Page 1 of 2

[No Longer Admin] Nabski

Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2018 8:46 am
by MrStonedOne
Please post any positive or negative feedback for the administrator here.
This is not the place to discuss ban appeals, admin complaints, or ban requests.
This is for specific feedback for this administrator.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:41 pm
by Shark-sie
Not sure how I totally feel about this. Its definitely not negative OR positive, its a bit of both. Although it might be more negative if EVERYONE i killed just so happened to be antag due to this.

During a traitors round, Nabski decided that giving someone a fully functioning cult TC trade was a good idea. This ended up, OF COURSE, snowballing hard as fuck and leading to more cultists than traitors, and cultists armed with Deswords, emags, and stetchkins. As security, the number of times I got attacked by multiple hostiles was astounding, and due to the chaplain being dead / perma being literally emagged to shit, I had to perform executions left and right (HOS and Cap were incompetent, wouldnt give me orders to the contrary, couldnt safely contain the prisoners.)

Im not totally positive because it seems like Nabski gave sec some leeway, i killed at least 15 people between exections and summoning kills, so either no one ahelped or Nabski was getting all three admins on at the time to say "sorry valid". Either way, this is a BAD!!!! Tc trade, spawning more antagonsits on top of traitors in high pop is hell.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 5:48 pm
by Nabski
You were ahelped MULTIPLE times actually. A few of which were rather valid. But yes security was given some leeway that they normally wouldn't get.

While from a security perspective it was a more stressful round from we had a high number of early dead/ghosts who were all enjoying the solocultist show. The chaplain was actually a bit of a hero that round and when there were radio calls going out that the moth was a cult was one of the only people fighting back against him. Also no-one ever made any attempt to order implants that round from cargo.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2018 6:26 pm
by Qbmax32
Fun to work with and very professional

Re: Nabski

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:13 am
by Shark-sie
Not informed about silicon policy at all. Left a note on my account about denying a captain upload access during a round where security was both 1: hunting for revs and 2: harming people over it.
As per silicon policy, which he should know, I can deny any head or sec access based on probable cause of human harm laws with presence of anti-station antags. I informed Nabski that he should know that in ticket. Left a note anyways.
Should know your shit through and through, or be willing to admit youre wrong when it is displayed correctly to you, to be an admin.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 5:04 am
by Hathkar
Deleted the drone shell dispenser when I asked in OOC for someone to fill it, denying me and anyone else who wanted to play drone the opportunity. So in other words, affected several other people besides just me. Stated they were aware of such after I ahelped to find out why it was deleted. If I didn't know better, I'd say they were acting on their grudge, which would be pretty unprofessional.

As for asking for someone to fill the drone dispenser, I've asked previously in other rounds, and other admins have okay'd it. Same with announcing there's a pAI active and ready to be claimed.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 4:53 pm
by cedarbridge
Hathkar wrote:Deleted the drone shell dispenser when I asked in OOC for someone to fill it, denying me and anyone else who wanted to play drone the opportunity. So in other words, affected several other people besides just me. Stated they were aware of such after I ahelped to find out why it was deleted. If I didn't know better, I'd say they were acting on their grudge, which would be pretty unprofessional.

As for asking for someone to fill the drone dispenser, I've asked previously in other rounds, and other admins have okay'd it. Same with announcing there's a pAI active and ready to be claimed.
Asking in OOC for somebody to do something IC...and you see no issue with this.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 6:16 pm
by Hathkar
cedarbridge wrote:
Hathkar wrote:Deleted the drone shell dispenser when I asked in OOC for someone to fill it, denying me and anyone else who wanted to play drone the opportunity. So in other words, affected several other people besides just me. Stated they were aware of such after I ahelped to find out why it was deleted. If I didn't know better, I'd say they were acting on their grudge, which would be pretty unprofessional.

As for asking for someone to fill the drone dispenser, I've asked previously in other rounds, and other admins have okay'd it. Same with announcing there's a pAI active and ready to be claimed.
Asking in OOC for somebody to do something IC...and you see no issue with this.
Like I said, I've previously ahelped before doing this, and other admins have said it's okay. The point I'm trying to make is that Nabksi straight up deleted the drone shell dispenser.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 6:37 pm
by kevinz000
which other admins ooc is entire separate from ic

Re: Nabski

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 6:39 pm
by feem
I would've asked you not to talk about the current round in OOC, and I can't say I wouldn't have deleted the dispenser.

Talking about the round in deadchat is fine, talking about it in OOC is not.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:24 pm
by BeeSting12
I've heard other admins say "pAI available is okay" but saying "posibrain available" is not. Not sure what the difference is since both imply you're open to a ghost role. I'd prefer a ban on both of them.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:46 pm
by PKPenguin321
It's a bit of an esoteric rule and I can't even remember where I heard it but prompting people to enable ghost roles (specifically, asking for somebody to use a pAI or make a drone) is (or at least was at some point) technically allowed. I personally don't really have much of an opinion on it.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2018 4:43 am
by Hathkar
I'm all for a discussion on this topic, but that's for a policy thread, not feedback. This is solely about the deletion of the drone shell dispenser.

If any other admins want to note me for asking about the drone shell dispenser, I'll take the note. I just feel it was a step too far when the shell dispenser was deleted, denying EVERYONE access to drones, not just me. Also worth mentioning that Nabski deleted the dispenser BEFORE even sending me an admin messages, which I had to prompt via ahelp. I'm no admin, but I'm pretty sure a bwoink is more appropriate than deletion.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2018 11:18 pm
by mikeike545
lmao gave a ten minute ban for 'ban baiting style ahelp' when it wasn't like that at all, I just didn't provide info that I didn't think was relevant especially considering circumstances in which the incident had started.

mostly because, you know, it wasn't really relevant. Because I guess slipping and cuffing a person, but standing stark still and attempting to cooperate with security and explain yourself is 'kidnapping' these days.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2018 12:00 am
by oranges
that's just your opinion though

Re: Nabski

Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:59 pm
by starmute
Put revs into a wizard round after security had armed everyone, and captain had given out a few all access to wizard hunters
round 84569
Server time 23:39, 2018-03-08

This is a opinion but I don't think you should press this button during a wiz round. It makes for a very confusing "event" round.

I don't have any interaction with them as far as a person, this is just feedback so I hope you understand that it isn't anything personal.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:09 am
by Nabski
The Revs were actually on the station before the wizard had left their ship. The spawning of additional antagonists was a condition of me giving the wizard plasmafist.

This turned into a massive administrative headache as the wizard then took the power to summon skeletons.

When the next headmins come around I'm going to push to get them to declare a solid policy on conversion and solo antags so that alot of the mess doesn't happen. I actually watched as the revhead managed to get himself armed out of the armory by asking and talking so that was a plus.

I did spawn an ERT to try to relieve some of the pressure on command/security.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:10 am
by Shark-sie
Gonna have to agree here with the above.
While I was not giving out all access, I was in fact the captain of that round.
No indication whatsoever that the round would be anything but normal. Not even a peep AFTER deadchat salt to inform other heads / the borgs that there was a revolution going on (I say other because almost as soon as he pressed the button, 4 people got rev status and killed the RD and I)
He then followed UP to the deadchat salt by spawning a rev, and TAKING IT AWAY.
Then pressed several response team buttons, but I dont know what spawned of them. One said nuclear team and one said nanotrasen response. Not a good round

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:30 am
by Bluespace
I, Bluespace, humbly request wizard in exchange for a 7 month ban from the servers. (No appeals allowed.)

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:39 am
by Nabski
The contract has been made.

EDIT: DID YOU REALLY DISCONNECT HERE!?

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:54 am
by Kingfish
3 minutes before he disconnected
worth

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2018 12:55 am
by Bluespace
lmao virgin media are awful and my net dropped.
still counts though, the round was about as fucked up as i am so i'm happy with it.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:05 am
by ESR
Overall fun admin, knows how to make slow Terry rounds more fun and is quick to respond to ahelps.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:47 pm
by yorii
Nabski is pretty great from what I can tell so far.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2018 1:20 pm
by Nabski
I feel like half the things written by this admin are half literate and typo filled.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 8:49 am
by Polyphynx
Wasn't very friendly handling an ahelp about me. I kinda felt made out to be some bad guy, even though I tried reasoning it out with them.
They also didn't seem to try to want to (is that a good sentence?) come to an understanding or look for alternatives, and jumped straight to a 3-week ban. Had hoped for a bit more communication before doing that.
They did lower it to 1 week shortly after as they said they were feeling nice, which I appreciated. But I felt a ban was a bit hasty, and that a simple warning would've sufficed.
Of course, that's from my perspective.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 2:14 pm
by Nabski
For reference this was an emote ban to get around the inability to talk due to social anxiety.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 7:24 am
by Polyphynx
Yeah, it's a really minor one, which is why I'm not appealing it.
It just leaves a bit of a sour taste to jump right into a ban rather than simply a warning, which would've had the same outcome.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2018 5:21 am
by MaximumOverlizard
I mean, I've seen a pacifist strip someone in space to kill them. That seems pretty small-time comparatively.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 2:49 pm
by Eaglendia
Nice guy and decent with administrative things from what I've experienced and seen respectively, but seriously needs to get in touch with his buttons. Turned some of the heads of staff into Traitors during a Revolution round; the round immediately after this was a relatively low-pop Wizard round in which he gave the Wizard's apprentice Dragon Form and Summon Friends. Not a highly consequential event in the grand scheme of things, but a frustrating couple of rounds for what seemed like almost everyone involved; definitely not something I'd be super eager to see more of.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:17 pm
by Dax Dupont
Eaglendia wrote:Turned some of the heads of staff into Traitors during a Revolution round; the round immediately after this was a relatively low-pop Wizard round in which he gave the Wizard's apprentice Dragon Form and Summon Friends.
That sounds like a good event tbh

Re: Nabski

Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:35 pm
by Nabski
One of the heads of the revolution decided to go to security and try to "broker a peace". This was unique enough that I decided to allow it but it heavily put the favor to the heads of staff. I did not make the heads of staff into traitors until the shuttle had been docked for 10 minutes. Neither of the remained revheads were actively flashing and after making a command report about what departments they were in decided to make the heads traitors to try to move things along.

The wizard had to DC at the start of the shift, so I offered his body to ghosts for a moment to avoid round end due to no antags (which isn't a thing outside revolution whoops). I then felt bad for the guy who got tempted with wizard but didn't get to keep it so he became the apprentice and got two bonus spells that I thought would be unique and interesting. Summon friend was picked it let another player get in on the fun, and dragon form because it's rare. Sadly they started with the hijack objective.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 11:19 pm
by Shadowflame909
>Gave away dragon form.

Duuuuuuude. That's a No-No. Turning antagonists into megafauna was the hill alphonzo died on.

But otherwise pretty good, most active admin by FAR. Always on terry, usually the only one. Pretty active on all servers in general. What would we do without the admin that has double the connections then all the rest.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 11:54 pm
by Nilons
Shadowflame909 wrote:>Gave away dragon form.

Duuuuuuude. That's a No-No. Turning antagonists into megafauna was the hill alphonzo died on.

But otherwise pretty good, most active admin by FAR. Always on terry, usually the only one. Pretty active on all servers in general. What would we do without the admin that has double the connections then all the rest.
I think he meant the minor version of it you can get for beating an ash drake

Re: Nabski

Posted: Tue May 01, 2018 11:33 am
by oranges
Shadowflame909 wrote:>Gave away dragon form.

Duuuuuuude. That's a No-No. Turning antagonists into megafauna was the hill alphonzo died on.

But otherwise pretty good, most active admin by FAR. Always on terry, usually the only one. Pretty active on all servers in general. What would we do without the admin that has double the connections then all the rest.
The hill that only existed while kor was a headadmin

Re: Nabski

Posted: Tue May 01, 2018 1:44 pm
by Nabski
Yes it was the ash version for beating an ash drake. I've been on Terry much less lately because it typically has an admin now, and because it's down (again)(again)(again).

Re: Nabski

Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 3:18 am
by Shadowflame909
Well, if that was just a KOR thing then I guess that's not an issue anymore. But If it was during Kor headmin term, dragon forms even worse! You can turn back human and go hide and junk, or heal up. Also stealthily fuck people over! Edit: But that would be pretty fun for a stealth wizard build.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sun May 13, 2018 7:52 am
by wubli
Evil gamer.
But responsible admin.
He's a lot around Sybil and will kick your ass if he has to. I can't know much about the buttons he presses, but I read ban appeals pretty often and I believe he makes good decisions.
Spoiler:
It happened some time ago, but during the ANIMETIDDIES complaint, he made jokes about it on Discord, which they obviously didn't laugh at, since a confrontation had happened before during an ahelp. Probably didn't mean no harm and was actually just joking, but I understand that it might have not been the best idea. This is the only thing I can disagree with about his ~professional~ behavior. I don't think of it as actually relevant but I'd feel bad just saying he's a good boy.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Mon May 14, 2018 12:01 am
by Doctor Pork
Yelled at me once because he thought I adminbuse'd. Not afraid of confrontation. Runs nice events. Good sense of humor. Seriously a great admin.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 1:00 am
by Qbopper
really needs to hold off on spawning antags

full story:

>wizard round ends in like, two minutes
>new round
>clown ops forced by another admin
>they declare war
>nabski spawns a wizard
>other admins are not okay with that
>nabski wants to spawn a mech for the crew to help
>wait a little bit
>nabski spawns an ert

when you do this it affects the round a shitload and causes a lot of frustration

imagine how the warops feel, they had no idea there was a wizard or ert when they docked, and clownops has to be forced so there's also probably going to be salt there because you can only get that role if an admin forces it and you win the die roll

imagine the crew, they're busy prepping for ops, they don't expect a wizard to show up and start killing people

spawning an ert to get people back into the round is a bandaid solution that just turns the round into even more of a mess

please please please stop pushing buttons and consider the round before you do, if you want to spawn in a wizard then force the round to wizard, don't wait until the ops declare war and then start to push buttons - there's a difference between meta breaking and just being far far too button happy

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2018 3:36 am
by Deitus
saved my account from russian hackers, #basedmin2k18

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2018 12:04 am
by CitrusGender
sawrge's trialmin (a bit late)

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:24 pm
by Hathkar
Had an "event" in which he hand-picked 36ish people to be blood brothers, including a derelict drone and round-start security officer. Also mysteriously disappeared before the ahelps started flooding in about the event, leaving it all to Imsxz.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2018 10:59 pm
by Atlanta-Ned
(there weren't that many ahelps)

Re: Nabski

Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 2:33 am
by Nabski
Dang it, I was one away from the second page.

The event followed two nuke ops in a row + a crashed round so I was trying to do something special. The first sections of pairings were lowest hours on the server players with highest hours. After that it I was just going around the station trying to pair people with whomever they interacted with. Having to go was unfortunate because I wanted to see how it played out, but something came up in real life.

Drone + engineer was because the drone was upgrading machinery right next to the guy, and I even gave him dronespeak so they could communicate. I included two security members because I've gotten feedback that mass antag rounds suck for security.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2018 4:23 am
by Ayy Lemoh
Did a small, funny joke that restored my faith in admins doing things that aren't just tc trades or big events where it's basically all or nothing.

It was quite nice in my opinion.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 2:17 am
by Hathkar
I'll just make this a general comment instead of anything specific.

Needs to chill with the events. Spamming the create antag buttons aren't very creative or interesting every other round. Also has a tendency to do "events" whenever he's not an antagonist, which feels like a holdover from when he wasn't an admin and would afk whenever he wasn't an antagonist.

I'm sure this will be disregarded, as he and I are known to dislike each other.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:05 am
by Nabski
For reference, the "events" for the night were.

Let a player become a security borg. It required captain/HOS request to centcomm, an ed-209, and their brain. For extra scrutiny there was an extra announcement at the end to make sure they didn't break their laws since I didn't watch them all shift.

I told ghosts on an announced extended they could do a trader event with a ship. They requested magical traders. I got two people interested and made them understand and agree they were to stick at the ship and if they needed something particularly special ahelp for the trade. One of them hit summon events guns and magic and I just sighed as there was no fixing that mess. I ended up giving them a fireball spell and polymorph wand for customers. This was an unmitigated disaster but I'm not unhappy about having tried to do it.

An enhanced security report naming the exact type and number of antags (3 lings and 6 traitors).

An alien hunter, which I then gave split personality. Then an alien hunter hunter. Neither did very well.

I gave a pickaxe to a player stuck in lavaland walls because they prayed. They continued interacting with the gods and I eventually gave them a quest to use a gorilla syringe on the captain. I think they managed it.

A haunted bar of soap, it spun and would move and casually try to slip people.

Changed the nickname of a player who was trying to make Firstname 'Nickname' Lastname a thing on this server, as I think that's bad naming form. It was very unflattering.

And that's it for things I spawned/did during approximately 6 hours worth of rounds for the evening.

I mean obviously I'm not going to do event's when I'm an antag. That would be retarded.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:14 am
by Hathkar
I wasn't referring specifically to tonight's events.

There's a joke I heard in ooc. "How do you know if Gene Ball is antag?" "If he's moving." The underlying meaning is that you play only for antag and frequently went afk if you didn't get it before you were an admin. Now instead of going afk, you can admin and do events.

The joke isn't very funny because I had to explain it.

Re: Nabski

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 4:23 am
by Nabski
Nah it's a good joke, with a touch of truth. I was just annoyed because I've been actively trying to move away for create antag events as often. I really thought the wizqrd traders would go over well for announced extended, but hey player thought up player messed up it was worth a try.