to break the link apart to preven embedding) listing on the discord, no actual loli pictures where posted by me. I used you since your post out of context look bad too and exactly that is beeing used against me.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:28 am
by Stickymayhem
technokek wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:
technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.


I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.

Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.

I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.

That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.

Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.


i never posted loli on the discord, i linked to a amazon (i made sure to break the link apart to preven embedding) listing on the discord, no actual loli pictures where posted by me. I used you since your post out of context look bad too and exactly that is beeing used against me.


I never said I wanted to bang lolis so let's keep some distinctions between us yeah bud

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 10:35 am
by technokek
Stickymayhem wrote:
technokek wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:
technokek wrote:hello i am now continuing this monologue.

Image

is me litterally saying
technokek wrote:I wanna jack off to those underage anime girls


this is not a epic thing to post but, this is the only message in 14,425 other post that can be even closely be interpreted as me being "creepy".

kinda cringe to ban me for a obvious joke.

Anyway dont mind this:

Image

Image

Image

yes there is more... no i will not post it.


I've been invoked so I guess I have to reply with context.

Loli is fucking disgusting but the data is unfortunately against common decency on this one.

I stand by those posts and will back the research to my own optical detriment.

That last post is out of context, and referring to someone who said something along the lines of all loli being harmful to real children, and I clarified that not all loli is traced from real cp.

Posting lolis in the discord is cringe and should get you dumpstered every time.


i never posted loli on the discord, i linked to a amazon (i made sure to break the link apart to preven embedding) listing on the discord, no actual loli pictures where posted by me. I used you since your post out of context look bad too and exactly that is beeing used against me.


I never said I wanted to bang lolis so let's keep some distinctions between us yeah bud


its litterally a shitty obvious joke

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/ravioli- ... e-formuoli

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2021 4:58 pm
by technokek
Guess since this is going nowhere I am asking for a head admin review

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2021 12:16 am
by Armhulen
I'm Ignoring any argument you've had with sticky because fine whatever sticky uses real statistics and your do the epic "i like lolis" troll. Even ignoring that there are multiple times you both kickstart the conversation about the legality of loli content and then also in that same argument you act like a total weirdo

I'll start with the most recent, you talking to lepi for posting this:

Spoiler:
Image


which came from the 26th, a debate about lolis you started:

Spoiler:
Image


which led to some unadulterated cringe i've never seen sticky even come close to:

Spoiler:
Image


which, after it's conclusion you repeatedly tried to restart (last message catching us up to OP image):

Spoiler:
Image


If anyone had looked into how you composed yourself on the 26th you would have already been banned, and this is all an entire precursor to the 12/10 logs WITHOUT sticky.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2021 12:18 am
by Armhulen
the ball is in the headmin's court now ig

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2021 7:38 am
by technokek
Armhulen wrote:I'm Ignoring any argument you've had with sticky because fine whatever sticky uses real statistics and your do the epic "i like lolis" troll. Even ignoring that there are multiple times you both kickstart the conversation about the legality of loli content and then also in that same argument you act like a total weirdo

I'll start with the most recent, you talking to lepi for posting this:

Spoiler:
Image


which came from the 26th, a debate about lolis you started:

Spoiler:
Image


which led to some unadulterated cringe i've never seen sticky even come close to:

Spoiler:
Image


which, after it's conclusion you repeatedly tried to restart (last message catching us up to OP image):

Spoiler:
Image


If anyone had looked into how you composed yourself on the 26th you would have already been banned, and this is all an entire precursor to the 12/10 logs WITHOUT sticky.



Thanks for saying I started that conversation. That's is absolutely false. I got called a pedo like 20 times that day in the channel and the discussion was already ongoing. Me posting those images are in reaction to someone saying "lolis are directly traced from children" so yes my images make sense in calling out bullshit that someone else posted. And in your screenshots. And again you are completely ignoring any context since there are multiple admins visible and where involved in said discussion so saying anyone would ban me is just false. And I still don't see any proof of me encouraging the pornographic use of lolis or even saying that I like them. Banning lolis is basically the same as banning child actors.

I even directly pinged a headadmin with what I posted because people kept pinging @discordjanny saying I post pedophile content. So yes a a headadmin did look at the discussion at that time and concluded it was ok.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2021 8:53 am
by technokek
i keep getting messages that people literally dont understand my point.

according to various websites loli = age / gender .

i have seen no proof that loli itself is a sexual thing.

So yes saying banning loli is like banning child actors makes sense your dipshits.

I still dont watch anime so correct me if i am wrong

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2021 10:10 am
by Vekter
Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.

Loli is, by definition, sexual.

Yes, I'm a weeb.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2021 11:13 am
by technokek
Vekter wrote:Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.

Loli is, by definition, sexual.

Yes, I'm a weeb.



Thanks for beeing the first person to actually clear this up.

I agree now that many of my statements are highly inappropriate about it should not be on the discord.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 8:02 pm
by technokek
based armhulen make more shit up

Image

Image

i never did that.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 8:22 pm
by The Respected Man
technokek wrote:based armhulen make more shit up

Image

Image

i never did that.

Image

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 9:51 pm
by Armhulen
Those terms are synonymous

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:19 pm
by technokek

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:24 pm
by Armhulen
Oh so NOW you're the expert

please reread what vekter said, and keep digging that hole

Vekter wrote:Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.

Loli is, by definition, sexual.

Yes, I'm a weeb.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 12:49 am
by technokek
Armhulen wrote:Oh so NOW you're the expert

please reread what vekter said, and keep digging that hole

Vekter wrote:Loli is short for "lolicon", which in itself is short for "Lolita complex". This is named after a book called Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov in which an older man literally has a sexual relationship with a young woman.

Loli is, by definition, sexual.

Yes, I'm a weeb.



yes me the expert going for the first result on google, that the most expert thing to do googeling something you dont know.

if you dont know how to google: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=loli here is some help.

All results on the first page support my argument that loli / lolicon are not the same thing.

There are litterally a bunch of articles defining lolis as the characters, and lolicons as the people that are into those characters.

Are you legit unable to read?

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:04 am
by MrAlphonzo
I'm locking this unhinged nightmare until some poor head admin comes along to unleash the beast.

Re: [armulen] banned for posting "not caring if lolis are ilegal"

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 5:20 am
by Coconutwarrior97
There is more than one instance here of you toeing the line or just outright being creepy with the content you've posted/discussed on the discord. With that in mind we have no issue with this ban sticking.

Headmin Votes:
Coconutwarrior97: Deny appeal.
Domitius: Deny appeal.
Naloac: Deny appeal.