/tg/Station 13

permits the CAS to withdraw a child from its family if it is determined the child is likely to suffer emotional or mental harm, or for a parent’s failure to provide the child with services or treatment. If a child decides he/she is of a gender other than his/her biological gender, the parents are required by this legislation to provide transgender medical services to the child or risk the child being removed from the home.

effectively gives wide jurisdiction to the State to control the lives of children in the CAS, and in doing so, interfere with the parent/child relationship. This occurs by defining the “best interests of the child” so broadly as to include: the child’s physical, emotional, mental and developmental needs, as well as the child’s race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression.

D&B wrote:It doesn't mention christians but it can be used to target christian or otherwise traditionally conservative religious families.

a child’s religion is no longer a factor to be considered in determining the child’s best interest. That is, “religious faith” has been removed at nearly every reference contained in the previous Act. No longer can parents direct their child’s religion, but rather it is the “child’s creed” that is to be taken into consideration when determining the needs of a child. This provision will create conflict within the family over such issues as abortion, gender identity or even assisted suicide if the child decides that is what he/she wishes.

"The matters to be considered in determining the best interests of a child are changed. The child’s views and wishes, given due weight in accordance with the child’s age and maturity, unless they cannot be ascertained, and in the case of a First Nations, Inuk or Métis child, the importance of preserving the child’s cultural identity and connection to community must be taken into consideration. In addition, any other circumstances that are considered relevant, including a list of 11 circumstances similar to those listed in the current Act, are to be considered. Differences include: the current Act includes the child’s cultural background in this list while the new Act includes the child’s cultural and linguistic heritage; the current Act includes the religious faith in which the child is being raised while the new Act includes the child’s race, ancestry, place of origin, colour, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression"

Armhulen wrote:finally, i can be my own assassin's creed

bman wrote:

Armhulen wrote:finally, i can be my own assassin's creed

frog creed

Spoiler:

XSI wrote:If society is not trusting them with alcohol because they're not old enough
Why would society trust them to decide on permanent, irreversible surgery and hormone therapy?

Something isn't quite right here

ShadowDimentio wrote:It's hysterically easy to get transgender surgery in Canada, and if your doctor refuses for whatever reason you can sue them.

Basically if your 10 year old says "I wanna be a girlie!" and you don't immediately get them surgery and the state finds out you lose your kid.

permits the CAS to withdraw a child from its family if it is determined the child is likely to suffer emotional or mental harm, or for a parent’s failure to provide the child with services or treatment. If a child decides he/she is of a gender other than his/her biological gender, the parents are required by this legislation to provide transgender medical services to the child or risk the child being removed from the home.

ShadowDimentio wrote:

permits the CAS to withdraw a child from its family if it is determined the child is likely to suffer emotional or mental harm, or for a parent’s failure to provide the child with services or treatment. If a child decides he/she is of a gender other than his/her biological gender, the parents are required by this legislation to provide transgender medical services to the child or risk the child being removed from the home.

If a child decides he/she is of a gender other than his/her biological gender, the parents are required by this legislation to provide transgender medical services to the child or risk the child being removed from the home.

nsos wrote:can you keep this shit in the pol thread this shit is irrelevant to me and most people

ShadowDimentio wrote:Also literally what the hell are you talking about, it's LITERALLY WRITTEN RIGHT HERE that you HAVE to give them the surgery if they want it or you risk having your kid taken from you. There's no "interpreting" this, it's RIGHT THERE

If a child decides he/she is of a gender other than his/her biological gender, the parents are required by this legislation to provide transgender medical services to the child or risk the child being removed from the home.

lzimann wrote:So basically, let your kid get the help they need for whatever reason(be it trans, depression, whatever) or they take your kid away. Sounds more than reasonable.

Qbopper wrote:does it define what ages this applies to

Lumbermancer wrote:Now I'm not a doctor, but I think cutting boys ball off or forcing HRT upon their organism before the end of puberty will adversely affect his mental and physical development.

But that's just my biology minor speaking.

TheColdTurtle wrote:Remie, I think lumber was just talking about in general. Nothing anyone has posted above him really disproved him or whatever, they were just clarifying what the bill was.

Remie Richards wrote:It's a good thing you actually read all of the thread Lumbermancer!

Remie Richards wrote:

Remie Richards wrote:It's a good thing you actually read all of the thread Lumbermancer!