/tg/Station 13

Please post any positive or negative feedback for the administrator here.
This is not the place to discuss ban appeals, admin complaints, or ban requests.
This is for specific feedback for this administrator.

Not on bagil (the server that actually needs admins)
Rep --

Shows promise as admin, and I know she will go far. Good luck!

They were always a good player, the few interactions I've had with them as admin were good, come back to bagil gamer haku is gone theres no need to stay in exile.

tinodrima7020 wrote:Not on bagil (the server that actually needs admins)
Rep --

Now that I actually have buttons I probably will frequent in and around bagil more. I gravitated over to Sybil just because it's quieter and has a really nice, calm community. But it's not to say I hate Bagil. I just really tired playing there.

Got three ban appeals in their first day as Trial Admin. That's kinda impressive but not in a good way. I've had NO interaction with them so have no clue what's up. They don't look like bad bans, so either the players are wrong or there isn't enough communication before the ban is dropped.

Usually getting a bunch of appeals in a short period is more down to activity, especially if they are covering peak times with a lot of tickets. That isn't to say there is nothing to learn but I couldn't really comment on how the tickets were handed. The bans look normal from this end and if the issue is one of communication it's the kind of thing you get used to. It can be tricky finding the right balance of explaining your ruling and hearing their justifications; once you've made a decision it's usually best to be clear you've come to a conclusion and explain what you'll be doing about it. It can also help to explain how they could have handled the situation better but everyone has their own methods.

Personally I'm just going to take it as a sign of a proactive new admin. Appeals just happen. I got a bunch in a row when I was trial, they are like buses sometimes.

Ran an admin-endorsed greytide event and tried to murder me with 100 drop pods filled with cans of peaches we fed to the clown
pretty based

Nabski wrote:Got three ban appeals in their first day as Trial Admin. That's kinda impressive but not in a good way. I've had NO interaction with them so have no clue what's up. They don't look like bad bans, so either the players are wrong or there isn't enough communication before the ban is dropped.

This isn't necessarily bad. Rapid-fire appeals on new trialmins is usually a combination of inexperience, unusually high activity, and player perception that "stupid trialmin doesn't know how things work." The appeals will speak for themselves and how those appeals are handled will probably say more than merely that appeals were made.

cedarbridge wrote:

Nabski wrote:Got three ban appeals in their first day as Trial Admin. That's kinda impressive but not in a good way. I've had NO interaction with them so have no clue what's up. They don't look like bad bans, so either the players are wrong or there isn't enough communication before the ban is dropped.

This isn't necessarily bad. Rapid-fire appeals on new trialmins is usually a combination of inexperience, unusually high activity, and player perception that "stupid trialmin doesn't know how things work." The appeals will speak for themselves and how those appeals are handled will probably say more than merely that appeals were made.

Yeah, I'm personally betting it's mostly inexperience. I wanted to make a meme merit badge, but that was too much effort. I'm sure they'll figure it out before review comes around.

Nabski wrote:Got three ban appeals in their first day as Trial Admin. That's kinda impressive but not in a good way. I've had NO interaction with them so have no clue what's up. They don't look like bad bans, so either the players are wrong or there isn't enough communication before the ban is dropped.

I had five ban appeals as an admin candidate and I got to be a game admin. Having lots of appeals does not mean bad administrative decisions but simply, as said before here, they were active. May I also say, that they adminned on bagil when this happened and bagil players are the ones that more frequently appeal.

the bans look fine, just because you have to ban lots of people in a sort amount of time doesnt itself discredit their validity

you could definitely get way more than 3 bans a day if you were on event hall. its like an average banper 20 minutes there

Malkraz wrote:Ran an admin-endorsed greytide event and tried to murder me with 100 drop pods filled with cans of peaches we fed to the clown
pretty based

Don't worry, the pods were totally harmless. I just wanted to spook ya.

coward you shoulda gone all in

They're doing a very good job at adminning. It's nice to see them on Bagil, both when adminning and as crew!

I had fun chilling w/ you in our lil pompadour gang the other day. Hope we can do that again.

It is my mission to change the face of Ethereals, one pompadour at a time. Their naming conventions suck.

Greased Lightning is the future.

Whenever I see the name, it's always either a ban appeal, or an admin complaint.

Necromancer Anne puts in a lot of work for /tg/ and while that does mean that they have a high number of ban appeals/complaints I don't think that's a bad thing. They're always respectful and positive when I see them in discord or in-game and I just wanted to say keep up the good work.

I think its more because all the new players are actually stupid as fuck and lack common sense aka an understanding to f our rules

InsaneHyena wrote:Whenever I see the name, it's always either a ban appeal, or an admin complaint.

I'm on quite frequently and usually at hours other admins are not. Sometimes that means I'm the only one to handle ahelps. If you hadn't seen my name anywhere but the forums, I'm not sure where you're looking.

Other people have highlighted the matter of how many appeals I've received but usually all of them have been handled without much of a problem since then. I always talk with admins when uncertain and that does happen from time to time, because getting a second opinion is a good idea to make sure I don't respond to something too emotionally, or maybe I missed some detail or precedent. A few of the appeals came from bans I placed with advice from other admins.

The admin we need, but not the one we deserve.

Unbased admin.

I don't believe you have much of a leg to stand on.

To point out - I thought this thread wasn't supposed to be about a specific issue. However the reason I said unbased is because you called me a cunt and imo that isn't how admins should act and I have been yet to be told that it is how they act here.

OdysseusGuy wrote:To point out - I thought this thread wasn't supposed to be about a specific issue. However the reason I said unbased is because you called me a cunt and imo that isn't how admins should act and I have been yet to be told that it is how they act here.

I'm sorry about your experience Karen. I will make sure to inform our managers of this incident and we hope that in the future you will continue to shop with us. We hope this does not affect our yelp reviews.

OdysseusGuy wrote:To point out - I thought this thread wasn't supposed to be about a specific issue. However the reason I said unbased is because you called me a cunt and imo that isn't how admins should act and I have been yet to be told that it is how they act here.

Oh no an Australian said cunt, stop the presses

they're a good cunt

You're a mad cunt oranges, and I appreciate it.

Just had a round where sheness had a black market trader during the shift and it was done really well. 10/10 should trade again.

John_Gobbel wrote:Just had a round where sheness had a black market trader during the shift and it was done really well. 10/10 should trade again.

Yeah that was awesome. I bought information on one of my targets, and then bought a storage room on hilberts hotel for my steal objectives.

Deleted someone reading WGW. There needs to be more of this.

Usually quite helpful, and occasionally facilitates more interesting gameplay and RP scenarios. Other times, a completely unreasonable banbot. Very mixed opinion.

deedubya wrote:Usually quite helpful, and occasionally facilitates more interesting gameplay and RP scenarios. Other times, a completely unreasonable banbot. Very mixed opinion.

ok now make a policy thread about your ban, you're almost there

Jimmius wrote:

deedubya wrote:Usually quite helpful, and occasionally facilitates more interesting gameplay and RP scenarios. Other times, a completely unreasonable banbot. Very mixed opinion.

ok now make a policy thread about your ban, you're almost there

oh yes jimmius lord forbid someone sees something they disagree with and try to change it, golly gee im fucking shaking dude this deedub guy si SO CRINGEY

Jimmius wrote:

deedubya wrote:Usually quite helpful, and occasionally facilitates more interesting gameplay and RP scenarios. Other times, a completely unreasonable banbot. Very mixed opinion.

ok now make a policy thread about your ban, you're almost there

ATHATH wrote:If deedubya had made yet ANOTHER thread about his ban/the handling of his ban, he'd have been dismissed as simply being salty.

wesoda25 wrote:

Jimmius wrote:

deedubya wrote:Usually quite helpful, and occasionally facilitates more interesting gameplay and RP scenarios. Other times, a completely unreasonable banbot. Very mixed opinion.

ok now make a policy thread about your ban, you're almost there

oh yes jimmius lord forbid someone sees something they disagree with and try to change it, golly gee im fucking shaking dude this deedub guy si SO CRINGEY

yes wesoda you're right i shouldn't make fun of someone for such detailed feedback as "Other times, a completely unreasonable banbot.", by cruelly making fun of him for his post i have stopped the admin from taking this very descriptive feedback on board and becoming a better admin. i promise to you i'll do better in future

Jimmius wrote:

wesoda25 wrote:

Jimmius wrote:

deedubya wrote:Usually quite helpful, and occasionally facilitates more interesting gameplay and RP scenarios. Other times, a completely unreasonable banbot. Very mixed opinion.

ok now make a policy thread about your ban, you're almost there

oh yes jimmius lord forbid someone sees something they disagree with and try to change it, golly gee im fucking shaking dude this deedub guy si SO CRINGEY

yes wesoda you're right i shouldn't make fun of someone for such detailed feedback as "Other times, a completely unreasonable banbot.", by cruelly making fun of him for his post i have stopped the admin from taking this very descriptive feedback on board and becoming a better admin. i promise to you i'll do better in future

thats all i ask

Good person, but I don't think they are good admin

Heavy echoes of Saegrimr to me.

I'm a fan.

A selfless force in a selfish community, peppered with baseless complaints.

Remain vigilant, you're needed here.

The only admin on Sybil that actually deals with issues if they arent personal and doesnt just mark 95% of ahelps as IC issues, leading to most of the playerbase testing out new strategies to be on the good side of the rules yet also remove all fun out of the game.

Okay they arent the only one handling ahelps, but most of the time even just consulting on rules has had it marked as an IC issue. Overall a +1 from me.

Also does testing in the thunderdome and fun events. Thats another +1 right there.

Gets the job done.

EDIT: Nevermind, wrong person, and I cant find the delete button

Actually wasn't me! That was TheMidnightRose! https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... 37&t=20509

They have no fear addressing issues and ahelps professionally and has been a huge source of knowledge to help myself learn not only the game but also as a trialmin.

I really respect you! Thank you!

NecromancerAnne has retired, they are welcome back anytime.

NecromancerAnne has returned.

Timonk wrote: ↑Sun Sep 01, 2019 7:17 pm Good person, but I don't think they are good admin

Actually based, helped an ex headmin admin better

Anne for headmin 2023

WEW LAD. Between this and Ned we're so fucking back