Page 2 of 2

defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 4:55 am
by iwishforducks

Bottom post of the previous page:

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=32192

fourth thread created for this. giving this 2 days before you guys go insane in the replies and get this one locked like the others

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:04 am
by carshalash
XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:51 am

Didn't you post weird gay porn gifs in the tg discord and get banned for it, and then proceed to join the manuelcord and do the exact same thing? Sounds like you're the one posting sexual material across servers m8.
The manuelcord? He never even joined the manuel cord from what I know.
Image

You two lie a lot. This situation is a glorified ban request in video form, ban requests should be available to either everyone or nobody.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:10 am
by TheSmallBlue
Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 am I won't touch the lolicon bit - it's clear everyone here disagrees with me on that one, and it would just lead to a long streaming shitshow that would give poor Mothblocks an aneurysm. I got my forum warning for that one already.

I already explained why my character age was set to 17, and why I was naked - it was for actual in-game mechanical reasons - ask anyone on sybil who plays at the same time as me if I steal people's shoes to be a menace all the time or not - they'll tell you yes.

And when I argued for less-strict ERP rules, even in their video with the out of context quotes, it was clearly said alongside the fact that I felt it was silly in conjunction with the fact that we're an over-18 server. I am very clearly pro "consenting adults" ERP.

I don't know what else to say other than that you're clearly seeing the work of someone setting up a hit piece. I'm sure if I was as obsessed as the people who made that video, I could probably make you look bad too if I tried hard enough, so I'm asking for your continued support in this matter.
What I'm trying to say is that, even WITH context, the combination of all the things I mentioned do paint you in a pretty bad (horrible) light. If it was one, justified event, sure, but when multiple events add to a horrible assumption, at that point even with the context and explanations it'll be seen as too much of a coincidence.
And uh you won't have my continued support, I dont wanna support a lolicon defender. I'm just trying to be fair to both sides.

Also, if EVERYONE disagrees with you on something- EVERYONE. Then maybe just maybe you might just be wrong?

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:10 am
by XII3912
Holy fuck he actually did it, based

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:15 am
by Imitates-The-Lizards
TheSmallBlue wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:45 amnor have I seen you deny that you're a lolicon in the first place.
Sorry for the double response on one post here, but I can respond to this actually -

Since you asked, I'm not a lolicon. I like tomboys, actually. I believe I said this in one of my original forum posts on this particular matter. Saying anything beyond that though, and I risk mr. RaveRadbury's wrath, sorry.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:21 am
by toemas
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:04 am
XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:51 am

Didn't you post weird gay porn gifs in the tg discord and get banned for it, and then proceed to join the manuelcord and do the exact same thing? Sounds like you're the one posting sexual material across servers m8.
The manuelcord? He never even joined the manuel cord from what I know.
Image

You two lie a lot. This situation is a glorified ban request in video form, ban requests should be available to either everyone or nobody.
lol

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:32 am
by XII3912
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am


Didn't you purposefully try to get the tgcord pulled by posting guides on how to make real bombs?
Not just me but Philip aswell why exactly do you feel the need attempt to incriminate him?

And do you genuinely think that the meth bait and switch I posted was posted to take down the tg cord or nah. If so I actually would like to know why you think that

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:39 am
by carshalash
XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:32 am
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am


Didn't you purposefully try to get the tgcord pulled by posting guides on how to make real bombs?
Not just me but Philip aswell why exactly do you feel the need attempt to incriminate him?

And do you genuinely think that the meth bait and switch I posted was posted to take down the tg cord or nah. If so I actually would like to know why you think that
Thoman shouldn't be the only person with the ability to make ban requests, especially considering his past behaviour.

And you? I just don't like you.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:44 am
by XII3912
>Thoman shouldn't be the only person with the ability to make ban requests, especially considering his past behaviour.

It was not Thomas who did it, it was somebody else entirely not sure what made you think it was him who made the "ban he" video






>And you? I just don't like you.


So you admit to spreading a lie about another user because you dislike them. I mean we don't even know each other bro but C'est la vie ig

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:51 am
by toemas
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:55 am Thoman shouldn't be the only person with the ability to make ban requests, especially considering his past behaviour
I didn't make anything

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:58 am
by carshalash
XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:44 am >Thoman shouldn't be the only person with the ability to make ban requests, especially considering his past behaviour.

It was not Thomas who did it, it was somebody else entirely not sure what made you think it was him who made the "ban he" video






>And you? I just don't like you.


So you admit to spreading a lie about another user because you dislike them. I mean we don't even know each other bro but C'est la vie ig

This is your ban reason, is it not?
"Banned from the server permanently - Over Discord, created several Rule 11 breaking posts and videos on how to make illegal substances and chemical weapons that needed to be reported to Discord trust and safety. When your name came up in discussion, the overall feedback was that admins were absolutely sick of you. Your note history adjusted for your time played is abysmal, so I'm taking this route to just remove you from the community altogether."
A FUN part of your appeal for this ban stuck out to me, particularly MSO's response to it.

Image

The server host told you to knock it off with spamming racist memes. So what do you do in the manuel discord since it's the only place that will begrudgingly accept you?

Image

Your weird gang shouldn't be the only people with the power to use ban requests just because it's in video format, it sets a terrible precedent.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 9:14 am
by toemas
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:58 am Your weird gang shouldn't be the only people with the power to use ban requests just because it's in video format, it sets a terrible precedent.
I think that not banning them would have set a worse precedent. Also, there is no gang lol

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 9:18 am
by XII3912
carshalash wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 8:58 am
Your weird gang shouldn't be the only people with the power to use ban requests just because it's in video format, it sets a terrible precedent.

What gang tho it was one person, one guy who i do not know very well there is no "weird gang" here ill explain to you what happened so you understand it better, so from phase 1

>alice defends lolicon in another thread
>thoman responds and tells them to kill themselves
>thoman is banned from the forums and his appeal gets denied
>kleinworks corporation the youtuber makes a video a few days later which exposes them as a pedo
>video is then posted and they are then lynched in the discord based on Alice's appeal
>they are then banned from the discord

So yes it's down to one guy not a gang. There are many people agreeing with the ban but does that make them apart of the so called "gang" no it doesn't. you can bring up past atrocities if you'd like to but know that the video was just one guy

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 9:43 am
by Shellton(Mario)
Whoever you think it was I don't think we should be allowing people to start a witch hunt on whoever they want at any time they want. Instead go through the proper channels. I.E Bring it up to an admin or something.

Am not even going to start on the pedo accusations as that is the out of the realm of my sanity and can only really be answered through an investigation.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:02 am
by Lacran
What the fuck are you retards even talking about

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:03 am
by XII3912
Lacran wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:02 am What the fuck are you retards even talking about
We went from the age of consent to "is he bad or is he good" then we went to "hey look at these 2 they have committed atrocities in the past"

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:07 am
by dirk_mcblade
Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 am
And when I argued for less-strict ERP rules, even in their video with the out of context quotes, it was clearly said alongside the fact that I felt it was silly in conjunction with the fact that we're an over-18 server. I am very clearly pro "consenting adults" ERP.
It's an over-18 server but it's also a don't ask don't tell server because the admins don't want to encourage doxing.

If you don't understand how the combination of these two things plus what you're talking about is problematic, I don't know man.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:15 am
by Lacran
Does the person in question have a history of pedo sympathizing or something?

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:15 am
by Imitates-The-Lizards
dirk_mcblade wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:07 am
Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 am
And when I argued for less-strict ERP rules, even in their video with the out of context quotes, it was clearly said alongside the fact that I felt it was silly in conjunction with the fact that we're an over-18 server. I am very clearly pro "consenting adults" ERP.
It's an over-18 server but it's also a don't ask don't tell server because the admins don't want to encourage doxing.

If you don't understand how the combination of these two things plus what you're talking about is problematic, I don't know man.
If they don't want to encourage doxxing, then my ban should be immediately overturned, with prejudice, because what this ban is showing that if you take the time to dig into people posts on the forums and discord, and look into every little detail about them you can find, you can get them banned if you don't like them.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:24 am
by Lacran
Imitates, can you explain why you want erotic content on a platform where the vast majority don't want to engage with it especially when you are also holding positions on sexuality that is at best, very borderline?

Why is this your chosen hill to die on?

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:28 am
by Imitates-The-Lizards
Lacran wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:24 am Imitates, can you explain why you want erotic content on a platform where the vast majority don't want to engage with it while you also holding positions on sexuality that is at best, very borderline?

Why is this your chosen hill to die on?
I'm sorry, I can't get into this topic here, Mr. RaveRadbury would rip me a new one. I already got a forum warning for this before.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:38 am
by Lacran
Ah ok, wasn't trying to banbait

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:01 am
by Thunder11
XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:03 am
Lacran wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:02 am What the fuck are you retards even talking about
We went from the age of consent to "is he bad or is he good" then we went to "hey look at these 2 they have committed atrocities in the past"
The worst atrocity of all is this thread

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:03 am
by XII3912
Thunder11 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:01 am
XII3912 wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:03 am
Lacran wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:02 am What the fuck are you retards even talking about
We went from the age of consent to "is he bad or is he good" then we went to "hey look at these 2 they have committed atrocities in the past"
The worst atrocity of all is this thread
Agreed mop this up jannies

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 11:54 am
by Qbmax32
Just more proof on why cat players are the worst thing to happen to the server in years

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:37 pm
by dirk_mcblade
Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:15 am
dirk_mcblade wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:07 am
Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:58 am
And when I argued for less-strict ERP rules, even in their video with the out of context quotes, it was clearly said alongside the fact that I felt it was silly in conjunction with the fact that we're an over-18 server. I am very clearly pro "consenting adults" ERP.
It's an over-18 server but it's also a don't ask don't tell server because the admins don't want to encourage doxing.

If you don't understand how the combination of these two things plus what you're talking about is problematic, I don't know man.
If they don't want to encourage doxxing, then my ban should be immediately overturned, with prejudice, because what this ban is showing that if you take the time to dig into people posts on the forums and discord, and look into every little detail about them you can find, you can get them banned if you don't like them.
I'm not going to bother looking up the evidence because to be honest I don't care aside from this thread appearing in one of two forums I read.

However I doubt they doxxed you. It sounds to me like they looked through your chat history so if anything you doxxed yourself.

Furthermore unless they posted your driver's license or home ownership records that's not the doxing I'm talking about. The admins are talking about not wanting people to send them people's identification documents to prove they're under 18, that kind of bullshit. I'm pretty sure the policy explains it as such. If they actually did what I'm talking about then that's a bannable offense but again I doubt that's what's going on.

Getting banned from discord is a minor penalty. You could consider this your "come to Jesus" moment where you sit back for a moment and reflect why people are getting the perception you're acting strange and either work on that if you're merely a severe contrarian or get some professional help if you have some other problem going on. Talking about it further online seems non productive though it's cheap entertainment for the rest of us watching people sperg out.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:56 pm
by KniraTwo
Shellton(Mario) wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 9:43 am Whoever you think it was I don't think we should be allowing people to start a witch hunt on whoever they want at any time they want. Instead go through the proper channels. I.E Bring it up to an admin or something.

Am not even going to start on the pedo accusations as that is the out of the realm of my sanity and can only really be answered through an investigation.
based take

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:12 pm
by Turbonerd
I think the situation would've been a lot better if everyone that talked about it got muted, while admins investigate and people have a normal conversation.

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 1:24 pm
by BONERMASTER
Imitates-The-Lizards wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 7:22 am The age of consent should be 25 because that's when brain development stops.
I think your brain stopped developing a long time before that, if you seriously believe this crap that you are peddling.

Now we can close the thread.


With consensual regards
-BONERMASTER

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 2:06 pm
by Rohen_Tahir
lol

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 2:18 pm
by Qbmax32
Rohen_Tahir wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 2:06 pmlol

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:25 pm
by Vekter
this thread sucks

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:29 pm
by CPTANT
What did he even say about Lolicon in the first place?

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:31 pm
by Turbonerd
Vekter wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:25 pm this thread sucks

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:33 pm
by Not-Dorsidarf
CPTANT wrote: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:29 pm What did he even say about Lolicon in the first place?
Anarcho-capitalist, connect the dots

Re: defender of all things righteous peanut thread

Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2022 4:06 pm
by iwishforducks
Alright folks. You can't even be granted 6 hours without resorting to whatever the fuck this is.

The ban was not because some insufferable spoiled brats began banging drums in the discord or "giving into the mob." The ban was because admins supported the ban of Imitates/Alice long before you guys ever started to fling shit around.

The entirety of this ban is focused upon Discord, because Discord Jannies were completely absent on the discussion of Imitates/Alice a month ago. And to be honest, I'm not quite sure why the discord ban wasn't mirrored over. Only a limited amount of us actually have forum permissions or proper training (something Mothblocks is pushing to fix)

Locking this thread so you mongrels stop digging a deeper hole.