Affectionate cat peanut

Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
User avatar
XivilaiAnaxes
Joined: Sat May 11, 2019 7:13 am
Byond Username: XivilaiAnaxes

Affectionate cat peanut

Post by XivilaiAnaxes » #584049

https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... ead#unread

I did nothing of a sexual nature at all! I'm just being friendly!! -ahelp

"Heh I'm gonna take this unconscious cat's pants off to see if she's got underwear on ;)" -quote by him in the ban appeal

BRUH
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
User avatar
thehogshotgun
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
Location: The best damn country in the world

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by thehogshotgun » #584050

Why haven't catpeople been removed yet?
User avatar
TheFinalPotato
Code Maintainer
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:58 am
Byond Username: LemonInTheDark

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by TheFinalPotato » #584051

I week ban

Appeal

Good god man
My ancestors are smiling at me, Imperials. Can you say the same?
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
saprasam
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2018 11:42 pm
Byond Username: Saprasam

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by saprasam » #584053

Image
Image
(FORMER) tgmc admin (I HAVE REGAINED MY HUMAN RIGHTS)
Fishimun
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2019 2:29 am
Byond Username: Fishimun

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Fishimun » #584061

felinids are fetish content
User avatar
Super Aggro Crag
In Game PermaBanned
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Super Aggro Crag » #584063

what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead

how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Farquaar
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
Byond Username: Farquaar
Location: Delta Quadrant

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Farquaar » #584065

Somebody made a dumb image macro
Better start sniffing virtual underwear
It's just like my japanese animes!
► Show Spoiler
cacogen
Forum Soft Banned
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
Byond Username: Cacogen

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by cacogen » #584067

/tg/station OST wrote:2. "Every Day We Slip Closer to Furcadia, or, 'Don't Furcadiate /tg/station!', or, Facehuggers are Physically Stimulating and so are TGMC Admins, or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Physical Stimulation" - 2:14
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
NSFW:
Image

Image
User avatar
Flatulent
Forum Soft Banned
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Flatulent » #584069

>eskkjjjjjhkkjkkjjkjj gets banned for erp
wowee!!! didnt see that one coming!!
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #584070

manuel confirmed degenerate server
User avatar
Flatulent
Forum Soft Banned
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Flatulent » #584071

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:manuel confirmed degenerate server
eskj is b*gil player doing sex tourism on manuel
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
User avatar
Screemonster
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
Byond Username: Scree

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Screemonster » #584075

fucking lmao
Eskjjlj wrote: To understand the logs you quoted in an erotic fashion you would need to perform olympic level mental gymnastics. The same thing happening on another /tg/ servers would not lead any admin to believe they should apply a ban.
And again I have no reason to "take responsability", as you say it, for the simple fact that I am innocent.
lmao

it's olympic level mental gymnastics to consider trying to forcibly strip someone to see their underwear (or lack thereof) as a sexual thing apparently
User avatar
Flatulent
Forum Soft Banned
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2019 8:36 am
Byond Username: FlatulentIndustrialist
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Flatulent » #584077

you are next on the chopping block screemonster your erp clique is falling apart
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by oranges » #584086

say" ;cat with no undies
User avatar
Denton
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 3:53 pm
Byond Username: Denton-30
Github Username: 81Denton

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Denton » #584088

>TGMC staff
>kat green
>manuel
man this appeal really got everything huh
Image
User avatar
Farquaar
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
Byond Username: Farquaar
Location: Delta Quadrant

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Farquaar » #584090

/me gently strokes Green Dahn's hair to comfort her during those hard times.
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
skoglol
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:25 am
Byond Username: Skoglol
Github Username: kriskog

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by skoglol » #584101

Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed. The "Red Pants" is also a topless jumpsuit, so I can only assume the cat with no undies was running around with her tits out on account of having no undies.

But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.
User avatar
Screemonster
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
Byond Username: Scree

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Screemonster » #584107

Flatulent wrote:you are next on the chopping block screemonster your erp clique is falling apart
I hope you slip and catch your finger with the peeler next time you peel potatoes
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #584110

can we ban whoever thinks this is how you rp?
NSFW:
Image
User avatar
thehogshotgun
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
Location: The best damn country in the world

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by thehogshotgun » #584112

jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players
User avatar
Cobby
Code Maintainer
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:19 pm
Byond Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobby
Github Username: ExcessiveUseOfCobblestone

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Cobby » #584114

Why haven’t they sent a video of them taking their pants off to show if they have undies since they are a catgirl irl.
Voted best trap in /tg/ 2014-current
User avatar
Rohen_Tahir
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
Location: Primary fool storage
Contact:

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Rohen_Tahir » #584115

thehogshotgun wrote:jesus fucking christ that image is fucking garbage whoever made that needs to be euthanized also how is that garbage funny holy fuck I despise /tg/ players
manuel
Image
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #584117

holy shit shad0k just btfo'd banbaiter, case closed
User avatar
thehogshotgun
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
Location: The best damn country in the world

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by thehogshotgun » #584118

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:holy shit shad0k just btfo'd banbaiter, case closed
Wrong penut retard
User avatar
remanseptim
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:38 pm
Byond Username: Remanseptim

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by remanseptim » #584120

m*nuel...
Image
Image
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #584121

holy shit timberboe just btfo'd erper, case closed
User avatar
remanseptim
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:38 pm
Byond Username: Remanseptim

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by remanseptim » #584122

it isn't even the rule 8 violation that is hilarious about this
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous
Image
Image
User avatar
stan_albatross
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:58 pm
Byond Username: Stan_albatross
Location: London

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by stan_albatross » #584123

Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead

how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server
the historically high tgmc standards, both for their admins, their rp level, and their balance
Karl Karlsson and never anything else
Tlaltecuhtli
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:16 am
Byond Username: Tlaltecuhtli

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Tlaltecuhtli » #584124

remanseptim wrote:it isn't even the rule 8 violation that is hilarious about this
it's the fact that he is attempting to play it off as something cute and innocuous
this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play
User avatar
remanseptim
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:38 pm
Byond Username: Remanseptim

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by remanseptim » #584125

okay retard
Image
Image
User avatar
Farquaar
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 7:20 am
Byond Username: Farquaar
Location: Delta Quadrant

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Farquaar » #584126

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play
► Show Spoiler
User avatar
Togopal
In-Game Admin
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm
Byond Username: Togopal
Location: 41.3071749, -74.8459928

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Togopal » #584127

If this doesn't end with 'cat wit no undies' being added to the list of brain damage quotes I will be thoroughly disappointed
Image

Image
User avatar
thehogshotgun
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 1:31 am
Byond Username: Thehogshotgun
Location: The best damn country in the world

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by thehogshotgun » #584130

Tlaltecuhtli wrote:this is just the brain damage that anime causes to people, and reason why weebos shouldnt be given right to play
User avatar
Not-Dorsidarf
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:14 pm
Byond Username: Dorsidwarf
Location: We're all going on an, admin holiday

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Not-Dorsidarf » #584137

stan_albatross wrote:
Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the absolute fuck is wrong with this denthead

how did this gormless sperg get admin on the fake server
the historically high tgmc standards, both for their admins, their rp level, and their balance
I was offered tgmc adminship on the first round of tgmc I ever played.
Image
Image
kieth4 wrote: infrequently shitting yourself is fine imo
There is a lot of very bizarre nonsense being talked on this forum. I shall now remain silent and logoff until my points are vindicated.
Player who complainted over being killed for looting cap office wrote: Sun Jul 30, 2023 1:33 am Hey there, I'm Virescent, the super evil person who made the stupid appeal and didn't think it through enough. Just came here to say: screech, retards. Screech and writhe like the worms you are. Your pathetic little cries will keep echoing around for a while before quietting down. There is one great outcome from this: I rised up the blood pressure of some of you shitheads and lowered your lifespan. I'm honestly tempted to do this more often just to see you screech and writhe more, but that wouldn't be cool of me. So come on haters, show me some more of your high blood pressure please. 🖕🖕🖕
User avatar
terranaut
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:43 pm
Byond Username: Terranaut

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by terranaut » #584140

thank god you didn't accept
[🅲 1] [🆄 1] [🅼 1]

Image
User avatar
Togopal
In-Game Admin
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm
Byond Username: Togopal
Location: 41.3071749, -74.8459928

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Togopal » #584142

Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake
Image

Image
User avatar
Rohen_Tahir
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:00 pm
Byond Username: Rohen Tahir
Location: Primary fool storage
Contact:

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Rohen_Tahir » #584143

Honestly this should have been at least a 1 month ban.
Image
User avatar
skoglol
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:25 am
Byond Username: Skoglol
Github Username: kriskog

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by skoglol » #584150

Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by iamgoofball » #584153

Togopal wrote:Still incredibly baffled reading over the appeal again. How unaware do you have to be to not realize that their actions were uncomfortable and unwanted. The person was avoiding them and calling for help and the appealer interprets it as "roleplaying as a panicked cat". Manuel was a horrible mistake
This isn't a manuel thing. Going by the banned user's scrubby, they're a Terry player who decided to join Manuel expecting everyone on manuel to also engage in the weird babyspeak roleplay stuff that Terry players do going by these logs I'm seeing.
User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by iamgoofball » #584155

skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.
User avatar
ThanatosRa
Rarely plays
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 4:07 pm
Byond Username: ThanatosRa
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by ThanatosRa » #584157

I'm pro-cat but fuck this shit it should have been a permaban.
my forum gimmick is that no one knows who i am

gender is irrelevant NO UR IRRELEVANT
u a bish
y u heff 2 b med
User avatar
Yenwodyah
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:47 pm
Byond Username: Yenwodyah
Github Username: Yenwodyah

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Yenwodyah » #584160

delete manuel
Image
User avatar
Super Aggro Crag
In Game PermaBanned
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Super Aggro Crag » #584161

goofball making sense
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Togopal
In-Game Admin
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 6:38 pm
Byond Username: Togopal
Location: 41.3071749, -74.8459928

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Togopal » #584162

iamgoofball wrote:
skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
Tiding and unwanted sexual conduct are two very, very different things and should be treated differently as a result. The only thing wrong with this ban was that it wasn't a permaban.
I agree with this. Common sense really should come into play for the person banned, here.
Image

Image
User avatar
Screemonster
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2014 7:23 pm
Byond Username: Scree

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Screemonster » #584166

skoglol wrote:Lets ignore the contents of the ban for a little while, and look at the conduct of the banning admin. His replies in the ticket make it clear that the ban is being based on an almost 2 year old "final warning" note (not a ban, mind you) and a bunch of even older history. Old history either matters or it does not, we need to be consistent. If we keep telling players that they do not need to worry about old notes, and that we do not look at old notes (they fade out and you gotta hit a button to view them) then we also should not be basing our decisions heavily on those same old notes or use them to justify bans.
If this was a 2 year old "no tiding, final warning" note, would you be okay with a weekban referring to this two year old note as the final warning? When is history forgiven?
the only mistake made here was referencing their old notes in the ban reason at all

erping with someone who isn't comfortable with your erping and tries to get away from you is something that gets you shitcanned on the spot regardless of your prior history
User avatar
Lacran
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:17 am
Byond Username: Lacran

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Lacran » #584167

skoglol wrote:Y'all are calling the pants removal sexual, while the banned player claims it was just to confirm the lack of undies. Clearly there was no interest in the contents of the undies since the pants went back on when the lack of undies was confirmed.

But I suppose manuel players dont like snuggly cats.
Yes, when your uncle crept into your room and removed your pants he was just checking you were wearing underwear, its called being a "snuggly uncle."

What the fuck is wrong with you
User avatar
Super Aggro Crag
In Game PermaBanned
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 9:47 pm
Byond Username: Super Aggro Crag

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by Super Aggro Crag » #584168

greenname c*der showing a startling lack of understanding of social cues?

imagine my fucking shock
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
skoglol
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2018 5:25 am
Byond Username: Skoglol
Github Username: kriskog

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by skoglol » #584178

Sexually repressed americans sees a mention of underwear, calls it ERP :oops:
User avatar
iamgoofball
Github User
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 5:50 pm
Byond Username: Iamgoofball
Github Username: Iamgoofball

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by iamgoofball » #584181

skoglol wrote:Sexually repressed americans sees a mention of underwear, calls it ERP :oops:
so are you like, deliberately ignoring the whole "taking advantage of an unconscious woman to remove her clothes" thing or the "trying to restrain a woman to remove her clothing" bit, or did you just genuinely not read it
User avatar
oranges
Code Maintainer
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 9:16 pm
Byond Username: Optimumtact
Github Username: optimumtact
Location: #CHATSHITGETBANGED

Re: Affectionate cat peanut

Post by oranges » #584182

people, it's a game, there's no actual women at risk there's no need to lose your marbles
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Actarys12, BonChoi