/tg/Station 13

Bottom post of the previous page:

Rustledjimm wrote:someday I will gain forum admin and ban everyone with a higher post count than me

Top 10 anime villains

what happened here

we need to redistribute postcounts

leibniz wrote:we need to redistribute postcounts

Over my dead body you fucking communists

Dasvidaniya comrade

1. Postcounts have no use to you
2. Your posts only have value because us, the visitors, read them
3. If 90% of your count was taken and distributed evenly you'd still be in the top
4. High postcounts are unfair to new users, it is hard to tell right away if someone is mentally unsound when they havent made lots of post like our veterans

*increases post count by 1*

Just strip the nobility of their wealth and land, they didn't earn it because of skill or anything and that's a pretty big chunk of wealth that could be used to jumpstart UBI in some countries.

So you're going to take rich people's stuff because they "didn't earn it" and then turn around and give it to poor people who didn't earn it? Genius!

Yes because the poor needs it more than they do

Just because you didn't "earn" a glass of water it doesn't mean you shouldn't be given one if you're thirsty

ShadowDimentio wrote:I'm going to college, but no.

This is why the voting age should be risen to 30

We're not talking about water, we're talking about entire fortunes of money, lifetimes people have spent amassing wealth.

Are the poor then entitled to other people's shit because they're poor? Does that entitlement then surpass their rightful owner's property rights and hard work they put in to earn it? What a backwards way of looking at things.

ShadowDimentio wrote:We're not talking about water, we're talking about entire fortunes of money, lifetimes people have spent amassing wealth.

Are the poor then entitled to other people's shit because they're poor? Does that entitlement then surpass their rightful owner's property rights and hard work they put in to earn it? What a backwards way of looking at things.

Holy fuck I'm dense but you're a neutron star compared to me. It's not about stripping people of their wealth because they didn't earn it, it's about redistributing wealth to each according to their needs and from each according to their ability, and of course redistribution should start with those who earned their fortune without skill or ability, A.K.A. the nobility

>It's not about stripping people of their wealth... it's about redistributing it

That's the same thing you idiot. It's "redistributing" in the same way armed robbery is redistributing, and often with the same gory results.

>To each according to their needs and from each according to their ability

Ah yes because people sure are going to be happy when they have some tap water, a room shared with 5 other people, and a bowl of rice. That is all you need after all.

>And of course redistribution should start with those who earned their fortune without skill or ability, A.K.A. the nobility

It would certainly "start" with them, and it would "end" with absolutely everyone. You're an imbecile if you think any of the nice things you enjoy wouldn't be, ahem, "redistributed" to buy more rice. You didn't need them after all!

Grazyn wrote:

ShadowDimentio wrote:We're not talking about water, we're talking about entire fortunes of money, lifetimes people have spent amassing wealth.

Are the poor then entitled to other people's shit because they're poor? Does that entitlement then surpass their rightful owner's property rights and hard work they put in to earn it? What a backwards way of looking at things.

Holy fuck I'm dense but you're a neutron star compared to me. It's not about stripping people of their wealth because they didn't earn it, it's about redistributing wealth to each according to their needs and from each according to their ability, and of course redistribution should start with those who earned their fortune without skill or ability, A.K.A. the nobility

Is there some kind of test for rich people that tells us if they got appropriate skills or not?

Craniometry is a start, but they'll all get the bullet eventually comrade.

Redistribution feels whimsical and impossible now because society hasn't developed enough yet for it to be a feasible solution. Specifically:

• removed subordination of the individual to the division of labor - not there yet
• removed antithesis between mental and physical labor - almost there
• labor has become not only a means of life but life's prime want - already there
• the productive forces have increased with the all-around development of the individual - almost there
• all the springs of co-operative wealth flow more abundantly - not there yet

Also
>bowl of rice and tap water
I don't think you fully grasp how rich is the 1% (I don't blame you, it's hard for the human brain to visualize such unfathomable quantities), fair redistribution would grant the smallfolk enough wealth to live a hedonistic lifestyle compared to their current one

>overpopulation
it's a problem but wealth redistribution still feels ethically and morally better than paying the poor to terminate pregnancy/get sterilized as they're doing now

The only way UBI will work is in an isolated, small state that produces more than it consumes.

So basically not in the western world as long as we have immigration, an import-economy that relies purely on the service sector without producing anything of note, and entire political parties dedicated to making the rich even richer
Redistribution isn't going to do shit unless it's on a global scale, and that's highly unlikely to ever go through

Kor wrote:

ShadowDimentio wrote:Weed is an illegal substance (except where it isn't). If you don't wanna get jailed for possession don't possess it in the first place.

ShadowDimentio wrote:Maybe so, but the law is the law and you're expected to follow it even if it is dumb. They knew what they were buying was illegal and if they got caught they'd be in trouble.

ShadowDimentio wrote:just don't break the same law three times.

ShadowDimentio wrote: they all knew what they were doing and that it was illegal. They made their bed so now they have to lie in it, as it were.

ShadowDimentio wrote:Off ya got me, guess I gotta submit to tyranny then because they changed the laws.

Do you think actually he doesn't realize or just flat out doesn't care if nothing he says is approaching consistent

Hey Shadowdementio respond to this post

the problem with wealth redistribution is that generally it will never work and is usually espoused by communists trying to bring in a system that definitely will never work(specific economic planning), that doesn't mean it should be a non-issue and solving the issue would probably require an entire rethink on how we define corporate ownership, property law etc etc

Or you could just tax the rich and use the revenue for welfare for the poor

"Wealth redistribution" doesn't mean the unwashed mob storming your villa to raid your stuff

Grazyn wrote:Or you could just tax the rich and use the revenue for welfare for the poor

"Wealth redistribution" doesn't mean the unwashed mob storming your villa to raid your stuff

>leaves the country

Anonmare wrote:

Grazyn wrote:Or you could just tax the rich and use the revenue for welfare for the poor

"Wealth redistribution" doesn't mean the unwashed mob storming your villa to raid your stuff

>leaves the country

Oh no you don't bourgeois scum

/gulags u

Wyzack wrote:Hey Shadowdementio respond to this post

Hi

You can take a one-off levy on their bank accounts in a single sweep at night time with no forewarning and use that

They did this in Italy in the early 90s with a 0.6 levy on all bank accounts following a serious currency crisis, surely it could be done to the rich only to fund welfare programs?

What I mean is that there are relatively peaceful ways to do this before the use of force becomes necessary

ShadowDimentio wrote:

Anonmare wrote:

Grazyn wrote:Or you could just tax the rich and use the revenue for welfare for the poor

"Wealth redistribution" doesn't mean the unwashed mob storming your villa to raid your stuff

>leaves the country

Oh no you don't bourgeois scum

/gulags u

it'd be a shame if something happened to leftwing politics before you could organise ...
*funds identity politics*
good luck.. kiddo. you'll need it

Grazyn wrote:What I mean is that there are relatively peaceful ways to do this before the use of force becomes necessary

Haha yeah man the rich should have just given up their wealth willingly if they didn't want to get shot in the head

leibniz wrote:

ShadowDimentio wrote:

Anonmare wrote:

Grazyn wrote:Or you could just tax the rich and use the revenue for welfare for the poor

"Wealth redistribution" doesn't mean the unwashed mob storming your villa to raid your stuff

>leaves the country

Oh no you don't bourgeois scum

/gulags u

it'd be a shame if something happened to leftwing politics before you could organise ...
*funds identity politics*
good luck.. kiddo. you'll need it

Yeah most hardcore communists agree that identity politics, lgbt movements and immigration are all promoted by the capitalist machine to sow chaos and dissent among the working class

They think everything is a move by the capitalist machine to oppress them.

ShadowDimentio wrote:

Grazyn wrote:What I mean is that there are relatively peaceful ways to do this before the use of force becomes necessary

Haha yeah man the rich should have just given up their wealth willingly if they didn't want to get shot in the head

>democracy
>socialists win
>they make laws
>you don't respect laws
>you suffer the consequences

This is how society works

>Socialists win
>Start executing everyone who stands in the way of their glorious communist utopia that's always just one more death away
>Dissent is met with gulag or summary execution
>Haha you should have just followed the law

youre being dumb right now buddy.

im from a country where socialists do win elections and there has been exactly zero killings and gulags.

go look up what a socialist is in the dictionary, i think you're getting it confused with a Stalinist.

Stalinism is a type of socialism.

ShadowDimentio wrote:>Socialists win
>Start executing everyone who stands in the way of their glorious communist utopia that's always just one more death away
>Dissent is met with gulag or summary execution
>Haha you should have just followed the law

"give up some of your wealth"
"ah ah fuck no"
"alright we'll just take it straight from your bank account"
"what no, fuck you, I riot"
"enjoy prison"

Nobody talked about mass executions

The law is the law, and breaking the law usually has consequences in civilized societies

If you don't like this you can just not vote socialists and hope they never win I guess?

and?

its all water in the ocean but not all water is in the ocean.

i hope youre being dense on purpose right now.

>Give me some of your wealth
>Fuck no, I'm not giving you shit
>Then I'll take it from your bank account
>It's in another country, you can't touch it
>Then I'll stop you from withdrawing from it
>Then I'll leave and take my money with me

Alternatively they'd just leave as soon as the commies won. Nobody with any sense waits around for their turn on the wealth redistribution chopping block.

ShadowDimentio wrote:Stalinism is a type of socialism.

Slavery and feudalism are a type of capitalism.

Yes leaving was always an option, of course this is predictable and there are ways around it such as making it harder to move money and assets off the country but yeah, I guess you should just leave soon after the elections if you're that much afraid.

However Trump has shown that people will say "fuck it I'll move" but they rarely go through with it

ShadowDimentio wrote:>Give me some of your wealth
>Fuck no, I'm not giving you shit
>Then I'll take it from your bank account
>It's in another country, you can't touch it
>Then I'll stop you from withdrawing from it
>Then I'll leave and take my money with me

Alternatively they'd just leave as soon as the commies won. Nobody with any sense waits around for their turn on the wealth redistribution chopping block.

Money is a medium of exchange for goods and services, they have little inherent value compared to their exchange value. If you're going to run away with money do it with gold or bitcoins.

I mean rich people know this. If they were afraid their money was about to plummet in value (such as by a heavily socialist regime being put in power) they'd quickly invest it in stocks or gold or something.

>hiding your money in stocks in the event of a "heavily socialist regime being put in power"

l m a o

clearly you're never going to have this problem

ColonicAcid wrote:im from a country where socialists do win elections and there has been exactly zero killings and gulags.

Consider reading the rest of the posts. We're not talking about safety net socialism, we're talking about forcibly taking rich people's wealth through the barrel of a gun and instating communism. That's literally what Grazyn is talking about.

shadowmemes once again proving he cannot read

ohnopigeons wrote:>hiding your money in stocks in the event of a "heavily socialist regime being put in power"

l m a o

clearly you're never going to have this problem

Stocks in a FOREIGN COUNTRY, I should have clarified.

One more thing: socialists, like all politicians, aren't stupid, and I don't think you realize how quick things can be done when speed is essential for the success of the operation. Trump signed the travel ban less than one week after taking office. Unless you have some serious insider knowledge, any wealth redistribution laws that could prompt people to move their riches off the country will be approved fast enough to catch you unaware. This is some really basic political shit and you should be naive to believe they wouldn't think about that

>what's a globalized economy, the post

shadow does it again

Paradise Papers kinda showed that they already have a headstart on this thing, you might catch people with 2 villas but not people with private islands

Grazyn wrote:One more thing: socialists, like all politicians, aren't stupid, and I don't think you realize how quick things can be done when speed is essential for the success of the operation. Trump signed the travel ban less than one week after taking office. Unless you have some serious insider knowledge, any wealth redistribution laws that could prompt people to move their riches off the country will be approved fast enough to catch you unaware. This is some really basic political shit and you should be naive to believe they wouldn't think about that

"Serious insider knowledge" like basic knowledge of who just got elected? Unless the entire communist party that just got elected kept it secret that they were all blood red communists, the rich people will know and have bailed at the first sign of it actually looking like the communists may win.

Plus, how fucking evil are you prepared to be for your glorious communist utopia? Now that I've forced you to admit you're literally just robbing people you've flat out given up the ghost and are advocating springing blind robbery on them and taking everything they own with no time for them to escape with any of THEIR shit. It's despicable.

All taxation is theft.

ohnopigeons wrote:All taxation is theft.

Hot take