/tg/Station 13

Bottom post of the previous page:

Screemonster wrote:I'm gonna make a character called Sadie Enword and tell the admin to fuck off iff they don't like my gimmick

chocolate_bickie wrote:A one year old cat is equivalent developmentally to a 15 year old human and a two year old cat equivalent to a 25 year old human. After that one human year equals four cat years.

17 - 2 = 15
15 x 4 = 60

60 + 25 = 85

Therefore Bea Socks is actually a naked old women likely suffering from memory loss.

chocolate_bickie wrote:A one year old cat is equivalent developmentally to a 15 year old human and a two year old cat equivalent to a 25 year old human. After that one human year equals four cat years.

17 - 2 = 15
15 x 4 = 60

60 + 25 = 85

Therefore Bea Socks is actually a naked old women likely suffering from memory loss.

Misdoubtful wrote:

chocolate_bickie wrote:A one year old cat is equivalent developmentally to a 15 year old human and a two year old cat equivalent to a 25 year old human. After that one human year equals four cat years.

17 - 2 = 15
15 x 4 = 60

60 + 25 = 85

Therefore Bea Socks is actually a naked old women likely suffering from memory loss.

Aging is weird let's all just live forever I know I will haha

oranges wrote:

PKPenguin321 wrote:code solution that makes underaged characters physically impossible to strip nude when? i want to powergame my age setting

I wish your mother had drowned you in the russian rivers at birth

CoffeeDragon16 wrote:What wuwe have I been bannyed undew!!11 Wuwe 8!!11 Nyobody ahewped about this. Nyobody took *sees buldge* ooc issue. *sweats* Some peopwe joke awound with i-it IC "Somebody get this catgiww dwessed!" yadayda. Nyot once have I evew *sweats* been wawnyed ow (・`ω´・) tawked t-to about this (In 104 wounds of pwaying Bea). Bea was once 22, I made hew 17 so I c-couwd have some f-fun fucking with b-bawtendews, by taking dwinks then f-fwashing my I-ID. Peopwe seemed t-to find i-it funny IC so I didn't *sweats* weawwy x3 see any owo weason t-to change it. >w< I'm nyot ewping with peopwe. I'm nyot d-d-doing anything "sexy". UwU I undewstand *whispers to self* that I was wude in ahewps, *sees buldge* but tewwing a pewson t-to k-kiww theiw gimmick just *blushes* because you don't wike *whispers to self* i-it is cwuew. I awso don't just *blushes* pway *boops your nose* Bea, I pway *boops your nose* hew when *boops your nose* I w-want t-to wewax. This is my fist time pwaying hew in a whowe month.

bobbahbrown wrote:

Mice World wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:gigantic snip (please save our board)

I really don't care that you're cherry picking. My post was sarcastic because I don't see the point of cherry picking on a forum where everyone can scroll up and read the op. But whatever man, you do you. To be honest, I'm kinda shocked that people are even fucking posting at this point. If you all hate me so much. Wouldn't it be better to just fuck off and leave me alone?

i for one do not hate you. you are funny and i like your gimmick, it brings a warm glow to my bee brain. i think this ban is dumb and the banning admin has done it in what i feel is very poor taste.

one thing that confused me about this thread is how much people laser-focused on your character's set age (which i feel is largely irrelevant, especially since you proposed modifying your characters age to one to maintain the banning admin's feelings), especially given that this particular thing only comes up for the bar gimmick thing

maybe im just plain wrong, that's totally possible, but i just dont get it. i think to this extent what oranges said above maybe plays in then...

best wishes,
bobbah 'bee' brown

TWATICUS wrote:

CoffeeDragon16 wrote:What wuwe have I been bannyed undew!!11 Wuwe 8!!11 Nyobody ahewped about this. Nyobody took *sees buldge* ooc issue. *sweats* Some peopwe joke awound with i-it IC "Somebody get this catgiww dwessed!" yadayda. Nyot once have I evew *sweats* been wawnyed ow (・`ω´・) tawked t-to about this (In 104 wounds of pwaying Bea). Bea was once 22, I made hew 17 so I c-couwd have some f-fun fucking with b-bawtendews, by taking dwinks then f-fwashing my I-ID. Peopwe seemed t-to find i-it funny IC so I didn't *sweats* weawwy x3 see any owo weason t-to change it. >w< I'm nyot ewping with peopwe. I'm nyot d-d-doing anything "sexy". UwU I undewstand *whispers to self* that I was wude in ahewps, *sees buldge* but tewwing a pewson t-to k-kiww theiw gimmick just *blushes* because you don't wike *whispers to self* i-it is cwuew. I awso don't just *blushes* pway *boops your nose* Bea, I pway *boops your nose* hew when *boops your nose* I w-want t-to wewax. This is my fist time pwaying hew in a whowe month.

for fucking shame dude. in what world do you think its ok to act like this? its not some joke appeal with no effort. it was a genuine good-faith appeal that laid out the reasons and explained it all. and you turn around and 'uwu-ify' it to post on their peanut thread? you can disagree with their reasonings. you can think theyre an idiot. but youre still expected to act with even a shred of professionalism when dealing with something related to your own appeal. shit like this not only makes you look bad, but makes the entire team look bad.

cant tell if joke

cacogen wrote:I thought it used to start at 18

TWATICUS wrote:

CoffeeDragon16 wrote:What wuwe have I been bannyed undew!!11 Wuwe 8!!11 Nyobody ahewped about this. Nyobody took *sees buldge* ooc issue. *sweats* Some peopwe joke awound with i-it IC "Somebody get this catgiww dwessed!" yadayda. Nyot once have I evew *sweats* been wawnyed ow (・`ω´・) tawked t-to about this (In 104 wounds of pwaying Bea). Bea was once 22, I made hew 17 so I c-couwd have some f-fun fucking with b-bawtendews, by taking dwinks then f-fwashing my I-ID. Peopwe seemed t-to find i-it funny IC so I didn't *sweats* weawwy x3 see any owo weason t-to change it. >w< I'm nyot ewping with peopwe. I'm nyot d-d-doing anything "sexy". UwU I undewstand *whispers to self* that I was wude in ahewps, *sees buldge* but tewwing a pewson t-to k-kiww theiw gimmick just *blushes* because you don't wike *whispers to self* i-it is cwuew. I awso don't just *blushes* pway *boops your nose* Bea, I pway *boops your nose* hew when *boops your nose* I w-want t-to wewax. This is my fist time pwaying hew in a whowe month.

fow fucking shame dude. ÚwÚ in what wowwd do you think its ok t-to act wike *whispers to self* this!!11 its nyot some joke appeaw with nyo effowt. i-it was a genyuinye good-faith appeaw that waid x3 out the x3 weasons and expwainyed i-it aww. and you tuwn awound and 'uwu-ify' :3 i-it t-to post on theiw peanyut thwead?!?1 you c-can disagwee with theiw weasonyings. you c-can think t-t-theywe an idiot. *huggles tightly* but y-youwe stiww expected t-to act with even owo a shwed :3 of pwofessionyawism *sees buldge* when *boops your nose* deawing with something wewated t-to youw own appeaw. shit wike *whispers to self* this nyot onwy m-makes you w-wook bad, but m-makes the x3 entiwe team w-wook bad.

thehogshotgun wrote:

bobbahbrown wrote:

Mice World wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:snip

What kind of mongoloid finds the gimmick of running around naked entertaining. Christ almighty what is wrong with you

terranaut wrote:wemembew when admins :3 didnt think :3 they wewe bettew peopwe just because they'we admins? wow

bobbahbrown wrote: im literally a bee

literally a bee,
bobbah 'bee' brown

terranaut wrote:remember when admins didnt think they were better people just because they're admins? lol

terranaut wrote:remember when admins didnt think they were better people just because they're admins? lol

wesoda25 wrote:I’ve been thinking about this situation for a while and have realized I probably didn’t act in the best way possible. I was one of the admins online at the time who had supported banning the gimmick (although I had no place in the weekban). As people may know, I have a bit of a colorful history with similar gimmicks, and am not a fan of them. While I’m self aware of this enough to not let myself do any bwoinking, I had thought it would be fine to advocate for the gimmick ban since I wouldn’t bear any direct responsibility for it. I now realize that I probably directly contributed to coffee’s confidence in speaking with mice world- which may have thus enabled the weekban? Idk. Either way my take away is that I should be more hesitant to voice my opinion in the future without at least providing a disclaimer that it might be biased. So sorry to coffee and mice world if I might have provided some unfair justification for what ultimately ended up not being the proper ruling.

The reason I’m bothering to say this is because I want to make it clear I’m trying to avoid becoming a token admin who can’t see beyond their personal vision of the game. I don’t want my potential - real or perceived - to be confined to that of some predictable player whose probably played too much for his own good.

Ayy Lemoh wrote:You're only allowed two sentences before you become a copypasta. That's just the way things go around here.

CoffeeDragon16 wrote:Is not true

If you add songs to your songs, learn more before the attack

It also depends on who you are and what you are in the text.