/tg/Station 13

by **XivilaiAnaxes** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:03 am #584049

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=28138&view=unread#unread

I did nothing of a sexual nature at all! I'm just being friendly!! -ahelp

"Heh I'm gonna take this unconscious cat's pants off to see if she's got underwear on

" -quote by him in the ban appeal

BRUH

by **thehogshotgun** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:12 am #584050

Why haven't catpeople been removed yet?

by **TheFinalPotato** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:21 am #584051

I week ban

Appeal

Good god man

by **saprasam** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 4:46 am #584053

by **Fishimun** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:56 am #584061

felinids are fetish content

by **Super Aggro Crag** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:00 am #584063

what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead

how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server

by **Farquaar** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:21 am #584065

Somebody made a dumb image macro
Better start sniffing virtual underwear
It's just like my japanese animes!

by **cacogen** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:34 am #584067

/tg/station OST wrote:2. "Every Day We Slip Closer to Furcadia, or, 'Don't Furcadiate /tg/station!', or, Facehuggers are Physically Stimulating and so are TGMC Admins, or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Physical Stimulation" - 2:14

by **Flatulent** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:56 am #584069

>eskkjjjjjhkkjkkjjkjj gets banned for erp
wowee!!! didnt see that one coming!!

by **Tlaltecuhtli** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:57 am #584070

manuel confirmed degenerate server

by **Flatulent** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:57 am #584071

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:manuel confirmed degenerate server

eskj is b*gil player doing sex tourism on manuel

by **Screemonster** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:04 am #584075

fucking lmao

Eskjjlj wrote:To understand the logs you quoted in an erotic fashion you would need to perform olympic level mental gymnastics. The same thing happening on another /tg/ servers would not lead any admin to believe they should apply a ban.
And again I have no reason to "take responsability", as you say it, for the simple fact that I am innocent.

lmao

it's olympic level mental gymnastics to consider trying to forcibly strip someone to see their underwear (or lack thereof) as a sexual thing apparently

by **Flatulent** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:08 am #584077

you are next on the chopping block screemonster your erp clique is falling apart

by **oranges** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:51 am #584086

say" ;cat with no undies

by **Denton** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:57 am #584088

>TGMC staff
>kat green
>manuel
man this appeal really got everything huh

by **Farquaar** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:58 am #584090

/me gently strokes Green Dahn's hair to comfort her during those hard times.

by **skoglol** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:23 am #584101

Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed. The "Red Pants" is also a topless jumpsuit, so I can only assume the cat with no undies was running around with her tits out on account of having no undies.

But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.

by **Screemonster** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 12:37 pm #584107

Flatulent wrote:you are next on the chopping block screemonster your erp clique is falling apart

I hope you slip and catch your finger with the peeler next time you peel potatoes

by **Tlaltecuhtli** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 1:58 pm #584110

can we ban whoever thinks this is how you rp?

NSFW:

by **thehogshotgun** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:02 pm #584112

jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players

by **Cobby** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:30 pm #584114

Why haven’t they sent a video of them taking their pants off to show if they have undies since they are a catgirl irl.

by **Rohen_Tahir** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:33 pm #584115

thehogshotgun wrote:jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players

manuel

by **Tlaltecuhtli** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:46 pm #584117

holy shit shad0k just btfo'd banbaiter, case closed

by **thehogshotgun** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:50 pm #584118

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:holy shit shad0k just btfo'd banbaiter, case closed

Wrong penut retard

by **remanseptim** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:58 pm #584120

m*nuel...

by **Tlaltecuhtli** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 2:59 pm #584121

holy shit timberboe just btfo'd erper, case closed

by **remanseptim** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:00 pm #584122

it isn't even the rule 8 violation that is hilarious about this
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous

by **stan_albatross** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:03 pm #584123

Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead

how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server

the historically high tgmc standards, both for their admins, their rp level, and their balance

by **Tlaltecuhtli** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:06 pm #584124

remanseptim wrote:it isn't even the rule 8 violation that is hilarious about this
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous

this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play

by **remanseptim** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:11 pm #584125

okay retard

by **Farquaar** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:12 pm #584126

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play

by **Togopal** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:22 pm #584127

If this doesn't end with 'cat wit no undies' being added to the list of brain damage quotes I will be thoroughly disappointed

by **thehogshotgun** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:44 pm #584130

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play

by **Not-Dorsidarf** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:21 pm #584137

stan_albatross wrote:
Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead

how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server

the historically high tgmc standards, both for their admins, their rp level, and their balance

I was offered tgmc adminship on the first round of tgmc I ever played.

by **terranaut** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:28 pm #584140

thank god you didn't accept

by **Togopal** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 5:52 pm #584142

Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake

by **Rohen_Tahir** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:02 pm #584143

Honestly this should have been at least a 1 month ban.

by **skoglol** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:45 pm #584150

Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?

by **iamgoofball** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 6:59 pm #584153

Togopal wrote:Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake

This isn't a manuel thing. Going by the banned user's scrubby, they're a Terry player who decided to join Manuel expecting everyone on manuel to also engage in the weird babyspeak roleplay stuff that Terry players do going by these logs I'm seeing.

by **iamgoofball** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:00 pm #584155

skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?

Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.

by **ThanatosRa** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:12 pm #584157

I'm pro-cat but fuck this shit it should have been a permaban.

by **Yenwodyah** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:16 pm #584160

delete manuel

by **Super Aggro Crag** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:16 pm #584161

goofball making sense

by **Togopal** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:17 pm #584162

iamgoofball wrote:
skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?

Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.

I agree with this. Common sense really should come into play for the person banned, here.

by **Screemonster** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:39 pm #584166

skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?

the only mistake made here was referencing their old notes in the ban reason at all

erping with someone who isn't comfortable with your erping and tries to get away from you is something that gets you shitcanned on the spot regardless of your prior history

by **Lacran** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:42 pm #584167

skoglol wrote:Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed.

But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.

Yes, when your uncle crept into your room and removed your pants he was just checking you were wearing underwear, its called being a "snuggly uncle."

What the fuck is wrong with you

by **Super Aggro Crag** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 7:45 pm #584168

greenname c*der showing a startling lack of understanding of social cues?

imagine my fucking shock

by **skoglol** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:19 pm #584178

Sexually repressed americans sees a mention of underwear, calls it ERP :oops:

by **iamgoofball** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:22 pm #584181

skoglol wrote:Sexually repressed americans sees a mention of underwear, calls it ERP

so are you like, deliberately ignoring the whole "taking advantage of an unconscious woman to remove her clothes" thing or the "trying to restrain a woman to remove her clothing" bit, or did you just genuinely not read it

by **oranges** » Thu Dec 17, 2020 8:27 pm #584182

people, it's a game, there's no actual women at risk there's no need to lose your marbles