/tg/Station 13

https://atlantaned.space/coderbus (raw data)

Concept is simple the more, issues you fix/improvements to the codebase you make, the bigger your epeen. Features, balances, and tweaks degrade your score. Going below zero is grounds for not getting your PR merged (no one has gotten even close yet and it's really easy to increase your score so don't complain about it)

the point system gimmick is back but this time it's not even in the game

memes aside I do think this is cool though

page looks beautiful 10/10

How are people added to the page?

automatically

factoryman942 wrote:page looks beautiful 10/10

Get a browser that formats json for you

Cyberboss wrote:https://tools.tgstation13.org/pr_balances.json

Concept is simple the more, issues you fix/improvements to the codebase you make, the bigger your epeen. Features, balances, and tweaks degrade your score. Going below zero is grounds for not getting your PR merged (no one has gotten even close yet and it's really easy to increase your score so don't complain about it)

That is some serious fucking bullshit there and yes I will complain about it.

Also balances and tweaks don't generate issues, so why do I get punished for addressing balance issues and other tweaks? Balance is already the shitty area nobody wants to touch.

you don't even code

Cyberboss wrote:the more improvements to the codebase you make, the bigger your epeen.

Cyberboss wrote:Features, balances, and tweaks degrade your score.

So which one is it?

Cyberboss wrote:Going below zero is grounds for not getting your PR merged (no one has gotten even close yet and it's really easy to increase your score so don't complain about it)

hold my beer

Doesn't go far enough.

Need gbp purchasable balance pr force merges.

kek good idea

Here, I got bored and did this until(if) mso/someone does a permanent page.

CPTANT wrote:

Cyberboss wrote:https://tools.tgstation13.org/pr_balances.json

Concept is simple the more, issues you fix/improvements to the codebase you make, the bigger your epeen. Features, balances, and tweaks degrade your score. Going below zero is grounds for not getting your PR merged (no one has gotten even close yet and it's really easy to increase your score so don't complain about it)

That is some serious fucking bullshit there and yes I will complain about it.

I literally opened a random file and found 3 different ways to get 5 points, it's not hard.

Also balances and tweaks don't generate issues, so why do I get punished for addressing balance issues and other tweaks? Balance is already the shitty area nobody wants to touch.

Oh sweet summer child...

someone who broke everything two times has more good boy points than me now i want to fix issues wtf

kevinz000 wrote:someone who broke everything two times has more good boy points than me now i want to fix issues wtf

the system works

What if I'm a complete shithead who doesn't know how to code? How do I get GBP then?

kevinz000 wrote:someone who broke everything two times has more good boy points than me now i want to fix issues wtf

Guide to getting goodboy points:

1. Break shit
2. Fix your own shit

Tadaaaa,

Cyberboss wrote:

Also balances and tweaks don't generate issues, so why do I get punished for addressing balance issues and other tweaks? Balance is already the shitty area nobody wants to touch.

Oh sweet summer child...

Cyberboss wrote:I don't trust myself to review this PR and I wouldn't merge it anyway because I generally don't touch balance,

I propose an amendment to this. If someone either creates a meme PR, or they have more closed PR's than merged PR's, it can have a bad effect on their points. For example, let's say they have 61 PR's. 30 was merged, and 31 was closed, it would decrease their points by one.

Not like someone is so horrible they will end up at like -480 points or something.

firecage wrote:I propose an amendment to this. If someone either creates a meme PR, or they have more closed PR's than merged PR's, it can have a bad effect on their points. For example, let's say they have 61 PR's. 30 was merged, and 31 was closed, it would decrease their points by one.

Not like someone is so horrible they will end up at like -480 points or something.

I have a lot of closed prs that are due to simply not being the direction that people would prefer to go in, along with prs that I close myself because there's a better way to handle the problem after some discussion.

It would be quite unfair to have those negatively impact me because we don't know how to ban goof.

It also dissuades touching anything that might be even remotely considered controversial.

CPTANT wrote:

Cyberboss wrote:

Also balances and tweaks don't generate issues, so why do I get punished for addressing balance issues and other tweaks? Balance is already the shitty area nobody wants to touch.

Oh sweet summer child...

Cyberboss wrote:I don't trust myself to review this PR and I wouldn't merge it anyway because I generally don't touch balance,

I was rolling my eyes at the "balances and tweaks don't generate issues," they do, all the time.

lzimann wrote:Here, I got bored and did this until(if) mso/someone does a permanent page.

I gotchu fam https://atlantaned.space/newSS13tools/coderbus/gbp.php

CPTANT wrote:It also dissuades touching anything that might be even remotely considered controversial.

example please?

Doctor Pork wrote:

CPTANT wrote:It also dissuades touching anything that might be even remotely considered controversial.

example please?

yeah I thought it was literally just "fixes up your points but features lower it" or something along those lines

These are the values

why's the atmos tag so high?

Qbopper wrote:why's the atmos tag so high?

literally an atmos simulator

Doctor Pork wrote:

Qbopper wrote:why's the atmos tag so high?

literally an atmos simulator

yeah I just thought it was odd, is there usually a lack of/so many atmos PRs that make it necessary or something

because it's hard

Atmos math requires a degree to understand

iamgoofball wrote:Atmos math requires a degree to understand

I wanted to say lolno, but then I remembered I have a technical degree.

Added labels from the repo (yay APIs!) and their values: https://atlantaned.space/newSS13tools/coderbus/gbp.php

Could probably stand to have "Grammar/Formatting" on the list at 1, since I believe pulls solely correcting those tend not to get "Fix".

I believe "Easy Fix" is a issues only tag, but if not then worth putting it at 1, since any fix is a good fix, even if its easy.

"Map Edit"... I feel like it should have some value, maybe -1? Not terribly sure tbh.

In terms of the issues side of things, maybe a new "Reproduced" or "Confirmed" tag that gives the reporter of the issue 1 point, for use where the reporter has given information/reproduction steps for their bug that has helped lead to a reproduction?

The vast majority of map edits are fixes

>Someone makes a sloppy balance PR that addresses an issue, but does so in the worst way possible

>Spend hours coding up the proper approach

>Getting the improved PR merged costs me points

Hmmm

Ned, the tags of values linking to github doesn't work for the two word labels. Toss some "" in there or something.

This was more amusing when I just thought nothing had ever been tagged "Code Improvement"

Nabski wrote:Ned, the tags of values linking to github doesn't work for the two word labels. Toss some "" in there or something.

This was more amusing when I just thought nothing had ever been tagged "Code Improvement"

goddammit this should be fixed now and i hate uris

>sound and sprites don't give anything

Cmon man, they're the two things we need the most

At first I thought this idea was a joke.

I don't see how a tweak costs points, it's as neutral as you can possibly get

bandit wrote:I don't see how a tweak costs points, it's as neutral as you can possibly get

this can only end well.

Issue count has actually started decreasing, albiet slowly. A massive improvement from the endless inflation

Feature might need to cost a little more since right now you gain points by submitting bugged stuff and fixing it afterwards instead of testing, but it's been a surprisingly successful system in general

Kor wrote:Feature might need to cost a little more since right now you gain points by submitting bugged stuff and fixing it afterwards instead of testing, but it's been a surprisingly successful system in general

That won't fix it

iamgoofball wrote:

Kor wrote:Feature might need to cost a little more since right now you gain points by submitting bugged stuff and fixing it afterwards instead of testing, but it's been a surprisingly successful system in general

That won't fix it

Well, you might make less PR's. That's fixing one of the problems.

This has been a surprising success.

>frog is on -2 points