Page 3 of 4

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Thu May 25, 2017 10:26 pm
by Oldman Robustin

Bottom post of the previous page:

Him fucking up the antag prayers was normal admin fuckups.

Him triggering Highlander that nobody wanted to try and sweep away the problem 15 minutes into the round was atrociously bad judgment.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sat May 27, 2017 10:06 am
by oranges
>when pax triggers highlander and gets in trouble

>when you trigger highlander and get away with it

devilish

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sat May 27, 2017 10:07 am
by kevinz000
oranges wrote:>when pax triggers highlander and gets in trouble

>when you trigger highlander and get away with it

devilish
>coders

>being held responsible

>having morals and responsibility

>having liability for anything

lol.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 7:22 pm
by Limski
Made us suffer through 3 gang rounds in a row because he went AFK after someone set the mode to gang, had to go to IRC to complain until Ausops went on and fixed it.

very angery tbh

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 7:26 pm
by danno
Doesn't really sound like his fault

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 7:28 pm
by Nilons
danno wrote:Doesn't really sound like his fault
Him afking caused ahelps not to go to the irc

Edit: As far as I understand it

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 8:17 pm
by Limski
danno wrote:Doesn't really sound like his fault
When someone ahelps with an admin on, they would expect the admin to handle the ahelp instead of it being ignored and not sent to the IRC, a player shouldn't go out of their way just to whine on IRC just because an admin is afk.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 8:29 pm
by MMMiracles
I feel like it should of taken less than 3 rounds to figure out he was AFK and proceed to go to the IRC to get an active person.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 10:27 pm
by oranges
ahelps are passed thorugh to irc as soon as n admin goes afk anyway

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:06 pm
by danno
unless he was the one who set gang, I don't think any of this is his fault

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 12:48 am
by IcePacks
i didn't set gang but i was still at my computer and alt+tabbed so it goes both ways

that said the ahelps should've been going to irc unless i was stopping in to check at a frequency that fucked the timer on it and somehow caused nothing to go to irc at all

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Wed May 31, 2017 1:12 am
by Not-Dorsidarf
Yeah if the ahelps weren't going through for three rounds solid while he was AFK that's not his fault.



it is however my fault for turning on gang mode. I was unaware that forcing a mode forces it forever.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 8:14 pm
by bman
VERY HOT memes, VERY spicy and has a big database of GOOD MUSIC from which to EXTRACT MEMES.

premium admin

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:07 pm
by IcePacks
i have never played music stop your shitposting vermin

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:08 pm
by bman
IcePacks wrote:i have never played music stop your shitposting vermin
i mean musical memes

edit: like johnny cash and bang bang

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:19 pm
by IcePacks
return to your residence-hole citizen

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:47 pm
by Armhulen
Asks for my advice way too often.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:06 am
by IcePacks
i said STOP SHITPOSTING

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 3:38 am
by ShadowDimentio
Incinerated my body after I stole an ID in war ops to do ID changes at arrivals and the assblasted chucklefuck whose ID I stole straight murdered me over it.

How is this man trialmin

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 3:49 am
by danno
What part of that relates to Pax's admin conduct
did they do that as an admin or was it while playing the game

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 4:16 am
by ShadowDimentio
I should think that our admin team be expected to not be shitty tiders when playing the game.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 4:36 am
by danno
It's not related to his admin shit though so it doesn't belong here

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 4:55 am
by Sweaterkittens
I disagree, if an administrator plays a line-toeing/rule-breaking greytider when they're playing the game, how can they be trusted to enforce the rules and create an enjoyable experience for everyone when they're administrating?

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 5:27 am
by danno
Admin feedback is not for what amounts to subtle ban-requests

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:08 am
by ShadowDimentio
Pax fucked up, I posted that he fucked up.

Pax isn't magically a different person when he puts his admin hat on or takes it off, Danno. If he's acting like a huge faggot when he's not being an admin, why would I or anyone else expect he not be a huge faggot when he is being an admin?

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:18 am
by danno
I'm just telling you the standards for posting in admin feedback that I have been told and have seen.
It's for feedback regarding administration, not how admins play as players.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:19 am
by danno
That is, at the least, my understanding of this subforum.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 7:20 am
by IcePacks
ShadowDimentio wrote:Incinerated my body after I stole an ID in war ops to do ID changes at arrivals and the assblasted chucklefuck whose ID I stole straight murdered me over it.

How is this man trialmin
let me tell you how me and the admins talked this one out

admin: did you incinerate the mime
me: yeah he was trying to steal all-access ids from the hop line during war ops
admin: k
(ticket resolved)

EDIT: oh! and the guy that tried to stop me from incinerating you!

guy: why
me: he was stealing fucking all-access ids from a line of people that were all getting all-acces ids
guy: oh okay

EDIT 2:
Sweaterkittens wrote:i do not like icepacks can we deadmin him already
do you actually like, check this thread to try and find threads to pull in my trialmin period? you really picked a quality post to chime in on!

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 7:33 am
by danno
So you ahelped it, and salty with the result came in Pax's thread to try to bring it back up?

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 1:20 pm
by Wyzack
Holy fuck I am sick of having to explain this. Once a player does something you don't like and an admin says it was okay it becomes that admin's problem to justify. His behavior has officially been sanctioned unless he was given a warning not to do it again. Sweaterkittens you have to realize this is a fucking retarded incident to jump on the deadmin pax train and looks like a really poorly veiled grudge

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 1:52 pm
by Sweaterkittens
Calm down Wyzack. I chimed in because I don't think it's unreasonable to bring up player conduct if it reflects on the admin's mindset and general attitude. I did not ever say that the incident that ShadowDimentio brought up specifically was against the rules or should be punished, so don't put words in my mouth. If you think I'm jumping on a bandwagon or trying to use that specific incident as grounds for deadminning, then you really need to relax and re-read the thread. I've already gone into why I think IcePacks is not admin material so I won't go into again.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 2:13 pm
by Wyzack
I may have read into your words a bit much. My bad. You are right that an admin's conduct as a player is relevant to their position as an admin, I just adamantly believe that this particular case reflects nothing whatsoever.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 5:30 pm
by danno
The facts of the matter are as follows:
Admins handled the situation, and if they believed that Pax required a ban or a note, they would have/already have given him one.
There is no place for stuff like this, which has already been handled by admins, in this thread.

It's saltposting. Come on.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:10 pm
by TehSteveo
Danno and Wyzack are right here. An admin's conduct while playing doesn't have meaningful feedback in the thread when it's related how they are when administrating. It's not to say an admin's conduct is not unnoticed as a player if it is excessive, but in this case it would seem admins ruled differently. If an admin is abusive or breaking rules as a player they are held to the same standards when playing and can be banned just the same. It has been done in the past as even Kor can tell you being they have been banned for going little too far; such as failing to kill a blob with BoHs. :singulo:

I'll leave the postings in here. Yet, I'm going to ask everyone to refrain further posting regarding how someone conducts themselves while playing. If you have an issue with how admins ruled; take it up as a complaint or with headmins.

Edit: Nevermind. Since two individuals seem to like to pick arguments and seek others they don't like out I'll be deleting chains related to those. I'll leave more relevant responses. Needless to say, further arguments from them I'll being issuing warnings which is a first from me as I try to be liberal with moderation. Yet what I'm seeing is just vendettas being executed; to where it was going to turn into a petty off-topic flame war in a feedback thread.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 3:42 am
by PKPenguin321
For what it's worth, admin feedback basically falls upon the interpretation of the admin in question and the headmins that want to see how that admin is doing, and I don't really care about this whole thing in terms of how he's been adminning. Other headmins might disagree but that's my two cents.

To go a tiny bit off topic, you could have adminhelped that, Shadowdimentio. Just because Pax is an admin doesn't mean he can't be bwoinked, and admins can't handle their own ahelps, so you don't have to worry about that.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 4:51 am
by danno
He was bwoinked for it if you read the posts

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Fri Jun 09, 2017 7:33 am
by IcePacks
IcePacks wrote:i said STOP SHITPOSTING

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:33 am
by Super Aggro Crag
What a silly fight

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:22 am
by Qbopper
i was kidding before but it's genuinely annoying that you stopsounds whenever an ogg starts and only ever play the i do cocaine one

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 3:49 am
by IcePacks
the incident in question was me stopping the .ogg because there was a heckin big explosion

that said i do like, just passively get this urge to stop all of armhulenn's sounds just to annoy him

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 3:57 am
by Armhulen
it's ok you aren't always online :)

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 1:54 pm
by Qbopper
IcePacks wrote:the incident in question was me stopping the .ogg because there was a heckin big explosion

that said i do like, just passively get this urge to stop all of armhulenn's sounds just to annoy him
oh, it just looked like you stopped my ogg to be a dick and play "i do cocaine" AGAIN

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:22 pm
by Nilons
Qbopper wrote:
IcePacks wrote:the incident in question was me stopping the .ogg because there was a heckin big explosion

that said i do like, just passively get this urge to stop all of armhulenn's sounds just to annoy him
oh, it just looked like you stopped my ogg to be a dick and play "i do cocaine" AGAIN
listen that shit is hilarious and metalocalypse is godlike

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2017 5:14 pm
by IcePacks
you are literally obsessed with my one biggest failing as an admin

i have discovered that the "i do cocaine" .ogg only really works at the end of other peoples' .oggs, which itself is kinda stupid because then i'm bombing our lovely playerbase with extra .oggs

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 3:44 pm
by Qbopper
IcePacks wrote:you are literally obsessed
that's a bit of a stretch, I brought it up twice

now, if I post in here a third time about it, you can start calling me obsessed, it's a fine line pal

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:28 pm
by IcePacks
nilons not you

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 4:56 pm
by Qbopper
IcePacks wrote:nilons not you
it's funnier to assume it was replying to me though

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 6:03 pm
by IcePacks
stop shitpost or i bop u

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:45 am
by PathOfChaos1
To lenient on grief.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:14 am
by Armhulen
If there was one criticism that I could give, I'd say he asks for advice way too often.

Re: IcePacks

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2017 2:50 am
by bandit
Armhulen wrote:If there was one criticism that I could give, I'd say he asks for advice way too often.
this isn't a bad thing, the opposite is far worse