Page 3 of 7

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 4:42 am
by Tunder

Bottom post of the previous page:

Scones wrote:
EDIT: Also, he edited or asked an admin to edit his objectives to give him greentext after the aforementioned murderboning ended with a dunk.
Why lie?
Wasn't a lie, it almost never happens aside from admin intervention.

I amended the post to reflect this.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:17 am
by Scones
Tunder wrote:
Scones wrote:
EDIT: Also, he edited or asked an admin to edit his objectives to give him greentext after the aforementioned murderboning ended with a dunk.
Why lie?
Wasn't a lie, it almost never happens aside from admin intervention.

I amended the post to reflect this.
I think you being so willing to jump to the conclusion that Sticky had another admin edit his objective says a lot here

And yes, it was a lie. In fact that way you wrote it was such to imply that he had it edited by another admin to allow him to greentext, which is hilarious enough, really.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 7:51 am
by mosquitoman
Scones wrote:As I recall from several mentions, Sticky keeps deadchat off.
no he doesn't

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 7:54 am
by Scones
mosquitoman wrote:
Scones wrote:As I recall from several mentions, Sticky keeps deadchat off.
no he doesn't
[citation needed]

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:01 am
by mosquitoman
Scones wrote:
mosquitoman wrote:
Scones wrote:As I recall from several mentions, Sticky keeps deadchat off.
no he doesn't
[citation needed]
okay, just make the logs public and I'll point out the ones where he's talking on deadchat while playing the game

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:21 am
by Stickymayhem
I keep deadchat on when I'm not an important role like antag, security or a head.

That way I can like, you know, administrate.

#woah #wow

Making turning off deadchat logged so these whiny bitches grasping at straws have none left.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 4:27 pm
by Not-Dorsidarf
I just realised.

The quote from your avatar.

It's not making fun of singulo

It's your goal

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 4:30 pm
by DemonFiren
Don't you mean: The quote from his sig?

And yeah, I figured that out waaaay ahead of you.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 4:48 pm
by Scones
KILL TWENTY-FIVE MILLION PLAYERS

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 4:57 pm
by peoplearestrange
mosquitoman wrote:
Scones wrote:
mosquitoman wrote:
Scones wrote:As I recall from several mentions, Sticky keeps deadchat off.
no he doesn't
[citation needed]
okay, just make the logs public and I'll point out the ones where he's talking on deadchat while playing the game
You know we're not 5 and can actually read information about something without acting upon it in character. In the same way as if you know meta information (such as someone shouting something stupid in OOC) you can ignore it and not let it effect your game play. Its one of the few things that admins have to be able to be trusted not to do in order to admin. Most other servers actually state this in their admin application forms.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 4:59 pm
by Scones
It's sort of subconscious sometimes.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 5:16 pm
by mosquitoman
Stickymayhem wrote:I keep deadchat on when I'm not an important role like antag, security or a head.

That way I can like, you know, administrate.

#woah #wow

Making turning off deadchat logged so these whiny bitches grasping at straws have none left.
It's not "grasping at straws". It's a fact.

If we had public logs everyone could see the instances where you did that and judge accordingly.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 7:08 pm
by Stickymayhem
mosquitoman wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:I keep deadchat on when I'm not an important role like antag, security or a head.

That way I can like, you know, administrate.

#woah #wow

Making turning off deadchat logged so these whiny bitches grasping at straws have none left.
It's not "grasping at straws". It's a baseless unsubstantiated untrue claim.

If we had public logs everyone could see the instances where you did that and judge accordingly.
fixed that for you mate. Come back with evidence or don't come back.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 7:11 pm
by Scones
ONLY TWENTY-FOUR MILLION NINE-HUNDRED NINETY-NINE THOUSAND AND NINE-HUNDRED NINETY-NINE REMAIN.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 8:55 pm
by Vekter
I thought it was illegal to own niggas like that.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 9:38 pm
by onleavedontatme
Stickymayhem wrote: Come back with evidence or don't come back.
Are public logs happening or what there was a lot of shouting back and forth about it and everyone seems to have forgotten about it

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 9:43 pm
by Bluespace
public logs would be the end of me :(

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:23 pm
by Vekter
Kor wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote: Come back with evidence or don't come back.
Are public logs happening or what there was a lot of shouting back and forth about it and everyone seems to have forgotten about it
Thanks for reminding me, I'll have a word with MSO tonight and get the ball rolling.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:38 pm
by mosquitoman
Excuse me, "own"? Nigga's talking on deadchat while playing every other round, tens of players have seen him doing that. You know you do it, I know you do it, many other people also know it, so why lie?

How can I "prove" it if you're the only ones with access to the logs? This is retardation to the utmost degree. You can prove it for yourself, just search the logs.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:13 pm
by Stickymayhem
>Stickymayhem just needs to sign the form and public logs will happen.

No. It's a massive fucking change that mso has been working on for weeks. It's happening but shit just doesn't appear out of nowhere jesus fuck.
mosquitoman wrote:Excuse me, "own"? Nigga's talking on deadchat while playing every other round, tens of players have seen him doing that. You know you do it, I know you do it, many other people also know it, so why lie?

How can I "prove" it if you're the only ones with access to the logs? This is retardation to the utmost degree. You can prove it for yourself, just search the logs.
You're right it's a conspiracy and out of the hundreds of people here you were the only one smart and charismatic enough to break through.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:28 pm
by Vekter
mosquitoman wrote:Excuse me, "own"? Nigga's talking on deadchat while playing every other round, tens of players have seen him doing that. You know you do it, I know you do it, many other people also know it, so why lie?

How can I "prove" it if you're the only ones with access to the logs? This is retardation to the utmost degree. You can prove it for yourself, just search the logs.
Sticky, he knows. Our conspiracy has finally been revealed. We have to tell them the truth.

INSERT OVERDRAMATIC INTERNET BULLSHIT COURTESY OF MOSQUITOMAN

ADMINNING SPACEMAN GAMES IS SERIOUS BUSINESS

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 5:23 am
by Incomptinence
If administration is such a joke to you then deadmining you should be equally inconsequential and fun.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 6:52 am
by Vekter
Incomptinence wrote:If administration is such a joke to you then deadmining you should be equally inconsequential and fun.
No, it's a joke when people take it this fucking seriously. Sticky does fine with what he has. He's just another in a line of scapegoats the very, very vocal minority likes to blame for every little thing that's going wrong in the community.

We could have literally anyone as headmin and someone would bitch incessantly about everything they do.

E: For the record, I think Sticky does a perfectly fine job, considering PAS is too waffle-y for my tastes and HG is never actually around. He's a bit rough and probably says more than he should, but what the fuck ever.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 7:14 am
by mosquitoman
Yes, it is a "conspiracy", as in two or more people trying to hide what they're doing while communicating in secret. As demonstrated by no less than 3 different admin buddies running to each other's rescue in this very thread.

Would I be interested in revealing logs if they can prove I'm lying? Clearly not. Who would be interested in concealing them then? Clearly the ones who can be proven wrong by their contents.

And the post above main is the epitome of everything that's wrong here.

"Admins did nothing wrong"
--Admins

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 7:58 am
by Vekter
mosquitoman wrote:Yes, it is a "conspiracy", as in two or more people trying to hide what they're doing while communicating in secret. As demonstrated by no less than 3 different admin buddies running to each other's rescue in this very thread.
What the actual fuck do you think we're talking about? How to ruin all of your experiences playing SS13? I don't get this concept because what the FUCK do you think we have to hide?

You wanna know what we talk about in adminbus? How much we hate that we bust our fucking asses making the game fun for people like you, just to get shit on constantly because we don't let people see literally everything we do or say.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:37 am
by peoplearestrange
Loud vocal minorities on the forums make this all seem like a bigger issue than any of this really is. In fact the forums have almost become there own mini power game vaguely linked to SS13. Most players are just happy playing the game and these "issues" have little consequence for any more than one round. And then people get on with the game again.
Vekter wrote:
E: For the record, I think Sticky does a perfectly fine job, considering PAS is too waffle-y for my tastes and HG is never actually around.
Lol why did I get lumped in with the other headmins? Has STP gone awol and ive some how usurped them? PAS FUR HEADMIN 2016!

Anyway this has got way off feedback for sticky and has just become an admin bashing thread. Can we go back to plain feedback please.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 11:39 am
by Saegrimr
I think its hilarious someone else is getting the MUH CONSPIRACY treatment other than me for once.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:29 pm
by Vekter
I keep getting PAS and STP confused.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:01 am
by lumipharon
What do people expect to gain from seeing private admin chat logs or whatever?
Anything admins dont want players to read (usually for good reason) they'll just say over some new medium - a bloody skype group or whatever the fuck, it doesn't matter, but if people don't wan you reading something, then this won't change that. Instead, it will just make it more inconvenient for admins since then they'd have to watch what they say privately to other admins, since it's guaranteed people will logdive for shit to bitch about.

Admins have plenty of valid reasons to want privacy to talk about admin shit, or just about how player X is a cunt without them getting pissy.

More on topic, sticky is ok, but it's pretty shitty how (atleast from my perspective) the other 2 headmins are essentially non existent, so sticky seems pretty dictatorish, regardless of whether that's true or not. The dumb footer/banner doesn't help.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 4:06 am
by NikNakFlak
Admins logs aren't going to be apart of public logs anyway, they never were. Public logs are just player stuff and I think admin buttons pushes but never asay.
Dont know for sure.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 7:09 am
by Stickymayhem
I do clear any major decisions with a headmin first. Any policy change or whatever will have two headmins backing it almost always.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 1:27 am
by Hibbles
lumipharon wrote:What do people expect to gain from seeing private admin chat logs or whatever?
Ammunition.

Also Kor is here now and he actually like exists, so that's at least 2/3 so hopefully that issue might lessen.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 6:21 pm
by Bombadil
http://imgur.com/gallery/GMbiWbb/new

This is the aftermath of Sticky fucking with things

So let me explain what happened

Nuke Ops I am one of the ops. Our syndicate commander decides to purchase 3 syndieborgs after we asked to have the tc distributed. There are no tc left we don't even have a single emag or any other gear other than basic. Team is pissed we beat the leader into crit they immediately succumbed afterwards. Then one of the Syndieborgs suicides so we can refund some of the TC. It is at this point Sticky comes out of the bathroom as a Syndicate Commander and then shoots 3 of us to death leaving only a single nuke op alive. The last nuke op proceeds to give up and sends 3 syndiborgs to obtain the nuke disc because this round was already fucked. Then he activates the onstation nuke and spawns 2 blobs after the syndieborgs died
Oh right and from that image I see he alerted the station crew of the nuke borgs/ops coming

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 6:30 pm
by Stickymayhem
I didn't alert anyone.

The operatives ended up having a shootout over buying too many borgs. I walk in, tell everyone involved in the retardation to line up to the right, they do so, then they get shot and replaced with borgs.

Bans could have been handed out for that shitshow but one IC death is probably better than a week off teamantag.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:00 pm
by Bombadil
Stickymayhem wrote:I didn't alert anyone.

The operatives ended up having a shootout over buying too many borgs. I walk in, tell everyone involved in the retardation to line up to the right, they do so, then they get shot and replaced with borgs.

Bans could have been handed out for that shitshow but one IC death is probably better than a week off teamantag.
None of us wanted to buy a cyborg the "Team Leader" just bought 3 in quick succession

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 7:49 pm
by imblyings
Just pointing out that I set the onstation nuke to on.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 12:03 am
by Stickymayhem
Bombadil wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:I didn't alert anyone.

The operatives ended up having a shootout over buying too many borgs. I walk in, tell everyone involved in the retardation to line up to the right, they do so, then they get shot and replaced with borgs.

Bans could have been handed out for that shitshow but one IC death is probably better than a week off teamantag.
None of us wanted to buy a cyborg the "Team Leader" just bought 3 in quick succession
I'm aware of that but that's never been justification for murdering fellow operatives ever.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 10:10 am
by callanrockslol
Stickymayhem wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:I didn't alert anyone.

The operatives ended up having a shootout over buying too many borgs. I walk in, tell everyone involved in the retardation to line up to the right, they do so, then they get shot and replaced with borgs.

Bans could have been handed out for that shitshow but one IC death is probably better than a week off teamantag.
None of us wanted to buy a cyborg the "Team Leader" just bought 3 in quick succession
I'm aware of that but that's never been justification for murdering fellow operatives ever.
I remember when it used to be justified to instantly murder anyone that tried to leave the shuttle with a single cloaker, let alone blow all the money on 3 fucking syndiborgs when everyone else doesn't want one.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Aug 12, 2015 11:50 pm
by sirnat
Threateaned to treat me like trash because im unrobust and got cucked by a temp gun. I want him to apologize and lick my big toe. <3 jk sticky, I've always enjoyed your administrative actions.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:03 am
by Stickymayhem
callanrockslol wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:I didn't alert anyone.

The operatives ended up having a shootout over buying too many borgs. I walk in, tell everyone involved in the retardation to line up to the right, they do so, then they get shot and replaced with borgs.

Bans could have been handed out for that shitshow but one IC death is probably better than a week off teamantag.
None of us wanted to buy a cyborg the "Team Leader" just bought 3 in quick succession
I'm aware of that but that's never been justification for murdering fellow operatives ever.
I remember when it used to be justified to instantly murder anyone that tried to leave the shuttle with a single cloaker, let alone blow all the money on 3 fucking syndiborgs when everyone else doesn't want one.
ok good to know you remember things thanks for the info

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2015 1:41 am
by callanrockslol
Stickymayhem wrote:
callanrockslol wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:
Bombadil wrote:
Stickymayhem wrote:I didn't alert anyone.

The operatives ended up having a shootout over buying too many borgs. I walk in, tell everyone involved in the retardation to line up to the right, they do so, then they get shot and replaced with borgs.

Bans could have been handed out for that shitshow but one IC death is probably better than a week off teamantag.
None of us wanted to buy a cyborg the "Team Leader" just bought 3 in quick succession
I'm aware of that but that's never been justification for murdering fellow operatives ever.
I remember when it used to be justified to instantly murder anyone that tried to leave the shuttle with a single cloaker, let alone blow all the money on 3 fucking syndiborgs when everyone else doesn't want one.
ok good to know you remember things thanks for the info
I'm saying there is precedent for dunking shitty ops for being shit.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 2:08 am
by Scones
Image

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 9:07 am
by Not-Dorsidarf
Glorious leader in exile

Re: Stickymayhem [No longer admin]

Posted: Fri May 13, 2016 12:52 am
by tedward1337
Goodnight, sweet prince

Re: [No longer admin] Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 1:03 am
by Armhulen
He's back.

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:41 am
by Xhuis
[youtube]oyA8odjCzZ4[/youtube]

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:01 am
by Cobby
Is this going to be Vekter 2.0

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 11:12 am
by Incomptinence
all the chefs gonna get banned

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2017 8:43 am
by kevinz000
CosmicScientist wrote:Somebody tell him we already have enough powergamers getting features nerfed. I want my stupid fun weapons to not get nerfed.
mew

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2017 8:19 pm
by oranges
You mean his boyfriend right

Re: Stickymayhem

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 5:41 pm
by Not-Dorsidarf
just remembered he exists.