BYOND account: Joe13413
Character name: Joachim Straub
Ban type: Security department ban (Hos, officer, detective, warden)
Ban length: 2 weeks
Ban reason: Banned from Roles: Head of Security, Warden, Detective, Security Officer for 2 weeks - As the Head of Security, set a chemist to arrest and claimed they were a suspected syndicate agent for not being in chemistry for the shift (30 minutes~). We had a long discussion about Joe's trajectory on Manuel and clashes with the MRP ruleset: I proposed he consider what he expects out of the server and how the server culture aligns with that, and to consider whether LRP servers would better fit his playstyle
Time ban was placed: 2021-08-22 07:24:02
Round ID in which ban was placed: 168245
Your side of the story: I was playing as the HoS, and the CMO informed me on command radio that one of their chemists hasn't been in chemistry all shift (It had been 30 minutes at this point). I set the chemist to arrest, explained the situation to my officers and said "they're probably a DIRTY FUCKING SYNDICATE" or something along those lines. After saying that, I just told my officers to search them and release them if nothing suspicious was found. After searching the chemist, my officers found a holoparasite injector on the chemist. Upon realizing that the holoparasite was a support stand, we released them with tracking implant and chemical implant. The chemist went on to have a fun shift.
Why you think you should be unbanned: I feel like this situation doesn't justify a security ban, let alone 2 weeks. I don't have any notes relating to behavior as a security member, and accusing someone of being a syndicate isn't that big of a deal. No drastic measures were taken, and it makes sense for long time security players to have a sort of sixth sense when it comes to figuring out who is a traitor, and who isn't. Even if this was a big problem, I could've just been told that accusing someone of being a traitor with no real evidence isn't okay.
[Okand37] Joe13413 - Unfair security ban
-
- Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2020 8:39 pm
- Byond Username: Joe13413
- Okand37
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:37 pm
- Byond Username: Okand37
Re: [Okand37] Joe13413 - Unfair security ban
Hello,
Thank you for taking the time to write an appeal. I will explain why this behaviour is problematic and the processes behind the ban below: It is important to understand this role ban is the escalating product of a growing series of issues raised with your behaviour on our medium roleplaying server, Manuel, and your conflicts with the rules thereof. The three largest issues at play are Metagaming, Validhunting, and Powergaming.
Ticket Transcript
Relevant Notes
6 of 24 total warning or ban notes from 2020-10-30 to 2021-08-26
Issue(s) in question
The related issue were a series of in-game chats over the security radio by the player that prompted security to arrest the chemist. The main issue is bridging an employee not at their station with a potential traitor to be searched and, if contraband is found, arrested.
Why is this problematic?
Our medium roleplay servers have a set of Roleplay Rules intended to guide interaction as characters acting within a setting. The issues in question are:
Ultimately, it is expected of administrators to use their discretion to assist in shaping and maintaining medium roleplay culture on our medium roleplay server(s) and your history has shown conflict abiding by the server rules and roleplay culture. You have garnered multiple warnings over several months as related to playstyle (metagaming, powergaming, validhunting): behaviour in conflict with the spirit (and letter) of our roleplay rules. A timed roleban was decided because of your line-toeing history and prior warnings according to the precedent set by server Rule 7:
Conclusion
I have explained the relevant background information, processes, and reasonings behind this appeal. My intent was to give you an understanding of why the issues in question were problematic and why a security roleban was issued. This appeal is denied. Head administrators may comment or overrule this verdict at their discretion.
Thank you for taking the time to write an appeal. I will explain why this behaviour is problematic and the processes behind the ban below: It is important to understand this role ban is the escalating product of a growing series of issues raised with your behaviour on our medium roleplaying server, Manuel, and your conflicts with the rules thereof. The three largest issues at play are Metagaming, Validhunting, and Powergaming.
Ticket Transcript
Spoiler:
6 of 24 total warning or ban notes from 2020-10-30 to 2021-08-26
Spoiler:
The related issue were a series of in-game chats over the security radio by the player that prompted security to arrest the chemist. The main issue is bridging an employee not at their station with a potential traitor to be searched and, if contraband is found, arrested.
Spoiler:
Our medium roleplay servers have a set of Roleplay Rules intended to guide interaction as characters acting within a setting. The issues in question are:
- Metagaming (i.e. correlating an absent chemist with a player potentially being a traitor)
- Validhunting (i.e. seeking out any justification to search for potential antagonists)
- Powergaming is loosely related (i.e. preparing to face problems that are not actively credible threats; a mindset of treating the game as one to be "won") insofar as the playstyle or mindset correlates to use of metaknowledge and valid seeking
Why was this a security ban?RULE 4 non-antagonists are not allowed to pre-emptively search for, hinder or otherwise seek conflict with antagonists without reasonable prior cause.
Ultimately, it is expected of administrators to use their discretion to assist in shaping and maintaining medium roleplay culture on our medium roleplay server(s) and your history has shown conflict abiding by the server rules and roleplay culture. You have garnered multiple warnings over several months as related to playstyle (metagaming, powergaming, validhunting): behaviour in conflict with the spirit (and letter) of our roleplay rules. A timed roleban was decided because of your line-toeing history and prior warnings according to the precedent set by server Rule 7:
It resulted in a security roleban as you were misusing your authority as a member of security during the incident and a server ban was not deemed appropriate given the circumstances. This verdict was reached consulting with administrators Harricross and Market Monkey who were present on the server.RULE 7 "If you regularly come close to breaking the rules without actually breaking them, it will be treated as the rules being broken. Repeated instances of the same rules being broken may be met with harsher consequences."
Conclusion
I have explained the relevant background information, processes, and reasonings behind this appeal. My intent was to give you an understanding of why the issues in question were problematic and why a security roleban was issued. This appeal is denied. Head administrators may comment or overrule this verdict at their discretion.
Are you being the neighbour Mr. Rogers would've wanted you to be?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users