[No longer admin] QuartzCrystal

Post by **MrStonedOne** » Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:18 am #30153

Please post any positive or negative feedback for the administrator here.
This is not the place to discuss ban appeals, admin complaints, or ban requests.
This is for specific feedback for this administrator.

QuartzCrystal · Tue Sep 23, 2014 1:19 am

I just want everyone to like me.

Cipher3 · Post by **Cipher3** » Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:48 am #30296

QuartzCrystal wrote:I just want everyone to like me.

Nobody will ever be liked by everyone.

Ikarrus · Post by **Ikarrus** » Tue Sep 23, 2014 6:59 am #30334

QuartzCrystal wrote:I just want everyone to like me.

You signed up for the wrong position.

Post by **oranges** » Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:09 am #30350

If you're willing to communicate the reasons behind your decisions effectively and clearly that would be a good step to getting people to like you.

QuartzCrystal · Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:52 pm

Is that actual feedback? I think I do that already. But if not I'll do so in the future.

Kavaloosh · Post by **Kavaloosh** » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:56 pm #30404

good admin

10/10

QuartzCrystal · Wed Sep 24, 2014 2:44 am

Kavaloosh wrote:good admin

10/10

Sweet. No room for improvement.

(the temptation to shitpost my own feedback thread is really overwhelming)

Bluespace · Post by **Bluespace** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 7:17 am #30565

Seems to have stepped back into being an admin with flawless efficiency.
10/10 would want to be bwoinked by.

Cipher3 · Post by **Cipher3** » Wed Sep 24, 2014 11:09 pm #30716

Bluespace wrote:10/10 would want to be bwoinked by.

Lewd.

peoplearestrange · Fri Sep 26, 2014 2:21 pm

Only seen on the forums so far, but I really like your attitude, seem easy going. Just don't burn out too early. Look forward to seeing you on the servers.

Post by **oranges** » Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:46 am #31982

QuartzCrystal wrote:Is that actual feedback? I think I do that already. But if not I'll do so in the future.

In a really delayed reply, that was advice, not feedback.

From what I've seen so far you seem to have everythign under control.

peoplearestrange · Mon Sep 29, 2014 10:05 am

Answered ahelps really quickly in game and dealt with them in a friendly to the point way. Both communicated well and made me feel like my issue was properly dealt with.
A++ Would buy from again

QuartzCrystal · Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:19 am

Someone said something nice to me in an ahelp the other day. Clearly I'm bestmin. Except that one bad ban recently.

I'm trying.

QuartzCrystal · Sun Nov 02, 2014 3:11 pm

Quartz is a pretty cool guy, got the headmin election ball rolling.

Antonkr · Post by **Antonkr** » Sun Nov 02, 2014 3:35 pm #40242

Trialmined intigracy/10

Purge with ICBMs

WeeYakk · Post by **WeeYakk** » Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:50 pm #40838

I haven't seen you actually playing since you got back. Admining, yes, but not playing. I think if you played more you'd have a better grasp on concepts like 'escalation', 'players not being omnipotent', and 'act like an antag get treated like an antag'. Maybe then we could avoid stuff like this or yesterday's gloves incident, which I feel compelled to make a complaint thread about involving how you handled it.

QuartzCrystal · Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:18 pm

I actually play a solid amount. My consistent character name is Jebidiah Redbull. We've interacted a few times.

youngbuckliontiger · Thu Nov 06, 2014 6:43 pm

Very good admin. Quick to help people and answers ahelp.
10/10

Kavaloosh · Post by **Kavaloosh** » Sat Dec 27, 2014 1:22 pm #53699

QuartzCrystal wrote:
Kavaloosh wrote:good admin

10/10
Sweet. No room for improvement.

(the temptation to shitpost my own feedback thread is really overwhelming)

just kidding, you're not a good admin

QuartzCrystal · Sun Jan 11, 2015 12:08 am

Kavaloosh wrote:
QuartzCrystal wrote:
Kavaloosh wrote:good admin

10/10
Sweet. No room for improvement.

(the temptation to shitpost my own feedback thread is really overwhelming)
just kidding, you're not a good admin

Kavaloosh · Post by **Kavaloosh** » Thu Jan 29, 2015 10:53 pm #64254

QuartzCrystal wrote:
Kavaloosh wrote:
QuartzCrystal wrote:
Kavaloosh wrote:good admin

10/10
Sweet. No room for improvement.

(the temptation to shitpost my own feedback thread is really overwhelming)
just kidding, you're not a good admin

you're a freedom hating bitch

Drynwyn · Post by **Drynwyn** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 2:40 am #81184

Forgot how deadly meteor pens were and gave me one when I prayed to trade my telecrystals for something fun. 10/10 headmin he.

Post by **Atlanta-Ned** » Thu Apr 09, 2015 4:06 pm #81259

Drynwyn wrote:Forgot how deadly meteor pens were and gave me one when I prayed to trade my telecrystals for something fun. 10/10 headmin he.

And then passed that info along to me over ahelp after I got :salt:y in deadchat. Always a pleasure to get bwoinked by him.

QuartzCrystal · Thu Apr 09, 2015 11:12 pm

Love you guys.

TechnoAlchemist · Mon Apr 13, 2015 4:56 pm

Quartz is a hero who has shaped the man I am today.

10/10 attitude would be trained by again

FamilyManPornoMan · Mon Apr 13, 2015 7:00 pm

From what I gathered with you during our foray together, you abruptly banned me after a minute of silence from you during a recent round, you seemed really disrespectful while I was trying to be nice with you. It feels like you didn't really care what I had to say in the matter, making it look like you were going on a power trip for an offense that was always considered IC. You seem like an awful influence on other administrators if this is how you usually treat players.

QuartzCrystal · Mon Apr 13, 2015 9:24 pm

I'm sorry I upset you FamilyManPornoMan. But you being a griffon and then saying "It's an IC issue" doesn't arouse much friendliness in me.

FamilyManPornoMan · Mon Apr 13, 2015 10:03 pm

QuartzCrystal wrote:I'm sorry I upset you FamilyManPornoMan. But you being a griffon and then saying "It's an IC issue" doesn't arouse much friendliness in me.

It was an in character issue that was resolved with all of us going to perma and you still decided to stick your nose into it, was it because I didn't immediately say I was sorry? You never answered my question. You cut straight to the chase and just banned me, along with one other involved and another who got a warning. The way you responded to me with this post makes it seem like you're acting high and mighty, again, not a very good way to act as an admin, especially one who is supposed to "train" other admins. You should really evaluate your words and work with players who are willing to discuss in game issues rather than give them the silent treatment.

QuartzCrystal · Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:02 am

FamilyManPornoMan wrote:
QuartzCrystal wrote:I'm sorry I upset you FamilyManPornoMan. But you being a griffon and then saying "It's an IC issue" doesn't arouse much friendliness in me.

It was an in character issue that was resolved with all of us going to perma and you still decided to stick your nose into it, was it because I didn't immediately say I was sorry? You never answered my question. You cut straight to the chase and just banned me, along with one other involved and another who got a warning. The way you responded to me with this post makes it seem like you're acting high and mighty, again, not a very good way to act as an admin, especially one who is supposed to "train" other admins. You should really evaluate your words and work with players who are willing to discuss in game issues rather than give them the silent treatment.

You were a dick for no reason. Just because you think your IC punishment for your actions was enough doesn't make it so.

FamilyManPornoMan · Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:54 am

But does that excuse an administrator trainer from acting like one as well?

QuartzCrystal · Wed Apr 15, 2015 9:45 pm

FamilyManPornoMan wrote:But does that excuse an administrator trainer from acting like one as well?

I was straight forward and to the point with you. If you'd like to file a complaint do so or talk to a headmin.

QuartzCrystal · Wed May 06, 2015 7:58 pm

I facilitated another election successfully and then made some decisions that will make the next one much better.
I also got mad at the headmins and made a thread which then kinda got us public logs, sorta.

I think I'm doing OK. No one has complained about me in a while.

Saegrimr · Post by **Saegrimr** » Wed May 06, 2015 8:18 pm #86252

POSTS FEEDBACK ABOUT HIMSELF IN HIS OWN THREAD WHAT A FAG DEADMIN HE

tedward1337 · Post by **tedward1337** » Wed May 06, 2015 9:44 pm #86292

Saegrimr wrote:POSTS FEEDBACK ABOUT HIMSELF IN HIS OWN THREAD WHAT A FAG DEADMIN HE

WOW LOOK AT THIS GUY
HES POSTING IN HIS OWN THREAD

QuartzCrystal · Wed May 06, 2015 11:19 pm

I am the badmin.

rdght91 · Post by **rdght91** » Fri May 29, 2015 2:05 pm #91565

Could you explain your reasoning behind the recent ban with the captain killing a guy trying to break into the HOP's office during a rev round? Who was the guy breaking in?

QuartzCrystal · Fri May 29, 2015 4:45 pm

I'm not disputing Sticky's lifting of the ban, if headmins want captain's to have more leeway then that's fine with me. I'm just going to copy and paste what I had posted in IRC to explain to Sticky why the ban was given originally.

They didn't even open the door they simply asked the AI, within sight of the captain, and he shot them to death instantly.

And they had complete control of cargo and the loyalists ended up winning.

Again, they had complete control of cargo. I get your reasoning but his appeal makes it sound like this was a clusterfuck it wasn't. He was alone in a hall with a single dude who only asked the AI to let him into the HoP office.

As you said, he could have let him explain himself (or he could have dragged him to cargo and waited for implants like other loyalists were doing).

He also insisted he was "breaking into" the HoP despite the fact he only asked the AI and never actually got access.

The player who was asking the AI for access to the HoP office was just a guy wanting to make Ian sentient with slime extract. I was of the opinion that asking for access to the HoP office, in front of the captain, via the AI isn't a good enough reason to get killed by the captain instantly without any questioning or whatever. I do want to repeat though, I don't have issue with Sticky lifting the ban.

Post by **Vekter** » Fri May 29, 2015 5:11 pm #91598

The thing a lot of players tend to forget is that our perspective is often very different than yours. In some situations what seems like a stupid show of force to us is completely logical to the player.

We're not perfect. When we get it wrong, we try and fix it. S'better than what Goons does.

Malkevin · Post by **Malkevin** » Fri May 29, 2015 8:30 pm #91641

He wasn't in front of me, I was down near tcomms inspecting the sabotage when I heard him ask the ai to let him in.

Plus he was a scientist, where do you think the bomb that blew up the brig came from?

QuartzCrystal · Fri May 29, 2015 8:35 pm

Malkevin wrote:He wasn't in front of me, I was down near tcomms inspecting the sabotage when I heard him ask the ai to let him in.

Plus he was a scientist, where do you think the bomb that blew up the brig came from?

As I've stressed like, 50 times now both on the forums, IRC and singulo. I understand why this was a bad ban, just explaining my original thought process and intentions. Sorry you got a bad ban Malkevin, won't happen again.

rdght91 · Post by **rdght91** » Wed Jun 03, 2015 6:24 pm #92748

QuartzCrystal wrote:
Malkevin wrote:He wasn't in front of me, I was down near tcomms inspecting the sabotage when I heard him ask the ai to let him in.

Plus he was a scientist, where do you think the bomb that blew up the brig came from?
As I've stressed like, 50 times now both on the forums, IRC and singulo. I understand why this was a bad ban, just explaining my original thought process and intentions. Sorry you got a bad ban Malkevin, won't happen again.

I was just curious as to the logic behind it and if the person involved in the break in was some sort of staff member. It's nice to see admins who are willing to re-think their decisions and to take feedback in a mature manner.

Post by **Vekter** » Wed Jun 03, 2015 8:24 pm #92759

rdght91 wrote:
QuartzCrystal wrote:
Malkevin wrote:He wasn't in front of me, I was down near tcomms inspecting the sabotage when I heard him ask the ai to let him in.

Plus he was a scientist, where do you think the bomb that blew up the brig came from?
As I've stressed like, 50 times now both on the forums, IRC and singulo. I understand why this was a bad ban, just explaining my original thought process and intentions. Sorry you got a bad ban Malkevin, won't happen again.
I was just curious as to the logic behind it and if the person involved in the break in was some sort of staff member. It's nice to see admins who are willing to re-think their decisions and to take feedback in a mature manner.

Most of us are when it's presented in a mature fashion.

Post by **oranges** » Wed Apr 27, 2016 10:34 am #171897

C-c-c-come back man I miss you ;~;