Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
Forum rules
Only Certified™ Players™ may post in here.
If you are not able to post in here, you are not a Certified™ Player™. Play on a mainline /tg/ game server to gain posting powers in this forum. (certified gamers are only calculated once per day)
Locked
User avatar
Timonk
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
Byond Username: Timonk
Location: ur mum

Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by Timonk » #637416

Currently, it only includes catGIRLS (not boys), plasmamen and ethereals.
As per Dex's recent outing as a furry (he called himself out) i think it should be only fair that moth players should be labeled as furries from here on out.
joooks wrote:
Naloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lol
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:
Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.


The hut has perished at my hands.
Image




The pink arrow is always right.
User avatar
Nabski
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:42 pm
Byond Username: Nabski
Github Username: Nabski89
Location: TN

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by Nabski » #637418

What the fuck are you talking about?
User avatar
BangingDonk
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 11:34 pm
Byond Username: BangingDonk

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by BangingDonk » #637465

monkeys are furries
User avatar
Timonk
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:27 pm
Byond Username: Timonk
Location: ur mum

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by Timonk » #637468

Nabski wrote: Tue Apr 12, 2022 8:15 pm What the fuck are you talking about?
Currently, catgirl, ethereal and plasmamen players are lawfully labeled as furries. I think we should extend that to moth players
joooks wrote:
Naloac wrote:
In short, this appeal is denied. Suck my nuts retard.
Quoting a legend, at least im not a faggot lol
See you in 12 months unless you blacklist me for this
Timberpoes wrote: I'm going to admin timonk [...]. Fuck it, he's also now my second host vote if goof rejects.
pikeyeskey13 wrote: ok don't forget to shove it up your ass lmao oops u can delete this one I just wanted to make sure it went through
Agux909 wrote:
Timonk wrote:This is why we make fun of Manuel
Woah bravo there sir, post of the month you saved the thread. I feel overwhelmed by the echo of unlimited wisdom and usefulness sprouting from you post. Every Manuel player now feels embarrased to exist because of your much NEEDED wise words, you sure teached'em all, you genius, IQ lord.


The hut has perished at my hands.
Image




The pink arrow is always right.
User avatar
BlevRuz
Joined: Tue May 05, 2020 4:57 pm
Byond Username: BlevRuz

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by BlevRuz » #637541

i understand catfiends and moths being labeled as furries, but ethereals and plasmemes? idk they dont exactly have much in the way of fur, or anthropomorphic animal-ness.
plays as Argon CVI, Sleigherburgo D'Fuckreby and Dr Hambold P. Qumer, PhD. on terry and manuel
User avatar
Jonathan Gupta
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:16 pm
Byond Username: BallastMonsterGnarGnar
Location: The Corner

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by Jonathan Gupta » #637596

Living God

Extraordinary Person

Image
User avatar
scamoppi
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2021 11:27 pm
Byond Username: Noahyoshi
Location: still at large

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by scamoppi » #637608

Timonk wrote: Tue Apr 12, 2022 8:07 pm Currently, it only includes catGIRLS (not boys) [...]
what lead to catboys being excluded from the furry labeling convention?
𓆏 ribbit... (nothing to see here...)
User avatar
Omega_DarkPotato
In-Game Admin Trainer
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2020 12:05 am
Byond Username: Omega_DarkPotato
Location: Former Hell, Gensokyo

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by Omega_DarkPotato » #637704

froggers wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 4:34 pm
Timonk wrote: Tue Apr 12, 2022 8:07 pm Currently, it only includes catGIRLS (not boys) [...]
what lead to catboys being excluded from the furry labeling convention?
i highly suspect this is because the poster does not want to deal with the idea that he likes what would otherwise be called furries
Super Aggro Crag wrote:This is what u get when u let people into your community
play opus: echo of starsong
I'm an admin, typically on /tg/station Sybil. If you've got anything you'd like to say about me, my adminning, or my decisions, please comment in my admin feedback thread!
User avatar
Jonathan Gupta
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:16 pm
Byond Username: BallastMonsterGnarGnar
Location: The Corner

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by Jonathan Gupta » #637726

Omega_DarkPotato wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 5:21 pm
froggers wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 4:34 pm
Timonk wrote: Tue Apr 12, 2022 8:07 pm Currently, it only includes catGIRLS (not boys) [...]
what lead to catboys being excluded from the furry labeling convention?
i highly suspect this is because the poster does not want to deal with the idea that he likes what would otherwise be called furries
no, catboys are not furrys I WILL NOT STAND IT.
Living God

Extraordinary Person

Image
cacogen
Forum Soft Banned
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
Byond Username: Cacogen

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by cacogen » #637737

felinids are the least insufferable furry (i.e. non-human) species on /tg/station

yes, golems are furries
User avatar
BlevRuz
Joined: Tue May 05, 2020 4:57 pm
Byond Username: BlevRuz

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by BlevRuz » #637755

cacogen wrote: Sat Apr 16, 2022 3:33 am felinids are the least insufferable furry (i.e. non-human) species on /tg/station

yes, golems are furries
only the legendary carpet golems could aptly be considered furries
plays as Argon CVI, Sleigherburgo D'Fuckreby and Dr Hambold P. Qumer, PhD. on terry and manuel
cacogen
Forum Soft Banned
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2018 10:27 am
Byond Username: Cacogen

Re: Section 4b of the furry labeling convention should be extended to moths

Post by cacogen » #637789

let me clarify, the first is because no one plays them aside from that jenji kohan character who trivialises medbay every round with their lengendary chem factory set ups so I just don't care about the nya speak shit

the second is not true but it is true that if you choose to play a non-human character you are a furry, and that being forced into it through the non-choice of either sitting out or playing free golem or slave golem is not a choice at all

obviously dullahan and vampire and all that halloween shit is not furry but if you call this special pleading then it is i don't care
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users