Moderator: In-Game Head Admins
Anuv wrote:snip
Shadowflame909 wrote:oranges wrote:What if I added a nickname field in prefs that shows up in your character description when you're examined?
Can we add backstories that show up when your character's examined?
oranges wrote:Shadowflame909 wrote:oranges wrote:What if I added a nickname field in prefs that shows up in your character description when you're examined?
Can we add backstories that show up when your character's examined?
https://pastebin.com/hFfYH2st
No
[MENTAL STATUS]:Unstable,Autistic
ausops wrote:apart from this there is literally nothing more to say other than that this is the first thread in five years to have achieved something.
Nilons wrote:BeeSting12 wrote:I can't remember if it was nerv or ari but they said a name with "von" in it, as long as it's good faith, is allowed.
either youre misinformed somehow or they were lying, because I was told the direct opposite by nervere
btfoNikNakFlak wrote:But Ostrava DeBoletaria or Ostrava VonBoletaria would probably be ok and that's what Vaina is arguing about
also the fact you're telling players to skirt policy and toe the line because its stupid means you should just not have it in the first place
oranges wrote:What if I added a nickname field in prefs that shows up in your character description when you're examined?
Steelpoint wrote:Nanotrasen only hires people of Western descent. Or at least fill in a Western sounding name on the employment form.
iamgoofball wrote:Steelpoint wrote:Nanotrasen only hires people of Western descent. Or at least fill in a Western sounding name on the employment form.
Can I start asking people to prove they're not islamic at HoP?
iamgoofball wrote:oranges wrote:Shadowflame909 wrote:oranges wrote:What if I added a nickname field in prefs that shows up in your character description when you're examined?
Can we add backstories that show up when your character's examined?
https://pastebin.com/hFfYH2st
No[MENTAL STATUS]:Unstable,Autistic
it could of stopped there honestly
PKPenguin321 wrote:iamgoofball wrote:oranges wrote:Shadowflame909 wrote:oranges wrote:What if I added a nickname field in prefs that shows up in your character description when you're examined?
Can we add backstories that show up when your character's examined?
https://pastebin.com/hFfYH2st
No[MENTAL STATUS]:Unstable,Autistic
it could of stopped there honestly
I saw this reply coming but laughed anyways
bobbahbrown wrote:PKPenguin321 wrote:iamgoofball wrote:oranges wrote:Shadowflame909 wrote:oranges wrote:What if I added a nickname field in prefs that shows up in your character description when you're examined?
Can we add backstories that show up when your character's examined?
https://pastebin.com/hFfYH2st
No[MENTAL STATUS]:Unstable,Autistic
it could of stopped there honestly
I saw this reply coming but laughed anyways
I saw this reply coming but replied anyways
Grazyn wrote:>examine someone
>client locks up from the amount of text in description
the future of /tg/
Anuv wrote:Grazyn wrote:>examine someone
>client locks up from the amount of text in description
the future of /tg/
>not min/maxing your powergame and flooding your description to crash all sec trying to see if your gun is real
confused rock wrote:Brb adding muslim quirk that gives you burkha and make pork make sad
NoxVS wrote:To what extent does the leniency for wiz and clowns and such extend? Can you have OOC references in your name?
duckay wrote:This doesn't change jackshit about before, because it still lies heavily on the admins definition of 'reasonable', only difference being that admins still have to apply it to Agent ID's, Clowns and Wizards only with more leniency, which will probably differ amongst the admins.
We arent Aurora stop implementing shit to encourage RP in a server that most of the time gets its best memes from the least RP moments.
iamgoofball wrote:I was just abused by a trial administrator in game for reporting character names that violated the specific policy set out in here. I'll be filing a complaint when the round is over.
Tell your trial mins to not fucking harass people for asking for clarification on if something is acceptable for your new fucking policy.
ghostecho wrote:I still don't see why we don't just do away with naming policy for the most part
I could make a simple one that'd do just fine, watch
1: No historical figure names (e.g., Karl Marx, Adolf Hitler, Julius Caeser, etc)
2: wackiness is allowed, but do not directly reference memes (T'khotalenuch Jellybutter, buy not Dan K. Meme)
3: Only one honorific and nickname allowed per name
Yeah sure its not a refined, perfect policy, but I imagine people would probably be happier overall
Let people have their fun with names, let them do wacky memey shit, sure have some restrictions, but don't try to act like we aren't a low roleplay station when we have greytiders uniting under GAMERS RISE UP, and conspirators whispering under hushed voices "So I've got this good meme for us to do..."
Steelpoint wrote:Just name your Wizard character your OOC name, nothing can go wrong.
Being serious, I would be disappointed if we ditched our naming policy for something even more loose. I like to pretend this is a low RP server although many people seem to act we should be a no RP server, and the naming policy is one of the only small silvers of sanity that try and act like we care about immersion to a minor degree.
Personally I've never supported even the memey names that some non-Humans use, I feel true whacky names should be reserved for the Clown, Mime and certain Antagonists like the Wizard.
Steelpoint wrote:Just name your Wizard character your OOC name, nothing can go wrong.
Being serious, I would be disappointed if we ditched our naming policy for something even more loose. I like to pretend this is a low RP server although many people seem to act we should be a no RP server, and the naming policy is one of the only small silvers of sanity that try and act like we care about immersion to a minor degree.
Personally I've never supported even the memey names that some non-Humans use, I feel true whacky names should be reserved for the Clown, Mime and certain Antagonists like the Wizard.
Steelpoint wrote:Low RP still implies some level of roleplay.
Having a somewhat realistic universe, with real sounding people and places, onboard a seemingly functional and realistic future space station, that then has to deal with the crazy and wacky shit that happens every round is what strikes me as amusing and fun.
Everyone running around with retarded names, antag hunting and acting one step below talking in OOC is not fun, interesting or engaging. At that point you may as well join the Antag Deathmatch server.
Steelpoint wrote:Nicknames are something that should be earned not stated in your name, why would an official company profile put someone's nickname in a official document?
Would Alan 'Robuster' Bentway be acceptable? Its the same quality as any other nickname.
Furthemore, titles like esquire are something I'd see in medieval UK not in the 26th century by some Cargo Technician.
Oldman Robustin at least follows the naming conventions as we see.
Steelpoint wrote:Nicknames being a separate entity is a code issue, but until that is implemented (if at all) then I still nonetheless profess that Nicknames should stay out of your official name.
Esquire is a British thing, usually for upper class individuals or akin in a professional situation. Which is odd since Nanotrasen seems to take more of an American influence than British influence.
At the end of it however, its not the 'esquire' I have a issue with but the concept of an prefix or suffix in someone's name. Your name should just be FirstName LastName. Now that be Alan Bentway, George Seeman, Muhammad Hashim or whatever, and the names should be somewhat realistic or at least not completely on the nose.
Oldman Robustin is not on the nose, its tame. Chad Thunderock is very on the fucking nose.
Now, people suicidally charging Nuke Ops is not really a issue and is a waste of an argument. If anything I find it interesting when you have a crew of regular people doing outlandish things, which is at the core of SS13. Hearing that John Bradley the Janitor managed to outrobst a Nuke Op is far more amusing than hearing that Jane 'Foxy' Spread Esq did the same thing, and that now half the crew have a snowflake name with shitty titles, suffixes and nicknames that no one is going to use.
Keep it short, keep it simple and keep it sane. If you want a whacky name, play as the Clown.
Like seriously, how does half the crew going to charge a red suited nukie with a desword and assault borg and two other nukies with LM6s, or a wizard with magic missile and fireball not break "immersion" more than someone having esquire in their name?
NikNakFlak wrote:Like seriously, how does half the crew going to charge a red suited nukie with a desword and assault borg and two other nukies with LM6s, or a wizard with magic missile and fireball not break "immersion" more than someone having esquire in their name?
in what way is this immersion breaking wtf
Steelpoint wrote:This is the third time I'm stating this. I personally believe that a somewhat realistic crew setting, with authentic appearing people, in a authentic environment, suffering through horrible and amusing trials and tribulations involving whacky Wizards, cold Mercenaries and lurking Traitors is a more interesting experience.
Removing our naming policy as it stands and loosening it would, in my opinion, tarnish the game as a whole. As I've stated, I believe we are at minimum a lowRP server, that standard, despite being a low one, does imply some levels of roleplay and my belief is our naming policy is a cornerstone of that.
duckay wrote:I'm more concerned about the shit nuke ops and traitors will get for naming themselves 'GibX Operative #1' or something similar.
Because y'know, Agent ID's aren't out of the question.
Naloac wrote:Since you have asked for a *community opinion* and im the player voted admin. Ill give you my official opinion straight from the *community* Your fucking retarded
Steelpoint wrote:This is the third time I'm stating this. I personally believe that a somewhat realistic crew setting, with authentic appearing people, in a authentic environment, suffering through horrible and amusing trials and tribulations involving whacky Wizards, cold Mercenaries and lurking Traitors is a more interesting experience.
Removing our naming policy as it stands and loosening it would, in my opinion, tarnish the game as a whole. As I've stated, I believe we are at minimum a lowRP server, that standard, despite being a low one, does imply some levels of roleplay and my belief is our naming policy is a cornerstone of that.
Users browsing this forum: Nabski