Page 1 of 1
Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 1:54 am
by J_Madison
The person that merged a PR cannot close a PR reverting their merge.
Generally good practise, otherwise it's an admin answering his own ahelps.
Re: Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 2:05 am
by lzimann
Sounds reasonable.
Re: Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 4:17 am
by oranges
no for the simple fact that only a few maintainers actually do tracker cleanup
Re: Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 4:44 am
by PKPenguin321
oranges wrote:no for the simple fact that only a few maintainers actually do tracker cleanup
As long as there are at least two maintainers the proposed rule works
Re: Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 4:47 am
by oranges
THERE NEVER IS PENGUINE, THERE NEVER IS
Re: Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 7:15 am
by onleavedontatme
If you disagree with a maintainers merge appeal to Cheridan, we shouldn't be encouraging revert wars between maintainers.
Re: Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 7:47 am
by danno
the git doesn't operate the same way that the admins do
Re: Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 10:00 pm
by PKPenguin321
cheridan! look at this thread!
Re: Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 10:01 pm
by danno
they very likely already have!
Re: Could this be a new revert rule?
Posted: Sat May 27, 2017 10:10 am
by oranges
this is the rule now