/tg/Station 13

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 4:20 am**

Bottom post of the previous page:

XSI wrote:I consider myself to be a centrist. Though I've been called both left wing and right wing a lot

This purely because I consider left-right to be economical and believe the social stuff of lgbt and so on should be on a different scale of progressive-traditional
In which I also consider myself to be centrist. I don't really give a shit about having any of that enforced, just do your own thing and don't bother everyone else with it, then we won't have to put laws in place to force people to do something either
This is considered oppression to the extreme progressives though, how dare I tell gay people to keep it in their homes!

The issue is that non-intervention in an already slanted scenario is not the same as neutrality.

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 5:07 am**

Judges are a joke anyways.

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 6:20 am**

My form of non-intervention is in 'stop other people from intervening as well because otherwise one side will just dominate the other and force them to live by their rules', at which point whichever side isn't winning is going to be very unhappy
Like I'm going to be okay with laws saying they're not allowed to kill/hurt/intimidate or otherwise just fuck with other people purely because of their lifestyle
But I also don't want to force churches to do gay marriage since that's directly against most religious customs. Also won't be forcing a synagogue to hold a christian wedding or anything silly like that
At that point things should be mostly good for both sides, assuming that people actually stick with the laws. Neither side will be 100% happy with this, but I think that the majority will be content enough to not push the matter onto attempting to dominate the other side and at the same time they will be able to live their own life

Though for (gay) marriage, I'd say a good start would be the removal of tax perks and government related bonuses people get for marrying. Clean up the tax code a bit and at the same time disconnect a religious service from the state, thus honouring the separation of church and state found throughout the western world. At that point gay people can go marry in any church that accepts them or have a secular ceremony and traditionalists can keep their own traditions.

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 6:26 am**

I have no particular opinion on gay marriage but I dunno why there wasn't a happy medium reached where gays could get some legal union that's just a marriage in all but name. Wouldn't that make everyone happy then?

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 6:31 am**

That was suggested and implemented in a few places and it wasn't enough

I guess

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 6:36 am**

Yeah, no idea why it wouldn't be enough, seems to me like it's a solution that makes everyone happy. Meh.

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 6:51 am**

ShadowDimentio wrote:I have no particular opinion on gay marriage but I dunno why there wasn't a happy medium reached where gays could get some legal union that's just a marriage in all but name. Wouldn't that make everyone happy then?

Already a thing, but the shit stabbers want a church wedding and want a cake made by people that don't want to make a cake of a giant pink cock

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:12 am**

Do gays even want to have a religious wedding in church or is it just another strawman? Because in Italy they couldn't even have a civil marriage until last year and even then some politicians managed to sneak in some small tweaks to make it different from a "real" marriage. And the new populist government is already talking about repealing that.

Maybe in your own country gays already have all the rights they could want and are campaigning for stupid stuff, but in the rest of the civilized world (so not just Muslim or other shitholes) there are places where they still lack the same rights as heterosexuals but they still have to hear the same arguments like "just keep it into your home" "you can already *basic human right like walking around without being arrested* what else do you want" and I can understand that it should be kinda annoying for them.

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:29 am**

Yes they do, there was a case last year where two poofs brought criminal charges against a christian cake shop because they refused to make them a gay cake (they were willing to make a normal cake, but the gays wanted a gay cake), and being such a 'progressive' country the cake shop was fined.

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:19 am**

I know and it falls under "campaigning for stupid stuff", also it's not "gays asking for religious wedding in churches" and even that would just be a publicity stunt to make a point.

Here, the natpop government said "well now the gay agenda won't be in the spotlight anymore, gays should accept that the world doesn't revolve around them and the country has other priorities" while actively talking about repealing the few gay rights they managed to scrape up. If it's not a priority, why not just leave them be? Sounds like pure gaslighting to me.

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 3:33 pm**

I just want a civil union that is effectively equal to a religious marriage in all regards without being one. I don't want to force a religious institution to do something that it's opposed to on a fundamental level.

Likewise, I don't want religious institution interfering with other people's affairs. I just want a true separation of church and state

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 4:48 pm**

Hard to believe in a generation the US went from gays being so exiled if anyone found out you were one you'd be unpersoned to "GAYS PORTRAYED IN FILM AREN'T GAY ENOUGH #NOTMYFAGGOT"

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 4:55 pm**

There's been a serious social overcorrection

We still have people who are actually against gays and all that, but the gay community doesn't help by flipping out over an actor doing their job and ACTING
Or doing pride parades which are little more than display cases for every type of dildo and undergarment currently on the market because they don't parade for pride, they parade to get as much coverage as possible by being as quirky and weird as possible

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 5:06 pm**

I hate pride events because that's what it's degenerated into. I don't define myself by my sexuality and I don't openly advertise but if you don't wear lether assless chaps, people will accuse you of appropriating the gay or claim that bisexuality doesn't exist.

The LGBT community is a toxic wasteland, don't get involved in it even if you are a faggot.

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 5:11 pm**

every community is a toxic wasteland

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 5:15 pm**

DemonFiren wrote:every community is a toxic wasteland

LGBT is worse in my opinion. They'll scream discrimination if you criticize them.

And for the love of god, pray you never meet people who deliberately infect others with HIV, it is a thing that actually exists and it's as horrible as it sounds.

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 5:23 pm**

yes, I know it does
and, uh
like I care about meeting them, I don't have sex

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 7:18 pm**

DemonFiren wrote:every community is a toxic wasteland

Especially this one

But on the straight man acting gay-
It might have been better for them to get someone actually gay to do it, but it's an actor. He's literally paid to pretend he is something he is not. Let him do his job and then complain if the result is shit

Also that's a very un-flattering picture

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:40 pm**

I have a bunch of stuff to kill trackers now simply because websites have stopped asking

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:55 pm**

Lol

Using mobiles

Posted: **Tue Aug 14, 2018 9:06 pm**

Anonmare wrote:I hate degenerated faggot.

Posted: **Wed Aug 15, 2018 12:55 pm**

Anonmare wrote: And for the love of god, pray you never meet people who deliberately infect others with HIV, it is a thing that actually exists and it's as horrible as it sounds.

Oh don't worry, California recently made that not a felony, it's only a misdemeanor now

So hooray

As of late last year, anyway

https://www.independent.co.uk/californi ... 88261.html

Posted: **Wed Aug 15, 2018 1:46 pm**

I swear that was posted twice already

Posted: **Wed Aug 15, 2018 4:03 pm**

Ye
It probably was, but it adds on to something that was said currently

Posted: **Wed Aug 15, 2018 11:23 pm**

That seems fair
They're not going to use the property if they cant get into the country anyway

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:18 am**

I seem to recall part of the reason for rents being stupid fucking high in london is due to offshore investors buying up a load of real estate and refusing to sell under any circumstances, putting the flats on the market for inflated prices. There's also been more than one scandal involving them "accidentally" "forgetting" that the sites are sometimes historic fuckin' buildings like the Carlton Tavern that got bulldozed. Presumably they assumed they'd just get a slap on the wrist fine and be able to flip the site after building shit on it or something, but instead the council ordered them to put it back. Brick by fucking brick. No, not a "replacement" building like some trendy fucking modern bar that they were no doubt planning to build anyway. Literally from the same fucking bricks.

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2018 1:26 am**

There is but it practically never happens

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:31 am**

Yeah, it made the news because there was enough outrage about it that the council intervened.

They wouldn't have done it if they didn't think they could get away with it. Fines are just a cost of doing business to them.

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2018 6:38 am**

"Final solution" isn't something Nazis would say specifically because they spoke German duh.

Sure the guy is dumb as a pile of bricks but typical over reaction by our mindlessly biased Australian media.

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:24 am**

Why let the chinaman buy all your buildings and charge you to live in them

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2018 7:17 pm**

The Chinese are notorious for this
To the point that they've had entire cities build just to sell the real estate. Not to live in, just to have the cities as investment

Real estate and buildings are considered a safe investment to them, with just about anything else being unsafe
Doesn't make it true, but it's why they do that

Posted: **Sat Aug 18, 2018 3:23 am**

https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/vi ... 25?v=railb

Where's Alex Jones when you need him?

Posted: **Sat Aug 18, 2018 10:42 am**

no one "needs" alex jones

Posted: **Sat Aug 18, 2018 10:55 pm**

I don't know, he is pretty good entertainment sometimes

Posted: **Sat Aug 18, 2018 11:34 pm**

ShadowDimentio wrote:https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/vi ... 25?v=railb

Where's Alex Jones when you need him?

In Mar's orbit

[youtube]7Snw6qjlPSE[/youtube]

Posted: **Sat Aug 18, 2018 11:36 pm**

[youtube]93VVg2tcpWc[/youtube]
truth is, the game was rigged from the start

Posted: **Sun Aug 19, 2018 4:01 pm**

Black farmer union to government of south africa: "hey dont take land from white farmers without compensation it'll fuck everything up and kill jobs"

Posted: **Sun Aug 19, 2018 6:11 pm**

Hasnt stopped zimbabwe from doing it anyway

Posted: **Sun Aug 19, 2018 9:10 pm**

Zimboobi did it 30 year ago

That why black african farmers of south america all "we dont wanna get zimboozled"

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 2:29 am**

All of South and Central America have HUGE corruption problems.

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 5:21 am**

https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy ... 648ea5c53b

We Zimbabwe boyes

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 5:56 am**

well the pm fought off a spill sparked by him not being a coal cultist enough

as in the coal industry in aus is mad strong and almost controls his party kind of people who use mentioning that the pm acknowledges climate change as a thinly veiled pod people screech

so turnbullshit beat off king in exile tones' dutton boy for now at least

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 6:59 am**

The thing in South Africa isn't racism, it's socialism. They're expropriating private farms. It just so happens that the vast majority of farms are owned by whites. It's the same thing that happens in America when they cut food stamps or other welfare stuff, would you call it racism just because the vast majority of people on welfare are black? It's just healthy capitalism that happens to mostly affect blacks and other people of colour.

Also South Africa is very corrupt. If you're a white landowner you can just bribe some government official and have them push your farm on the bottom of the list. Hell, maybe add a little extra and they'll expropriate your direct competitor first.

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 7:57 am**

The party in charge of government has been singing "Kill the boers" in public, that's not a sign or anything
And they've been blaming white people and colonialism for their woes rather than their own corruption and inability to govern

They call it socialism, but they're showing that the intention isn't socialism, it's racism and deflecting attention from their own failures by blaming someone else and trying to get the population to pick sides
If the US government decides to take over asian people's businesses and only asian people's businesses while their leaders are talking about how asians ruin everything and asians must die, then is that just socialism too?

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:11 am**

Die antwood sucks

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:28 am**

XSI wrote:The party in charge of government has been singing "Kill the boers" in public, that's not a sign or anything
And they've been blaming white people and colonialism for their woes rather than their own corruption and inability to govern

They call it socialism, but they're showing that the intention isn't socialism, it's racism and deflecting attention from their own failures by blaming someone else and trying to get the population to pick sides
If the US government decides to take over asian people's businesses and only asian people's businesses while their leaders are talking about how asians ruin everything and asians must die, then is that just socialism too?

This is what happened: ANC supporters sang an old Zulu rebel song that says "kill the Boers", government said that singing folk songs doesn't qualify as hate speech and they were not going to arrest them. The headline became "Government defends protesters who want to kill whites". There are a lot of Irish rebel songs that call for the murder of Englishmen and they are routinely sang in pubs and other public places, would you call it hate speech?

Or lets put it in another way: alt-right supporters sing a hateful Johnny Rebel song at a Charlottesville-like rally. Republican government says it's not hate speech and defends their right to sing whatever they want. Same government also implements stuff like welfare cuts, healthcare reforms, poll tax disguised as voter ID laws, harsh punishment for minor possession of weed and other laws which are all perfectly in line with the Republican values of conservatism and capitalistic economic policy but just so happen to mostly affect blacks. Would you say they're doing all of this because they're racist, and the fact they defended the Johnny Rebel singers proves it?

Reality is nuanced. South Africa is socialist and you can criticize that, but what they're doing is in line with socialist policy. Some farms that are going to be expropriated are also co-owned by blacks, it's just a matter of wealth redistribution.

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:34 am**

a bullet through your head is very nuanced please be understanding of black (national) socialism

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:38 am**

Grazyn wrote:
XSI wrote:The party in charge of government has been singing "Kill the boers" in public, that's not a sign or anything
And they've been blaming white people and colonialism for their woes rather than their own corruption and inability to govern

They call it socialism, but they're showing that the intention isn't socialism, it's racism and deflecting attention from their own failures by blaming someone else and trying to get the population to pick sides
If the US government decides to take over asian people's businesses and only asian people's businesses while their leaders are talking about how asians ruin everything and asians must die, then is that just socialism too?
This is what happened: ANC supporters sang an old Zulu rebel song that says "kill the Boers", government said that singing folk songs doesn't qualify as hate speech and they were not going to arrest them. The headline became "Government defends protesters who want to kill whites". There are a lot of Irish rebel songs that call for the murder of Englishmen and they are routinely sang in pubs and other public places, would you call it hate speech?

Or lets put it in another way: alt-right supporters sing a hateful Johnny Rebel song at a Charlottesville-like rally. Republican government says it's not hate speech and defends their right to sing whatever they want. Same government also implements stuff like welfare cuts, healthcare reforms, poll tax disguised as voter ID laws, harsh punishment for minor possession of weed and other laws which are all perfectly in line with the Republican values of conservatism and capitalistic economic policy but just so happen to mostly affect blacks. Would you say they're doing all of this because they're racist, and the fact they defended the Johnny Rebel singers proves it?

Reality is nuanced. South Africa is socialist and you can criticize that, but what they're doing is in line with socialist policy. Some farms that are going to be expropriated are also co-owned by blacks, it's just a matter of wealth redistribution.

quoting because this doesn't deserve bottom of last page

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:48 am**

It deserves to be at the bottom of the page it's fence sitting dodge the subject milquetoast trash.

[youtube]8JNc7SLUE1g[/youtube]
Their president for nine years Jacob Zuma singing shoot the boer while still in office.

It's not just some supporters it goes all the way to the very top.

This is not a very nuanced subject the unofficial farmer murders and land theft before official seizing recently were about as subtle as kristallnacht if it went on for years.

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:49 am**

right, I forgot you're incapable of posting in good faith

Posted: **Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:56 am**

Americunts need to take male mental illness more seriously.

/tg/Station 13

2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/

Re: 2k18 /pol/