Page 1 of 1

chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2021 9:05 am
by Romeqeux
BYOND account: romequex
Character name:augustus sextus
Ban type: Server
Ban length: Permanent
Ban reason: https://tgstation13.download/dip/discordimageproxy.php/attachments/ ... nknown.png
Time ban was placed: 1:02am pst
Server you were playing on when banned: sybil
Round ID in which ban was placed: 174653
Your side of the story: Chimpston pm'ed me thinking I was somah69 we talked for a long time and both agreed it should be moved to the forums due to confusion in the admin pm's.
Why you think you should be unbanned: Simple as. I am not somah69. I don't know what evidence to need to provide to prove this but I am happy to provide any.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2021 7:40 pm
by Chimpston
Hey, I'm a bit late, but thanks for sending an appeal.

I've discussed your appeal alongside other admins and we're certain that you are evading with all the evidence we were given, and from observing your behavior.

Again, if you feel this is incorrect, you are more than welcome to give your reasoning.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2021 8:19 pm
by Romeqeux
I don't know any of the evidence you have so i'm not sure how you want me to give reasoning. Alot of the evidence you said in admin pms I gave reasoning right?

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2021 12:35 am
by Chimpston
There is a lot more evidence than just the ahelps we had, but your reasonings in them didn't exactly connect at all. Our interactions in dead chat, your behavior, combat, and going up to your "metafriends" who they themselves were positive that you are Somah is enough and I am sure that you are well aware of it too, you know.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2021 12:40 am
by Romeqeux
Your ahelp was rather confusing in the way it was worded which is why I asked multiple times for you to reword it. But I can't provide reasoning If I dont know the evidence? Like what about my combat? I'm really confused on how combat is a sure sign that I'm ban evading. Can you elaborate on behavior too? I went up to tiders, william dornan, helen weinstein, phillip thomas just 3 examples of tiders that I saw messing with sec and I joined them.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2021 9:38 am
by Chimpston
You only asked me to reword myself once, but I'll pull it up. I will not refer to the combat in this case as I can not prove it myself unless I were to have a recording, in which case I don't.

The first ticket, as you requested evidence:
► Show Spoiler
I'll not sure what you need to be elaborated on, but I'll do it again since you asked me to reword my statement, again, you only asked once.

I am confused how you already hopped on the hating Gay Johnson joke, despite us having zero interactions whatsoever, and the fact you only have an hour of gameplay recorded that you would even be aware of this. Your reasoning just doesn't make sense, especially considering that you went straight to Gay Johnson, but you weren't aware that I play Johnsonium XIX too, which is my third most frequent static.

You also immediately followed it up by saying I say "Zamn! She's 12!", in which I become defensive because... I don't, other than "zamn" because I picked it up after spending some time in Terry and interacting with the player base of course. Somah69/Paris Konets is the only player that has done this multiple times.

Not only that, but all the rounds I have been interacting with you, I have not been playing as Gay Johnson whatsoever, yet you immediately mention the name the moment I start chatting in dead chat with other observers.
► Show Spoiler
Here is our second ticket, as you may not have the logs yourself:
► Show Spoiler
Here's a log filtering our messages in dead chat, during round 174646. (Garlic Bread refers to another character I play)
► Show Spoiler
I feel that this is more than enough evidence, considering my interactions with Somah personally. I wanted to steer them, or you, in the right direction, although I feel as I haven't made much of a change really.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2021 12:43 am
by Romeqeux
im busy this week currently can I answer like this weekend without the appeal being closed?

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2021 4:00 am
by Chimpston
That's alright, take your time.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2021 6:21 am
by Mothblocks
Since this ban, this account has since tried to evade under the name Gobliurve on two separate rounds.

Ban evasion details are kept private in nature, head admins are invited to either contact me for details or check #admin-bus if deemed necessary.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 2:58 am
by Mothblocks
This user has attempted to evade a 3rd time under the name Cenami.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 8:18 am
by Mothblocks
This user has ban evaded a 4th time as Kifo69.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2021 1:52 am
by Vekter

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2021 7:29 am
by Chimpston
I've decided to... deny this appeal due to the obvious events that have occurred.

Re: chimpston romeqeux

Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2021 6:07 am
by Romeqeux
hold on please ill have the response tommrow.