Trialmin review: Kevinz000
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 12:51 am
The day has come, tell us /tg/station, how did he do in these two months of trial?
He makes jokes into serious things and serious things into jokes. He never takes feedback seriously and continues bad admin habits. His Pax ban was incredibly telling, wherein he completely failed to communicate, banned over something that could easily be passed as IC or rule 10, and went through with it despite the victim of Pax saying outright he was fine and actually found Pax's actions amusing.
That last point is the one I'm MOST concerned about. A player actively tells you that another player amused him, yet you ban that other player anyways because their playstyle didn't conform to your vision of the game. Your vision is so flawed that you've actually removed amusement from the game. It's not forgivable.
aside from him being a meme and just that, i havent heard much positive about himKevins horrid abuse of midis actually prompted me to write a full guide on how to properly trim sounds to play them on the server, evidently he has still somehow missed the message
Still goes afk 99/100 times that I see him on server, always stealthmins when he does it, doesn't pop in when a stray ahelp appears, so the only discernable reason for him to do this is farming play time on the stat tracker. Obnoxious behavior, evidently he didn't get the message last time I mentioned this here. I've begun just kicking him if we already have a reasonable amount of admins anyways.
From this I've gathered that he doesn't seem to learn from past negative feedback. Definitely a red flag.
Can I just say that I believe in this case that they were either someone who ran into a cloud of plasma on fire as non antag and burned down about 4 different areas, or someone that was just spamming links for OOC (forgot which guy)? I didn't just seek them out because I saw them have lots of ckeys on the database, I don't do that, I only looked them up after I was given significant reason to.danno wrote:My biggest concern is that despite the fact that Kevinz000 is the perfect example of what bad administration is, there will be a cavalcade of posts in this thread that read;
"Oh my god, Kev is sOoOoOOoOOO nice and funnyyyyyyy, he does the meme face so dank XD"
The idea that Kevin would receive fullmin just because he acts friendly towards some of the few players who actually post on the forums makes me uneasy.
Kevin treats his administrative position like a whip he has to crack behind the backs of the players, simply to vindictively remind them that he is there. He is embarrassingly aggro in anything he does.
eg. (This was taken from "Legendary Ahelps" in the admin forum, which in itself is a fucking horrifying indication of the mindset of some of our recent trialmins.)
There's nothing legendary about this. It's fucking embarrassing. It's a game, for christ sake. You don't have to spend your time actively seeking out reasons to ban people. The ban quota is a joke. A JOKE.
This is but a drop into the pool that is all of the embarrassing shit involving Kevinz000. If you haven't seen it, I suggest you read IcePack's appeal. This is one of the lamest and most limp-dick Kevin interactions I have seen. "Thin Ice" is fucking astounding.
We recently found out that in ~1 month of adminning, Kevin has permanently banned almost 50 players from the game. That's enough people to populate an entire server. That's more perma bans than some long standing admins have, period.
That's not impressive.
That's awful. It infuriated a lot of admins which I hold in high regard.
Kevinz000 is the poster boy of admins who have a dangerous misunderstanding of what being an admin means. It doesn't mean putting every single person you can on the watchlist, or permabanning at every opportunity.
You bring shame to this video game.
Can you please actually check the ban database before screaming that I permabanned a server's worth of people? The grand majority of my permabans are NOT server bans as I've explained above, and you are aware that clicking "command roles" in jobbans or anything similar for department/section banning will apply the amount of bans equal to the amount of jobs under that section so when I command permabanned someone it shows as 7?danno wrote:Probably just meant normal bans
Which is still like 2 bans a day.
fwiw those numbers were flawed. I rebuilt the query:danno wrote: We recently found out that in ~1 month of adminning, Kevin has permanently banned almost 50 players from the game. That's enough people to populate an entire server. That's more perma bans than some long standing admins have, period.
2 months, but you get my point, I'm not trying to ban everyone I see.danno wrote: We recently found out that in ~1 month of adminning, Kevin has permanently banned almost 50 players from the game. That's enough people to populate an entire server. That's more perma bans than some long standing admins have, period.
I mean, I can understand where you're coming fromQbopper wrote:I think danno makes some good points but is overly aggressive about it so I find it hard to support that post
This is still a ridiculous amount of bans for a two month periodAtlanta-Ned wrote:fwiw those numbers were flawed. I rebuilt the query:danno wrote: We recently found out that in ~1 month of adminning, Kevin has permanently banned almost 50 players from the game. That's enough people to populate an entire server. That's more perma bans than some long standing admins have, period.
71 - JOB_TEMPBAN
54 - JOB_PERMABAN
48 - TEMPBAN
7 - PERMABAN
Saeg's replacement?Sometinyprick wrote:This is still a ridiculous amount of bans for a two month periodAtlanta-Ned wrote:fwiw those numbers were flawed. I rebuilt the query:danno wrote: We recently found out that in ~1 month of adminning, Kevin has permanently banned almost 50 players from the game. That's enough people to populate an entire server. That's more perma bans than some long standing admins have, period.
71 - JOB_TEMPBAN
54 - JOB_PERMABAN
48 - TEMPBAN
7 - PERMABAN
Fair enough, I suppose, I just stand by what I said about people doubling down in the face of aggressiondanno wrote:I mean, I can understand where you're coming fromQbopper wrote:I think danno makes some good points but is overly aggressive about it so I find it hard to support that post
but you have to understand that for the most part, once people pass trialmin; They are in. And they won't be removed for at the least a very, very long time.
So there's really no more appropriate time than now to be aggressive when I believe that giving Kevin fullmin would be a mistake
Most of the people who I jobbanned are nowhere near new, and those who were weren't just for "incompetence", feel free to find an example that doesn't support this.Wyzack wrote:Monthbanning new players from jobs and roles is a pretty shit way to teach them how to be better. Especially compared to explaining what they have done wrong/linking the wiki and letting them try again.
Most of the interactions i have read between Kevinz and players have left a really bad taste in my mouth, but i have no doubt there is some bias there as i probably would not be seeing the good ones.
He won't.MimicFaux wrote:I'd be happy to see him take on full admin status after taking some extra time to internalize everything said here in this thread.
Him not taking feedback seriously and persisting with bad habits is one of his huge negatives and part of why I dislike him on the team.Kevins horrid abuse of midis actually prompted me to write a full guide on how to properly trim sounds to play them on the server, evidently he has still somehow missed the message
Still goes afk 99/100 times that I see him on server, always stealthmins when he does it, doesn't pop in when a stray ahelp appears, so the only discernable reason for him to do this is farming play time on the stat tracker. Obnoxious behavior, evidently he didn't get the message last time I mentioned this here. I've begun just kicking him if we already have a reasonable amount of admins anyways.
From this I've gathered that he doesn't seem to learn from past negative feedback. Definitely a red flag.
He was asked by others to do this, though?danno wrote: There's nothing legendary about this. It's fucking embarrassing. It's a game, for christ sake. You don't have to spend your time actively seeking out reasons to ban people. The ban quota is a joke. A JOKE.
beerobot wrote:if swarge and danno can make admin then you may as well accept any old trash
With PKP's trick to condense the sounds there's no reason you should be chaining in 2017.Grazyn wrote:I only had one bwoink from him and all went smooth, the only thing I can say is that he should tone down with .OGGs (AFAIK you can't disable them unlike midis, only use stop sounds after they start playing), the lagspikes are real and a lot of people, miners mostly, die regularly to them. At least announce you're going to chain-upload them so people can avoid engaging in combat until you're done.
There's an example of his inability to accept feedback within this very thread!PKPenguin321 wrote:He won't.MimicFaux wrote:I'd be happy to see him take on full admin status after taking some extra time to internalize everything said here in this thread.
Him not taking feedback seriously and persisting with bad habits is one of his huge negatives and part of why I dislike him on the team.Kevins horrid abuse of midis actually prompted me to write a full guide on how to properly trim sounds to play them on the server, evidently he has still somehow missed the message
Still goes afk 99/100 times that I see him on server, always stealthmins when he does it, doesn't pop in when a stray ahelp appears, so the only discernable reason for him to do this is farming play time on the stat tracker. Obnoxious behavior, evidently he didn't get the message last time I mentioned this here. I've begun just kicking him if we already have a reasonable amount of admins anyways.
From this I've gathered that he doesn't seem to learn from past negative feedback. Definitely a red flag.
Edit: do you mean the midis or what?kevinz000 wrote:I mean I haven't played midis in like a week so how is this an example?
You are basically just repeating other peoples opinion and added an insult in addition to that,even though you didn't even see him yet? I understand that you don't like them but I find that a bit unfair and quite rude.Xhuis wrote:
I haven't seen kevinz in-game - probably because of the stealthminning, if what I'm hearing is right - but he comes off to me as very brash. If the posted ahelps and my own looking into the ban appeals forum is anything to judge by, he seems very happy to hand out bans and very grudging to lift them. His constant AFKing and .ogg playing also seems to imply to me that he is an admin because he feels like being an admin; he shows no legitimate concern for the game other than banning, and is quick to dole them out to people with minor infractions. The closest person to this tendency that I remember is Skorvold when he still played, who once gave me a dayban for killing a cyborg after around ten warnings when it wouldn't stop attacking my mech and screaming for an ion rifle, but that's another story. Even then, Skorvold was very clear in his/her intentions, and thoroughly explained the reasoning why.
Kevinz doesn't have that restraint. He seems to presume that people know the rules by heart and assumes that people know the reason why they were banned when his official ban statement is "You're clearly not mentally old enough to play here." That's immature and stupid, and, if my personal experience with him both as a player and as a coder is anything to judge by, kevinz is wholly unfit to be an admin. He's similar to Robustin, with the exception that while Robustin was a constant source of vitriol for everyone, kevinz is not. That said, covering shit with a blanket still makes it shit - just with a prettier coat.
My claims weren't entirely baseless. As I said, I've gone through the Ban Requests Appeals forum and seen how he behaves there, as well as IRC. I also have my existing experience with him before he became an admin, several months ago. I included those disclaimers because I felt that my opinion wasn't entirely justified and shouldn't be weighted equally because of that same reason; I hadn't seen him in person. I just figured that I would chip in, as I've seen him around a good bit on the forums and on coderbus, just not in game. That's what opinions are for, and I chose to back mine up with facts - even if they're flimsy - instead of just rant against him like people are fond of doing here.Lexorion wrote:You are basically just repeating other peoples opinion and added an insult in addition to that,even though you didn't even see him yet? I understand that you don't like them but I find that a bit unfair and quite rude.Xhuis wrote:
I haven't seen kevinz in-game - probably because of the stealthminning, if what I'm hearing is right - but he comes off to me as very brash. If the posted ahelps and my own looking into the ban appeals forum is anything to judge by, he seems very happy to hand out bans and very grudging to lift them. His constant AFKing and .ogg playing also seems to imply to me that he is an admin because he feels like being an admin; he shows no legitimate concern for the game other than banning, and is quick to dole them out to people with minor infractions. The closest person to this tendency that I remember is Skorvold when he still played, who once gave me a dayban for killing a cyborg after around ten warnings when it wouldn't stop attacking my mech and screaming for an ion rifle, but that's another story. Even then, Skorvold was very clear in his/her intentions, and thoroughly explained the reasoning why.
Kevinz doesn't have that restraint. He seems to presume that people know the rules by heart and assumes that people know the reason why they were banned when his official ban statement is "You're clearly not mentally old enough to play here." That's immature and stupid, and, if my personal experience with him both as a player and as a coder is anything to judge by, kevinz is wholly unfit to be an admin. He's similar to Robustin, with the exception that while Robustin was a constant source of vitriol for everyone, kevinz is not. That said, covering shit with a blanket still makes it shit - just with a prettier coat.
In fairness, visibility in-game is probably something that should be weighed on its own. Being visibly present is often as effective as being actively boinking people.Xhuis wrote:My claims weren't entirely baseless. As I said, I've gone through the Ban Requests forum and seen how he behaves there, as well as IRC. I also have my existing experience with him before he became an admin, several months ago. I included those disclaimers because I felt that my opinion wasn't entirely justified and shouldn't be weighted equally because of that same reason; I hadn't seen him in person. I just figured that I would chip in, as I've seen him around a good bit on the forums and on coderbus, just not in game. That's what opinions are for, and I chose to back mine up with facts - even if they're flimsy - instead of just rant against him like people are fond of doing here.Lexorion wrote:You are basically just repeating other peoples opinion and added an insult in addition to that,even though you didn't even see him yet? I understand that you don't like them but I find that a bit unfair and quite rude.Xhuis wrote:
I haven't seen kevinz in-game - probably because of the stealthminning, if what I'm hearing is right - but he comes off to me as very brash. If the posted ahelps and my own looking into the ban appeals forum is anything to judge by, he seems very happy to hand out bans and very grudging to lift them. His constant AFKing and .ogg playing also seems to imply to me that he is an admin because he feels like being an admin; he shows no legitimate concern for the game other than banning, and is quick to dole them out to people with minor infractions. The closest person to this tendency that I remember is Skorvold when he still played, who once gave me a dayban for killing a cyborg after around ten warnings when it wouldn't stop attacking my mech and screaming for an ion rifle, but that's another story. Even then, Skorvold was very clear in his/her intentions, and thoroughly explained the reasoning why.
Kevinz doesn't have that restraint. He seems to presume that people know the rules by heart and assumes that people know the reason why they were banned when his official ban statement is "You're clearly not mentally old enough to play here." That's immature and stupid, and, if my personal experience with him both as a player and as a coder is anything to judge by, kevinz is wholly unfit to be an admin. He's similar to Robustin, with the exception that while Robustin was a constant source of vitriol for everyone, kevinz is not. That said, covering shit with a blanket still makes it shit - just with a prettier coat.
I thought it was a fair assessment. If "opinions" (that are actually facts when it comes to stuff like constant AFK) are being repeated, maybe you should give them more weight instead of dismissing them.Lexorion wrote:You are basically just repeating other peoples opinion and added an insult in addition to that,even though you didn't even see him yet? I understand that you don't like them but I find that a bit unfair and quite rude.Xhuis wrote:
I haven't seen kevinz in-game - probably because of the stealthminning, if what I'm hearing is right - but he comes off to me as very brash. If the posted ahelps and my own looking into the ban appeals forum is anything to judge by, he seems very happy to hand out bans and very grudging to lift them. His constant AFKing and .ogg playing also seems to imply to me that he is an admin because he feels like being an admin; he shows no legitimate concern for the game other than banning, and is quick to dole them out to people with minor infractions. The closest person to this tendency that I remember is Skorvold when he still played, who once gave me a dayban for killing a cyborg after around ten warnings when it wouldn't stop attacking my mech and screaming for an ion rifle, but that's another story. Even then, Skorvold was very clear in his/her intentions, and thoroughly explained the reasoning why.
Kevinz doesn't have that restraint. He seems to presume that people know the rules by heart and assumes that people know the reason why they were banned when his official ban statement is "You're clearly not mentally old enough to play here." That's immature and stupid, and, if my personal experience with him both as a player and as a coder is anything to judge by, kevinz is wholly unfit to be an admin. He's similar to Robustin, with the exception that while Robustin was a constant source of vitriol for everyone, kevinz is not. That said, covering shit with a blanket still makes it shit - just with a prettier coat.
I know the ban was justified. I just think that mocking him in the ban message is unprofessional. I was like that when I moderated for a Gmod server a long time ago. Surely we're better than Gmod?kevinz000 wrote:I mean it might be seen as ill suited but the guy flat out said he was underage after someone told me to ask them. The ban wasn't for being bad at the game.