[Discord] GOODWIN#2703 - I'm just a silly little guy
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2023 4:45 pm
Discord username: GOODWIN#2703
Commonly used names: V This Post is Bait V, π₯πΆπΈπππΆππππ
Banning admin: OmegaDark (Nutella/Ewe Kant) / Omega_DarkPotato#1232
Ban reason: ?timeout apply 10m rules apply to you too, please communicate in good faith
Time ban was placed: Approximately 1:01 AM, AEST, 07/04/2023 in #admin-moderate-rat-posting | formerly #admin-skyratter | formerly #admin-chatter
Your side of the story: I was shitposting in the designated admin shitposting channel. My specific messages were:
"Leftist wall of text"
"Look at these bozos effortposting in #admin-moderate-rat-posting"
"I
Must
Place
A newline
Between each point
So that my fellow redditors can read them"
Last post reconstructed from memory as it was deleted. I may have been more or less liberal on the newline count. Definitely not the most harmless form of shitposting but it's not THAT bad.
Why you think you should be unbanned: In complete and utter fairness I feel as though I may have gotten what I was asking for. I was being disruptive - though I would argue good-natured shitposts in the designated shitposting channel were in no way the not-in-good-faith communication the timeout reason would imply they were. The crux of my argument, however, is that my posts were made directly in response to a post made by the banning admin. I feel as though the "flaming" nature of my posts may have incensed the banning admin to administer punishment to me in a way that may not have been neutral. Now while this is purely speculative - I would wager heavily that if any other administrator had timed me out for my posts I would have only contested it jokingly with phrases such as "1984", rather than appealing against the administrative action taken on the forums.
In exchange for my concession that the post I was replying to's spacing did indeed greatly aid its readability and upon reflection was in no way "digg" as I mistakenly accused it of being, I would like the administrator who timed me out to admit to playing a moth - and thereby concede the argument. Thank you for your consideration.
Also if I don't appeal this I'll eventually make a joke like "Well I WOULD make a comment but I'd be timed out" and I'll think smugly to myself (Like the smug wojak) "Damn that's such a zinger man I'm on FIRE today" and Omega will reply with something like "Rent free" and I'll be owned forever. So this appeal is partially to prevent that unfortunate eventuality.
Commonly used names: V This Post is Bait V, π₯πΆπΈπππΆππππ
Banning admin: OmegaDark (Nutella/Ewe Kant) / Omega_DarkPotato#1232
Ban reason: ?timeout apply 10m rules apply to you too, please communicate in good faith
Time ban was placed: Approximately 1:01 AM, AEST, 07/04/2023 in #admin-moderate-rat-posting | formerly #admin-skyratter | formerly #admin-chatter
Your side of the story: I was shitposting in the designated admin shitposting channel. My specific messages were:
"Leftist wall of text"
"Look at these bozos effortposting in #admin-moderate-rat-posting"
"I
Must
Place
A newline
Between each point
So that my fellow redditors can read them"
Last post reconstructed from memory as it was deleted. I may have been more or less liberal on the newline count. Definitely not the most harmless form of shitposting but it's not THAT bad.
Why you think you should be unbanned: In complete and utter fairness I feel as though I may have gotten what I was asking for. I was being disruptive - though I would argue good-natured shitposts in the designated shitposting channel were in no way the not-in-good-faith communication the timeout reason would imply they were. The crux of my argument, however, is that my posts were made directly in response to a post made by the banning admin. I feel as though the "flaming" nature of my posts may have incensed the banning admin to administer punishment to me in a way that may not have been neutral. Now while this is purely speculative - I would wager heavily that if any other administrator had timed me out for my posts I would have only contested it jokingly with phrases such as "1984", rather than appealing against the administrative action taken on the forums.
In exchange for my concession that the post I was replying to's spacing did indeed greatly aid its readability and upon reflection was in no way "digg" as I mistakenly accused it of being, I would like the administrator who timed me out to admit to playing a moth - and thereby concede the argument. Thank you for your consideration.
Also if I don't appeal this I'll eventually make a joke like "Well I WOULD make a comment but I'd be timed out" and I'll think smugly to myself (Like the smug wojak) "Damn that's such a zinger man I'm on FIRE today" and Omega will reply with something like "Rent free" and I'll be owned forever. So this appeal is partially to prevent that unfortunate eventuality.