Well it's been a week and my scoring of the event is complete. Since I am not giving away any prizes I won't be naming any victors, but anyone who feels like rewarding wiki editors can use this scoring as an excuse.
Only edits from 17:40 23rd of January to 23:59:59 of the 28th of February were counted.
A reminder of the rules:
5 points: Enormous content additions, like writing a guide from scratch or completely rewriting one to be much better.
3 points: Major content additions, such as documenting large PRs.
2 points: Minor content additions, like adding an item to a list. Corrections of factually incorrect information. Image stuff. Mirroring changes from PRs on GitHub.
1 points: Spelling errors and similar trivial edits. Limit: One point per editor per page.
-1 points: Obvious attempts to game the score system.
How I interpreted the rules, on a per article basis:
5 points: BIG, NEW stuff. So big in fact, only one edit was awarded 5 points
3 points: A lot of stuff. More than a handful of items added to a list, more than a couple of corrections here and there on the article
2 points: Corrections of factually incorrect info, addition of a set of sprites (yes sets), adding a paragraph to a guide, reformatting text and improving it. In essence, anything not major that would be noticed if absent.
1 points: spelling errors, things that are interesting but won't be missed if deleted
0 points: lazy copypaste from code/Github, ""humor"", failures to actually improving a page.
-1 points: "Gaming the system". I noticed no such behavior.
The difference between 2 and 3 points can sometimes be subtle. Some scores have a range, none of which thankfully overlap. The lowball is conservative of 3 pointers, the high mark is more generous.
About the sprites: I considered "spritework" to be referencing work in which the sprites are the meat of the edit. In those cases where some thought had been put in a description, the text was scored and the sprites counted as bonus points, but barebone descriptions were awarded no points themselves, only the sprites were scored. Sprites were grouped together as single submission in those cases where they were a proper variant of eachother (tools with multiple setting, drones with multiple colors) or very closely related. Rule of thumb: can I put these sprites together in a .gif/single image and lose no information?
THE CONTRIBUTORS, IN DESCENDING ORDER OF POINTS AWARDED
Kingfish total: 175-177 (+3) // I don't know techwebs but nobody will care about those couple points stuck in limbo
123-125 from edits, 52 from sprites 112 images uploaded, 26 disqualified (16 unused, 5 duplicates, 1 self-deleted, 1 meme, 1 placeholder, 2 low quality) = 86 Accepted, counted as 26 separate submissions.
Factoryman942 total: 50-54 //
44-48 from edits, 6 from sprites, 3 images uploaded
Xhius total: 43-45 points // + Circuits Guide rework nominated for best large improvement.
19-21 from edits, 24 from sprites 42 images uploaded
Calzilla1 total: 42-43 points //
38-39 from edits, 4 from sprites. 2 images uploaded
XDTM total: 32-34 points //
28-30 from edits, 4 from sprites. 3 images uploaded
Nervere total: 30 points //
0 from edits, 30 from srpites. 35 images uploaded
Denton total: 28-29 points //
26-27 from edits, 2 from sprites. 1 image uploaded
Didn't make the cut:
Cameronwoof, TehSteveo, PotatoMasher, TribeOfBeavers, Anonmare, Francium, somerandomguy, ESR, Doerakpoes, SpaceManiac,Oranges, Cruix, MMMiracles, Muncher21, Oldman Robustin, FrozenGuy5, Kerbin Fiber, Mobiledove, Atlanta-Ned, CosmicScientist, Qbmax32/Qbopper, MrStonedOne, subject217, Jordie0608.
Not participating: me.
Score Sheets: