/tg/Station 13

Bottom post of the previous page:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=33930
so, gang: what are the thoughts?

Grow the fuck up. We get it, you are either a late middle schooler or an early high schooler. Grow up and at the bare minimum pretend to be a normal adult.

i have such a difficult time reading his posts because of it. i applaud the admins who actually have to read them to make decisions on his appeal.

edit also he made a new appeal lol

Honesty, if they didn't act like a clown in the appeal, it might have gotten accepted.

BeeSting12 wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:46 pm i have such a difficult time reading his posts because of it. i applaud the admins who actually have to read them to make decisions on his appeal.

I read the entire thing. Still shivering me timbers at the dad with the milk thing.

WineAllWine wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:55 pm I don't really understand why this relatively innocuous ban got such a heated peanut thread.

where is the heat? everyone is just clowning on this guy because he's free entertainment until he manages to talk himself into a perma

cheeser0mancer wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:31 pm

TheRex9001 wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:23 pm

cheeser0mancer wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:57 pm AND OF COURSE OOOOOOH THE POOR ADMIN HE HAD TO DO WORK HE SIGNED UP FOR LMAO

Dude this is an arguement you are having with yourself, no one has said this. The fact a note ended up with 45 replied instead of just ”Yeah the name is dumb” is fucking baffling

i was saying this to wine

WineAllWine wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:55 pm I'm not really happy with how this played out and I think lots of it is my fault. I shouldn't have flip-flopped- essentially deferring my responsibility to other admins.

I don't really understand why this relatively innocuous ban got such a heated peanut thread.

I don't like that I, a senior admin, made work for conrad and I sincerely apologise for that

cheeser0mancer wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:57 pm AND OF COURSE OOOOOOH THE POOR ADMIN HE HAD TO DO WORK HE SIGNED UP FOR LMAO

Cheese, I think the problem is no longer that you're not picking good names but that you're being an insufferable cunt about it.

i am an absolute cunt i admit, and i would just like to say, this is about a game, im not treating this like its a courtcase man lmao

cheeser0mancer wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 10:13 pm i am an absolute cunt i admit, and i would just like to say, this is about a game, im not treating this like its a courtcase man lmao

Then don't be surprised when nobody wants to be nice to you if you're going to be an asshole about something as simple as being asked to change your name.

cheeser0mancer wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:31 pm

TheRex9001 wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:23 pm

cheeser0mancer wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:57 pm AND OF COURSE OOOOOOH THE POOR ADMIN HE HAD TO DO WORK HE SIGNED UP FOR LMAO

Dude this is an arguement you are having with yourself, no one has said this. The fact a note ended up with 45 replied instead of just ”Yeah the name is dumb” is fucking baffling

i was saying this to wine

WineAllWine wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:55 pm I'm not really happy with how this played out and I think lots of it is my fault. I shouldn't have flip-flopped- essentially deferring my responsibility to other admins.

I don't really understand why this relatively innocuous ban got such a heated peanut thread.

I don't like that I, a senior admin, made work for conrad and I sincerely apologise for that

cheeser0mancer wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:57 pm AND OF COURSE OOOOOOH THE POOR ADMIN HE HAD TO DO WORK HE SIGNED UP FOR LMAO

I've said that a lot of this was my fault. What do you want me to say?

oranges wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:59 pm

WineAllWine wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:55 pm I don't really understand why this relatively innocuous ban got such a heated peanut thread.

where is the heat? everyone is just clowning on this guy because he's free entertainment until he manages to talk himself into a perma

It's a 3 page peanut, that's a big'un

time to shit

saprasam wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:23 pm

I, datorangebottle, completely agree with and stand by this post.
With exasperated regards
-datorangebottle

oranges wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 9:59 pm

WineAllWine wrote: ↑Wed May 03, 2023 8:55 pm I don't really understand why this relatively innocuous ban got such a heated peanut thread.

where is the heat? everyone is just clowning on this guy because he's free entertainment until he manages to talk himself into a perma

This is a 4 paged peanut thread. You've been around longer than me to know that that's a lot!

The name ban wasn't the issue.

It was the shining specimen of the species that it was placed against which has caused the peanut to endure over time.

Like vultures we flock to the drama carcass to slough off more meat. Each new page a tender morsel of peanut to savour and digest.

At this point nobody really cares about the bans or notes and we're all just focused on the star of the show. Think Cirque du Soleil but all the performers are replaced by pandas.

this is so cold

actually timber just wrote a freezing ice cold line so im gonna lock it at this threads peak