Page 2 of 2

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:30 pm
by bman
cedarbridge wrote:
Sligneris wrote:appears to like a dead game

I can even blame it for getting me a girl.


he got a multicolor-haired, nose-pierced, obese game grill

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:41 pm
by Lazengann
Cedar confirmed for our guy

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 10:35 pm
by Deitus
one of my least favorite admins to deal with. dont see him on often and ahelps are usually met with sarcasm, condescension, and general unprofessionalism. im sure this will be chalked up to "deitus is just being salty" but i've felt this way for some time now, just never cared enough to post it here.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2017 11:36 pm
by BeeSting12
I usually see cedar as the only admin online whenever i log into sybil

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:29 am
by oranges
hard to tell if thats a compliment though

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:01 am
by cedarbridge
Deitus wrote:one of my least favorite admins to deal with. dont see him on often and ahelps are usually met with sarcasm, condescension, and general unprofessionalism. im sure this will be chalked up to "deitus is just being salty" but i've felt this way for some time now, just never cared enough to post it here.


When I give a straight forward ruling and you respond implying that there's some sort of admin conspiracy to change the rule for you and only you, you bet I'm going to be as sarcastic as the implication deserves.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:04 am
by oranges
deitus hating an admin is a compliment

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 1:29 pm
by Deitus
cedarbridge wrote:
Deitus wrote:one of my least favorite admins to deal with. dont see him on often and ahelps are usually met with sarcasm, condescension, and general unprofessionalism. im sure this will be chalked up to "deitus is just being salty" but i've felt this way for some time now, just never cared enough to post it here.


When I give a straight forward ruling and you respond implying that there's some sort of admin conspiracy to change the rule for you and only you, you bet I'm going to be as sarcastic as the implication deserves.


>be rev
>kill nonrev who is attacking other revs
>*BWOINK* hey why are you attacking unimplanted nonrevs?
>be unimplanted nonrev
>guy i dunked in previous round oh-so-happens to be in my department this shift
>leaves immediately upon hearing of revs
>comes back later, slips me, welds me in a locker, and taunts me before spacing me
>"no thats ok"
>"no you're paranoid we're not cherrypicking rulings"

really gets my noggin joggin.

also, you were immediately sarcastic in reply to my initial ahelp, and when i noted this you replied with, and i quote, "your salt is noted xd." this generally snarky attitude is something that i see regularly both in discord, site, and game, and my feedback reflects that.

be sure to pull up all my past notes to try and discredit me, though. surprised it didnt happen with the first reply.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:47 pm
by cedarbridge
Deitus wrote:be sure to pull up all my past notes to try and discredit me, though. surprised it didnt happen with the first reply.

Who needs your notes for that?

If you wanted to discredit yourself you should have just asked for the logs of that conversation.
Spoiler:
[21:30:08]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Deitus/(Jonathan Talist)->Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees): since when is being rev a go-ahead to grief random people if they're not heads?
[21:30:32]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees)->Deitus/(Jonathan Talist): Since when were revs limited to only attacking/killing/spacing heads?
[21:30:58]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Deitus/(Jonathan Talist)->Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees): ive been bwoinked before for killing nonrevs and now it so happens its ok when it happens to me. wew lad
[21:31:11]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees)->Deitus/(Jonathan Talist): You're right. Its a conspiracy
[21:31:29]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Deitus/(Jonathan Talist)->Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees): no, its cherrypicking stupidity. but i expect no less
[21:31:41]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees)->Deitus/(Jonathan Talist): Your salt is noted
[21:31:50]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Deitus/(Jonathan Talist)->Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees): as is your incompetence
[21:31:55]ADMINPRIVATE: PM: Cedarbridge/(Dreams-of-Trees)->Deitus/(Jonathan Talist): xd


You asked a question that I then answered with a question. The answer to my question (they aren't limited to only headhunting heads.) answers your question. You take this ruling to imply that you're subject to some sort of cherrypicking admin conspiracy because people don't like you. I confirm your fears of said admin conspiracy while really having no real reason to care who you are or what rep you've built around here short of your notes (which I checked at that time because frankly I don't have enough contact with you to know or care who you are.) You call me a mean word. I respond with "xd" and that's really more response than the barb deserved.

If you want to be taken seriously, I'd suggest not making dumb accusations that instantly discredit your inquiry. Your response that I would have to cite to your other notes (which are, for the record, ample even apart from the meme notes/bans) is pretty telling, frankly. You find a lot of really dumb ways to get into trouble on your own. If I knew or cared enough about you individually to care about banning you, I'd certainly not need to invent reasons to do so.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:48 pm
by Nilons
Deitus how far do you intend to get when your primary complaint is "was very sarcastic to me"

Some feedback for cedar is goodmin as fuck tells shitters like it is

Edit: Being bwoinked =/= action was taken. It just means an admin wanted to clear something up. An admin bwoinking you in and of itself does not mean what you're doing is against the rules.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:51 pm
by Qbmax32
The deitard gets salty for no reason sometimes, he will calm down eventually

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:50 pm
by Deitus
Nilons wrote:Deitus how far do you intend to get when your primary complaint is "was very sarcastic to me"

Some feedback for cedar is goodmin as fuck tells shitters like it is

Edit: Being bwoinked =/= action was taken. It just means an admin wanted to clear something up. An admin bwoinking you in and of itself does not mean what you're doing is against the rules.


as ive said, its an attitude they have shown multiple times in and out of my interactions with them. being snarky right off the bat isn't "telling shitters like it is," its just having a poor attitude. and yes, i was bwoinked and warned not to hurt nonrevs as a rev before, so a stance was made clear at the time.
for the record, the conversation went something along the lines of
-"hey can you ask [player] why they spaced me? i get that they're rev but it seems kind of shitty they come after me specifically as nonrev"
-"since when are revs not completely able to attack nonrevs?"
-"well i've been bwoinked for it before so i thought it should be the same here"
-"you're right it some massive conspiracy against you"
-"well it seems kind of stupid that admins cherrypick rulings like that"
-"your salt is noted"
-"as is your attitude"
-"xd"
-(your ticket has been closed)

most admins i deal with are
question>clarification>answer
but cedar tends to be
question>sarcasm>attempted clarification>lol whatever>ticket closed

sorry, but thats not cool. maybe cedar's a super nice guy to others but they're usually an unsolicited dick to me.


Qbmax32 wrote:The deitard gets salty for no reason sometimes, he will calm down eventuallu


fugg u qbnerd >:^((((

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:00 pm
by cedarbridge
Deitus wrote:for the record, the conversation went something along the lines of


The logs are literally in my post. Its really hard to take you seriously when you do this.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:51 pm
by Deitus
cedarbridge wrote:
Deitus wrote:for the record, the conversation went something along the lines of


The logs are literally in my post. Its really hard to take you seriously when you do this.


not even an argument, but sure, i'll take the bait.

setting aside the fact that the post was edited, i find it rather amusing that you are so quick to bring up missed points in posts given the recent cat thread where i repeatedly stated my opinion multiple times despite you and other posters ignoring it and your arguments simply boiling down to little more than "lol deitus is bad disregard," something that you continue to do now. past behavior does not discredit current topics, and believe it or not, i have been trying to change my behavior recently, which makes it all the more aggravating when literally years-old notes are brought up for no reason. your replies here also speak volumes to my points that you are generally condescending and apathetic towards the playerbase and your job on a whole with the "ehhh im ABOVE caring about such small matters you lowly player!" attitude.

this is an admin feedback thread, and here's my feedback: you are not a good admin. you need a major attitude adjustment and you need to drop the snarky holier-than-thou approach to your interactions with other players. this has been a continued behavior on your part and it needs to stop.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 5:52 pm
by captain sawrge
I know him and I have disagreed in the past but Im gonna come out and say it: deitus is 100% in the right

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:34 pm
by Qbopper
i feel like this should be an admin complaint

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:36 pm
by cedarbridge
Deitus wrote:this is an admin feedback thread, and here's my feedback: you are not a good admin.

Your feedback has been noted. Thanks for posting!

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:49 pm
by Lazengann
Cedar posts like he's burned out

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:52 pm
by cedarbridge
Lazengann wrote:Cedar posts like he's burned out

Not yet but probably getting there. Mostly, I have very little patience for inane conspiracy theories.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2018 4:30 am
by Shadowflame909
They're a good firm, but fair admin. Pretty active on Sybil as well.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2018 10:01 pm
by oranges
Image

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:13 pm
by cedarbridge
Bumping my own thread because you can't tell me what to do.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Mon Mar 18, 2019 6:47 pm
by Nabski
This "man" is a bully and always would steal my agendas.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 12:52 am
by cedarbridge
Nabski wrote:This "man" is a bully and always would steal my agendas.

NESEI making new sets in FFG's place friendo. The dream lives on.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2019 4:35 am
by Nabski
I liked the runners that retired and came back as connections. I read the spoilers but haven't touched the game in like a year.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:11 am
by elyina
I really like Cedarbridge, every interaction I've had with him in adminhelp has been pleasant, and he has good judgement. When he is handling an adminhelp I sent or I was involved in I know I'm in good hands.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:46 am
by lmwevil
obsessively reads FNR like me, makes me feel less weird +1 for bridges but i dunno about cedars :geek:

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2020 8:25 pm
by cedarbridge
Don't post in my thread.

Re: Cedarbridge

PostPosted: Fri Jul 24, 2020 1:39 am
by Domitius
Revives dead threads and talks about their pogs too much. 8/10.