Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:32 pm
Bottom post of the previous page:
And, i'm the most active admin on this server, so.Page 2 of 2
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 11:19 pm
I mean, honestly I think the way Pax is responding to criticism in this thread is a probably a good indicator of whether or not he should be an admin.
Spoiler:
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2017 11:36 pm
Docprofsmith wrote:I mean, honestly I think the way Pax is responding to criticism in this thread is a probably a good indicator of whether or not he should be an admin.
Spoiler:
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:23 am
i guess it's the logical extension that we go from guy who i've bwoinked once and muted ooc on three times (extend), guy who i've never even seen in-game but cussed me out for telling them that their idea didn't work several months ago(remove and rambling paragraphs) to guy i just haven't seen before (uhhhh just remove i guess)Docprofsmith wrote:I mean, honestly I think the way Pax is responding to criticism in this thread is a probably a good indicator of whether or not he should be an admin.
Spoiler:
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 12:40 am
irony alertDocprofsmith wrote:I mean, honestly I think the way Pax is responding to criticism in this thread is a probably a good indicator of whether or not he should be an admin.
Spoiler:
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:06 am
Pax is a good admin, and was a decent player despite what a lot of people think.
I'd say you should make yourself free pax because you are too good for this.
I'd say you should make yourself free pax because you are too good for this.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:12 am
as someone who plays security for hours on end i can tell you bryce pax is not even close to the worst of the bunch for "greytiding" and such.
also out of all the critique in the thread i wouldn't agree with mr shove 300 rods up the station's hull.
also out of all the critique in the thread i wouldn't agree with mr shove 300 rods up the station's hull.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:13 am
It's literally,
in the literal sense,
a "meme" to scream about pax being a bad player
in the literal sense,
a "meme" to scream about pax being a bad player
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:20 am
This is why I don't think you should be an admin, Packs. I brought up a completely valid reason to be cautious about you becoming an admin, and how do you respond? You mock me, tell me to get over it rather than take responsibility, then take a shot at me. My opinion of you hasn't changed since that particular incident because you haven't changed.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:37 am
uhSweaterkittens wrote:be cautious about you becoming an admin, and how do you respond?
meanwhileSweaterkittens wrote:Remove.
this was a single argument several months ago where all you did was cuss me out when i asked you to back up your own intellectual horseSweaterkittens wrote:valid reason
i'm sorry if i found your idea horrible, explained why it was horrible, and your response was to just tell me to fuck off a bunch, but you really need to get over it because that particular night said more about you than it did about meSweaterkittens wrote:You mock me, tell me to get over it rather than take responsibility, then take a shot at me.
you're also an extremely mockable person and this is your last-ditch effort to try and get me deadminned so i'm going to be a little combative because i don't think someone who has zero actual experience with me beyond trying to drown me out with profanities really has a valid say in whether or not i'm admin
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:45 am
Is that really how you remember it? "Drowning you out with profanities?" You came into a reasonable discussion and we tried to talk to you (and I'll mention for everyone's sake that we were absolutely pleasant and cordial with you) for almost 20 minutes before we gave up, after which you hounded us constantly. I don't even know how to respond to this because it's so off-base. Do you not remember us trying to talk to you? Do you not remember us trying to have a discussion with you before we realize you were just talking past us and ignoring us when we responded?
You're right, it was a single argument months ago. But it was just one example. Do you want me to give you more? The fact that you're still acting like an asshole even months from now, again, proves to me that you haven't changed. And my opinion of you still stands.
This is your feedback thread where we decide whether you get promoted, extended or removed. It's my job to post my opinions on you in here, not some personal vendetta to get you deadminned. I think you're combative, arrogant and childish, and I think you'd make an extremely poor admin. So yeah, I'm going to make sure I voice those concerns here because I want everyone on the server to have a good time, and not have to deal with you in a position of power.
You're right, it was a single argument months ago. But it was just one example. Do you want me to give you more? The fact that you're still acting like an asshole even months from now, again, proves to me that you haven't changed. And my opinion of you still stands.
This is your feedback thread where we decide whether you get promoted, extended or removed. It's my job to post my opinions on you in here, not some personal vendetta to get you deadminned. I think you're combative, arrogant and childish, and I think you'd make an extremely poor admin. So yeah, I'm going to make sure I voice those concerns here because I want everyone on the server to have a good time, and not have to deal with you in a position of power.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:47 am
apparently someone had logs, if it is truly so integral to the happenings of this thread people can decide for themselves
https://pastebin.com/KmDg4zUL
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
https://pastebin.com/KmDg4zUL
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:06 am
can you guys like keep the shitposts out this is about icepacks not oxford/acid getting into a shitposting slapfight.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:28 am
Alright I read the whole pastebin for some reason
In which sweaterkittens ignores every valid criticism Pax brought up regarding disablers and the very common "both sides will harm the other if the other side is stunned" scenarios, and then declares that IcePacks's points were all "refuted" so they're done talking about it. IcePacks says to post it on forums and sweaterkittens says no and that they're going to sneak around oranges and play maintainer politics instead.
It wasn't a case of IcePacks ignoring SK to talk over them it was just SK not even responding to Packs and then declaring the argument won and done.
Giving borgs boxing gloves is a better idea than a disabler
In which sweaterkittens ignores every valid criticism Pax brought up regarding disablers and the very common "both sides will harm the other if the other side is stunned" scenarios, and then declares that IcePacks's points were all "refuted" so they're done talking about it. IcePacks says to post it on forums and sweaterkittens says no and that they're going to sneak around oranges and play maintainer politics instead.
It wasn't a case of IcePacks ignoring SK to talk over them it was just SK not even responding to Packs and then declaring the argument won and done.
Giving borgs boxing gloves is a better idea than a disabler
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:30 am
I wonder if sweaterkittens didn't think anyone would check or if they have alzheimer'sLazengann wrote:Alright I read the whole pastebin for some reason
In which sweaterkittens ignores every valid criticism Pax brought up regarding disablers and the very common "both sides will harm the other if the other side is stunned" scenarios, and then declares that IcePacks's points were all "refuted" so they're done talking about it. IcePacks says to post it on forums and sweaterkittens says no and that they're going to sneak around oranges and play maintainer politics instead.
It wasn't a case of IcePacks ignoring SK to talk over them it was just SK not even responding to Packs and then declaring the argument won and done.
Giving borgs boxing gloves is a better idea than a disabler
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:11 am
I think SK thinks that they are just genuinely in the right and still do, I've had similar conversations with themNilons wrote:I wonder if sweaterkittens didn't think anyone would check or if they have alzheimer'sLazengann wrote:Alright I read the whole pastebin for some reason
In which sweaterkittens ignores every valid criticism Pax brought up regarding disablers and the very common "both sides will harm the other if the other side is stunned" scenarios, and then declares that IcePacks's points were all "refuted" so they're done talking about it. IcePacks says to post it on forums and sweaterkittens says no and that they're going to sneak around oranges and play maintainer politics instead.
It wasn't a case of IcePacks ignoring SK to talk over them it was just SK not even responding to Packs and then declaring the argument won and done.
Giving borgs boxing gloves is a better idea than a disabler
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... 85#p267585
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:21 am
If Sweaterkittens thinks that Pax will make for a shit admin, he must be given headmin immediately.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:22 am
Oh wow that's aggressively stubbornKor wrote:I think SK thinks that they are just genuinely in the right and still do, I've had similar conversations with themNilons wrote:I wonder if sweaterkittens didn't think anyone would check or if they have alzheimer'sLazengann wrote:Alright I read the whole pastebin for some reason
In which sweaterkittens ignores every valid criticism Pax brought up regarding disablers and the very common "both sides will harm the other if the other side is stunned" scenarios, and then declares that IcePacks's points were all "refuted" so they're done talking about it. IcePacks says to post it on forums and sweaterkittens says no and that they're going to sneak around oranges and play maintainer politics instead.
It wasn't a case of IcePacks ignoring SK to talk over them it was just SK not even responding to Packs and then declaring the argument won and done.
Giving borgs boxing gloves is a better idea than a disabler
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... 85#p267585
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 2:47 pm
It would behoove us all if we would keep the discussion related to IcePacks' admin antics from this point onwards, I'm sure
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:24 pm
^danno wrote:It would behoove us all if we would keep the discussion related to IcePacks' admin antics from this point onwards, I'm sure
this isn't SK's feedback thread
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:41 pm
What slap fight...kevinz000 wrote:can you guys like keep the shitposts out this is about icepacks not oxford/acid getting into a shitposting slapfight.
I don't remember posting more than once in this thread what have I done unknowingly.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Mon Jun 12, 2017 8:05 pm
Bwoinked me so I could tell him to fuck off in case he got demoted I vote to promote
Edit: the man cares about the individual wants and needs of players even when those wants are to be very mean to him, how can you not promote this. He's a fucking masochist when it comes to being a goodmin
Edit: the man cares about the individual wants and needs of players even when those wants are to be very mean to him, how can you not promote this. He's a fucking masochist when it comes to being a goodmin
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 6:37 pm
shoutout to ice packs his soul trapped in the vhs static realm bless up
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 8:01 pm
I've seen him active fewer times than I've seen him just be AFK, but when he IS active, he's pretty good.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:37 am
Pax good.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 2:03 am
stop playing the "I do cocaine" ogg and you'll have my vote, otherwise remove
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 2:05 am
Docprofsmith wrote:I mean, honestly I think the way Pax is responding to criticism in this thread is a probably a good indicator of whether or not he should be an admin.
Spoiler:
Screen cappin this post
and pax is objectively a nice person and admin
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 4:08 am
he can't be worse than swarge and danno right?
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:12 am
no can-doQbopper wrote:stop playing the "I do cocaine" ogg and you'll have my vote, otherwise remove
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:59 am
funniest fruit in the building over hereoranges wrote:he can't be worse than swarge and danno right?
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 7:50 am
Let me try to rephrase, you both have a very similar approach to forum posting style and how you treat people outside of administration interaction as icepax but you both turned out to be legitimately good admins, does that make it clearer?danno wrote:funniest fruit in the building over hereoranges wrote:he can't be worse than swarge and danno right?
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:37 am
oranges wrote:Let me try to rephrase, you both have a very similar approach to forum posting style and how you treat people outside of administration interaction as icepax but you both turned out to be legitimately good admins, does that make it clearer?danno wrote:funniest fruit in the building over hereoranges wrote:he can't be worse than swarge and danno right?
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:48 am
0 - 1 - 0
He's active but I've yet to see a good event / .ogg jam session / or a proper TC trade from him.
He gets no wew but one ladds.
He's active but I've yet to see a good event / .ogg jam session / or a proper TC trade from him.
He gets no wew but one ladds.
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:29 pm
thanks oranges 
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 5:49 pm
goodmin
edit: that means upgrade
edit: that means upgrade
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 6:45 pm
surprisingly insightful post from the fruitoranges wrote:Let me try to rephrase, you both have a very similar approach to forum posting style and how you treat people outside of administration interaction as icepax but you both turned out to be legitimately good admins, does that make it clearer?danno wrote:funniest fruit in the building over hereoranges wrote:he can't be worse than swarge and danno right?
I feel the same way tbh re: posting styles, the three of you are very similar in that sense and I can't think of any time you guys have ever been poor admins in game
Re: Trialmin Review: IcePacks
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:11 pm
Promoted