Page 1 of 2
PKPenguin321
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 11:25 am
by MrStonedOne
Please post any positive or negative feedback for the administrator here.
This is not the place to discuss ban appeals, admin complaints, or ban requests.
This is for specific feedback for this administrator.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 1:37 am
by PKPenguin321
best admin i've ever seen definitely gonna vote him for headmin you all should too
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:31 am
by oranges
takes feedback on code pr's well
learnt git so has to be semi competent.
pretty good
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:30 pm
by Digdugxx
Really friendly, makes me laugh too <3
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:53 pm
by ShadowDimentio
Ruined my self-esteem
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2016 7:44 pm
by TechnoAlchemist
good boy
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 1:07 am
by Atlanta-Ned
Mark my words: In two years we'll all either be working for them or dead by their hand.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 3:24 am
by Luke Cox
Disagrees with my opinions 0/10 worse than Hitler
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:53 pm
by Slignerd
Had my doubts, but seems like a pretty good admin after all.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:41 pm
by sirnat
If he nerfs the temp gun ill give him positive feedback. <3
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:56 pm
by Saegrimr
[18:46:37] <PKPenguin321> why cant the players understand
[18:47:02] <PKPenguin321> i never imagined this would be such a common issue
Looks like he's starting to learn the depths of routine stupidity, how does it feel?
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 12:18 am
by J_Madison
Captain's Charter
Bill Rowe has designated your station as DONT GO IN THE ARMORY NIGGER
I think your response to the guy that went into the armoury and found himself permabrigged is appropriate.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 1:10 am
by PKPenguin321
J_Madison wrote:Captain's Charter
Bill Rowe has designated your station as DONT GO IN THE ARMORY NIGGER
I think your response to the guy that went into the armoury and found himself permabrigged is appropriate.
Naming the station like that wasn't me but yeah that was pretty funny
Armory is a restricted area (moonlighting is NOT OKAY)
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 1:16 am
by ShadowDimentio
Didn't give me a note for double dunking an atmos tech who hit three strikes and was out, listened when I argued my case and ruled in my favor, cool dude even if my self-esteem from being cucked is shattered
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 12:53 pm
by Aloraydrel
Good boy
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:45 pm
by John_Oxford
J_Madison wrote:Captain's Charter
Bill Rowe has designated your station as DONT GO IN THE ARMORY NIGGER
I think your response to the guy that went into the armoury and found himself permabrigged is appropriate.
'
the memes we're good that round, he shouldnt have gone into the armory.
also, 10/10 admin would make headmin so he can become corrupted through the experience.'
hint: it was me i am best memester ok
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:14 pm
by J_Madison
I'd glad we've been able to come to agreement on 20 TC revenant being awful in general.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2016 10:45 pm
by ShadowDimentio
JMad is your only purpose here to whine about everything? At least I spice things up with shitposting on the side.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2016 3:13 am
by IrishWristWatch0
>actually has their feedback link in their signature .
casual
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2016 7:29 am
by Alipheese
Haven't seen him too extensively. Only around 20 rounds. But agood admin, interacts with the players, talks with them about fun / event rounds and helps out alot.
10/10 min.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2016 11:06 am
by Okand37
They've been doing a great job as an administrator and are certainly a welcome addition to the team! I'm happy they're being able to both administrate and make it more enjoyable for players!
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2016 7:38 pm
by PKPenguin321
Alipheese wrote:Haven't seen him too extensively. Only around 20 rounds. But agood admin, interacts with the players, talks with them about fun / event rounds and helps out alot.
10/10 min.
You can usually catch me during weekdays late on Sybil when it's around 30 pop. I don't jump into Bagil too often unless there are no other admins.
Thanks for the feedback!
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2016 12:05 pm
by Danowar
- Pretty cool dude
- Fun adminfuckery
- Reasonable judgement
10/10
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 12:15 am
by John_Oxford
-10/10 admin fuckery does not do it enough needs to push more buttons
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 4:16 am
by calzilla1
John_Oxford wrote:-10/10 admin fuckery does not do it enough needs to push more buttons
Wait was it on the shuttle? If so then i was the scientist beating you with a crowbar
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:22 am
by Armhulen
It hurt to watch. How was everyone who worked to kill you not banned again?
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:12 pm
by PKPenguin321
John_Oxford wrote:-10/10 admin fuckery does not do it enough needs to push more buttons
Remember to vote me for headmin so we can hashtag bring back ban requests
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:15 am
by ShadowDimentio
Continue being a good boy and promote your good rival buddy Shadow to admin once you win, ok PKP?
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 12:33 pm
by D&B
Goes to immesurable debts to forego reading the context, or is simply oblivious enough not to read posts and acts based on biased shortening of actions. Truly sad to see in a headmin, hope this improves.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:12 pm
by PKPenguin321
D&B wrote:Goes to immesurable debts to forego reading the context, or is simply oblivious enough not to read posts and acts based on biased shortening of actions. Truly sad to see in a headmin, hope this improves.
cease these memes
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:01 am
by D&B
Not a meme this time
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:38 am
by PKPenguin321
D&B wrote:Not a meme this time
But it's about dannno's lack of buttposting isn't it
Or is it about the jmad ban?
?
I cant tell anymore
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:26 am
by metacide
Seems not to want any scrutiny of that
J_Mad incident where PKP and Danno week-banned J_Mad from sec after what seems like clear ban-baiting from (?fellow admin) Pax.
Why doesn't PKP want people to talk about the general issue of escalation and ban-baiting? Why lock that mention of this on the policy forum?
Where else is the place to discuss this sort of thing? It seems like valid and just criticism that is worth discussing openly elsewhere from the NTR hut.
It looks quite fair and reasonable to try to clarify what went on here and how it impacts current sec policy.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:46 am
by danno
- . -
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:47 am
by danno
pax was not an admin at the time and it wouldn't have factored into the situation regardless
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 8:45 am
by PKPenguin321
I don't know where you were when this was originally discussed, but there was already a week long shitshow and my post before locking that thread gave you a really really basic tl;dr of what it ended up boiling down to. I've already "faced scrutiny" (see: been found in the right) over this. Just because it wasn't by you doesn't mean it's invalid.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:43 am
by J_Madison
I think you prematurely locked the thread.
There was still discussion to be had.
I think you should unlock the thread because it seems something happened to the ban.
The ban was removed before the week duration is over.
It seems someone reduced it without mentioning it, but it was a headmin reinforced ban.
Are you sure it's a clear and cut case if it was reduced early, and are you sure all headmins agreed on your decison?
The very matter that other players three weeks in find the ban unreasonable should indicate this is something to discuss and it shouldn't be locked. The headmins of the past very rarely locked threads in policy discussion prematurely.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 2:01 pm
by Qbopper
What is there to be said on the topic that wasn't said in the ban appeal, though? Maybe locking the thread was a mistake but it was discussed for a fairly long time, and I don't see any arguments beyond what was posted previously popping up
Also no one has started yet but please don't discuss the issue itself in here
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 4:04 pm
by captain sawrge
J_Madison wrote:I think you prematurely locked the thread.
There was still discussion to be had.
I think you should unlock the thread because it seems something happened to the ban.
The ban was removed before the week duration is over.
It seems someone reduced it without mentioning it, but it was a headmin reinforced ban.
Are you sure it's a clear and cut case if it was reduced early, and are you sure all headmins agreed on your decison?
The very matter that other players three weeks in find the ban unreasonable should indicate this is something to discuss and it shouldn't be locked. The headmins of the past very rarely locked threads in policy discussion prematurely.
There has been an ongoing discussion regarding security moderation in the admin forum, it was pointless to have a second thread given that policy threads are exclusively just back-and-forth pointless arguing and have never solved anything.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:26 pm
by J_Madison
captain sawrge wrote:J_Madison wrote:I think you prematurely locked the thread.
There was still discussion to be had.
I think you should unlock the thread because it seems something happened to the ban.
The ban was removed before the week duration is over.
It seems someone reduced it without mentioning it, but it was a headmin reinforced ban.
Are you sure it's a clear and cut case if it was reduced early, and are you sure all headmins agreed on your decison?
The very matter that other players three weeks in find the ban unreasonable should indicate this is something to discuss and it shouldn't be locked. The headmins of the past very rarely locked threads in policy discussion prematurely.
There has been an ongoing discussion regarding security moderation in the admin forum, it was pointless to have a second thread given that policy threads are exclusively just back-and-forth pointless arguing and have never solved anything.
Alrighty. It seems a little strange and foreign to me because the previous headmins have usually been more lax in regards to locking the threads.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:05 pm
by lzimann
unironically turned gang back on, very disappointed
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:13 am
by Qbopper
lzimann wrote:unironically turned gang back on, very disappointed
wait, like, the config?
pkp what the fuck I voted for you
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:14 am
by PKPenguin321
Qbopper wrote:lzimann wrote:unironically turned gang back on, very disappointed
wait, like, the config?
pkp what the fuck I voted for you
http://ss13.eu/tgdb/tg/ingamepolls.php#p166
and player support when mode was ran, and a unanimous headmin decision
gang will be revived and is currently is only 1 tick more likely than Extended (so really rare)
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:23 am
by lzimann
PKPenguin321 wrote:Qbopper wrote:lzimann wrote:unironically turned gang back on, very disappointed
wait, like, the config?
pkp what the fuck I voted for you
http://ss13.eu/tgdb/tg/ingamepolls.php#p166
and player support when mode was ran, and a unanimous headmin decision
gang will be revived and is currently is only 1 tick more likely than Extended (so really rare)
Players voted for ERP(and will most likely vote yes if a poll is ran again), doesn't mean it's a good thing.
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:09 am
by oranges
just because you don't like someting doesn't mean it's a bad thing either that's a really stupid argument
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 5:35 am
by Qbopper
PKPenguin321 wrote:Qbopper wrote:lzimann wrote:unironically turned gang back on, very disappointed
wait, like, the config?
pkp what the fuck I voted for you
http://ss13.eu/tgdb/tg/ingamepolls.php#p166
and player support when mode was ran, and a unanimous headmin decision
gang will be revived and is currently is only 1 tick more likely than Extended (so really rare)
I mean I was half joking, I hate gang but I'm not going to bash you for it when the poll was in favor, though I do have to concede to the point that players often vote for things that may not be good in the long term
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:14 am
by Slignerd
Qbopper wrote:pkp what the fuck I voted for you
that's where you went wrong
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:58 am
by PKPenguin321
Sligneris wrote:Qbopper wrote:pkp what the fuck I voted for you
that's where you went wrong
It was a unanimous vote, if my headmin spot was occupied by anybody else this still would have gone through by the other two, not sure why you have such a grudge
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 4:48 pm
by Qbopper
PKPenguin321 wrote:Sligneris wrote:Qbopper wrote:pkp what the fuck I voted for you
that's where you went wrong
It was a unanimous vote, if my headmin spot was occupied by anybody else this still would have gone through by the other two, not sure why you have such a grudge
yeah why did you feel the need to post this
I have a personal dislike of gang so I figured I would make a light jab at pkp
Re: PKPenguin321
Posted: Sun Apr 30, 2017 9:45 pm
by oranges
stop grudging him qbobber