/tg/Station 13

Bottom post of the previous page:

https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic ... 36#p606636

"I dont care if you get off to kids just dont do it here"

sinfulbliss wrote:A year for a pedo smut book seems kind of harsh by itself, but considering he straight up lied in the appeal it makes sense.

Also I find it hilarious he ERP’d with Ian and the banning admin put “Gross” in the ban note. Just further evidence backing up the fact that only high quality ERP is allowed.

sinfulbliss wrote:I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago.

Those sure are words in an order, and I sure did just read them.

Misdoubtful wrote:

sinfulbliss wrote:I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago.

Say 'words are words' to the pedo's out there serving fat prison sentences for possessing or passing along written material that depicts the sexual exploitation of minors.

The only pedos serving fat prison sentences for that are the ones who recorded themselves molesting their niece and sold the shit to fucked up people on the darkweb.
Ain't nobody in the history of America served a minute in prison for writing a book, even the most sick twisted horrible book you could imagine.

Then again TG isn't America so that's another story.

NoxVS wrote:

sinfulbliss wrote:I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago.

I am pretty sure supporting pedophilia is not the best hill to choose to die on.

Any comment other than "burn them at the stake" is supporting pedophilia?
I simply don't find books to be a threat unless they are targeting someone. Not on TG, not IRL, not anywhere else. Doesn't mean I support pedophilia, and you know that's not what my argument was. Don't intentionally twist my words to discredit me. I'm plenty capable of discrediting myself as it is for making an unpopular opinion.

sinfulbliss wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

sinfulbliss wrote:I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago.

Say 'words are words' to the pedo's out there serving fat prison sentences for possessing or passing along written material that depicts the sexual exploitation of minors.

The only pedos serving fat prison sentences for that are the ones who recorded themselves molesting their niece and sold the shit to fucked up on the darkweb.
Ain't nobody in the history of America served a minute in prison for writing a book, even the most sick twisted horrible book you could imagine.

Then again TG isn't America so that's another story.

https://www.illinoislawreview.org/wp-co ... ostrin.pdf

Thats where you're dead wrong.

Misdoubtful wrote:

sinfulbliss wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

sinfulbliss wrote:I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago.

Say 'words are words' to the pedo's out there serving fat prison sentences for possessing or passing along written material that depicts the sexual exploitation of minors.

The only pedos serving fat prison sentences for that are the ones who recorded themselves molesting their niece and sold the shit to fucked up on the darkweb.
Ain't nobody in the history of America served a minute in prison for writing a book, even the most sick twisted horrible book you could imagine.

Then again TG isn't America so that's another story.

https://www.illinoislawreview.org/wp-co ... ostrin.pdf

Thats where you're dead wrong.

Touche, but to be fair this was Ohio, not the federal government.



I agree with "many leading scholars." I don't view writing any different from speaking or, if privately, from thinking. If you throw someone in prison for what they write, it's no better than throwing someone in prison for what they think.

sinfulbliss wrote:I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago.

Not a fucking gain sinful

cheese pizza thread

TheFinalPotato wrote:

sinfulbliss wrote:I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago.

Not a fucking gain sinful

Full disclosure, I don't support pedophiles, doxers, or smut pedo porn on TG... THERE IS A THING CALLED "ABSTRACTION" PEOPLE, OKAY? YOU CAN TALK ABOUT THE UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES BEHIND SOMETHING WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT THE CONCRETE SITUATION ITSELF.

sinfulbliss wrote:

TheFinalPotato wrote:

sinfulbliss wrote:I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago.

Not a fucking gain sinful

Full disclosure, I don't support pedophiles, doxers, or smut pedo porn on TG... THERE IS A THING CALLED "ABSTRACTION" PEOPLE, OKAY? YOU CAN TALK ABOUT THE UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES BEHIND SOMETHING WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT THE CONCRETE SITUATION ITSELF.

sometimes the best thing to do is to stay silent instead of shooting yourself in the foot

sinfulbliss wrote:Full disclosure, I don't support pedophiles, doxers, or smut pedo porn on TG

but you just did
you said vekter was too harsh on someone writing pedo smut, and that it didn't even warrant a year ban

if you wanted to discuss some abstraction of the situation you should have started with that instead of backtracking to it later

NoxVS wrote:

sinfulbliss wrote:Full disclosure, I don't support pedophiles, doxers, or smut pedo porn on TG

but you just did
you said vekter was too harsh on someone writing pedo smut, and that it didn't even warrant a year ban

if you wanted to discuss some abstraction of the situation you should have started with that instead of backtracking to it later

SinfulBliss wrote:[...]but considering he straight up lied in the appeal it makes sense.

Then you clearly just misread what I said. I said the year ban made sense, not for the writing itself but for the writing combined with lying in the appeal.
I support Vekter's ban and thought he was just the perfect amount of harsh.

sinfulbliss wrote:I simply don't find books to be a threat unless they are targeting someone.

think again fuckwipe

Vekter wrote:I condemn pedophiles

I don't care if he gets off to fictional representations of what the fuck ever

So do you condemn pedophiles or just CSA perpetrators?

lmfao what a fucking bizarre argument

Vekter was just saying he's not part of the fucking Thought Police you dimwits.

Agux909 wrote:Vekter was just saying he's not part of the fucking Thought Police you dimwits.

I would never believe someone who's part of the INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS TOWER who says that he's not part of the thought police.

INTERNAL DISCUSSIONS
INTERNAL DISCUSSIONS
INTERNAL DISCUSSIONS
INTERNAL DISCUSSIONS
INTERNAL DISCUSSIONS

fucking tower

so DISCUSSIONS aren't COMMUNICATIONS?

XivilaiAnaxes wrote:lmfao what a fucking bizarre argument

The only bizarre argument here is the tribal caveman idea that writing a pedo smut book is worthy of being condemned to hell and burned at the stake.

Like bro. Do you realize how painful being burned at the stake in the fires of hell is? People say this unironically without pausing for a moment to imagine what it would be like. Not one of you would burn even Adolf Hitler at the stake. If you even saw him burning you would put it out with water, because no one of sound mind could subject another human being to that kind of agony. I don't care what you do, you are still a human being and you have basic human rights.

Fishimun wrote:so DISCUSSIONS aren't COMMUNICATIONS?

The broader term "COMMUNICATIONS" might be clouding your judgement regarding the bigger picture in this case. Please refrain from using it and instead give the proper term a chance to better build your argument. Thank you.

sinfulbliss wrote:Not one of you would burn even Adolf Hitler at the stake. If you even saw him burning you would put it out with water, because no one of sound mind could subject another human being to that kind of agony. I don't care what you do, you are still a human being and you have basic human rights.

Excuse me, but some of us are sociopaths and take offence to this call to humanity.

sinfulbliss wrote:The only bizarre argument here is the tribal caveman idea that writing a pedo smut book is worthy of being condemned to hell and burned at the stake.

Like bro. Do you realize how painful being burned at the stake in the fires of hell is? People say this unironically without pausing for a moment to imagine what it would be like. Not one of you would burn even Adolf Hitler at the stake. If you even saw him burning you would put it out with water, because no one of sound mind could subject another human being to that kind of agony. I don't care what you do, you are still a human being and you have basic human rights.

I didn't realize pyres were in the cards here, I can't believe the admins burned OP alive

Agux909 wrote:

Fishimun wrote:so DISCUSSIONS aren't COMMUNICATIONS?

The broader term "COMMUNICATIONS" might be clouding your judgement regarding the bigger picture in this case. Please refrain from using it and instead give the proper term a chance to better build your argument. Thank you.

I'm dying on the hill of "INTERNAL CIRCULATIONS TOWER".

Fishimun wrote:

Agux909 wrote:

Fishimun wrote:so DISCUSSIONS aren't COMMUNICATIONS?

The broader term "COMMUNICATIONS" might be clouding your judgement regarding the bigger picture in this case. Please refrain from using it and instead give the proper term a chance to better build your argument. Thank you.

I'm dying on the hill of "INTERNAL CIRCULATIONS TOWER".

I am pretty sure supporting capricious terminology is not the best hill to choose to die on.

sinfulbliss wrote:

XivilaiAnaxes wrote:lmfao what a fucking bizarre argument

The only bizarre argument here is the tribal caveman idea that writing a pedo smut book is worthy of being condemned to hell and burned at the stake.

Like bro. Do you realize how painful being burned at the stake in the fires of hell is? People say this unironically without pausing for a moment to imagine what it would be like. Not one of you would burn even Adolf Hitler at the stake. If you even saw him burning you would put it out with water, because no one of sound mind could subject another human being to that kind of agony. I don't care what you do, you are still a human being and you have basic human rights.

playing on /tg/station 13 isn't a basic human right brainhead

knowing our playerbase this guy was just 12 and self inserting into his own books

oranges wrote:knowing our playerbase this guy was just 12 and self inserting into his own books

Stop doxxing me ?

Super Aggro Crag wrote: playing on /tg/station 13 isn't a basic human right brainhead

Where did I say I was talking about TG in that post? Is there an Adolf Hitler on TG?
God damn, use the fuckin context clues...
Also TG is a basic human right.

IkeTG wrote: I didn't realize pyres were in the cards here, I can't believe the admins burned OP alive

Okay that was pretty funny not gonna lie. I giggled.

oranges wrote:knowing our playerbase this guy was just 12 and self inserting into his own books

i checked the round logs and this theory seems to be supported by the say logs

sinfulbliss wrote:

Super Aggro Crag wrote: playing on /tg/station 13 isn't a basic human right brainhead

Where did I say I was talking about TG in that post? Is there an Adolf Hitler on TG?

None ever told you?

Sinful, I don't think you realize how much the world (justly) despises pedophiles and pedophilia. It's not a hobby or a lifestyle choice. It's a moral abomination to the vast majority of people. The very idea is enough to make people wretch in disgust.

It doesn't matter if a pedophile hasn't hurt any kids yet. People who pursue sexual pleasure from the idea of hurting/raping kids are a complete moral anathema to nearly everybody.

sinfulbliss wrote:Is there an Adolf Hitler on TG?

It depends.

lmao

sinfulbliss wrote:

Super Aggro Crag wrote: playing on /tg/station 13 isn't a basic human right brainhead

Where did I say I was talking about TG in that post? Is there an Adolf Hitler on TG?

yes but we call him Herr Orangen now

Farquaar wrote:Sinful, I don't think you realize how much the world (justly) despises pedophiles and pedophilia. It's not a hobby or a lifestyle choice. It's a moral abomination to the vast majority of people. The very idea is enough to make people wretch in disgust.

It doesn't matter if a pedophile hasn't hurt any kids yet. People who pursue sexual pleasure from the idea of hurting/raping kids are a complete moral anathema to nearly everybody.

I realize this. The fact that a gangster who has brutally murdered 10 people will be treated better in prison than a pedo who got arrested for child porn is a testament to the failure of humanity's modern moral intuition.

You can commit atrocities as long as you do it in a way that's sort of "badass," and no one will really judge you for it. Hell, people will admire you for it and make you into a viral Youtube video. Meanwhile the guy who did next to jackshit except write in his diary his own mentally distorted fetishes will get beaten and raped in prison, then kill himself at 50 once he's back in society since everyone has shunned them for it. That isn't justice and Ohio can kiss my ass.

God damn this thread sucks.

posting in a thread about how much it sucks is the kony2012 of tgstation forum posting

sinfulbliss wrote:

Farquaar wrote:Sinful, I don't think you realize how much the world (justly) despises pedophiles and pedophilia. It's not a hobby or a lifestyle choice. It's a moral abomination to the vast majority of people. The very idea is enough to make people wretch in disgust.

It doesn't matter if a pedophile hasn't hurt any kids yet. People who pursue sexual pleasure from the idea of hurting/raping kids are a complete moral anathema to nearly everybody.

I realize this. The fact that a gangster who has brutally murdered 10 people will be treated better in prison than a pedo who got arrested for child porn is a testament to the failure of humanity's modern moral intuition.

You can commit atrocities as long as you do it in a way that's sort of "badass," and no one will really judge you for it. Hell, people will admire you for it and make you into a viral Youtube video.

Spoiler:

Meanwhile the guy who did next to jackshit except write in his diary his own mentally distorted fetishes will get beaten and raped in prison, then kill himself at 50 once he's back in society since everyone has shunned them for it. That isn't justice and Ohio can kiss my ass.

they should make a pill that cures being a pedo

What did I come back to

Super Aggro Crag wrote:they should make a pill that cures being a pedo

setup for a easy punch line right there.

MortoSasye wrote:What did I come back to

autism

morto im gonna be honest when rohen_tahir said "csa perpetrators" i thought the acronym stood for Confederate States of America and was trying to wonder why rohen is conflating Robert E. Lee with child molestation

Super Aggro Crag wrote: they should make a pill that cures being a pedo

cyanide

also on another note this mob boss is actually pretty based, watched the full video. just goes to show you religion is a powerful thing

[youtube]mWtfpM0CnX8[/youtube]

sinfulbliss wrote:A year for a pedo smut book seems kind of harsh

sinfulbliss wrote:Words are words are words.

Come on don't hit me with the wendies meme.
There is a "but" god damnit.

this is what the thread would look like in anime

God I see now why no one defends pedos.
It isn't worth it man. It just ISN'T WORTH IT.
Even a lukewarm defense, and now you're in an anime as a kiddie diddler.

sinfulbliss wrote:

TheFinalPotato wrote:

sinfulbliss wrote:I stand by my statement. Words are words are words. Also I bet if they had made a proper appeal and didn't lie they'd have a shot of being unbanned for it, considering it was a year ago.

Not a fucking gain sinful

Full disclosure, I don't support pedophiles, doxers, or smut pedo porn on TG... THERE IS A THING CALLED "ABSTRACTION" PEOPLE, OKAY? YOU CAN TALK ABOUT THE UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES BEHIND SOMETHING WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT THE CONCRETE SITUATION ITSELF.

Screemonster wrote:

advocate.png

I think it is a sort of mental illness, just like depression, sociopathy, and psychopathy are mental illnesses. You punish them for the offense, not the mental illness.
No one should be punished for merely existing. We can find something disgusting and repulsive and distance ourselves from it as a community, but if you're a court of law you should not be locking people up for it.

to be honest if MSO didnt step in, coconut would just have overriden the ban

Super Aggro Crag wrote:morto im gonna be honest when rohen_tahir said "csa perpetrators" i thought the acronym stood for Confederate States of America and was trying to wonder why rohen is conflating Robert E. Lee with child molestation

Same.

Critawakets wrote:to be honest if MSO didnt step in, coconut would just have overriden the ban

Is this about ten codes

I think this thread has run its course and there's not much more to be gleaned from it, particularly with the appeal being (essentially) over. Move to the next one boys.