Bottom post of the previous page:
ban appeal https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=29700
Last time I decelerated into an underage I lost my license for a while.MrStonedOne wrote:
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
basedDomitius wrote:Last time I decelerated into an underage I lost my license for a while.MrStonedOne wrote:
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
I wanted to make a joke but it was really not funny and would get me banned, though it was 10x more based.ArcaneDefence wrote:basedDomitius wrote:Last time I decelerated into an underage I lost my license for a while.MrStonedOne wrote:
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
Underage homophobes? In MY phpbb forum? It's more likely than you think.MrStonedOne wrote:They think being gay is a choice but being too young to drink isn't.Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the fuck is this guy talking aboutRohen_Tahir wrote:words
They are likely trying to play some game with wording where they are gonna suggest that they are saying "the act of having sex with another man" is a choice.
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
do not call a british person a jigger irl even as a jokeMalkraz wrote:
fucking lolDomitius wrote:Last time I decelerated into an underage I lost my license for a while.MrStonedOne wrote:
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
(valid escalation)Screemonster wrote:fucking lolDomitius wrote:Last time I decelerated into an underage I lost my license for a while.MrStonedOne wrote:
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
Mothblocks, winter 2020, “successfully” preventing bagil death with relevant data wrote:You seem to be under the fallacy that reinforcing that Bagil is a TDM shithole where you must carry bolas and spears on you at all times, while looking for the next valid to hunt down is a positive change to the server. I don't. The data suggests other people don't.
imsxz wrote:I give up there’s too many furries
cacogen wrote:i asked oranges how often he plays and he deleted the post
cybersaber101 wrote:Welp, you guys let a terrymin become a headmin, thousand years of darkness.
Vekter wrote:I jerk off Nist a bit too much but he's honestly one of the best silicon players on the server. B.O.R.G.O. is also pretty good.
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
he got banned for the round my g.cacogen wrote:as far as i know he didn't get in trouble for this which i thought was odd
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... wn#p602134
lmfao that fucking snap at nox's static character was gold thoughcacogen wrote:as far as i know he didn't get in trouble for this which i thought was odd
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... wn#p602134
Stickymayhem wrote:Imagine the sheer narcisssim required to genuinely believe you are this intelligent.
im really good at getting banned but also really good at appealing banscacogen wrote:as far as i know he didn't get in trouble for this which i thought was odd
https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... wn#p602134
technokek wrote:Cannot prove this so just belive me if when say this
Only started calling them rude words after they started trying to beat me to death for shoving them, shitwit.cacogen wrote:yeah you just leave out pertinent details like that to make the other side look unreasonable
It appears that my post wasn't clear enough to not be interpreted as the exact opposite of what I was trying to state. Fucking hell.MrStonedOne wrote:They think being gay is a choice but being too young to drink isn't.Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the fuck is this guy talking aboutRohen_Tahir wrote:words
They are likely trying to play some game with wording where they are gonna suggest that they are saying "the act of having sex with another man" is a choice.
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
It expresses the idea A that whether demeaning or harrasing someone for characteristic B can be considered bigotry depends upon whether B is a inherent trait or notAt the end of the day I think it should come down to harassing or demeaning people for things about themselves that are inherent to them. That's basically the core rpoblem with bigots and the kinda people we want to expel from the community
The FINAL copeRohen_Tahir wrote:It appears that my post wasn't clear enough to not be interpreted as the exact opposite of what I was trying to state. Fucking hell.MrStonedOne wrote:They think being gay is a choice but being too young to drink isn't.Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the fuck is this guy talking aboutRohen_Tahir wrote:words
They are likely trying to play some game with wording where they are gonna suggest that they are saying "the act of having sex with another man" is a choice.
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
"Men who have sex with men" ≠ homosexual.
Ok so easy to follow explaination of what I was trying to say for the plonkers who weren't just prentending not to get it for the lols:
The following statement by Stickymayhem exists:It expresses the idea A that whether demeaning or harrasing someone for characteristic B can be considered bigotry depends upon whether B is a inherent trait or notAt the end of the day I think it should come down to harassing or demeaning people for things about themselves that are inherent to them. That's basically the core rpoblem with bigots and the kinda people we want to expel from the community
Idea C:
It is not bigoted to harrass a man who has sex with men for that characteristic, because whether a man is one depends on that man's actions.
Idea D :
It is bigoted to refuse to sell alcohol to a child because a person's date of birth is an inherent characteristic and that's what's used to determine whether a person is a child or not.
If we do not accept idea C, then neither should we accept idea A as A leads to C.
If we do not accept idea D, then neither should we accept
idea A as A leads to D.
C and D are clearly unacceptable for a normal reasonable 1st worlder.
Therefore idea A is not useful and biggotry should be defined in some other way.
Pretty good clarification of your point, I'd say. A clumsy, if not succinct case as to why our definition of bigotry shouldn't be solely dependant on whether a particular characteristic is inherent.Rohen_Tahir wrote:It appears that my post wasn't clear enough to not be interpreted as the exact opposite of what I was trying to state. Fucking hell.
"Men who have sex with men" ≠ homosexual.
Ok so easy to follow explaination of what I was trying to say for the plonkers who weren't just prentending not to get it for the lols:
The following statement by Stickymayhem exists:It expresses the idea A that whether demeaning or harrasing someone for characteristic B can be considered bigotry depends upon whether B is a inherent trait or notAt the end of the day I think it should come down to harassing or demeaning people for things about themselves that are inherent to them. That's basically the core rpoblem with bigots and the kinda people we want to expel from the community
Idea C:
It is not bigoted to harrass a man who has sex with men for that characteristic, because whether a man is one depends on that man's actions.
Idea D :
It is bigoted to refuse to sell alcohol to a child because a person's date of birth is an inherent characteristic and that's what's used to determine whether a person is a child or not.
If we do not accept idea C, then neither should we accept idea A as A leads to C.
If we do not accept idea D, then neither should we accept
idea A as A leads to D.
C and D are clearly unacceptable for a normal reasonable 1st worlder.
Therefore idea A is not useful and biggotry should be defined in some other way.
fagRohen_Tahir wrote:It appears that my post wasn't clear enough to not be interpreted as the exact opposite of what I was trying to state. Fucking hell.MrStonedOne wrote:They think being gay is a choice but being too young to drink isn't.Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the fuck is this guy talking aboutRohen_Tahir wrote:words
They are likely trying to play some game with wording where they are gonna suggest that they are saying "the act of having sex with another man" is a choice.
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
"Men who have sex with men" ≠ homosexual.
Ok so easy to follow explaination of what I was trying to say for the plonkers who weren't just prentending not to get it for the lols:
The following statement by Stickymayhem exists:It expresses the idea A that whether demeaning or harrasing someone for characteristic B can be considered bigotry depends upon whether B is a inherent trait or notAt the end of the day I think it should come down to harassing or demeaning people for things about themselves that are inherent to them. That's basically the core rpoblem with bigots and the kinda people we want to expel from the community
Idea C:
It is not bigoted to harrass a man who has sex with men for that characteristic, because whether a man is one depends on that man's actions.
Idea D :
It is bigoted to refuse to sell alcohol to a child because a person's date of birth is an inherent characteristic and that's what's used to determine whether a person is a child or not.
If we do not accept idea C, then neither should we accept idea A as A leads to C.
If we do not accept idea D, then neither should we accept
idea A as A leads to D.
C and D are clearly unacceptable for a normal reasonable 1st worlder.
Therefore idea A is not useful and biggotry should be defined in some other way.
POLITICS HAS BREACHED CONTAINMENTRohen_Tahir wrote:It appears that my post wasn't clear enough to not be interpreted as the exact opposite of what I was trying to state. Fucking hell.MrStonedOne wrote:They think being gay is a choice but being too young to drink isn't.Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the fuck is this guy talking aboutRohen_Tahir wrote:words
They are likely trying to play some game with wording where they are gonna suggest that they are saying "the act of having sex with another man" is a choice.
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
"Men who have sex with men" ≠ homosexual.
Ok so easy to follow explaination of what I was trying to say for the plonkers who weren't just prentending not to get it for the lols:
The following statement by Stickymayhem exists:It expresses the idea A that whether demeaning or harrasing someone for characteristic B can be considered bigotry depends upon whether B is a inherent trait or notAt the end of the day I think it should come down to harassing or demeaning people for things about themselves that are inherent to them. That's basically the core rpoblem with bigots and the kinda people we want to expel from the community
Idea C:
It is not bigoted to harrass a man who has sex with men for that characteristic, because whether a man is one depends on that man's actions.
Idea D :
It is bigoted to refuse to sell alcohol to a child because a person's date of birth is an inherent characteristic and that's what's used to determine whether a person is a child or not.
If we do not accept idea C, then neither should we accept idea A as A leads to C.
If we do not accept idea D, then neither should we accept
idea A as A leads to D.
C and D are clearly unacceptable for a normal reasonable 1st worlder.
Therefore idea A is not useful and biggotry should be defined in some other way.
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
this.Armhulen wrote:The FINAL cope
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... cd_1_2.mp4Armhulen wrote:The FINAL copeRohen_Tahir wrote:It appears that my post wasn't clear enough to not be interpreted as the exact opposite of what I was trying to state. Fucking hell.MrStonedOne wrote:They think being gay is a choice but being too young to drink isn't.Super Aggro Crag wrote:what the fuck is this guy talking aboutRohen_Tahir wrote:words
They are likely trying to play some game with wording where they are gonna suggest that they are saying "the act of having sex with another man" is a choice.
In reality all they've done is blunder what they think is a gotcha into a deceleration of a their homophobic and underage nature.
"Men who have sex with men" ≠ homosexual.
Ok so easy to follow explaination of what I was trying to say for the plonkers who weren't just prentending not to get it for the lols:
The following statement by Stickymayhem exists:It expresses the idea A that whether demeaning or harrasing someone for characteristic B can be considered bigotry depends upon whether B is a inherent trait or notAt the end of the day I think it should come down to harassing or demeaning people for things about themselves that are inherent to them. That's basically the core rpoblem with bigots and the kinda people we want to expel from the community
Idea C:
It is not bigoted to harrass a man who has sex with men for that characteristic, because whether a man is one depends on that man's actions.
Idea D :
It is bigoted to refuse to sell alcohol to a child because a person's date of birth is an inherent characteristic and that's what's used to determine whether a person is a child or not.
If we do not accept idea C, then neither should we accept idea A as A leads to C.
If we do not accept idea D, then neither should we accept
idea A as A leads to D.
C and D are clearly unacceptable for a normal reasonable 1st worlder.
Therefore idea A is not useful and biggotry should be defined in some other way.
i was admittedly baited and then quickly let go of the hook yummy bait no hookGigapuddi420 wrote:lol that edit. Now we're cooking with politics containment.
this.Armhulen wrote:The FINAL cope
Boris wrote:Sticky is a jackass who has worms where his brain should be, but he also gets exactly what SS13 should be
