/tg/Station 13

Bottom post of the previous page:

Climate treaties are a token anyway the only way America is going renewable is if the inolved industries can lobby harder than the fossil fuels lobbyists currently welded to the arse of 90% of us politicians. So probably never as lobbying gives greater financial benefits than expenditure like you know all corruption.

SHUT THE FUCK UP NERDS

[youtube]OwDiPrFCM0M[/youtube]

>go on twatter
>people are freaking the fuck out and saying it is an apocalypse
>tfw I gain energy from the salt
I will become a god before the week ends

Zilenan91 wrote:Hillary will win against Trump 100% if it's between both of them, though I think that Bernie would lose to Trump due to Bernie calling himself a socialist. People would spin it that he's a communist and he'd lose voters.

joke is on you faggot hahaha

I hope there will be another democratic candidate like bernie in the future.

Both sides need to rebel the major parties being so bought out by the same people has meant NO VOTER has been getting what they want in America for decades.

I doubt the Trump presidency will turn out well, but hey, I've been wrong before. At this point, I'm in full "Eat, drink, and be merry- for tonight we are still alive" mode.

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/796222841612042240

This is probably the funniest revelation of all the leaks this campaign.

ahahahahahah holy shit, they really thought Jeb! had a better chance then cruz or trump? Oh my god

poor jeb

I honestly did feel bad for Jeb!, he always wanted to be president and then his father and brother became president. It was just sad to watch him sometimes, where even his family hated him.

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/08/ ... l-run-2016

Also don't forget this particular gem

All of this suggests a horrific backfire on the Clintons.

Kor wrote:http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/08/ ... l-run-2016

Also don't forget this particular gem

What if the Clintons were playing chess … against themselves?!

That 5D chess really is something, isn't it

TheColdTurtle wrote:I honestly did feel bad for Jeb!, he always wanted to be president and then his father and brother became president. It was just sad to watch him sometimes, where even his family hated him.

also jeb! was the good kid and his brother was the alcoholic fuckup and yet

also, if you bring your /pol/ shitposting into actual elections then you're a fucking moron and this is exactly what you deserve

It was a strategically smaller electoral vote count for Madam President Hillary Rodham Clinton you deplorable drumpfkinlets, you'll see who gets inaugurated come January.

Wyzack wrote:I feel like another big part of this is people who supported Trump but were afraid of being socially ostracized for their political views so kept quiet about it

Did I not call it for the shy tory effect like five pages ago?

The other part of it is that the dems are suffering from a lot of "if you don't back every cause 100% to the hilt then I don't want anything to do with you, blocked" among their supporters - and some of them will take supporting a leftist cause other than their own personal pet causes as a slight 'cause apparently people are incapable of having opinions on more than one thing at a time or something. Post something about AIDS charities? Fuck you for not supporting black civil rights apparently.
The Gravity Falls guy called it on twitter, the left can't tell the difference between an imperfect ally and an outright enemy.

Places like /pol/ on the other hand call each other faggots on a daily basis anyway regardless of political opinions. It's not that there's no infighting on the right, but whatever infighting there is tends not to lead to people, say, cutting people they've been best friends with for years out of their lives over a fucking tweet that wasn't worded very well (literally something I saw happen last night)

Kor wrote:https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/796222841612042240

This is probably the funniest revelation of all the leaks this campaign.

>promote "pied piper" candidates

>he manages to get the majority of the country in tow

>wins

OUT
FUCKING
SKILLED

imblyings wrote:It was a strategically smaller electoral vote count for Madam President Hillary Rodham Clinton you deplorable drumpfkinlets, you'll see who gets inaugurated come January.

Are you implying that Shillary will somehow still get in office in spite of how she lost and conceded? The desperation is real.

Shadow I'm pretty sure he was making fun of the people who actually think that

Color me stumped then

I am really interested in the trial now, simply because literally every potential outcome is going to make things more complicated and worse.

What trial?

ShadowDimentio wrote:

imblyings wrote:It was a strategically smaller electoral vote count for Madam President Hillary Rodham Clinton you deplorable drumpfkinlets, you'll see who gets inaugurated come January.

Are you implying that Shillary will somehow still get in office in spite of how she lost and conceded? The desperation is real.

are you so desperate to "mine the salt" that you just stopped reading posts entirely

TheColdTurtle wrote:Shadow I'm pretty sure he was making fun of the people who actually think that

Guess we're all #cruzmissiles now

Couldnt countershill yourself out of a bag of milk

What angers me the most about this is that it's really our own fault. Most American media have been biased toward the Democrats, and created the image that there was no way Donald Trump could win. That combined with Hillary's character assassination caused a lower turn-out for democratic votes, and a "hidden" republican vote that was never really hidden but simply got brushed aside until it was too late.

I hope that this will teach the Democrats the lessson that simply dismissing people who are racist/sexist/whatever is only going to reinforce their resent.

Ricotez wrote:What angers me the most about this is that it's really our own fault. Most American media have been biased toward the Democrats, and created the image that there was no way Donald Trump could win. That combined with Hillary's character assassination caused a lower turn-out for democratic votes, and a "hidden" republican vote that was never really hidden but simply got brushed aside until it was too late.

I hope that this will teach the Democrats the lessson that simply dismissing people who are racist/sexist/whatever is only going to reinforce their resent.

doop doop doop what do we have here
I should turn this list into a bingo card sometime

• Type I: Overestimations of the group — its power and morality
  • Illusions of invulnerability creating excessive optimism and encouraging risk taking.
  • Unquestioned belief in the morality of the group, causing members to ignore the consequences of their actions.
• Type II: Closed-mindedness
  • Rationalizing warnings that might challenge the group's assumptions.
  • Stereotyping those who are opposed to the group as weak, evil, biased, spiteful, impotent, or stupid.
• Type III: Pressures toward uniformity
  • Self-censorship of ideas that deviate from the apparent group consensus.
  • Illusions of unanimity among group members, silence is viewed as agreement.
  • Direct pressure to conform placed on any member who questions the group, couched in terms of "disloyalty"
  • Mindguards— self-appointed members who shield the group from dissenting information.

dezzmont wrote:I am really interested in the trial now, simply because literally every potential outcome is going to make things more complicated and worse.

ShadowDimentio wrote:What trial?

there are two trials:

1. the trial for raping a 13-year-old, which is not happening because she dropped the suit and the whole thing was shady as fuck to begin with

2. the trump university trial, which is still happening

This is a next level of absolute madman.
He gets endorsed by the KKK, Putin, and Kim Jong Un.
He still wins.
He has zero political experience and is a fukken TV Celebrity.
He still wins.
He has a history of being a massive con artist, especially with that University.
HE STILLS WINS.

THE ABSOLUTE
M
A
D
M
A
N

Ricotez wrote:What angers me the most about this is that it's really our own fault. Most American media have been biased toward the Democrats, and created the image that there was no way Donald Trump could win. That combined with Hillary's character assassination caused a lower turn-out for democratic votes, and a "hidden" republican vote that was never really hidden but simply got brushed aside until it was too late.

I hope that this will teach the Democrats the lessson that simply dismissing people who are racist/sexist/whatever is only going to reinforce their resent.

Wut, all I saw on the internet was Clinton emails, Bengazi and Crooked Hillary/ Hillary for jail.

Like everywhere.

MrAlphonzo wrote: He has a history of being a massive con artist

Any lidgitimate sources?

[youtube]8TwXe908rRk[/youtube]

[youtube]rEwCvHVS394[/youtube]

bandit wrote:

dezzmont wrote:I am really interested in the trial now, simply because literally every potential outcome is going to make things more complicated and worse.

ShadowDimentio wrote:What trial?

there are two trials:

1. the trial for raping a 13-year-old, which is not happening because she dropped the suit and the whole thing was shady as fuck to begin with

2. the trump university trial, which is still happening

1: Figures

2: Have only heard about it slightly through the grape vine, though I think if the case was good that the liberal media would have made sure everyone has heard about it by now, so I thus don't think it's very good.

CPTANT wrote:Wut, all I saw on the internet was Clinton emails, Bengazi and Crooked Hillary/ Hillary for jail.

Like everywhere.

>On the internet

He's talking about on TV and """news""" websites. A fuckton of people were mad that neither of the aforementioned groups were covering any of the mountains of allegations against Hillary and were instead either over-reporting on every little possibly bad thing Trump did and trying to cast Hillary as a saint.

The people spamming Hillary for Prison stuff everywhere is trolling, like when producers on YouTube or Twitch or Twitter or whatever tell trolls to fuck off etc they 100% of the time don't fuck off but come back more numerous and angry.

I've lost a lot of sleep over this election because of how fucking hilarious it is

ShadowDimentio wrote:Wut, all I saw on the internet was Clinton emails, Bengazi and Crooked Hillary/ Hillary for jail.

Like everywhere.

this is the same dumbassery that makes people shocked that trump won. almost every part of the internet is an echo chamber because it is literally designed that way. if you read trump stuff you will get more trump stuff, if you read hillary stuff you will get more hillary stuff.

Which is why you should get out and talk to a lot of people if you want to see both sides

As far as the internet went for my perception, it was a slight Trump majority with the rest being people who really hated Trump and prefered Clinton(Though amusingly a lot of those were Germans), and people who weren't going to vote at all because fuck them both(Mostly Bernie supporters).
Not a single one that actually liked Clinton though. She is just that unlikable.

I don't know a single person on or offline that liked Clinton. I know lots of them voted for, but nobody who was happy about it.

I know a couple that actually liked Clinton, and we're 100 percent with her. Needless to say most of them are calling for assasination and saying that Trump is litterally Hitler.

The fools dont realize how much worse that nut pence could be.


It's not the end of the world. But we can see it from here.

Trump isn't going to get assassinated because of that

Anyone smart enough to plan and go through with a presidential assassination will be smart enough to understand it would give power to someone worse.

Unless someone wants that because it furthers their agenda.

XSI wrote:Trump isn't going to get assassinated because of that

Anyone smart enough to plan and go through with a presidential assassination will be smart enough to understand it would give power to someone worse.

Ah, the John McCain defense.

Speaking of which Palin is being seriously considered for a cabinet position. Dare we say Miss Secretary of State Sarah Palin?

MisterPerson wrote:

XSI wrote:Trump isn't going to get assassinated because of that

Anyone smart enough to plan and go through with a presidential assassination will be smart enough to understand it would give power to someone worse.

Ah, the John McCain defense.

Speaking of which Palin is being seriously considered for a cabinet position. Dare we say Miss Secretary of State Sarah Palin?

Ohw god, I actually think the people that Trump is gathering around him might actually be worse than him.

Cant do that much worse than Hillary

I'd say they could indeed do far worse than not being there.

XSI wrote:Cant do that much worse than Hillary

Who of the people around Clinton do you find dubious?

XSI wrote:Cant do that much worse than Hillary

Ricotez wrote:(Picture)

CPTANT wrote:Who of the people around Clinton do you find dubious?

Missing the joke huh
You can't do worse than not doing the job.

A leaky faucet is better than a flooded kitchen after the plumber royally fucked up.