/tg/Station 13

https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=28213
Hmm I wonder why he's back in town


Oh wait, looks like he got lonely over the xmas period

The only conspiracy here is just how he managed to make himself so unlikeable everyone wanted him gone and nobody cares now that he is. Although reading his post and his whiny tone about making himself the victim I can see why, hell I'd get rid of him if he was that annoying all the time.

Why does he even bother?

I don't think he has anywhere else left man

oranges wrote:I don't think he has anywhere else left man

Actually, he has only one place left on this miserable Earth:

that domain is expiring in jan and I don't think I"ll renew it

based headmins

Amazed it was resolved and locked in under 3 hours.

Also laughed at "IT WAS EASIER TO BAN ME THAN DEAL WITH CORRUPTION" like bruh tg is a fucking playground it isn't a public service like water or electricity. There are no oil baron schemes to bribe politicians.

I originally wanted to make his thread a free for all of peanuts. Allowing anyone to post in his thread just so he would know what it was like dealing with him and having bans filled with his peanuts.

he tried to appeal again.

Five bucks says he ends up getting that hard forum ban he is so clearly shooting for.

XivilaiAnaxes wrote:Amazed it was resolved and locked in under 3 hours.

proof of the conspiracies!

MrStonedOne wrote:he tried to appeal again.

This is how Kirk Van Houten tries to look cool to his friends.

"Oh go ahead Boomerstation why don't you tell them one of your little bedtime stories, like how rotten it is to be headmin'd by a loser!"

I try to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. But after a while Deedubya's victim complex made his posts insufferable to read. Any attempts to honestly engage with him were met with snark and accusations of irrational bias against him.

Like bruh, it's a game. There's no conspiracy. People can disagree with your hot takes for reasons other than personal animosity. It was your knee-jerk reactions to the people who engaged with you that made everyone dislike you. That's on you.

Farquaar wrote:I try to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. But after a while Deedubya's victim complex made his posts insufferable to read. Any attempts to honestly engage with him were met with snark and accusations of irrational bias against him.

Like bruh, it's a game. There's no conspiracy. People can disagree with your hot takes for reasons other than personal animosity. It was your knee-jerk reactions to the people who engaged with you that made everyone dislike you. That's on you.

When you assume conspiracy where there is none, and accuse everyone else of being self serving with no care for the larger community, it's not really going to be a big surprise when they dislike you.

i dont like deedubya but what i don't like even more is that my retarded brain still makes empathy chemicals for total wastoids like him

i wish my brain would be pitiless so it wouldn't waste neurons on people like deedubs who has had like...years? years to stop...being deedubyalike

this is the biggest long-con ironic game of all time

https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=28221
Why even bother writing an appeal if you’re going to obliterate any chance of getting unbanned with your pissy attitude?

Honestly? He's not even being that bad in that appeal. At least from my perspective

The first Deedubya appeal is a classic, but the sequel is obviously just a soullless cash grab

DING DING

ROUND TWO

I got fun policed for peanut posting but I'm not going to let my words be ignored



Also it's a dubya thread so I'm obligated

[youtube]f8_3A5MOGUk[/youtube]

Also also trust me, the irony of him talking about living rent-free in my head isn't lost

deedubya wrote:aside: We had a betting pool in our staffbus as to what the result of the last appeal would be. My bet was on rejection+further punishment, so you made me lose that one. Good going, dicks.

How much do you fellers wager his staffbus talks about /tg/station?

[youtube]vbWz5SOj9RM[/youtube]

deedub appeals

Misdoubtful wrote:[youtube]vbWz5SOj9RM[/youtube]

excellent post, more ferret content please

Rohen_Tahir wrote:deedub appeals

The YT alogrithm recommended this to me yesterday. Why?

Farquaar wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:deedub appeals

The YT alogrithm recommended this to me yesterday. Why?

YT knows I'm your alt.

Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Wow, this deedubya guy seems like a real heel.*

You know what isn't a real heel though? Space Station 14!

*Any statements made that could be seen as inflammatory are my own opinions and do not reflect the views of Space Station 14 as a corporate entity. If you have qualms with EMPLOYEE:SWEPT please file a formal complaint with PJB#3482.

Swept wrote:Wow, this deedubya guy seems like a real heel.*

You know what isn't a real heel though? Space Station 14!

*Any statements made that could be seen as inflammatory are my own opinions and do not reflect the views of Space Station 14 as a corporate entity. If you have qualms with EMPLOYEE:SWEPT please file a formal complaint with PJB#3482.

can someone please ban this idiot

for spam maybe?

Swept wrote:Wow, this deedubya guy seems like a real heel.*

You know what isn't a real heel though? Space Station 14!

*Any statements made that could be seen as inflammatory are my own opinions and do not reflect the views of Space Station 14 as a corporate entity. If you have qualms with EMPLOYEE:SWEPT please file a formal complaint with PJB#3482.

can someone please ban this idiot

for spam maybe?

The jannies keep getting away with it

Wow, this deedubya guy seems like a real heel.*

You know what isn't a real heel though? TGMC!

*Any statements made that could be seen as inflammatory are my own opinions and do not reflect the views of TGMC as a corporate entity. If you have qualms with EMPLOYEE:TERRANAUT please suck it up, buttercup.

capn_monkeypaw wrote:

admins secretly quaking at deedubs' genius

Screemonster wrote:Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Because freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence.

Misdoubtful wrote:

Screemonster wrote:Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Because freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence.

Are you joking or mind-bogglingly retarded?

Rohen_Tahir wrote:words

you're really telling on yourself rn

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Screemonster wrote:Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Because freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence.

Are you joking or mind-bogglingly retarded?

I'll let you think about that one when you get arrested for screaming obscenities in public.

Misdoubtful wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Screemonster wrote:Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Because freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence.

Are you joking or mind-bogglingly retarded?

I'll let you think about that one when you get arrested for screaming obscenities in public.

Ok so the second one.
I don't scream obscenities in public, I just consider the UDHR a better source of human rights definitions than Twitter/digg.

RaveRadbury wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:words

you're really telling on yourself rn

Yes you got me, I don't actually find big chungus funny, it was a lie.

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Screemonster wrote:Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Because freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence.

Are you joking or mind-bogglingly retarded?

I'll let you think about that one when you get arrested for screaming obscenities in public.

Ok so the second one.
I don't scream obscenities in public, I just consider the UDHR a better source of human rights definitions than Twitter/digg.

Absolutely, I understand 100%. Whatever you gotta tell yourself to make it true. Nation-wide agreements don't nullify national laws.

What are you even on about, Md?

Misdoubtful wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Screemonster wrote:Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Because freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence.

Are you joking or mind-bogglingly retarded?

I'll let you think about that one when you get arrested for screaming obscenities in public.

Ok so the second one.
I don't scream obscenities in public, I just consider the UDHR a better source of human rights definitions than Twitter/digg.

Absolutely, I understand 100%. Whatever you gotta tell yourself to make it true. Nation-wide agreements don't nullify national laws.

Good thing I don't live in whereever the fuck freedom of speech is defined as the state being unable to use censorship but being able to retaliate against people who express dissenting oppinions in any way state officials see fit. Which I guess is North Korea and Syberia because asynchornous communication and therefore also censorship is impossible in those places.

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Screemonster wrote:Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Because freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence.

Are you joking or mind-bogglingly retarded?

I'll let you think about that one when you get arrested for screaming obscenities in public.

Ok so the second one.
I don't scream obscenities in public, I just consider the UDHR a better source of human rights definitions than Twitter/digg.

Absolutely, I understand 100%. Whatever you gotta tell yourself to make it true. Nation-wide agreements don't nullify national laws.

Good thing I don't live in whereever the fuck freedom of speech is defined as the state being unable to use censorship but being able to retaliate against people who express dissenting oppinions in any way state officials see fit. Which I guess is North Korea and Syberia because asynchornous communication and therefore also censorship is impossible in those places.

You should really take the time to look at the different bits of unprotected speech and public morality clauses all the around the world then. Italy, the US, Denmark, Sweden. Consequence isn't the same as censorship by the way. Unless you think hate speech laws themselves are censorship, but then you'd be telling on yourself. So lets avoid that, please.

hate speech laws are fucking rubbish for the sole fact that one guy says "kill all people who are this color" and gets punished and the other says "kill all people who are this color" and doesn't because 300 years ago someone did something to a guy the same color as him

people who say FREEDOM OF SPEECH ISNT FREEDOM OF CONSEQUENCES are the first to cry about how they're being oppressed when someone pops them in the mouth for being a cunt

everyone regardless of position should cease being cunts forthwith or shall get popped in the mouth by Mr. Lager

Super Aggro Crag wrote:hate speech laws are fucking rubbish for the sole fact that one guy says "kill all people who are this color" and gets punished and the other says "kill all people who are this color" and doesn't because 300 years ago someone did something to a guy the same color as him

people who say FREEDOM OF SPEECH ISNT FREEDOM OF CONSEQUENCES are the first to cry about how they're being oppressed when someone pops them in the mouth for being a cunt

everyone regardless of position should cease being cunts forthwith or shall get popped in the mouth by Mr. Lager

Some speech laws and public morality bits are really really wack. Like Austria having ones specifically about what people can call Muhammad. I guess thats just as bad as some other unrelated laws like chewing gum being illegal in Singapore. Who comes up with this stuff? Maybe I just don't get the culture of the time and the reasoning.

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Screemonster wrote:Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Because freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence.

Are you joking or mind-bogglingly retarded?

I don't think it's possible to know what interpretation of the motivation behind each other's posts each of them is responding to. Rohen seems to resent the idea when presented by Misdoubtful, an admin that the right to free speech doesn't protect him from all possible consequences of the speech it protects. Misdoubtful seems to want to see saying n      made illegal and cops brought in to arrest people for saying racist things in public.

laws are cringe which is why i play security so i can just harass people whenever i feel like it since space law is just a suggestion

cacogen wrote:

Rohen_Tahir wrote:

Misdoubtful wrote:

Screemonster wrote:Why do people argue their fuckin constitutional rights about being UNFAIRLY BANNED from a social gathering

he's got the same energy as some dipshit that calls the cops over being ejected from a wendy's

Because freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence.

Are you joking or mind-bogglingly retarded?

I don't think it's possible to know what interpretation of the motivation behind each other's posts each of them is responding to. Rohen seems to resent the idea when presented by Misdoubtful, an admin that the right to free speech doesn't protect him from all possible consequences of the speech it protects. Misdoubtful seems to want to see saying n      made illegal and cops brought in to arrest people for saying racist things in public.

True honestly. Assumptions and miscommunication are the devil. I'm guilty of it too.