Page 1 of 2

Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:08 am
by Malkraz
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=28408
please fuck off of bagil coffeedragon this is total brainrot banbot behavior except this isn't banbottable it's just retarded

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:23 am
by saprasam
the joys of being a victim of brainrot

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 5:34 am
by Man_Shroom
i would like to state for the record that i am a retard so you can not make fun of me for anything

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 6:04 am
by TheWiznard
Man_Shroom wrote:i would like to state for the record that i am a retard so you can not make fun of me for anything
Please wait for the round to end before making an appeal as it contains in-round info. I'm very strong and powerful I'm an admin and you broke the rules.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 6:07 am
by Armhulen
TheWiznard wrote:
Man_Shroom wrote:i would like to state for the record that i am a retard so you can not make fun of me for anything
Please wait for the round to end before making an appeal as it contains in-round info. I'm very strong and powerful I'm an admin and you broke the rules.
but this has always been a rule to avoid getting to avoid people learning who the traitors were and were not while they play

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 6:16 am
by Man_Shroom
this is true, and if i understood the logs i would check the time i made the post and the time the round ended and try to determine if it is possible for an epic gamer to read my forum posts, decode who were the 5-6 individuals who had AA, find and locate them in-game and then take the AA card to use for their own purposes, all within the timeframe starting at my forum post and ending when the round naturally ended or the shuttle came.

but i dont know the logs

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 6:42 am
by TheWiznard
Armhulen wrote:
TheWiznard wrote:
Man_Shroom wrote:i would like to state for the record that i am a retard so you can not make fun of me for anything
Please wait for the round to end before making an appeal as it contains in-round info. I'm very strong and powerful I'm an admin and you broke the rules.
but this has always been a rule to avoid getting to avoid people learning who the traitors were and were not while they play
thats not what it was about sure posting during round is bad i agree with lol I mean idk why I'm even malding just sad this is tg now I guess

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:41 am
by Malkraz
>get an appeal for a dogshit dayban
>reply to it within 11 minutes about the round being in-progress
>fuck off and don't give an actual reply probably until it's already expired
absolute power move

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:42 am
by wesoda25
A clean signature is a clean mind I whisper to myself as the shadowmen draw ever closer.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 11:02 am
by pugie
I hate aa hop but not only was this not an aa hop it was a hop putting more than minimum effort into their job.

AA is only really cancer when it has id console access cause then command access can be spread...

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 11:08 am
by terranaut
>coffeedragon
>shit ban
wow color me surprised

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 11:12 am
by Tlaltecuhtli
he got day banned for this not even job ban, not even ce setting sm wrong gets daybanned, did he have prior notes? or was it just admin disrespect for the fact this man didnt read manuel rules before playing bagil on low pop

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 11:40 am
by Malkraz
coffee was active for 2 1/2 hours after their post in the thread for the record

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 6:25 pm
by saprasam
so who’s making the admin complaint

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:42 pm
by Man_Shroom
its all good bros im getting good at TGMC now

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:42 pm
by Malkraz
FAILRP! FAILRP!

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:45 pm
by Malkraz
This isn't about u shroom it's about an admin overexerting their power to a ridiculous degree over dumb RP shit on a non-rp server to micro-manage players
Let us play the dumb game

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:48 pm
by RaveRadbury
Malkraz wrote:This isn't about u shroom it's about an admin overexerting their power to a ridiculous degree over dumb RP shit on a non-rp server to micro-manage players
Let us play the dumb game
LRP isn't Non-RP

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 8:53 pm
by Malkraz
If you're going to have your hand up my ass while I'm playing at least give the front a little toot too.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 9:06 pm
by ArcaneDefence
Malkraz wrote:at least give the front a little toot too.
begone brapposter

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 10:02 pm
by terranaut
RaveRadbury wrote:
Malkraz wrote:This isn't about u shroom it's about an admin overexerting their power to a ridiculous degree over dumb RP shit on a non-rp server to micro-manage players
Let us play the dumb game
LRP isn't Non-RP
giving people funny stuff for funny reasons fits the LRP niche pretty well though

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 10:11 pm
by RaveRadbury
terranaut wrote:
RaveRadbury wrote:LRP isn't Non-RP
giving people funny stuff for funny reasons fits the LRP niche pretty well though
Yeah that's a good point, I'm just pointing out Malkraz's mis-take because this is the second time in the last day or so where he's asserted that we have some sort of Non-RP server(s)

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 10:17 pm
by XivilaiAnaxes
I like coffee but I don't like some of these bans. This isn't "fuck you 7 day ban first offense suck my dick" though. Policy thread?

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2021 10:46 pm
by wesoda25
I've been saying there should be a policy thread but im too lazy to make one myself.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:02 am
by Malkraz
You know exactly what I mean radbury Manuel is explicitly referred to as the roleplay server

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 2:10 am
by Man_Shroom
how do i get good at Boiler guys

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:37 am
by RaveRadbury
Malkraz wrote:You know exactly what I mean radbury Manuel is explicitly referred to as the roleplay server
You'd be surprised, we get people coming in thinking that we have some sort of "No-rules" server or something like that. LRP isn't No-RP. There's a big difference, idk it feels like you're pushing the overton window when you gloss over it and call it non-RP.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:51 am
by cacogen
LRP is no-RP

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 4:42 am
by Malkraz
I'm saying it as "servers that aren't the dedicated RP server" but I get how it can be misunderstood because we didn't use to have an "RP server"
Anyway there's virtually no precedent for this on LRP when the dope isn't just handing out AA willy nilly or knowingly giving it out to traitors. Half the rounds HoP will just give Clown AA for the meme who then spreads it anyway. You RARELY see them actually require stamps and to go and act like that's bad RP on fucking Bagil of all servers is complete retardation and micro-management horse shit.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:28 am
by WineAllWine
Why is there a manuel ban on bagil? This ban stinks

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 2:48 pm
by BONERMASTER
Man, all these bans are about all the things that pissed me off when I was playing head/security, like this guy handing out all access to everyone except security. I'd love to call em a banbot, but they're targetting behavior that would have sent my monitor out of a window. Arguably these bans are reaching out a bit too far, could have also just been regarded as IC issue, but as long as it just keeps hitting all the people I don't like, well... tehehehe.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 2:55 pm
by CoffeeDragon16
I think the point of the ban has gotten lost, said point being when you're ahelped asked not to do something, don't immediately resume doing it

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:18 pm
by Omega_DarkPotato
CoffeeDragon16 wrote:I think the point of the ban has gotten lost, said point being when you're ahelped asked not to do something, don't immediately resume doing it
ok thats cool and all but like
the counterargument is "why doesn't manuelmin jannie banbot just ahelp people to follow the manuel rules and bang they now get to rule 1 ban anyone who doesn't abide by manuel rules"?

Where's the line where administrators have to say "ok well I don't like this personally since i exclusively play manuel but I can't just overextend admin powers through the one-two of 'ahelp to stop' and 'ban after they don't' because it's NOT AGAINST THE RULES ALREADY REEE"?

If I was an admin and ahelped someone to never play felinid again and then they played felinid again would that be a-ok to ban them? Where's a good definition of "too disruptive to a round" that admins and players can follow by? And why does it seem like "too disruptive to a round" is being ported from MRP to a historically LRP-y LRP server?

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:33 pm
by Screemonster
I wouldn't even ban for this on a hrp server I don't know why people have this idea that higher rp levels means fun isn't allowed

you can hrp discworld or hitch hikers guide to the galaxy if you wanted to and that's far from a serious no fun allowed setting

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:46 pm
by Farquaar
Screemonster wrote:I wouldn't even ban for this on a hrp server I don't know why people have this idea that higher rp levels means fun isn't allowed
Yeah, that’s the weirdest part. It’s not like he just handed out AA for nothing. He made people go through all sorts of administrative hoops to do so. This is classic paperwork HoP, and I am shocked that such a common practice, even on Manuel, is considered bannable by some admins.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 4:36 pm
by Qustinnus
so i tell em go get the heads of staff stamps and come back.
`
half of the stamps mentioned weren't even from heads.

this is pretty cringe behavior but the real issue is that you can put access on literaly any ID that easily so I can't wait for the ID re-design to be in.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 5:00 pm
by Kel
Malkraz wrote:>get an appeal for a dogshit dayban
>reply to it within 11 minutes about the round being in-progress
>fuck off and don't give an actual reply probably until it's already expired
absolute power move
this is honestly the worst part

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 5:17 pm
by CoffeeDragon16
Qustinnus wrote:
so i tell em go get the heads of staff stamps and come back.
`
half of the stamps mentioned weren't even from heads.

this is pretty cringe behavior but the real issue is that you can put access on literaly any ID that easily so I can't wait for the ID re-design to be in.
yet another code issue jannies have to pick up after

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 5:27 pm
by terranaut
there was no issue until you fabricated one retard

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 8:09 pm
by RaveRadbury
Omega_DarkPotato wrote: ok thats cool and all but like
the counterargument is "why doesn't manuelmin jannie banbot just ahelp people to follow the manuel rules and bang they now get to rule 1 ban anyone who doesn't abide by manuel rules"?

Where's the line where administrators have to say "ok well I don't like this personally since i exclusively play manuel but I can't just overextend admin powers through the one-two of 'ahelp to stop' and 'ban after they don't' because it's NOT AGAINST THE RULES ALREADY REEE"?

If I was an admin and ahelped someone to never play felinid again and then they played felinid again would that be a-ok to ban them? Where's a good definition of "too disruptive to a round" that admins and players can follow by? And why does it seem like "too disruptive to a round" is being ported from MRP to a historically LRP-y LRP server?
What are you even on about Coffee has over 2000 rounds on Bagil and 8 on Manuel

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 8:11 pm
by CoffeeDragon16
slightly more than absolute bare minimum RP = manuel, duh

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:13 pm
by Malkraz
And this is why Adminwho is the most useful verb in the game

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:39 pm
by WineAllWine
I've often asked for stamps as a bounty to get as a HoP, so what would you suggest as an alternative, Coffee?

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:44 pm
by CoffeeDragon16
Oh, access bounties are fine, it's just when they're repeatedly giving access to stuff like armory and upload is what bothers me. As I said, that's not why I banned even, just that they kept doing it right after I told them not to.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:54 pm
by teepeepee
ban for admin disrespect
lol

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:00 pm
by Malkraz
>Micro-manage a player and try to force them not to do something it's completely acceptable for them to do otherwise
>They keep doing it because that's retarded
>Oops sorry kid that's a banning!
This is a really slimy way to ban someone for not actually breaking any rules

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:00 pm
by XivilaiAnaxes
Its not really "ban for admin disrespect" when it's a "dude stop doing this" and the guy just keeps doing it.

Made a policy thread. Fight there.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:13 pm
by Malkraz
By the way why do these appeals keep getting moved to Resolved before the player has acknowledged the response or a headmin has weighed in?
You were already told here https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... 64#p583164 not to lock and move appeals before the headmins have looked at them.

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 11:13 pm
by teepeepee
bake the cake bigot
this is an admin ruling and rulings are FINAL

Re: Man_Shroom peanut

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:12 am
by CoffeeDragon16
Malkraz wrote:By the way why do these appeals keep getting moved to Resolved before the player has acknowledged the response or a headmin has weighed in?
You were already told here https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... 64#p583164 not to lock and move appeals before the headmins have looked at them.
because the ban expired, there's nothing to appeal. even if they wanted to do a note appeal the note itself is factually correct so it isn't valid for a note appeal