[Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Locked
User avatar
D&B
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
Byond Username: Repukan
Location: *teleports behind you*

[Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by D&B » #287748

Byond account and character name: Repukan - Donatello Versus

Admin: Cheridan

Time and Server(Bagil or Sybil) incident occurred: Bagil, 6:44 PM EST

Detailed summary: As I join into the round it is revealed there is a clock cult in the station and what not. Nothing much happens until I get on the shuttle. A borg named T1000 started flashing me until its flash broke, and due to the fact that this incurred eye damage on me and it kept pushing me around, I decide to return its fire because it was acting like a subverted borg. It then gets a catperson (Cecilia Meme) to assault me whilst riding on top of them in order to stop the onslaught. I die later on to someone different, but initially caused by the borg flashing me. I hover near the borg to see if it was truly subverted, and it turns out it was Asimov. I ahelp the shitty play and I get taunted in OOC by being called salty and "Make a ban request in the forums :^)" by Cheridan.

Irregardless of what transpired in the round or not, this is an absolute breach of whatever degree of formality administrators are held to. This is less about the in game actions that transpired in the game and more about the overall response done by the administrator, which I feel were not proper for someone in their position.
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by cedarbridge » #287767

Logs would help clarify this beyond hearsay.
User avatar
bandit
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:35 pm
Byond Username: Bgobandit

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by bandit » #287774

D&B wrote:Irregardless of what transpired in the round or not, this is an absolute breach of whatever degree of formality administrators are held to.
given that even the admins can't agree on this degree of formality I doubt an admincomplaint will make much dent
"I don't see any difference between ERP and rape." -- erro

admin feedback pls
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by oranges » #287777

>Ahelping something that didn't even result in your death

How can you be this shitcurity and yet this unrobust?
User avatar
Haevacht
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:08 am
Byond Username: Capital_H

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Haevacht » #287780

And how can you be this demanding of formal procedure and yet also get banned like once a week?

Cheri's fine.
User avatar
D&B
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
Byond Username: Repukan
Location: *teleports behind you*

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by D&B » #287784

Because it sets a bad precedent.

I don't know in which cases it is acceptable to brush off someone and tell them to "make a ban request :^)" for making a legit ahelp. I could care less if I get admin bused for being me, but this shouldn't be let off to happen normally without it being noticed or else it could happen to other players that don't have accounts in the forum/are not informed enough to salt here.
User avatar
PKPenguin321
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:02 pm
Byond Username: PKPenguin321
Github Username: PKPenguin321
Location: U S A, U S A, U S A

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by PKPenguin321 » #287788

D&B wrote:Irregardless
:?

Logs would be appreciated (OOC logs, ahelps), see this thread to figure out how to get those
i play Lauser McMauligan. clown name is Cold-Ass Honkey
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
Spoiler:
Image
User avatar
Cheridan
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:04 am
Byond Username: Cheridan

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Cheridan » #287805

D&B wrote: an absolute breach of whatever degree of formality administrators are held to.
pfft :roll:

As I already explained to you in OOC, you got no response to your ahelp because it was like 2 minutes before the shuttle left and we were busy dealing with the bugged non-launching asteroid shuttle.
Image
/tg/station spriter, admin, and headcoder. Feel free to contact me via PM with questions, concerns, or requests.
User avatar
BeeSting12
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:11 am
Byond Username: BeeSting12
Github Username: BeeSting12
Location: 'Murica

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by BeeSting12 » #287807

Cheridan wrote:
D&B wrote: an absolute breach of whatever degree of formality administrators are held to.
pfft :roll:

As I already explained to you in OOC, you got no response to your ahelp because it was like 2 minutes before the shuttle left and we were busy dealing with the bugged non-launching asteroid shuttle.
You could've delayed roundend or explained that you were busy instead of making a snarky response.
User avatar
Qbopper
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2015 6:34 pm
Byond Username: Qbopper
Github Username: Qbopper
Location: Canada

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Qbopper » #287833

BeeSting12 wrote:
Cheridan wrote:
D&B wrote: an absolute breach of whatever degree of formality administrators are held to.
pfft :roll:

As I already explained to you in OOC, you got no response to your ahelp because it was like 2 minutes before the shuttle left and we were busy dealing with the bugged non-launching asteroid shuttle.
You could've delayed roundend or explained that you were busy instead of making a snarky response.
Cheridan just said "as I already explained to you in OOC"

maybe the snarky response didn't help, sure, but they explained the thing you asked them to explain, what's the problem here
Limey wrote:its too late.
User avatar
D&B
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
Byond Username: Repukan
Location: *teleports behind you*

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by D&B » #287845

Because the ahelp was sent before the shuttle even left, because it wasn't the only complain post round that was made by some players regarding silicons, and because they were being sassy and just waving me off?

I'll get the logs later today but seriously, since when are ahelps ignored before the shuttle even leaves? I've seen rounds extended and CTF enabled when ahelps were made during shuttle transit, so why is this the exception?

If I had done it too late to be seen then yeah I would brush it off and no shit I'd just suck it up, but this is something I haven't ever seen in my time playing here.
User avatar
Cobby
Code Maintainer
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Cobby » #288042

Cheridan wrote:
D&B wrote: an absolute breach of whatever degree of formality administrators are held to.
pfft :roll:

As I already explained to you in OOC, you got no response to your ahelp because it was like 2 minutes before the shuttle left and we were busy dealing with the bugged non-launching asteroid shuttle.
Don't we ban people for using this exact reasoning to grief? I'm not sure I agree with the thread because I'm a memer myself at times, but allowing grief prior to the shuttle launching/landing/etc. IS a bad precedent.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
User avatar
BeeSting12
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2016 1:11 am
Byond Username: BeeSting12
Github Username: BeeSting12
Location: 'Murica

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by BeeSting12 » #288050

ExcessiveCobblestone wrote:
Cheridan wrote:
D&B wrote: an absolute breach of whatever degree of formality administrators are held to.
pfft :roll:

As I already explained to you in OOC, you got no response to your ahelp because it was like 2 minutes before the shuttle left and we were busy dealing with the bugged non-launching asteroid shuttle.
Don't we ban people for using this exact reasoning to grief? I'm not sure I agree with the thread because I'm a memer myself at times, but allowing grief prior to the shuttle launching/landing/etc. IS a bad precedent.
the difference is, at least in my experience, when you meme in ahelps you've either taken care of it already or my adminhelp was obviously a joke in the first place
User avatar
D&B
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
Byond Username: Repukan
Location: *teleports behind you*

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by D&B » #288052

I checked and the may logs aren't appearing on the list.

I'd ask an admin to lock this until they're available so it's not just hearsay as cedar put it.
User avatar
Nilons
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:38 pm
Byond Username: NIlons
Location: Canada

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Nilons » #288053

An unemagged and unfucked with borg starts messing with repukan randomly, then directly calls for their harm, and them fucking with him ended up getting rep killed(if the events described are unaltered and true). How is this not a cursory investigation? Even if it was round end a short "Ahelp it at the start of next round" would have sufficed instead of bullying someone for being memed on. This sounds like you either didn't want to even try to help repukan and deal with the situation in a best case scenario. Sure he gets banned every week but you can't just let players get fucked over because of that. Also it's ridiculous that players are expected to not post in admin complaints when admins are, how could anyone foresee that as not a circlejerk. Great idea lets force players to argue with every single admin when they have beef with one and not let players help or give their view point. Ban appeals I get but like come on how is it acceptable that the only people allowed to respond are also in the cool guy clique that the person who the complaint is about is in?
onleavedontatme
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 10:26 pm
Byond Username: KorPhaeron

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by onleavedontatme » #288054

Asay and adminhelps/responses are filtered from logs so it is a bit silly you were asked to find them.
bman
Github User
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:55 pm
Byond Username: Basilman
Github Username: Militaires

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by bman » #288060

i thought shuttle griff was a serious rule violation and not a "pff get over it"
User avatar
D&B
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
Byond Username: Repukan
Location: *teleports behind you*

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by D&B » #288064

I'm guessing it's more of a "List what happened between you and the borg and what he said in OOC" kind of thing.
User avatar
cedarbridge
Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 12:24 am
Byond Username: Cedarbridge

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by cedarbridge » #288246

ExcessiveCobblestone wrote:
Cheridan wrote:
D&B wrote: an absolute breach of whatever degree of formality administrators are held to.
pfft :roll:

As I already explained to you in OOC, you got no response to your ahelp because it was like 2 minutes before the shuttle left and we were busy dealing with the bugged non-launching asteroid shuttle.
Don't we ban people for using this exact reasoning to grief? I'm not sure I agree with the thread because I'm a memer myself at times, but allowing grief prior to the shuttle launching/landing/etc. IS a bad precedent.
I understood his statement to mean that they were trying to get the shuttle fixed before those two minutes ran out thus robbing them of time to deal with the ahelp issue and get the shuttle fixed at the same time.
User avatar
Cheridan
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:04 am
Byond Username: Cheridan

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Cheridan » #288291

ExcessiveCobblestone wrote:
Cheridan wrote:
D&B wrote: an absolute breach of whatever degree of formality administrators are held to.
pfft :roll:

As I already explained to you in OOC, you got no response to your ahelp because it was like 2 minutes before the shuttle left and we were busy dealing with the bugged non-launching asteroid shuttle.
Don't we ban people for using this exact reasoning to grief? I'm not sure I agree with the thread because I'm a memer myself at times, but allowing grief prior to the shuttle launching/landing/etc. IS a bad precedent.
He didn't present it as shuttle grief. All he said in the ahelp was something along the lines of "T-1000 was being kinda shitty all round", which is a vague comment I'm not going to delay roundend for to do a full investigation. If he had instead said "T-1000 griefed me on the shuttle by repeatedly flashing me leading to a fight where I was killed" then I might have been inclined to actually look into it. After the round ends and the next round is setting up, he starts complaining in OOC about the incident.
Image
/tg/station spriter, admin, and headcoder. Feel free to contact me via PM with questions, concerns, or requests.
User avatar
D&B
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
Byond Username: Repukan
Location: *teleports behind you*

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by D&B » #288295

I specified they flashed me multiple times for no reason
User avatar
Cheridan
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:04 am
Byond Username: Cheridan

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Cheridan » #288298

That statement alone is still not reason for investigation because flashing someone doesn't hurt them at all, so who cares. You can't leave out the "and then I died" and expect anyone to treat the situation with any gravity.
Image
/tg/station spriter, admin, and headcoder. Feel free to contact me via PM with questions, concerns, or requests.
User avatar
D&B
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:23 am
Byond Username: Repukan
Location: *teleports behind you*

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by D&B » #288302

I don't remember the exact events I mentioned in the first ahelp, but I do remember that I mentioned that it was doing so as a non culted Borg.

Also how is causing eye damage and basically chain stunning someone not grief. People get in shit for spamming flashbangs in the shuttle, how is containing it to a single person for no discernible reason not grief?
User avatar
Cheridan
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:04 am
Byond Username: Cheridan

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Cheridan » #288315

Again, you didn't specify that he was chain stunning you. "He flashed me multiple times" is not enough information for an admin to spring into action over, it could mean as little as twice. If you had said "he's chain stunning me" or "he flashed me over 10 times in a row", etc then myself or one of the other admins on might not have ignored the ahelp.
Image
/tg/station spriter, admin, and headcoder. Feel free to contact me via PM with questions, concerns, or requests.
User avatar
Nilons
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:38 pm
Byond Username: NIlons
Location: Canada

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Nilons » #288316

Cheridan wrote:Again, you didn't specify that he was chain stunning you. "He flashed me multiple times" is not enough information for an admin to spring into action over, it could mean as little as twice. If you had said "he's chain stunning me" or "he flashed me over 10 times in a row", etc then myself or one of the other admins on might not have ignored the ahelp.
Pretty sure Ive just ahelped HELP at some point and gotten a response of some kind. Why is your response to him not giving you enough information to meme on him instead of asking for more information?
User avatar
Cheridan
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:04 am
Byond Username: Cheridan

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Cheridan » #288324

If an admin is free and willing to investigate an ahelp that is nothing but "HELP" then they can do so. I was not free. I was monitoring an issue effecting the whole server. No other admins were free or willing to look into it either, evidently. He was whining in OOC about the previous round, when all indication up to that point was that the matter was trivial, and the current admin philosophy is that previous rounds should be left in the past. That is why the IC issue button was added in-game and why Ban Requests was removed.

I reserve the right to meme on whoever I wish.
Image
/tg/station spriter, admin, and headcoder. Feel free to contact me via PM with questions, concerns, or requests.
User avatar
DemonFiren
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2014 9:15 pm
Byond Username: DemonFiren

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by DemonFiren » #288334

Affecting, not effecting.

Unless the issue was literally having the effect of making a server.
User avatar
PKPenguin321
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2014 7:02 pm
Byond Username: PKPenguin321
Github Username: PKPenguin321
Location: U S A, U S A, U S A

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by PKPenguin321 » #288359

Kor wrote:Asay and adminhelps/responses are filtered from logs so it is a bit silly you were asked to find them.
I thought that was changed, my bad. I'll find logs myself later when I'm at a computer.
i play Lauser McMauligan. clown name is Cold-Ass Honkey
i have three other top secret characters as well.
tell the best admin how good he is
Spoiler:
Image
User avatar
Not-Dorsidarf
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Not-Dorsidarf » #288362

I'd like to add that in the same round, Cheridan dismissed me being murdered by a non-antag while T-1000 watched and injected tiring solution to help me be flashed and thrown in the murder machine as "You should have seen it coming"
Image
Image
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please. 🖕🖕🖕
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by oranges » #288384

Why didn't you see it coming?
User avatar
Cheridan
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 6:04 am
Byond Username: Cheridan

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Cheridan » #288427

Not-Dorsidarf wrote:I'd like to add that in the same round, Cheridan dismissed me being murdered by a non-antag while T-1000 watched and injected tiring solution to help me be flashed and thrown in the murder machine as "You should have seen it coming"
You walked into the roboticist's department, when there was dangerous equipment clearly visible inside (a cookie-powered tesla engine setup, not a "murder machine" as you put it, though dangerous either way), started punching people with gloves on, including the borg, who dosed you with tiring solution in a reasonable response.
I'm not going to ban someone because someone else is upset that they did something stupid and died over it. I also felt uncomfortable taking action because of how you were acting in asay; looking up the person's notes, etc. and trying to convince me to ban the person based on them. When a normal player gets a response that a problem is an IC issue he just has to accept it, it's not fair or ethical to allow an ahelper an 'advantage' in ahelping because they happen to be an admin.

I ruled it an IC issue and very clearly stated that if you disagreed you could bring the situation up with another admin.
This post doesn't even have anything to do with the original complaint here except for tangentially involving the same cyborg -- any blame for you dying would have gone on the roboticist.
Image
/tg/station spriter, admin, and headcoder. Feel free to contact me via PM with questions, concerns, or requests.
User avatar
Nilons
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:38 pm
Byond Username: NIlons
Location: Canada

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Nilons » #288456

Cheridan wrote:
Not-Dorsidarf wrote:I'd like to add that in the same round, Cheridan dismissed me being murdered by a non-antag while T-1000 watched and injected tiring solution to help me be flashed and thrown in the murder machine as "You should have seen it coming"
You walked into the roboticist's department, when there was dangerous equipment clearly visible inside (a cookie-powered tesla engine setup, not a "murder machine" as you put it, though dangerous either way), started punching people with gloves on, including the borg, who dosed you with tiring solution in a reasonable response.
I'm not going to ban someone because someone else is upset that they did something stupid and died over it. I also felt uncomfortable taking action because of how you were acting in asay; looking up the person's notes, etc. and trying to convince me to ban the person based on them. When a normal player gets a response that a problem is an IC issue he just has to accept it, it's not fair or ethical to allow an ahelper an 'advantage' in ahelping because they happen to be an admin.

I ruled it an IC issue and very clearly stated that if you disagreed you could bring the situation up with another admin.
This post doesn't even have anything to do with the original complaint here except for tangentially involving the same cyborg -- any blame for you dying would have gone on the roboticist.
Im against cheri on the original matter but this seems clear cut play stupid games win stupid prizes
bman
Github User
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 4:55 pm
Byond Username: Basilman
Github Username: Militaires

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by bman » #288457

the borg still broke its laws by standing still and letting the dude be thrown into tesla grilles, regardless of what he was doing, in the above case.

on the original matter: cheridan should've investigated it further because he still gave adequate detail.
User avatar
Cobby
Code Maintainer
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Cobby » #288506

@Cheri @Cedar

Ah alright, thanks for the clarification.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
User avatar
Armhulen
Global Moderator
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:30 pm
Byond Username: Armhulenn
Github Username: bazelart
Location: The Grand Tournament

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Armhulen » #288508

Or, you know, they could have waited until the round ended and then delayed it so they could do their job

Or atleast not mock him in ooc
User avatar
Nilons
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:38 pm
Byond Username: NIlons
Location: Canada

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by Nilons » #288511

Armhulen wrote:Or, you know, they could have waited until the round ended and then delayed it so they could do their job

Or atleast not mock him in ooc
This honestly, a public shaming is not somehow a proper response because youre busy and dont like the level of info they gave you

Edit: I rescind my dissenting opinions because cheris avatar is great
User avatar
imblyings
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:42 pm
Byond Username: Ausops
Location: >using suit sensors

Re: [Cheridan] Repukan - 「Taunting Tirade」

Post by imblyings » #289616

A proper shaming may in fact not be the public look we want our admins to have.

Players however should remember that our admins are volunteers and not paid 911 dispatchers professionally trained to patiently coax out information from each and every vague ahelp they get.
The patched, dusty, trimmed, feathered mantle of evil +13.
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users